- Search Results
Obviously Women Can’t Cut It !!
Now that the world has been thoroughly f~~~ed up by the female (♀) gender men (♂) are finally waking up and walking out!
Now.. One big mistake that men might have made was to believe that females could cut it outside the homes! Right !! Now we all see the results of this terrible assumption! Women are..well.. after all only women ! It has become plenty obvious to many awaken men that they are irresponsible creatures.. incapable to accept the responsibility of their own actions, always blaming their closest neighbors. And the worst thing is they don’t even have it within themselves to see & acknowledged this flagrant truth!They are like spoiled rotten babies holding the fate of so many in their hands without having the ability to wield that power with foresight and wisdom !
Men will have to take back control of this planet, one way or another or see this chaos continue until it plunges us all in some kind of Armageddon! It’s like having a crazy rogue captain at the helm of a cruise liner! A mutiny is in order!
You must own a better Crystal ball than IA multi-level analysis of the US cruise missile attack on Syria and its consequences
This is an abridged version of the article by the one and only The Saker.
The full text can be found here http://thesaker.is/a-multi-level-analysis-of-the-us-cruise-missile-attack-on-syria-and-its-consequences/The latest US cruise missile attack on the Syrian airbase is an extremely important event in so many ways that it is important to examine it in some detail. I will try to do this today with the hope to be able to shed some light on a rather bizarre attack which will nevertheless have profound consequences. But first, let’s begin by looking at what actually happened.
The pretext:
I don’t think that anybody seriously believes that Assad or anybody else in the Syrian government really ordered a chemical weapons attack on anybody. To believe that it would require you to find the following sequence logical:
First, Assad pretty much wins the war against Daesh which is in full retreat. Then, the US declares that overthrowing Assad is not a priority anymore (up to here this is all factual and true). Then, Assad decides to use weapons he does not have. He decides to bomb a location with no military value, but with lots of kids and cameras. Then, when the Russians demand a full investigation, the Americans strike as fast as they can before this idea gets any support. And now the Americans are probing a possible Russian role in this so-called attack.
Frankly, if you believe any of that, you should immediately stop reading and go back to watching TV. For the rest of us, there are three options:
(1) a classical US-executed false flag
(2) a Syrian strike on a location which happened to be storing some kind of gas, possibly chlorine, but most definitely not sarin. This option requires you to believe in coincidences. I don’t. Unless,
(3) the US fed bad intelligence to the Syrians and got them to bomb a location where the US knew that toxic gas was stored.
What is evident is that the Syrians did not drop chemical weapons from their aircraft and that no chemical gas was ever stored at the al-Shayrat airbase. There is no footage showing any munitions or containers which would have delivered the toxic gas. As for US and other radar recordings, all they can show is that an aircraft was in the sky, its heading, altitude and speed. There is no way to distinguish a chemical munition or a chemical attack by means of radar.
Whatever option you chose, the Syrian government is obviously and self-evidently innocent of the accusation of having used chemical weapons. This is most likely a false flag attack.
Also, and just for the record, the US had been considering exactly such a false flag attack in the past. You can read everything about this plan here and here.
The attack:
American and Russian sources both agree on the following facts: 2 USN ships launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Al Shayrat airfield in Syria. The US did not consult with the Russians on a political level, but through military channels the US gave Russia 2 hours advance warning. At this point the accounts begin to differ.
The Americans say that all missiles hit their targets. The Russians say that only 23 cruise missiles hit the airfield. The others are “unaccounted for”. Here I think that it is indisputable that the Americans are lying and the Russians are saying the truth: the main runway is intact (the Russian reporters provided footage proving this) and only one taxiway was hit. Furthermore, the Syrian Air Force resumed its operations within 24 hours. 36 cruise missiles have not reached their intended target. That is a fact.
It is also indisputable that there were no chemical munitions at this base as nobody, neither the Syrians nor the Russian reporters, had to wear any protective gear.
The missiles used in the attack, the Tomahawk, can use any combination of three guidance systems: GPS, inertial navigation and terrain mapping. There is no evidence and even no reports that the Russians shot even a single air-defense missile. In fact, the Russians had signed a memorandum with the USA which specifically comitting Russia NOT to interfere with any US overflights, manned or not, over Syria (and vice versa).
While the Tomahawk cruise missile was developed in the 1980s, there is no reason to believe that the missiles used had exceeded their shelf live and there is even evidence that they were built in 2014. The Tomahawk is known to be accurate and reliable. There is absolutely no basis to suspect that over half of the missiles fired simply spontaneously malfunctioned. I therefore see only two possible explanations for what happened to the 36 missing cruise missiles:
Explanation A: Trump never intended to really hit the Syrians hard and this entire attack was just “for show” and the USN deliberately destroyed these missiles over the Mediterranean. That would make it possible for Trump to appear tough while not inflicting the kind of damage which would truly wreck his plans to collaborate with Russia. I do not believe in this explanation and I will explain why in the political analysis below.
Explanation B: The Russians could not legally shoot down the US missiles. Furthermore, it is incorrect to assume that these cruise missiles flew a direct course from the Mediterranean to their target (thereby almost overflying the Russian radar positions). Tomahawk were specifically built to be able to fly tangential courses around some radar types and they also have a very low RCS (radar visibility), especially in the frontal sector. Some of these missiles were probably flying low enough not to be seen by Russian radars, unless the Russians had an AWACS in the air (I don’t know if they did).
However, since the Russians were warned about the attack they had plenty of time to prepare their electronic warfare stations to “fry” and otherwise disable at least part of the cruise missiles. I do believe that this is the correct explanation. I do not know whether the Russian were technically unable to destroy and confuse the 23 missiles which reached the base or whether a political decision was taken to let less than half of the cruise missiles through in order to disguise the Russian role in the destruction of 36 missiles.
What I am sure of is that 36 advanced cruise missile do not “just disappear”. There are two reasons why the Russians would have decided to use their EW systems and not their missiles: first, it provides them “plausible deninability” (at least for the general public, there is no doubt that US signal intelligence units did detect the Russian electronic interference (unless it happened at very low power and very high frequency and far away inland), and because by using EW systems it allowed them to keep their air defense missiles for the protection of their own forces. Can the Russian really do this?

Take a look at this image, taken from a Russian website, which appears to have been made by the company Kret which produces some of the key Russian electronic warfare systems. Do you notice that on the left hand side, right under the AWACs aircraft you can clearly see a Tomahawk type missile turning around and eventually exploding at sea?
How this is done is open to conjecture. All that we are told is that the missile is given a “false target” but for our purposes this really does not matter. What matters is that the Russians have basically leaked the information that they are capable of turning cruise missiles around. There are other possibilities such as an directed energy beams which basically fries or, at least, confuses the terrain following and or inertial navigation systems.
Some have suggested a “kill switch” which would shut down the entire missile. Maybe. Again, this really doesn’t matter for our purposes. What matters is that the Russian have the means to spoof, redirect or destroy US cruise missiles. It sure appears to be that for the first time these systems were used in anger.
I would note that those who say that the Russian air defense systems did not work don’t know what they are talking about. Not only did Russia sign an agreement with the US not to interfere with US flight operations, the Russian air defenses in Syria are NOT tasked with the protection of the Syrian Air Space. That is a task for the Syrian air defenses. The Russians air defenses in Syria are only here to protect Russian personnel and equipment. This is why the Russians never targeted Israeli warplanes. And this is hardly surprising as the Russian task force in Syria never had the mission to shut down the Syrian air space or, even less so, to start a war with the USA or Israel.However, this might be changing. Now the Russians have withdrawn from their agreement with the USA and, even more importantly, have have declared that the Syrians urgently need more advanced air defense capabilities. Currently the Syrians operate very few advanced Russian air defense systems, most of their gear is old.
- [Sidebar: for those interested in seeing what such a system looks like here is a short video made by the Russians themselves showing how such a system is deployed and operated:
- In terms of technical details, or we are told that this system can jam any airborne object at a distance of 200km
Legal aspects of the attack:
The US attack happened in direct violation of US law, of international law and of the UN charter. First, I would say that there is strong legal evidence that the US attack violated the US Constitution, Presidential War Powers Act and the 2001 Authorization of Military Force (AUMF) resolution. But since I don’t really care about this aspect of Trump’s criminal behavior, I will just refer you to two pretty good analyses of this issue (see here and here) and just simply summarize the argument of those who say that what Trump did was legal.
It boils down to this: “yeah, it’s illegal, but all US Presidents have been doing it for so long that they have thereby created a legal precedent which, uh, makes it legal after all“. I don’t think this kind of “defense” is worthy of a reply or rebuttal. So now let’s turn to international law.
Most people think that crimes against humanity or genocide must be the ultimate crime under international law. They are wrong. The ultimate crime is aggression. This is the conclusion of the Nuremberg Trial on this topic:
To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.
So, following the long and prestigious list of other US Presidents before him, Donald Trump is now a war criminal. In fact, he is a “supreme war criminal”. It only took him 77 days to achieve this status, probably some kind of a record.
As for the UN Charter, at least for articles (1, 2, 33, 39) ban the kind of aggression the USA took against Syria.
Political consequences (internal)
My son perfectly summed up what Trump’s actions have resulted in: “those who hated him still hate him while those who supported him now also hate him“. Wow! How did Trump and his advisors fail to predict that? Instead of fulfilling his numerous campaign promises (and his own Twitter statements) Trump decided to suddenly make a 180 and totally betray everything he stood for. I can’t think of a dumber action, I really can’t. I have to say that Trump now appears to make Dubya look smart. But there is much, much worse.
The worst aspect of this clusterf**k is how utterly immoral this makes Trump appear. Think of it – first Trump abjectly betrayed Flynn. Then he betrayed Bannon.
- [Sidebar: I mostly liked Flynn. I had no use for Bannon at all. But the fact is that they were not my best friends, they were Trump’s best friends. And instead of standing up for them, he sacrificed them to the always bloodthirsty Neocons in the hope of appeasing them. This is what I wrote about this stupid and deeply immoral betrayal the day it happened:
- Remember how Obama showed his true face when he hypocritically denounced his friend and pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.? Today, Trump has shown us his true face. Instead of refusing Flynn’s resignation and instead of firing those who dared cook up these ridiculous accusations against Flynn, Trump accepted the resignation. This is not only an act of abject cowardice, it is also an amazingly stupid and self-defeating betrayal because now Trump will be alone, completely alone, facing the likes of Mattis and Pence – hard Cold Warrior types, ideological to the core, folks who want war and simply don’t care about reality.
- The worst aspect of that is that by betraying people left and right Trump has now shown that you cannot trust him, that he will backstab you with no hesitation whatsoever. Would you ever take a risk for a guy like that? Contrast that with Putin who is “notorious” for standing by his friends and allies even when they do something really wrong! There is a reason why the AngloZionists could not break Putin and why it only took them one month to neuter Trump: Putin is made of titanium, Trump is just an overcooked noodle]
And now Trump has betrayed HIMSELF by turning against everything he, himself, stood for. This is almost Shakespearean in its pathetic and tragic aspects!
During his campaign Trump made a lot of excellent promises and he did inspire millions of Americans to support him. I personally believe that he was sincere in his intentions, and I don’t buy the “it was all an act” theory at all. Just look at the total panic of the Neocons at the prospects of a Trump victory and tell me this was all fake. No, I think that Trump was sincere. But when confronted with the ruthless opposition of the Neocons and the US deep state, Trump snapped and instantly broke because he is clearly completely spineless and has the ethics and morals of a trailer park prostitute.
So what we really have is a sad and pathetic version of Obama. A kind of Obama 2.0 if you want. The man inspired millions, he promised change you can believe in, and he delivered absolutely nothing except for an abject subservience to the real masters and owners of the United States: the Neocons and the deep state.
Trump did get what he apparently wanted, though: the very same corporate media which he claimed to despise is now praising him. And nobody is calling him a “Putin agent” any more. None of which will prevent the Neocons from impeaching him, by the way. He chose a quickfix solution which will stop acting in just days. How totally stupid of him.
He apparently also chose the option of an “attack for show” to begin with, which turned into one of the most pathetic attacks in history, probably courtesy of Russian EW, and now that the USA has wasted something in the range of 100 million dollars, what does Trump have to show? A few flattering articles from the media which he has always hated and which will return to hate him as soon as ordered to do so by its Neocon masters. Pathetic if you ask me.
Ever since he got into the White House, Trump has been acting like your prototypical appeaser (it makes me wonder if his father was an alcoholic). How a guy like him ever made in business is a mystery to me, but what is now clear is that the Neocons totally submitted him and that they will now turn him into political roadkill.
I am afraid that the next four years (or less!) will turn into a neverending Purim celebration…
Political consequences (external)
Trump has single handedly destroyed any hopes of a US collaboration with Russia of any kind. Worse, he has also destroyed any hopes of being able to defeat Daesh. Why? Because if you really believe that Daesh can be defeated without Russian and Iranian support I want to sell you bridges all over the world. It ain’t happening. What is much, much worse is that now we are again on a pre-war situation, just as we were with Obama and would have been with Clinton. Let me explain.
The following are the measures with Russia has taken following the US attack on Syria:
(1) Denunciation at UN (to be expected, no big deal)
(2) Decision to strengthen the Syrian air defenses (big deal, that will give the Syrians the means to lock their airspace)
(3) Decision to cancel the Memorandum with the USA (now the Russians in Syria will have the right to decide whether to shoot or not)
(4) Decision to shut down the phone hot line with the US military (now the US won’t be able to call the Russians to ask them to do or not do something)The combination of decisions 2, 3 and 4 does not mean that the Russians will shoot the next time, not by itself. The Russians will still be restricted by their own rules of engagement and by political decisions. But this will dramatically affect the US decision-making since from now on there will be no guarantee that the Russians will not shoot either. The Russians basically own the Syrian airspace already.
What they want to do next is to give a similar capability to the Syrians. Not only will that allow the Syrians to defend themselves against any future US or Israeli attacks, it will provide the Russians plausible deniabilty the day they decide to shoot down a US aircraft or drone. Finally, the Russians are rushing back some of their most advanced ships towards the Syrian coast. So after giving Trump the benefit of the doubt, the Russians are now returning to a Obama-times like posture in Syria. Bravo Trump, well done!
- The Russians expressed their total disgust and outrage at this attack and openly began saying that the Americans were “недоговороспособны”. What that word means is literally “not-agreement-capable” or unable to make and then abide by an agreement. While polite, this expression is also extremely strong as it implies not so much a deliberate deception as the lack of the very ability to make a deal and abide by it.
- For example, the Russians have often said that the Kiev regime is “not-agreement-capable”, and that makes sense considering that the Nazi occupied Ukraine is essentially a failed state. But to say that a nuclear world superpower is “not-agreement-capable” is a terrible and extreme diagnostic. It basically means that the Americans have gone crazy and lost the very ability to make any kind of deal.
- Again, a government which breaks its promises or tries to deceive but who, at least in theory, remains capable of sticking to an agreement would not be described as “not-agreement-capable”. That expression is only used to describe an entity which does not even have the skillset needed to negotiate and stick to an agreement in its political toolkit. This is an absolutely devastating diagnostic.
This is bad. Really bad. This means that the Russians have basically given up on the notion of having an adult, sober and mentally sane partner to have a dialog with. What this also means is that while remaining very polite and externally poker faced, the Russians have now concluded that they need to simply assume that they need to act either alone or with other partners and basically give up on the United States.
I have already explained in my previous analysis why Trump’s plan to defeat ISIS is a non-starter and I won’t bother repeating it all here. What I will say is that Erdogan’s endorsement of Trump’s attack is equally stupid and self-defeating. I really wonder what Erdogan is hoping to achieve. Not only did the Americans almost kill him in a coup attempt, they are now working on creating a semi-independent Kurdistan right on the border with Turkey.
Yes, I know, Erdogan wants to get rid of Assad, fair enough, but does he really believe that Trump will be able to remove Assad from power? And what if Assad is removed, will Turkey really be better off once the Emirate of Takfiristan is declared in Syria? I very much hope that after the referendum Erdogan will recover some sense of reality.
What about the Israelis, do they really believe that dealing with Assad is worse than dealing with this Caliphate of Takfiristan?! But then, we can expect anything from folks with such a long history of making really bad decisions.
Still, it really looks like the all have gone completely insane!
Conclusion: what happens next?
Simply reply: I don’t know. But let me explain why I don’t know. In all my years of training and work as a military analyst I have always had to assume that everybody involved was what we called a “rational actor”. The Soviets sure where. As where the Americans. Then, starting with Obama more and more often I had to question that assumption as the US engaged in what appeared to be crazy and self-defeating actions.
You tell me – how does deterrence work on a person with no self-preservation instinct (whether as a result of infinite imperial hubris garden variety petty arrogance, crass ignorance or plain stupidity)? I don’t know. To answer that question a what is needed is not a military analyst, but some kind of shrink specializing in delusional and suicidal types.
So what can the world do?
First, the easy answer: the Europeans. They can do nothing. They are irrelevant. They don’t even exist. At least not in the political sense.
Some countries, however, are showing an absolutely amazing level of courage. Look at what the Bolivian representative at the UNSC dared to do:

And what a shame for Europe: a small and poor country like Bolivia showed more dignity that the entire European continent. No wonder the Russians have no respect for the EU whatsoever.
What Bolivia did is both beautiful and noble. But the two countries which really need to step up to the plate are Russia and China. So far, it has been Russia who did all the hard work and, paradoxically, it has been Russia which has been the object of the dumbest and most ungrateful lack of gratitude (especially from armchair warriors). This needs to change.
We better prepare ourselves for some very tough times ahead.
Our only consolation is that all the dramatic events taking place right now in the USA are signs of weakness. The US elites are turning on each other and while the Neocons have broken Trump, this will not stop the fratricidal war inside the US plutocracy. Look at the big picture, at how the empire is cracking at every seam and remember that all this is taking place because we are winning.
You can read the full analysis here
A multi-level analysis of the US cruise missile attack on Syria and its consequences
Topic: My story …so far
Hi everybody!
Obviously I’m new around here – so be gentle:
I’m a 45 yr old guy living in Brisbane Australia. Life seemed acceptable but dull for many years and the mind numbing monotony of middle class suburban existence with wife and 2 children left me utterly unfulfilled and feeling like a packhorse working hard for no enjoyment in life whatsoever. Wife seemed to revel in her time with the kids, seemed to resent time I spent with them and made no attempt whatsoever to acknowledge the pressures of the financial situation, announcing her plans and aspirations frequently without considering the implications of her lofty ambitions.
A few years ago, after increasing arguments over money, decreasing intimacy and a general malaise I did what many other before me have also done. I responded to the attention and interest of a younger woman – a former colleague with whom I shared a good friendship and bond. We got drunk… and we admitted our attraction to each other. Over the next few weeks we met often, spoke constantly and f~~~ed wildly. – All very text-book. She knew I was married and had kids, but she also knew that I was unhappy.
Obviously the marital situation at home didnt stand much chance of holding up or improving and before long it became clear I had to change things up. I moved away from my sexless wife and moved in my new girlfriend 16 years younger than me and considerably more financially secure! I was still spending a lot of time at the former home when wife was working shifts. Kids needed stability and I was there for them as much as I could be. It didnt seem appropriate for them to be around the new girlfriend, so I split my life between venues, balancing between kids and family responsibilities and a girlfriend who made me happy.
Life seemed pretty good for a while – except in the interests of keeping the peace and allowing feeling to be processed and get amicable settlements I was still paying a FORTUNE to my wife for all her costs and living almost entirely off the charity of my girlfriend. Wife and I attended some counselling sessions, in the hope (from my end) of trying to understand that our relationship had died and that we could move on separately without going to war. From her perspective she was hoping I would “see sense/the error of my ways” and return to being the loving husband.
Then after a few months, it got weird…..
My wife seemed to change (hindsight gives me a much more interesting take on this) – the anger subsided, the levels of cooperation increased, the acknowledgement of neglect and really oddly her libido seemed to experience a resurgence. When we crossed paths (as we do frequently with kids involved) she pretty much jumped me. There was only so much resistance I could muster….
The guilt I felt for ‘cheating’ on the ever supporting and understanding girlfriend was tough. How could I do that? Surely that meant I was not 100% committed to her? Was I just using her for financial and emotional support? This wasnt any way to treat a friend. Perhaps with a resurgent and newly understanding wife I could rescue the family situation?
I tool a hard (and misguided) decision to leave girlfriend and nervously move back to the family home. We agreed we’d try to address the lifestyle problems we had identified in the counselling sessions and attempt to rebuild something better.
I wanted changed our diet, I committed to an exercise regime and get us all off the couch. I was not going to sit in front of the TV and atrophy away. My family would be active and healthy. We’d do things together. We’d work at improving the run down s~~~-hole that the house had become. We’d share the burdens and split the financial responsibilities.
It didnt work.
I got fit and quit TV, the rest of my family ignored me (I’ve since run 4 marathons with another in 2 weeks time). I wanted to improve the diet – but the wife kept dragging us to McDs…. It seemed the harder I tried to make positive lifestyle changes, the further away she was from doing the same. Her “12 week body transformation” plan (she’d gained at least 20kg since we were married) lasted 2 days before she decided she couldnt be botehred. Her attempts to develop a hobby and start playing a musical instrument ended after 3 weeks. She had no enthusiasm for anything, and we found ourselves less engaged with each other than ever. The money situation hadnt really changed, I was still paying for everything, she was still spending like a drunken sailor. To top it all the venomous hatred in my wife that my ‘straying’ had created bubbled up again and I became increasingly angry at her that I’d thrown away and hurt a good friend (and nymphomaniac!) who had done nothing beside support me.
Last year I called time and decided that enough was enough. I moved into a rental, my kids could stay with me for the 50% of the time they needed to, and I was going it alone. I was going moving out not to be with someone else, but to be with ME.
Oddly enough, I still needed to keep paying for things. I knew that if I pulled out my support the kids would be punished. They’d be pulled out of their school, they’d be made almost homeless. Nothing was their fault – so I kept bailing things out. Still hopeful that such benevolence would increase the chances of an amicable split when it finally comes to the inevitable divorce. If we could avoid a heated legal battle, we could save $50-$60k of legal fees – and given the 50/50 parenting is always agreed and uncontested, the arguments of division of assets would only ever be fine details anyway (40/60? 50/50?). Amicable is clearly the better way to go.
A year later and the wife is still dragging her feet. I make suggestions of ways of dividing assets and future responsibilities, but I get nothing in return. I know if I have to get legal she’ll come off a lot worse off and I dont want to do that – but patience is running thin.
So thats the background…. I know that post-divorce my income could effectively rise quite dramatically through cutting out some of those unnecessary expenses (paying for a house I dont actually live in!) – but in order to get there, I may have to the hard-ass bastard I didnt want to.
I’d be really intrigued to hear the perspectives of guys around here. Some of you have no doubt been though the process of marital separation – did any of you manage to negotiate those waters without being embittered? I dont want to hurt my ex-wife. I just have no desire whatsoever to look after her any more! Its time to look after me for once.
Topic: The 180
I have to say, this website has really put me in a great mood. Some posts I’ve read gave me the perspective, from the person posting, that this site trends to the negative. I don’t agree. Men are gruff and straight forward with one another when things count.
For the last two – three years before I found MGTOW I have been a complete wreck full of insecurities about my physical appearance, and lack of accomplishments. I believe I was slowly programmed to believe this through the influences of the last “she devil” I was trying to follow societal norms with.
With the appearance of more than intolerable behavior continuing to become present in the “she devil” my resolve started to solidify.
I up and walked out of the “she devil’s” life without telling her when it was going to happen or how. I made a plan, had patience, and followed through. I really wasn’t sure what to expect for my future. I left because the intolerable behavior could not be tolerated anymore.
When I bought my house and moved in I was on a high. It is my decision what new appliances I was going to get, what style of furniture suite me best, what paint I was going to select to make this house mine, etc. Things seemed… better?
No, I was still dragging the sulky, wimpy, insecure me through life. I had a good start immediately after leaving, but there was still a lot I did not recognize that I was missing. I started to feel as though I was stuck in a rut with the diff case half submerged in muck, and/or high centered. The wheels are spinning and there is a lot of noise, but I wasn’t moving my own way to betterment.
I would come home every day with lack of motivation. I would get the basic chores done, etc., but there was no improvement to my station.
I don’t even remember how I came about this MGTOW movement/ideology, but it has forced me to self-analyze my way of thinking, and conduct in general.
This week after my first posts and lurking on others I decided to finally climb down out of the Jeep and grab the shovel, winch cable, and Hi-Lift jack. Damn, I can see with clarity all the stuck I am actually in now. It is some disgusting muck, gentlemen. No tow truck is making it down this trail to help. I’m going to get this thing moving again, and I’m going to get it done solo.
There are those here in a world of hurt, and there are some that seem to be on top of the world while others are somewhere in between. Before coming here I thought I was at the bottom, but come to find out there are other poor bastards worse off than I. Whether you can buy a gold Rolex, or barely afford a can of soup, we all have one thing that few others have – an understanding that societal norms are not correct. We may be fighting our own individual battles, but our direction is the same, and it is our own way! If you are on the bottom… keep working because your accomplishments are going to be that much more grand!
I wanted to thank you guys for providing a man’s garage forum, and the instructions on how to use my shovel, winch, and jack. Directly, or indirectly, in some cases, you all provided me something to strive for… making myself better which leads to a better life.
I made a bet on another thread about limiting the unnecessary in life as much as possible. I started that yesterday – one less beer was drank for the night. Tonight, one less. Also, the Total Gym, dumbbells, and Wavemaster will be reintroduced to the schedule. My inner twelve year old plans on kicking my ass everyday now, and I’m actually looking forward to it.
Thank you for the recovery tools instructions, gentlemen!
MGTOW helps men build their inner strength and turn away from the consequences of over indulgence of the unnecessary.
Topic: Virgil Intro
Hello everyone. I have been reading a lot on here and wanted to finally make my introduction.
I was a purple pill most of my life, but in the last few (roughly 9) years started to have small red pill experiences. My journey into MGTOW wasn’t your typical. I didn’t crash and burn, but had my own struggles. I dated a girl with more problems to count that did constant shaming when things didn’t go her way (this was 6 years ago). I didn’t realize all of it at the time but as I have read here…. it became a…Wow was I that stupid back then.
For me personally, it wasn’t one big thing that brought me here, but many small things. Reading though and understanding the red pill, it was things that I thought were isolated incidents and didn’t have the necessary info to put it all together without the experiences of others.
I can only describe my life as growing up as a professional ghost. People only see what you want them to see, as such I present nothing that warrants a second glance. And it gets me left alone for the most part.
Things I noticed that brought me here though, are the obvious double standards between men and women, the fact that having a dissenting opinion is grounds for shaming, and that women aren’t worth the time. I got tired of the BS, and said f~~~ it.
The best example I can give is being the only semi conservative in my family and going more so as I age. Can’t even attempt to describe the s~~~storm that got stirred up when my oldest sister a femnazi found out I voted republican in the most recent election. I attempted to voice a well thought out argument for my choice, and was shut down with the typical “but hes a misogynist” and “oh, using your white male privilege”. WTH does that even mean… my privilege.. of being forced to sign up for a draft…. of being borderline unemployable in a field dominated by white men because everyone needs to hire a minority.. but I digress.
Glad I have found a place to vent a voice opinions.
And cause I have read enough here to know The Manipulated man is going to ask.
Where are you on the MGTOW Road?
Well on my journey, but still learning.Any Red Pills?
That no matter what you do as a Man… a Woman can half ass it and get twice the credit.What does YOUR life look like?
Working in the field I was trained for, and taking life a day at a time.What part of the USA are you living at now?
Northeast.What kind of work are you doing?
Technical work, best described as infrastructure/bridges.What kind of fun things do YOU do?
I am a gamer in my free time. I like to read but only when I feel like it, as I read deeper things. Examples: Dante’s Inferno, Julius Caesar’s War Commentaries, and about to start into Cicero’s Politics followed by Machiavelli. Trying to get the classical education that is lacking in the current educational system.Any future projects or plans for YOUR life?
My plan is to get my s~~~ sorted out. Save for retirement, pay off a car, buy some American Muscle (preferably a Camaro), then keep on keeping on.As for anything else, ask.
Hope that someday I may lead others the path I have learned. As Virgil led Dante through Hell.
- This is a complete reproduction of the post found on http://thesaker.is/the-mosul-massacres-the-banality-of-evil-revisited/
- The subject matter is too important not to be transcribed here. Do not read if you do not have a strong constitution. The truth must be told even if it offends some people’s views of the world. This is also NOT an April Fool’s joke.
- You can correspond with the author at the site above.
- Thank you for reading and watching.
- Yumbo
The Mosul Massacres: The Banality of Evil revisited.
By Anwar Khan
What is the moral difference–if any– between the intentional shooting at fleeing civilians and using them as human shields on the one hand, and the flattening of entire neighborhoods, killing hundreds of innocent civilians, on the pretext of the presence of enemy fighters there-in, on the other? The answer is that there is no moral difference. Both are high crimes under any book, and it is being perpetrated on the people of Mosul as we speak. The first is done by ISIS– the Frankenstein that crept out of the Empire’s Research and Development labs, with the sole aim of destroying Muslim societies, disparaging the name of Islam, and advancing the march towards Full Spectrum Dominance— and the second is perpetrated by the Empire’s military might in broad day light, on the pretext of annihilating the very monster that it created. In between a most vicious massacre of innocent people is being perpetrated, with an almost complete media blackout.
(Side Note: Not that the knowledge of such crimes would bother much the moral nerves of the western world, who have come to accept scenes of dead Muslims as a phenomenon as normal as cloud formation. Between slavish work to pay for what they call life, celebrity worship, and the collective immolation of the soul that takes place in the dark temples we call cinemas— mirroring very much the darkness that encompasses the modern conscience—one wonders if idle time could be spared to show moral revulsion to such crimes. Yes, candles are lit and tears shed to the unfortunate victims at home, but the Muslim lands are simply too far, too unknown, and too “other” to cause any discomfort of the conscience)
While the Syrian and Russian offensive to retake Aleppo from the terrorists saw much crocodile tears from the Empire’s media, the Mosul offensive or Inherent Resolve—where Coalition air strikes have turned the city into a heap of rubble hiding a virtual urban graveyard inside its belly— is not even mentioned in passing. The amount of suffering that the people of Mosul have faced since the operation began is difficult to compare to anything in our times, including the Syrian war theatre which is as cruel as modern warfare can be. The scenes from Mosul Jadida(New Mosul) area are reminiscent of Dresden during the Second World War.
The Guardian reported Chris Woods, the director of monitoring group Airwars, to have said: “The Jadida incident alone is the worst toll of a single [airstrike] incident that I can recall in decades. The coalition’s argument that it doesn’t target noncombatants risks being devalued when so many civilians are being killed in west Mosul.” He is referring to a coalition airstrike that killed over 200 civilians mostly children, women and elderly seeking shelter in a building. The mounting human suffering and infrastructural destruction is of such a scale that the Iraqi Army, conducting the ground offensive, had to call off its advance fearing that the operation has slid into a catastrophe, thanks to the coalition’s Make America Great Again strategy.
(Side Note: You wonder where is Hollywood and George Clooney and their crocodile tears which they shed incessantly for the people of Sudan– who we were told were going through a “genocide”– eventually leading to imperial intervention and creation of South Sudan. How courageous of these celebrities to root for imperial causes and then hide in their holes when true courage is needed?)
Those who still harbor any doubts about the Empire being beyond redemption and salvation need to see its conduct in Mosul to realize how utterly indifferent it is to human suffering, or even to public opinion, which was of some concern, purely for PR reasons, not too long ago. But when the imperial hubris has reached such proportions that it cannot be even bothered to explain why shelters housing children and women are blown into oblivion for the sake of one ISIS fighter, you surely have entered what I call the Curse Stage, a particular stage in the stagnation of empires when there is not even a veneer of moral pretense behind its conduct. It is the homestretch of the unraveling. It cannot possibly be reversed.
“Once the Heavens cast the dice of fate, it shall not be reversed, even when a million supplication intersect its path”. Hafiz Shirazi
What is also there to be witnessed is that the same western world that always held Russia to be morally inferior to the ideals of the Enlightenment, part of “the primitive and cruel East”, have fared infinitely more inhumane and cruel in its conduct of warfare under very similar circumstances. The Russian method displayed in the Aleppo offensive was one that regarded avoidance of civilian suffering as the driving factor in its formation. Humanitarian corridors were formed with aid and shelter also being provided in some areas. It took months of meticulous planning and coordination with local partners, and even with the rebels to guarantee their and their families’ safe passage. It was a diplomatic and humanitarian master class of an act. Carpet-bombing of Aleppo would have been a rather easier choice. But the “primitive and cruel” Easterner had a soul after all.
The Coalition on the other hand, forbade the creation of any human corridors which would have allowed many inhabitants to leave the city. This was proposed by the Iraqi government but refused by the Coalition. Their rationale to the Iraqi government was that “they feared ISIS will trickle out of the city with the civilians”. They were told to have faith in the Coalition’s “precision strikes”. To the media they would say “well its ISIS that is not allowing civilians to leave, not us”, which actually is not entirely true. The fact is that they wanted to send a clear message to the world with the new administration’s military strategy in the Muslim lands, featuring Trump as Krishna: Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.
This article can go in many directions. I can begin with how Mosul fell in ISIS hands to begin with; the conduct of ISIS terrorists of systematic terror to “reform” its citizens; the role of Turkish, Gulf states and the Kurdish intelligence agencies with ISIS during its four year occupation (yes, even the “anti-ISIS” Kurdish leaders like Jalal Talabani and Masoud Barzani had intimate relationship with ISIS and often allowed them safe passages to conduct its operations. The ultimate Kurdish goal was to annex Mosul to Barzani and Talabani’s fiefdoms when the conditions were ripe). But today I have one concern only and that is the plight of the innocent civilians and the dead children under the rubble.
I am embedding a video here (with my edits and translation) that my Iraqi friends (whose families are still trapped in Mosul) sent me to watch, and help spread the word on the unspoken suffering that the people of Mosul have to persevere. I promised them to do my part, knowing well the fate of such writings when it meets the dead conscience of the modern media consumer. God forbid that the comrades here on this site have such a disposition. But the fact remains that in our times, no matter how deeply shocking an event comes to our knowledge, it does not stay long enough deep inside our conscience to bother the usual trajectory of our lives (this happens even to the most soft-hearted amongst us) But it has to be said nonetheless, whether it finds the desired place or not. That’s the least we owe to the dead children under the rubble–their little bodies still warm from the not too long ago association with life.
The Prophet of Islam is reported to have said “whosoever see an evil, let him stop it with his hand; if he is not able, then with his tongue, and if he is not able to do so, then with his heart— and that is the least of faith.” (The masculine pronoun is inclusive of the feminine, lest the more gender-sensitive raise an issue with that). I am doing the least of what the faith and humanity requires.
The video shows a government official inspecting the part of Mosul most affected by the coalition airstrikes, and gathering first-hand information on the nature of the offensive and plight of the people. Please do watch the entirety of it. I will leave you with one quote from her that sums up the Mosul offensive:
“After meeting many people and hearing the reports from all sides, it has become abundantly clear to me, and I can swear to God on this, that there are no more than 6 or 5 ISIS fighters in the entire New Mosul area and they walk around freely in open streets and amazingly they are not targeted. Yet what is targeted are entire neighborhoods and houses containing shelter seeking civilians. And all this on the pretext of targeting these ISIS fighters. It is very clear that the idea is to just destroy Mosul and nothing else”. Basma Basem, President of Mosul Judiciary Council.
{From God we come and to Him shall we return}–Common Muslim statement on hearing the news of death.
Post Script: Since this article, which was first written on March 20th, there finally has been some media coverage. RT has been especially active and credit should go to them. But the scale of suffering is still far from being portrayed accurately.
Also, the subtitles could have been more viewer friendly, alas, that’s the extent of my video editing skills.

