Search Results for 'Trump'

[AncientwisdomParticipant]

However, all the media outlets are pushing Carly Fiorina as the “winner” of the debate

When I heard the SECOND round of applause for Fiorina from the crowd, I KNEW all of the major media outlets would proclaim her the victor.

Thoughts…?

First off, this wasnt a ‘debate’. A political debate is presenting, defending, and arguing their positions as it relates to our democracy. CNN set this up so each candidate would personally attack one another. Each question was in this format –
“He said this about you. How do you respond?”

Who cares what they said about one another, what about their POSITIONS? It was SO transparent. The liberal CNN wanted the candidates to self-cannobolize.

Second, am I the only one who notices the palpable tension when ANY candidate has to adress precious “Carly”? Its like the kiddy gloves have to come on merely because shes a woman. People mock Trumps hair day and night. People mock Christys weight, but say one thing about a womans appearance and its sexist.

I really hope Trump supporters dont play puppet to the medias pullings. Hes the only candidate that can save our country from its demise. We cant last another 8 years with this kind of debt and PC laws.

I hope people arent voting based on someones skin color (Carson) or gender they were born (Fiorina) rather than merit. But thats how this society is being taught: “lets put a female on the 10 dollar bill because, well shes a female”. Theyve picked out the GENDER merely to do it, but have no individual to base it on merit. Sick!

What happened to BLIND justice? You know justice doesnt see appearances? F~~~ing bulls~~~.

That is all.

Resident cynic.

The Drudge poll has Trump at 60% now after tonight’s debate. However, all the media outlets are pushing Carly Fiorina as the “winner” of the debate. The media outlets are interviewing all these so-called conservative college students (there’s no such thing, of course) who are saying they didn’t support her before the debate, and now they are a fan. As if these college students know anything about the world, and they are girls and manginas anyway.

I heard the full debate and Trump slammed Carly on her record at HP. But now the propaganda machine is in full swing. All we are going to be hearing now is Carly Carly Carly, and that Trump supporters have converted to Carly supporters. The media controls the crowds like Mark Antony. HP mostly does government contracts now, facial recognition, imaging, etc… spy stuff – more stuff to control us and limit white man’s freedom. The establishment would love to have her as a president – she will be very easy to control.

Be prepared for the TOTAL anti-Trump propaganda to commence now.

Thoughts…?

[Anonymous]

stopmockingman wrote:

Epilogue: The Wife of Noble Character
10 A wife of noble character who can find?
She is worth far more than rubies.
11 Her husband has full confidence in her
and lacks nothing of value.
12 She brings him good, not harm,
all the days of her life.
13 She selects wool and flax
and works with eager hands.
14 She is like the merchant ships,
bringing her food from afar.
15 She gets up while it is still night;
she provides food for her family
and portions for her female servants.
16 She considers a field and buys it;
out of her earnings she plants a vineyard.
17 She sets about her work vigorously;
her arms are strong for her tasks.
18 She sees that her trading is profitable,
and her lamp does not go out at night.
19 In her hand she holds the distaff
and grasps the spindle with her fingers.
20 She opens her arms to the poor
and extends her hands to the needy.
21 When it snows, she has no fear for her household;
for all of them are clothed in scarlet.
22 She makes coverings for her bed;
she is clothed in fine linen and purple.
23 Her husband is respected at the city gate,
where he takes his seat among the elders of the land.
24 She makes linen garments and sells them,
and supplies the merchants with sashes.
25 She is clothed with strength and dignity;
she can laugh at the days to come.
26 She speaks with wisdom,
and faithful instruction is on her tongue.
27 She watches over the affairs of her household
and does not eat the bread of idleness.
28 Her children arise and call her blessed;
her husband also, and he praises her:
29 “Many women do noble things,
but you surpass them all.”
30 Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting;
but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.
31 Honor her for all that her hands have done,
and let her works bring her praise at the city gate.

WOW, you’re describing a unicorn!
And it’s from some religious text,,,,so it must be true!!!
This is the greatest load of s~~~ I’ve ever seen on this site. Well done.
You trumped that insult with your next post by calling someone a liar in their introduction.
It takes b~~~~ to drop your guard and speak openly about yourself. They don’t need to be insulted and shamed for doing it.

[WolveParticipant]

Some great points although there are a few things that are doubtful and I would like to see some statistics on before I belief them for example:
They say they want a “Real Man.” Meaning: a pawn that they can control that will give them things, take them places, and entertain them.
Do women really put as much importance on entertainment as control cause they are said in the same sentence it makes it look like it (at least it looks like that to me)

+ Men always talk about wanting a better caliber of woman, yet most men would trade intelligence for beauty in a heartbeat.”
Do they? I have seen some supposed studies say that men for a big part want a women with a good personality and it actually isn’t that far off of beauty although beauty still trumps it is not such a big gap that not a lot of men would prefer personality and intelligence over beauty.

Though to be fair I’m not entirely trusting those studies either they have their own problems just saying if you want to make that point you do need sufficient evidence to back it up

[FrankOneParticipant]

We’ve seen libertarian nirvana. It’s sixteen hour days, child labor, miners lung unrecompensed etc. Libertarians forget history and every facet of intentional labor reforms. You’re a historically ignorant zealot, falling for something created by neocins in the 80s. Id rather go back to mercantilism. That’s why I’m a trump guy.

Were there not 16 hour days and child labor on farms prior to the industrial revolution, intensive agriculture, and migration to the cities? Who recompensed these workers for injuries?

Did labor unions create an 8 hour day, or did increased economic productivity? I’d argue increased productivity caused it.

I would argue that early organized labor DID result in some improvements in workplace safety. Nowadays, it’s all about wages and benefits, and paying people based on how long they’ve been employed instead of performance. The Teacher’s unions are classic examples. I have nothing against unions, I just don’t believe they should be enshrined into law — so if an employer wants to fire me because I’m in a union or an organizer, they should be allowed to do so.

I work in a highly regulated industry, and have worked for companies that have had fires, severe burns, explosions, and other personnel injuries. So I take worker safety very seriously. When a company has an accident, it costs a huge sum of money, damages their reputation and potentially their customer base, and makes it difficult to attract good employees So companies are trying to avoid accidents, regardless of government rules.

Libertarianism was not created by ‘neocons’; you’re mixing up your political philosophies and mis-representing them as a result: libertarianism was created by Locke. I suppose you could argue F. A. Hayek created modern libertarianism by writing ‘The Road to Serfdom’ in the early 194o’s. Let’s see. Neocons believe in: The Drug War, Foreign Wars, fiat currency, and corporatism. I can’t say I’ve ever met a libertarian who believe in ANY of that.

The issue I have with mercantilism is the protectionist components: Firms cannot produce most efficiently because they’re locked out of foreign markets by excessive import duties or other protectionist measures. It isn’t the most efficient system, as a result.

As for the ‘historically ignorant’ comment you directed at me, please present the evidence that libertarian philosophy is an offshoot of the neocon movement of the 1980’s as you assert, and explain how the leading libertarian magazine, Reason, was founded in 1968.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

This thread is going to become a Donald Trump one?

My reaction, whenever I see Trump brought up is to have this song start playing in the back of my mind:

My take on MGTOW is that I don’t need a hero. I need to get my stuff together, and I am not waiting for the white knight to show up to do it either.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Anonymous]

Trump is the hero needed in this feminist PC driven society.

Not that I’m for his views on immigration, and the so-called other where many are genuine American citizens, but his views on women is no holds barred.

That’s why I have his infamous quote against Megyn Kelley as my signature.

[Robert HallamParticipant]

Let Donald Trump have a go at her. Why did she put up a coy picture instead of a straight-on shot with no make-up. This is all bulls~~~ to get publicity..

[Anonymous]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

I never understand these types of questions, to be brutally honest with you. If someone believes in a Creator and the afterlife, then any MGTOW belief would clearly be second in line. The former would trump the latter and the latter would have to be subject to the beliefs and tailored to the spiritual belief.Maybe I am not understanding your question but that is how I read it. Spiritual beliefs wouldnt “fit into” MGTOW; MGTOW would have to “fit into” them.

No you did not miss understand my question, although I made an error in it, which I will address a little later. The question is plain enough and not about religion vs MGTOW although it can be debated but that was not my point. Sometime’s questions are asked with an ulterior motive and mine was to see if I can gauge the strength and belief in what we do irrespective of other influences in our lives.
If you see this as a s~~~ test . . . . I’m guilty as charged, but it showed me from a small sample size of eight replies/comments MGTOW is strong.

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Im also curious why you linked “pseudo science” with “religion”?

I view pseudoscience/s as a precursor of religions and it’s poor cousin at the same time, Mantra is the same as far as I can understand it.

Keymaster wrote:

HOW AND WHERE DO PSEUDOSCIENCE & RELIGION FIT IN MGTOW IDEOLOGY ?

They don’t, really. MGTOW is not an “ideology’. It’s an individual lifestyle choice grounded in reality.
Religion is an “ideology”. Feminism is an “ideology”, and we know this because they both FAIL the moment you refuse to subscribe to it. They are “belief systems”.
MGTOW is truth based. Like fire. You don’t have to light one for it to still exist. It’s always there. Because MGTOW is not a belief system you can still be religious or believe in Santa Claus and live a MGTOW lifestyle. You can live off the grid, for yourself, by yourself and still believe in “god” – whatever that means to you – if it brings you some kind of spiritual comfort.
MGTOW is less of a “moral issue” and more of a legal issue.You choose it for tangible, logic-based reasons. It’s perfectly sensible and easily justified

Yes I know I f~~~ed up again. Instead of writing philosophy I wrote ideology. That was the error I wrote about earlier in response to Ancientwisdoms questions.

[AncientwisdomParticipant]

. I think you can believe in a god, and afterlife and still easily maintain a MGTOW belief system.

I wasnt saying the contrary. Im NOT saying they are diametrically opposed, inconsistent, or irreconcilable. It was his phrase “how does MGTOW fit in with religion ” which lead me to the comparison that a spiritual belief would trump MGTOW and not vice versa.

I probably read his question too literally. The both can certainly be consistent and reconcilable.

Resident cynic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant]

I never understand these types of questions, to be brutally honest with you. If someone believes in a Creator and the afterlife, then any MGTOW belief would clearly be second in line. The former would trump the latter and the latter would have to be subject to the beliefs and tailored to the spiritual belief.

Maybe I am not understanding your question but that is how I read it. Spiritual beliefs wouldnt “fit into” MGTOW; MGTOW would have to “fit into” them.

Im also curious why you linked “pseudo science” with “religion”? I dont consider myself religious ( the Catholic church is religious) but relationship based with God. Religion is full of rules and regulations, an anthropomorphism, a construct created by man.

If Im interpreting you wrong, please clarify.

Resident cynic.

[PhantomParticipant]

Sky-☯️ wrote:

I woke up in the morning is planning to say she was raped because she is angry I told her I’m not ready for a relationship right now.

Their wild card right there ^^^
I have yet to formulate a personal strategy that trumps it.
Why it’s been about 4 yrs since my last sexual encounter.
Damn good point man

I watched my XWV lay on mammoth tears & make people believe s~~~ she said, and she was so slick,
I still can’t believe her performance, even now, in retrospect after all these years since then.

[SandalsParticipant]

I just lost respect for someone whom I have respected for over a decade.

You see, when Scott Adams calls Trump a “clown” from the get-go, Mr. Adams is setting up an “anchor” in your mind. That’s another classic negotiation/persuasion method.. BY continually repeating throughout the article that Trump is a clown, Adams is repeating the “anchor” in order to hypnotize his readers.

Calling Trump a clown is an ad hominem attack. Adams pulls out the ad hominem from the get go, which means he loses the argument before he even begins his first premise.

Adams is wrong – Trump did not literally write the book on negotiating. I have only read a couple pages of Trump’s Art of the Deal book, so I can’t comment on it. However, I have read the literal book on negotiating, which is this:

How To Outnegotiate Anyone (Even a Car Dealer!)

Don’t be fooled by the cartoonish cover: it is literally the book on negotiating, and is not written by Trump. The book does discuss “anchors”, which are not even remotely what Scott Adams describes. Anchoring is a negotiating term describing setting prices during a negotiation. When Trump is doing is called building an argument by laying down his premises. Amazingly, Trump does not repeat himself during a speech at all. Only from speech to speech as he wants his one message to be heard by the new audiences. Mr Adams fails to understand that Mr. Trump just has a good message, and the experience to back it up.

Scott Adams fails to understand that Trump is winning because he is telling the truth, and Trump is sincere, which possibly no politician has done in over a century. Trump can afford to tell the truth because he is rich, so by stating his net worth, he is bolstering his trust-worthiness by demonstrating that he can’t be bought. He is not bragging. People realize Trump is not part of the two-headed one-party system.

I have read two of Trump’s other books, and I can tell you Trump is no clown. Trump is pure genius. But people are very quickly moved to jealousy, so they resort to ad hominem attacks. Scott Adams has been watching too much Jon Stewart and Bill Maher. Heaven forbid anybody admit that the definition of a country is a geographical land with borders to keep foreigners out.

By the way, Hillary will not be the Democratic candidate. Mark my words. Adams is not in tune with the political kaleidoscope.

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant]

The Shrike wrote:

With the combination of gays getting married and Trumps promises regarding immigration, it may be that we could be seeing the possibility of a hard look at the criminal conspiracy of the divorce industry soon.

The low reproduction rates in western culture are going to cause some serious issues with the tax base. I think the powers that be are counting on the high immigration to bump up the numbers and sucker in our southern neighbors into family court money machine. Fixing the immigration system could cause issues with both of those.

Curious you point this out; I was just talking to one of my friends about red pill philosophy and he brought up how he’s noticed in Hispanic culture, the men are all about catering to the women and it’s why Hispanic men tend to be stereotyped as “smooth talkers” and romantic types in movies and popular culture while the women are portrayed as the coldest of bitches and extremely entitled. I brought up that a lot of my white female friends in their late 20’s and early 30’s have been almost exclusively dating and marrying Hispanic men.

His response? “Yeah, that’s because they know they want kids and a family. Hispanic men tend to jump at that and they love white women because they’re generally kinder to them than Hispanic women.” I think you maybe onto something, Shrike.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Neutron wrote:

Thanks for the info, in the back of my mind I always wondered just how much of the PUA s~~~ was legit.

There is some useful info in the PUA community, based on experiences of men trying to do this and that. You actually get more “game” material by studying MGTOW stuff, eventhough the point of MGTOW isn’t to “get game” but to leave “the game” (and it can be argued part of it is also to have your own game).

What you end up having happen is that a PUA will do over and over and over, and trumpet the rare success, and block out all the failed attempts. It is trying by large numbers.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

Badly Needed, and Long Overdue
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2015/09/badly-needed-and-long-overdue.html

How to survive SJW character assassination attempts. A book and a free PDF with the key instructions. If you are a Nobel Prize winner with a penchant for off color jokes, then you need this. If you are in the public eye for any reason, you need this.

Donald Trump does not need this. He already practices its principles of verbal self defense.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RoyDalParticipant]

I stopped at:

5. Don’t go on about how hard your day was. Even if your day consisted of being gang raped by angry silver back gorillas, she can probably trump you.

No, she can do her job dressed in old sweatpants and a tee shirt, and no angry gorillas are involved, only her beloved children. Whatever your job is, it does not involve staying home and playing with the kids all day.

Soldier-Medic wrote:

7. Don’t lie on your back and hold the baby above your head facing you.

@soldier-medic, I agree with this too. Also, watch for the boy baby who can squirt his pee six feet up into your face.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Darth CovfefeParticipant]

Do we vote Trump to save America, or do we vote Hillary and watch this gynocentric cesspool burn?

The only reason women have so much privilege is because 20 million years ago they forgot how to lay eggs.

[Anonymous]

selfmaster wrote:

your one of those people aren’t you!? those who dissect others comments and go into full crusade trying to create an argument and question other motives here on MGTOW

Yes, I dissect other people arguments in order to better digest, or refute, said arguments. It is called critical thinking.

selfmaster wrote:

your kind is the sole reason why I stopped participating much on this forum

That… is pretty much your problem. If you don’t want to hear other people opinions, than don’t read other people’s comments. If you don’t want your opinion’s criticized, than don’t post.

selfmaster wrote:

you have a certain version of MGTOW philosophy in your head and you think that this is what TRUE MGTOW is all about,

This is partially true. Yes, I think my “version” (if you want to call that way) of Mgtow is what Mgtow is all about FOR ME (like, in MY LIFE). Again, don’t see a problem with that.

selfmaster wrote:

discrediting anyone who believe even slight differently that your version of MGTOW

You give me too much credit. I just post here other’s people arguments from MY POINT OF VIEW. In the end, that is what this forum is about isn’t it? EXCHANGE OF IDEAS. Oh… I see… You think that the only exchange valid is when the idea exchange is the SAME. Sorry to disapoint you, but if I see someone that I disagree with, and I feel it is worth to point it out, I WILL DO IT. If the argument I “debunked” was “discredit, thatn it is a seign that the argument in question was not strong to begin with, was it? And who knows, I might actually learn something from the exchange… Or I might end up with some concern troll like yourself. It is a risk that I am willing to take.

selfmaster wrote:

guys like you are like the ISIS of islam, your the extremist of MGTOW either your version or not at all.

Wow, refuting other people’s argument is now AS BAD AS JOINING ISIS?!?! Are you f~~~ing kiding me? And… wait…. are you the so called MODERATE MGTOW?!? F~~~ing hell, that explains a lot. We use to call you guys PUSSY BEGGARS…. Sorry mate, you will find quite low tolerance for pussy begging on this site.

selfmaster wrote:

and it appears from the number of posts you have on your profile and your mode of communication, you have nothing else to do but to argue and argue and argue with other members in order to get attention and feel good about yourself. . . . . . to be honest it’s just pathetic.

Well than, Than I guess you better get on your way. Don’t let the exit door hit you.

Besides, you are complaining that I post threads… on a website that was made for posting threads… And complaining about my LANGUAGE?!? Gees, nevermind the CONTENT of my messages, I should watch my F~~~ING GODAM LANGUAGE, forgive F~~~ING ME your majesty….

On top of that, the one criticizing me is the one that don’t post here because he is afraid f CRITICISM?!?! Yeah, that is really commendable…

selfmaster wrote:

headon.collision clearly made it clear that the article goes feminist toward the end and blackghostic confirmed that by pointing out in the video in part 2, she made her point in the beginning of the article and she started hamster spinning toward the end, which only screams how messed up women life is nowadays

And Stardusk (Thinking Ape) pointed out how LITTLE this all means! See, even on YOUTUBE there are opossing opinions. And I am one guy that don’t agree with Stardusk on SEVERAL POINTS. So, because a youtuber agrees with OP, that means I can’t disagree?!?

selfmaster wrote:

and how we are winning and driving them nuts

Yeah, cause nothing scream VICTORY like going back to be the SOLE PROVIDER and RESPONSIBLE ADULT on the household. And still, you didn’t refute ANY of my points.

selfmaster wrote:

and yet you digressed around the point of the article and found whatever bulls~~~ to say to create an argument out of nothing.

No, no, no. That is what you are doing RIGHT NOW. I pointed out the EXACT PROBLEM of article. A nicer slave owner, IS STILL ASLAVE OWNER. She misses being a “mother”, because working is “too hard”. Besides, if you are talking about subjects like f~~~ing BIOLOGY, you would have to consider the MALE SIDE AS WELL AS THE FEMALE. Or do you think ony FEMALES have DRIVES AND REPRODUCTIVES STRATEGIES. Men have those as well and they can be as HARMFULL TO MEN AS WOMEN’S STRATEGIES. But hey, you probably must think women’s uterus is sacred, and their “holy duty” is to generate children, like the article implies. F~~~ing “moderate mgtow”, go back being a tool than.

selfmaster wrote:

basically people like you are what hindering MGTOW from growing

Really? So, freedom of speech hinders the Mgtow growing up?!?! Yes, I shall join the collective mind, join the hive mind or die…
….
Wait… this is feminism. You are on the wrong site my friend, feminism is on the other direction.

selfmaster wrote:

your just driving members aways cuz they have a slightly different version of MGTOW than you

Yeah, because APPEARANCE trumphs SUBSTANCE! I mean, nevermind exposing different ideas and f~~~ing debunking them, we should mind people’s FEELINGS ove f~~~ing FACTS. Or, maybe, we should start putting TRIGGER WARNINGS?!?! You are, indeed, a concern troll aren’t you?

selfmaster wrote:

it’s just sad, I’ve been MGTOW long enough and tired of people like u who come in and s~~~ all over the movement.

Good bye than!
And I believe Mgtow is more of a phenomena than a movement, but I digress…

selfmaster wrote:

learn how to say something positive and learn how to support other members, than just going around arguing with people.

Ok, ok… I will try…
Ready…?
…
…
F~~~ YOU!
How about that? Look, as I said before, FACTS OVER FEELINGS, is my motto. If I disagree with someone, I will say it. I will not support another Mgtow just because penis. If there is anything to support, than he can F~~~ OFF. If there is something to criticize, I WILL DO IT. If you want this kind of s~~~, go to the SOCIAL JUSTICE “movement”, they are obessed with “trigger wrnings”

selfmaster wrote:

and yes we are limited by our biology, I doubt you work or study in a medical or biological field to know how human biological systems function and how limited we are in terms of what hormones, peptides, neurotransmitters and other chemicals that governs our body

Im sorry, and you are? If so, can you point me to the paper that say that it is BIOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for a woman to F~~~ING TAKE CARE OF HERSELF? Or that a man has no other function/utility than to be a f~~~ing TOOL?

You know, I will prove my point, at least from the male perspective. It is called MGTOW! Maybe you heard of it…

selfmaster wrote:

and thats not even the point of why headon said you can’t argue with biology, he simply quoted that from the article and put it as a headline.

Where he got the phrase doesn’t matter. He made a point, I argued against it.

selfmaster wrote:

if you read the article correctly you would have notice that, but NO! u just swifted through the article, made a quick conclusion and came to s~~~ all over the thread to get some attention

I read the article, and saw Stardusk and part of Black Agnostic videos, that is why I f~~~ing posted the reply. Projecting much?

selfmaster wrote:

you should seriously know and learn what it means to be a true MAN GOING HIS OWN WAY!

Already wento through this topic with Soldier-Medic on another topic, not going to repeat myself.
Also, I liked the “real man” tactic… Where did I heard that before?

selfmaster wrote:

it doesn’t mean wasting time on the computer criticizing other members and arguing with them, it means going out there and carving your own life and path, away from the system claws and women influence, making money, enjoying life, doing a hobby etc.

Oh yeah, we shouldn’t talk about it. We should just shut up and go our own way. Cause a REAL MAN don’t complain. A REAL MAN is a REAL AUTOMATON….

selfmaster wrote:

I fear for the movement from mentalities like you sending the wrong message. pretty much like alqaida and ISIS with their extremist view of things sending the wrong message about the Muslims around the globe, ruining their rep and endangering them.

Concernec troll is concerned… Also, comparing me with ISIS for POSTING an OPPOSIG VIEW…

F~~~ off

[Anonymous]

Soldier-Medic wrote:

I just back tracked this ladies bonafides.

She has a double masters in business and psychology.

To be fair, she is the first woman that has written like this that actually posses a graduate degree in psychology.

I guess this gives her the the street cred to discuss potty training men.

Hey Medic, thanks for the homework, I knew something was ivyleagish about her, she’s just like the politicians, judges, and lawyers, you know Yale, Princeton, Haaaavard, and others, they’ve been indoctrinated by feminism’s trade mark, you know, “political correctness” (what other’s think), “Go along to get along” (sheep to slaughter) Environmental hysteria (a religion of sorts based on falsified and doctored data) “World conglomeration” (sticking their noses up everyone’s ass while ignoring the fact their hypocrisy invokes retaliation)
Feminism has inundated universities for decades, they tolerate no other philosophy, those who challenge these pink cloud abominations of single track thinking are targeted for dismissal, or even worse, conspirator criminal accusations.

The Western universities have been trumpeting this cesspool of toxic thinking for many decades, we can see the results all around us, excessive expansion of their civilization I refer to as “Gynocentrailia”.
Millions now feed on this parasitic religion that’s decimated our hopes and dreams of a free and prosperous society.
Donald Trump (street thug logic) Is so popular now because his demeanor is purely analytical and makes no exceptions for the emotional hysteria of political correctness.
It seems he’s pulled the suffocating pink gag off and tied it around these pink cloud p~~~ified ivy league manginas!
Good for him! Perhaps free speech and other philosophy may again echo in Gynocentrailia’s universities, lets hope…
NEVER GO TO A FEMALE SHRINK! HER HEAD HAS BEEN PACKED FULL OF TOXIC UNIVERSITY THINKING!