Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Man's insurmountable Sexual Drive
This topic contains 83 replies, has 24 voices, and was last updated by 
Ancientwisdom 1 year, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Anonymous18@grumpy : Brother its one thing to swear women off, its another to actively run away when they are after you (looks, resources).
The hardware necessitates men enslave them for sexual pleasure. Society has banked and profited immensely on it.
Walking away is possible. But its not as easy as deluding oneself to impregnate a woman and rationalizing a life of slavery because you can’t walk away.
I will go on a limb here and accuse some my brothers of being brainwashed by the libtard agenda if they actually believe a woman has a higher sexual drive than a man.
Actually the libtard agenda wants men to believe women have lower sex drive: hence duping men into believing they need to fork over tons of $$$$ and bend over backwards to get access to pussy.
Anonymous18I rarely lose my cool. But this tuna s~~~ with an established member who differs on opinions is akin to women calling rape when being confronted by a man with opposing viewpoints.
It is beneath each and any one of you who has been here for over a month.
Duly go f~~~ yourself.
In your definition a married man in 21st century is pussified?
I’m not sure what your definition of pussified is. It seems slightly different in every post.
A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)
Anonymous18I notice that for a MGHOW eric, you seem to be very defensive towards women at most opportunities. Just an observation, perhaps I’m way off here…
I think Eric’s middle name is Chad.
That’s a compliment.
In your definition a married man in 21st century is pussified?
I’m not sure what your definition of pussified is. It seems slightly different in every post.
I have no definition. I was going by Shadow’s definition of non-pussified men creating things he posted about.
Pussified man is how he sees himself in relation to women. Not if he can build a colossal and sign it off to his ex-wife and her live in boyfriend.
But this tuna s~~~ with an established member
I agree. That’s why I called him Chad 🙂
A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)
Brother its one thing to swear women off, its another to actively run away when they are after you (looks, resources).
This is true.
I have not sworn off women completely, however I came to the conclusion that in relationships the prey (me) must be smarter, faster, and nearly invisible to the predators (women). Avoidance rather than running in fear.Walking away is possible. But its not as easy as deluding oneself to impregnate a woman and rationalizing a life of slavery because you can’t walk away.
Also Truth.
It is very hard to walk away when chained to a pew in a boat on the ocean without removing a body part then facing shark infested waters.
Best to avoid that boat in the first place.There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
I dont think Eric is a tuna, nor any other derogatory name (with the exception of being a politician 🙂 ).
My theory is Eric’s wife or girlfriend got a hold of his account.
I rarely lose my cool. But this tuna s~~~ with an established member who differs on opinions is akin to women calling rape when being confronted by a man with opposing viewpoints.
When someone start using shaming tactics, it is usually a tuna.
If you go through my posts in this thread, I state I believe Eric’s account has been hijacked.
Anonymous18I will go on a limb here and accuse some my brothers of being brainwashed by the libtard agenda if they actually believe a woman has a higher sexual drive than a man.
Actually the libtard agenda wants men to believe women have lower sex drive: hence duping men into believing they need to fork over tons of $$$$ and bend over backwards to get access to pussy.
I stand corrected. 🙂
Anonymous3I rarely lose my cool. But this tuna s~~~ with an established member who differs on opinions is akin to women calling rape when being confronted by a man with opposing viewpoints.
It is beneath each and any one of you who has been here for over a month.
Duly go f~~~ yourself.
I agree with this. Eric is a long time member here, just because you disagree you can’t just make that accusation. It is one thing to say his account could have been hacked, that’s also bad, but not as bad as if you think Eric was tuna the entire time. That’s just stupid.
As to this topic. It’s obvious young men have higher sexual desire than women do, this is how the system works, there is absolutely nothing incorrect about that. Anyone denying that is full of it. It’s well documented scientifically, it is completely linked to testosterone. There have even been tests with women being given testosterone, who have said as much. But even that is a small fraction of what a young man’s desire is.
That is why feminism came about the way it did. Older men that should know better abdicated their duty to society, and sold younger men up the river. It was of course intentional by the elites to use women as useful idiots, and here we are decades later. As men age, their drive lowers, but for many the memory of how society and specifically women treated them while young remains, and so men are armed with both knowledge and resentment, and then less and less can be shamed into marriage at later ages. And that is how we get our current trend, with more and more women in their 30s and beyond single, with zero marriage prospects, which they don’t deserve anyway so it’s just desserts.
A mistake sometimes made on this site is MGTOW don’t understand that we are not average. I have posted this before, and I truly believe it. Men, we are the best of the best. We are not mindless simpletons, but the average blue pill man IS. And the blue pill man is the MAJORITY. So when you’re discussing the overall picture, you can’t think of just yourself or your MGTOW brothers. You have to look at BLUE PILL men who make up the MAJORITY.
Now framed with that point, anyone arguing about the sex drive, does that change your position?
Anonymous1Maybe one of you Chads can explain this to me? If you are a circumcised man than 80% of your nerve endings are gone. If you have sex with a woman she is having 4-5 times more nerve endings and pleasure receptors firing than you are. Now, who is really the beneficiary of such an arrangement. Women act like sex is doing YOU a favor. In fact, you are doing THEM a favor. Also women reset from sex in about 2 minutes. Men reset in about 2 hours. Women have a virtually insatiable sex drive compared to men. The greatest trick these feminists ever pulled is to make you think, that they hate sex and only will do it with you for a high price.
I agree with this. Eric is a long time member here, just because you disagree you can’t just make that accusation. It is one thing to say his account could have been hacked, that’s also bad, but not as bad as if you think Eric was tuna the entire time. That’s just stupid.
Let us get some facts straight.
I claim that Eric’s account has been hijacked, from the posts likely by a woman. This person replied to my post first on thread with shaming tactics. That was uncalled for.
I will call a cigar a cigar. And I am going to call a tuna a tuna.
I could have called the account hijacker worse, but I was trying to keep things somewhat polite.
Anonymous18Women act like sex is doing YOU a favor. In fact, you are doing THEM a favor.
Men and women both desire sex. But men need more of it. Whether you are circumcised doesn’t change the underlying programming for you to have sex with as many women as you can.
And if a man who only knows sexual pleasure post-circumcision and nothing to compare to – that’s as good as it will ever get. How they come up with 80% of reduction in pleasure is debatable.
Anonymous18This person replied to my post first on thread with shaming tactics. That was uncalled for.
Brother shaming tactic are bad. They have no room to debate on. It’s refuge for the weak. But calling someone a tuna with its well-established rep around here, is poisoning the well.
Call a man out for his behavior. Call him out on his ways of arguing. Don’t call a man a woman.
Each one had a wife to go home to who ordered him where to take off his dirty shoes. In your definition a married man in 21st century is pussified? No?
Pffft let’s take a ride on the assumption Merry go round where Every single 18th Century Women ordered their Husbands around. You do understand that Men used to spank Women who got out of line, even into the 1950s right?
Bolded: No man is really Pussiefied. Othwerwise MGTOW wouldn’t exist. Even assuming that 21st century Men are all Pussified, that still leaves over 10 millennia of Unpussified Men. Once again this doesn’t prove your point of, “Men have a higher sex drive than Women.” Men instituted Marriage and Christianity effectively limiting our Sexual Partners to one. Women when given voting rights instituted Abortion, no fault divorce, Welfare for single mothers, anti slut shaming laws, etc. You have no where to stand based on thoses facts alone.
A man’s actions in workplace is direct correlation of his natural transcendence of testosterone. His belief in his own ability. Pussified men design and land spacecrafts on planets but cry when feminists attack them for wearing women wearing bikini-laden shirts.
Uh are we still talking about sex drives??? Testosterone is simply not allowing yourself to be dominated. Even by vagina. It is why Women specifically seek Un-Pussified men to have Sex with them. Why the whole, “Women like Bad Boys” mantra exists.
Gina tingles likes Men who dominate them. Men do not like Dominate Women. Period.
What you do to earn money says very little about your views and assessment of how society benefits and exploits male autonomy to meet feminine desires and feels.
I still don’t see how this statement even proves in any way, shape, or form that Men have higher sex drives than Women. And I really hate this kind of argument. In Gynocentric societies, yes they do. But you miss the fact that Men tie Sex in with Companionship. Women want resources without the responsibility. In other words all they care about is SEX.
Precisely. Not enough testosterone (drive).
In other words too busy lying around and f~~~ing at home rather than going out and building things.
I think you’re implying that Testosterone is all about Sex, sex, sex, F~~~, F~~~, F~~~. My Testosterone also tells me to protect my Brother and Father when they are threatened, my country if it is threatened, and my own life.
I don’t want any of those things to be dominated, therefore I dominate the factors threatening them. If Testosterone was just about Fukking, there would be no complete Monk Mgtow. In fact if 21st century Men were all about the Wimminz which I think is what you’re really trying to say, not only would there be no MGTOW but Marriage rates would not be in decline.
That is exactly what they were. If your quotations were meant as sarcasm I missed that. They designed a system best capable of getting sex that was ego-syntonic i.e. less chances of her challenging his ego, his investments in children that were likely his own and not Chad’s. Their actions were damage-co
ntrol because the male sexual drive necessitated they reproduce and be with women. If they could just walk away why invest the time and energy controlling others, let alone an entire opposite sex’s, actions?Sigh,
You’re talking about People like Thomas Aquinas and others who warned against Hypergamy. You don’t understand at all how a civilization Works and Flourishes. It works on the backs of Men. The reason they invested time and energy into controlling Women is bc Women’s Hypergamous nature IS THE PROBLEM. NOT MEN’S.
Penguin builds Nest, Chad walks in, Female humps the Chad, The Penguin is left bloodied and Battered. Female chooses the Homewrecker.
Why would I want to contribute and build a Society if a Woman whose children I am going to invest resources in isn’t going to be loyal?
The answer I won’t, I’ll either live off the dole or go my own way. Which means no children being raised into adults, a rise in criminality, and ultimately societal collapse.
Do you not see the deal with the devil that Men made? It wasn’t bc their goddammed “Higher Libido.” No, it was bc they understood that Children are the building blocks of your civilization. They are the walls that hold it up against Nature. When you f~~~ over future generations, you f~~~ over the future simple as that. Your civilization crumbles and you become slaves. You either dominate or be dominated. Patriarchal Civilization is winning. It gives Men easier lives. Gynocentric Civilization is essentially Slavery.
Women could care less. They will vote for immigrants to come raging in, jobs to be outsourced, run away with the Chad.
BC ALL THEY CARE ABOUT IS THE MAN WITH THE MOST TESTOSTERONE. ALL THEY CARE ABOUT IS THE GENETICS. BC THEY ARE DOMINATED BY THEIR DRIVE TO REPRODUCE.
They are loyal to the Species, not the Individual.
You are in denial. Take it as you may.
No I’m not, you use Shaming language left and right. I love seeing AD Hominem arguments, bc it always means the other Party is generally grasping for straws.
He who is Brave is Free - Seneca
Women have more sexual partners than men and can’t go a day without a partner, they’re the ones always belly aching about being ALONE.
A f~~~ing bitch will break up on Tuesday and banging a new guy by Friday and not giving a solitary f~~~ about Mr. Gone!
I’m with Tower on this one.
Everybody wants sex.
But most men want sex with 1 woman. Once they are in a relationship they are happy.
Women want sex in general. And they are never happy with just one man.
A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)
Anonymous3Maybe one of you Chads can explain this to me? If you are a circumcised man than 80% of your nerve endings are gone. If you have sex with a woman she is having 4-5 times more nerve endings and pleasure receptors firing than you are. Now, who is really the beneficiary of such an arrangement. Women act like sex is doing YOU a favor. In fact, you are doing THEM a favor. Also women reset from sex in about 2 minutes. Men reset in about 2 hours. Women have a virtually insatiable sex drive compared to men. The greatest trick these feminists ever pulled is to make you think, that they hate sex and only will do it with you for a high price.
This isn’t true. In my mid-20s my refractory period was somewhere along the line of 30 seconds to 2 minutes, at most. I could go repeatedly.
But women? Once I finished off a woman, she would be done. Comatose. Wouldn’t be able to get up for sex again for awhile. Also it didn’t take long for me to finish a woman off. Maybe a minute, two minutes max if I was really going for it.
There is this myth that women can go again and again and want to go for hours. The reality is that is nonsense. I do not know how other men do things, but I always had an easy time with women, and maybe this is a reason they would brag to each other about me and seemingly take great pride that I would f~~~ them.
It really doesn’t matter what you think the pleasure is or whatever. More importantly, look at actions, look at how men think and act. Even on this site, so many men talk about chasing women and pumping and dumping and all of that. Women do not think like that. They can not even affirmatively seek sex or make a move in any type of overt manner. It is indistinguishable between a woman being “friendly” and one seeking sex from a man, because the action is exactly the same and even in her mind she probably doesn’t know—they all seek to be pursued and conquered, even when they approach you and initiate contact. They can not make the move to sexual.
Women’s sex drive is also more tightly tied to her reproductive cycle—she seeks sex to reproduce. Birth control, especially pills, mess with that, and are one reason Western women are so messed up—the other of course being societal indoctrination and the pussy pass.
But why is this stuff even important? I understand the thread is about that, but I think MGTOW have more important and better things to think about. I only comment on this with the facts either from science or my own experience (and I have made an attempt to make it clear what is my own experience), only to clarify in the hopes that it helps others, because I believe truth is important. The media and society feed a lot of bulls~~~ about sex and try to get men to be pathetic pussy beggars. It is hard programming to break. But some of it works because on some level it is tied to some basic male desires, so you can’t just throw that away and not understand it. Western society is unhealthy because of a multitude of things.
Anonymous18No I’m not, you use Shaming language left and right.
When you jump in a pool, you get wet. When you say pussy/sex has zero leverage over you, you are in denial.
Shaming language would be to tell you can’t get laid. To not get laid because you have managed to re-code your biology and animalistic instincts strictly on your observations of how society functions is impossible.
I’d clarify – whether you act on it or not is not what I am debating here. The indifference on the surface doesn’t mean peace and quiet in a man’s inner world when a hot tail is ready for meat.
So let me ask you this, when you say ‘F~~~ this idea that they control us with their pussy’ .. what are you implying exactly?
Because pussy controls men at biological level. Each one of us. The struggle is to overrule the instinct with intellect and reasoning.
In your definition a married man in 21st century is pussified?
I have no definition. I was going by Shadow’s definition of non-pussified men creating things he posted about.
Pussified man is how he sees himself in relation to women. Not if he can build a colossal and sign it off to his ex-wife and her live in boyfriend.
Now you’re just flopping all over the place
He who is Brave is Free - Seneca
Brother shaming tactic are bad. They have no room to debate on. It’s refuge for the weak. But calling someone a tuna with its well-established rep around here, is poisoning the well.
You are not listening to me. That is not Eric. Someone has hijacked his account.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
