The Ninety-Nine Percent

[Anonymous 54]

How to coax out real participents?
DONT worry if you cant write at an intilecual level.
DONT worry if you cant spell worth a s~~~.
DONT worry if your sentences are alllll f~~~ed up.

Thats how!!!!

We all have something to say, to add, if our heart is in the right place.

Stealthy.. I tried to warn him to never underestimate your enemy.
He laughed me off..
Probably cause of my spelling.

Trolloing c~~~s..

Come get it.

[Max PowerParticipant 2721]

OldBill, just wanna say, in all my dealings over 44 years, you are one of the smartest people I have ever encountered. Respect, brother.

[OldBillParticipant]

bstoff wrote:

May I also suggest requiring an intro paragraph or two to make sure whoever has signed up has provided one within a few days to make sure they are legit?

While that sounds good, it won’t work. They can simply lie, just as they already do when they answer the Are you a man? and Are you over 18?” questions.

Instead front loading some cumbersome and easily subverted verification process, I’d purge inactive accounts after a certain period. No posts within X of joining? Gone. No posts for X after the last post? Gone.

Time triggered purges aren’t going to keep trolls and lurkers from joining or rejoining. They will, however, make it a little harder to stick around. Low hanging fruit gets plucked first, so let’s raise the branch a little.

The membership numbers we’re strangely proud of would take a incredibly huge hit, the inactive member rate is 99% remember, but an inactive member isn’t really a member anyway.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 54]

I like the intros.
A toll will write some f~~~ up stories, full of holes you can call them on.

Big fun.

[Anonymous 11]

I was called a tuna on my intro. I don’t think Peter Pan liked me very much. NFG!

We’ve had some issues in the past where a member’s wench got the credentials, or even worse dictated the words. Even when I’m busy as hell, I’ll drop in and leave a comment or two.

Also, gentlemen, posting here helps you develop and maintain your writing skills. I still imagine my old school English composition teacher standing over my shoulder when I compose posts. That little old lady did more good for me than any woman other than my mother. She was tough as nails, and from the generation well before women went feral.

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

I still imagine my old school English composition teacher standing over my shoulder when I compose posts.

Not me, I remember Mizzzzz Parkins making every effort to harangue me and belittle me, evicting me from her class, with orders to go to the principle’s office.

I usually went out the back door and left school for the day, sometimes not returning for a month straight!

I want no part of this unclean spirit of feminism, I know her like the back of my hand! I’m educated in feminism, not scholastic activities!

In winter I always got caught by returning from school smelling like smoke from the fires I built in the park to keep warm and pass the time away.

Feminism= tragic waste of men and destruction to all things civil and orderly.

Feminism’s reputation cannot escape itself anymore, we’re witnessing the implosion like a Supernova!

[DocParticipant]

F~~~ the lurkers who want to gather s~~~ on me.

You ain’t got s~~~. None.
F~~~ off.
I am f~~~ing bullet proof to your s~~~.

Lurker who are sympathetic –
This is not directed at you.
Lurkers who want to harm me/us go to hell. You lost now f~~~ off.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[DocParticipant]

Sorry KM – I had an Aspergic outburst then.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[NerdTunnelerParticipant]

Now we are going mainstream and a target for trolls and the femtards…Still, they may bash themselves at the gates and we wont give a f~~~…We gave them the empty chair and starve their need for attention…

We have expert tuna and troll hunters that delight in toying with the prey before disposing of them…The newer red pilled brothers can also hone their skills in spotting bulls~~~ and learning how to stand up for themselves instead of kowtowing to trolls…

And lastly, we have KM that cleans up the mess when we have a fights or fun or vicious hunts…

I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...

[IRuleMeParticipant]

OldBill wrote:

bstoffers wrote:

May I also suggest requiring an intro paragraph or two to make sure whoever has signed up has provided one within a few days to make sure they are legit?

While that sounds good, it won’t work. They can simply lie, just as they already do when they answer the Are you a man? and Are you over 18?” questions.

Instead front loading some cumbersome and easily subverted verification process, I’d purge inactive accounts after a certain period. No posts within X of joining? Gone. No posts for X after the last post? Gone.

Time triggered purges aren’t going to keep trolls and lurkers from joining or rejoining. They will, however, make it a little harder to stick around. Low hanging fruit gets plucked first, so let’s raise the branch a little.

The membership numbers we’re strangely proud of would take a incredibly huge hit, the inactive member rate is 99% remember, but an inactive member isn’t really a member anyway.

I think this is a good idea. KM may not agree, but I just see no reason to lurk. Either you want to participate or you don’t. If you don’t, why did you sign up?

[Anonymous 11]

These attackers are only hurting themselves. I could not lurk on a forum that leaves me with my veins bulging in anger. They are addicted to anger. There are probably hundreds that simply lurk to get their anger crack fix for the day.

The last troll was mentally ill on some level. It was incoherent. It admitted it too.

Anyways : I was locked up in a mental hospital at some point for calling my mom out on her bulls~~~.

You don’t get sent to a mental hospital for calling your mom out unless you’re threatening her with an axe.

The gender guesser that Jan turned me onto called it a Weak Male, European. Chrissy was called Female by it so gender can be spoofed. It believe it was a mentally ill woman. The logs for this site would show exactly how it got so many stars.

There is a set of mentally ill people out there reading us. We will trigger some.

I did have fun obliquely toying with it. I’m even wondering if it were a bot of some sort too. I reread what it wrote. It was just regurgitating what we say in general.

Men and even a few women died for freedom of expression. I’ll never let some aggressive whack jobs take it away from us.

IRuleMe wrote:

I just see no reason to lurk

Picture this, IRM.

You’re a cuckold in a female lead relationship and living in terror. By allowing lurking, we are setting some of these men free.

I write nothing on this site that I would not say to any woman, mangina, or white knight’s face. Paradoxically, women always agree with me. They are amazed that I know their tricks. I’ve never gotten a negative reaction from a woman. Blue pillers treat me like an alien from another planet. I avoid white knights more than I do women.

[BigvernParticipant 1983]

OldBill wrote:

Everything you post here can be read by anyone who wishes to and some of those reading what you post will take great exception to your thoughts and opinions.

In an ‘IDEAL’ world, these people would welcome debate, opinions and discussion, but it isn’t. These cupcakes are not lurking for ANY OTHER reasons, than to cause trouble, and of course invade YET ANOTHER MALE ONLY SPACE.
Then again, in an IDEAL world, mgtow, wouldn’t be a thing.

OldBill wrote:

If you’re dating a woman, you best bet she knows how to unlock your phone and she knows you post here.

SPOT ON OldBill!! I was hanging around a mature woman of my OWN age, last year, (I know, I know).
ME, previously having been married to a nosy b*tch, for years, I knew the drill.
SO……At the start of the ‘affair’, I CATAGORICALLY, told this woman, that “IF YOU EVER CHECK MY MOBILE/CELL PHONE, WITHOUT MY PERMISSION, I’LL BE GONE OK!??”
She went into this big speech about how “she would NEVER do that yadda yadda”.

SO this day, I was travelling a long way, to visit family in hospital, and she calls me while I was driving (I have previously told her to NEVER call me, when driving, unless it’s an emergency).
She told me a bulls~~~ story about how some unknown woman, 2 weeks ago had called her phone, and was asking about me!
So I asked her for the number, it WAS A NUMBER FROM MY PHONE!!!

That morning, before my 3 hour car journey, I went to the barbers for a short, back and sides. It was only once I had entered the shop, took off my jacket, that I realised I had left my phone at this FWB’s apartment. I wondered at the time if she would try and snoop through my messages and contacts, I shrugged it off and didn’t think about it anymore.
I had my hair cut, and returned to her apartment to have a sandwich, before I travelled. MY PHONE WAS EXACTLY WHERE I HAD LEFT IT EARLIER, ON THE ARM OF THE SOFA/SETTEE.
I packed up after lunch and got in the car and began my journey.

An hour into the journey, she called me and told me about the BS story, and after I told her I would call her later that night, as I WAS DRIVING on the motorway/highway.

As soon as I hung up, I carried on driving and began to think about this DRAMA, which I didn’t need as someone in my family was having a MAJOR OPERATION.
I thought more and more, and it then dawned on me that this woman, MAY have checked my phone, when I was at the barber’s shop.
So later in the evening, I called her and asked for the number, and asked her to keep repeating the BS story, so I could make sense of the LIE.
The number that ‘called’ her weeks before was in fact a very dear person to me, a woman I have KNOWN FOR FIFTEEN F*CK*NG YEARS.

I played dumb to the b*tch, and told her i’d see her in a few days, stayed with my family, and then drove back to the her, the next week.

SO MEN, what had happened was that this b*tch HAD TRAWLED THROUGH MY PHONE’S CONTACTS/CALL LOG, AND FOUND THIS WOMAN’S NUMBER, WHO I HAD CALLED A FEW WEEKS BEFORE.

This was just a sick and twisted Drama ‘GAME’, so I asked the b*tch quite clearly if she “remembered what I had said to her about NEVER CHECKING MY PHONE?”

She looked a little quizzed and CONFIRMED that she REMEMBERED what I had originally told her, IF SHE EVER CHECKED MY PHONE.

So I asked her outright, “Can I ask you if you checked my phone, when I left it on your sofa while having my hair cut?”
She told me “NO, OF COURSE NOT, YOU KNOW I WOULDN’T DO THAT”.

I didn’t even call her a liar, needless to say, she put on the old TEAR’S ROUTINE, when I told her weeks later, that I was ending the ‘relationship’.

She of course, through misty eyes, asked me why I was not happy in the relationship?
I simply replied, “You SNOOPED IN MY PRIVATE PROPERTY”, GOODBYE.

MEN, she is mid-forties, and single,……actually you’d think they might actually try to hold on to a fella, by not INVADING EVERY SINGLE MALE SPACE HE HAS.

They are UNTRUSTWORTHY, LIARS, AND HAVE NO MORAL COMPASS.

I ALWAYS FELT THAT LIVING WITH A WOMAN/ANY WOMAN, MEANS CHECKING YOUR BACK, EVERY F*CK*NG DAY.

"What made you think, there'd be a livin' in sheep?, Eat, Work, Eat Work and Sleep" - Mark Knopfler.

[OldBillParticipant]

NerdTunneler wrote:

Now we are going mainstream and a target for trolls and the femtards…

I pointed that out nearly a year ago in my Trolls: The New Normal thread.

We have expert tuna and troll hunters…

I’ve pointed this out many times before and I’ll repeat it again here: We can only spot tuna and trolls when they break cover and those that break cover are only a tiny percentage.

Ninety-nine percent of the accounts here never post and thus cannot be identified as tuna or trolls. We’d fools to assume that all of those silent accounts have either been abandoned or are lurking frightened manginas.

Anonymous wrote:

You’re a cuckold in a female lead relationship and living in terror. By allowing lurking, we are setting some of these men free.

I’ve no trouble with lurkers and for the reason you cite.

I just want the active members here to realize that most of the lurkers here are not the terrorized cuckolds we believe them to be. Most of the “silent yet active” accounts are here to read and monitor what is being said and by be whom.

They are here and they are watching. The 500 up-votes “Peter Pan” received in only a few hours time should make that clear to anyone.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[BigvernParticipant 1983]

Anonymous wrote:

Also, gentlemen, posting here helps you develop and maintain your writing skills. I still imagine my old school English composition teacher standing over my shoulder when I compose posts.

EXCELLENT POINT @ChauvinisticPig, particularly in this day and age of ‘text’ speak.

"What made you think, there'd be a livin' in sheep?, Eat, Work, Eat Work and Sleep" - Mark Knopfler.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Anonymous wrote:

For all we know they’re women looking to sharpen their game!

Desperate times call for desperate measures…

I’ll pay you!

Yea, F~~~ you!

Everyone has a price. Me? No one can pay my price.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[OldBillParticipant]

Bigvern wrote:

EXCELLENT POINT @ChauvinisticPig, particularly in this day and age of ‘text’ speak.

Exactly. If we’re here to communicate, we should make the effort to communicate as well as we’re able.

That being said, some members do face hurdles. English is a second language for some, although nearly every one writes in English very well and sometimes better than some native English speakers, I should add.

For others aging and medical conditions impose deficits. I’m sure we all remember the legally blind brother who had to write in ALL CAPS ALL BOLD in order to see what he had typed.

While there are exceptions, it doesn’t follow that there are also excuses. What you’re sharing is important, so take the time to express yourself clearly.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 8]

These are some interesting observations Bill, definitely some food for thought here and in Greg’s thread about the missing ninety nine percent. Thanks for taking the time out to share your thoughts, as always they are very insightful.

It makes me understand the cryptic nature of many lessons from the past. Speaking too plainly can have grave consequences, unfortunately. As C-Pig stated it is necessary to be oblique in some circumstances.

It brings to mind a speech I heard from the civil rights era. I can’t find a source presently but to sum it up, the man was speaking at a rally in a packed auditorium and he opened by greeting his brothers, sympathizers and his enemies, because he would be a fool to believe that a gathering that large would be of a single mind. That’s not a quote, I’m just paraphrasing but that was the jist of it.

Anonymous wrote:

The gender guesser that Jan turned me onto called it a Weak Male, European. Chrissy was called Female by it so gender can be spoofed. It believe it was a mentally ill woman.

My theory is it was a female that was trying to identify as a male and fell down trying. Oh well, maybe it should get some better hormones, or better yet accept nature, embrace it even.

[Anonymous 11]

I know whenever I infiltrate. I run silent and run deep.

Any account that starred Peter Pan should be investigated and punted. It looks to me like there are 50 to 100 accounts that participated. It could have been done programmatically too by a small group.

These assholes are diverting us from our primary mission of saving men and just maybe making the occasional woman wake up and smell the coffee.

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

It brings to mind a speech I heard from the civil rights era. I can’t find a source presently but to sum it up, the man was speaking at a rally in a packed auditorium and he opened by greeting his brothers, sympathizers and his enemies, because he would be a fool to believe that a gathering that large would be of a single mind. That’s not a quote, I’m just paraphrasing but that was the jist of it.

I too remember that quote and I too cannot place it.

Despite the fact we both can’t remember who to give credit for it, that quote is an excellent summation of the point I was trying to make in my original post.

Thank you, brother, for explaining in one anecdote what I could only partially do in hundreds of words.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Any account that starred Peter Pan should be investigated and punted. It looks to me like there are 50 to 100 accounts that participated. It could have been done programmatically too by a small group.

While breaking cover like that was a mistake on their part, we need to remember there are many many more like them still laying in the weeds who will not make that mistake.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Author]

Posts