- Search Results
Topic: Hello and thank you
Hello,
I’m ArchGHOW and I’ll keep it at that for now. I’m thankful for you all for this site and this community and I’d like to introduce myself.
I’m currently in a state of transition and trying to work on my character and personal problems but from what I believe I will be able to find help and support here. Yes, I understand that most of the men who join are seeking guidance and help and I’ll do what I can based on my experiences to help avoid some of the pitfalls and problems that may come about from going your own way and dealing with the injustice many have had to go through. Learn from my mistakes.
Having said that, I’m also looking for help and support. I’m angry a lot and because of that I’ve specifically started a youtube channel as an audio/video diary/journal for myself and anyone else that wants to listen/watch. I find it’s easier to speak than type when there is a lot to say. I also find it easier to vent or explain in words and honestly suggest more men on here record audio journals for themselves to keep track of what has been happening in their lives, and also so they can look back and see if things have changed for the better and be more objective about what has been happening in their lives.
I don’t believe I’m going to be able to help anyone until I help myself but I’m going to do my best to try – I think helping others will help me as well. My anger isn’t from just from the blinders from my eyes being opened wider to let me see more in my life and what’s been happening it’s also from many other things. I tend to ramble, please bear with me.
Thank you for this community; I wish everyone here the best. I want to make it clear why I’m here: I’m here to finally do something, to join a community that might understand me, to help and to be helped. Going your own way isn’t easy as most who have been doing so know, even if they didn’t realise it at the time.
This is not a plug for views but this is what I’m planning to do; research, learning and sharing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA5brXbQ8I8
I hope to be of some use, welcome new members and wish everyone happiness and fulfillment.
Expelled under new policy, ex-Amherst College student files suit
A lawsuit against Amherst College claims the plaintiff was falsely accused of rape, not given a fair investigation by the college, and denied justice
n December 2013, Amherst College imposed its first major sanction under a new get-tough sexual misconduct policy, expelling a 21-year-old senior after a disciplinary board concluded that he had forced a female classmate to perform oral sex during an alcohol-infused encounter nearly two years earlier.
In April 2014, however, the expelled student presented the college with new evidence — a series of text messages the woman sent to two other male students immediately after the alleged rape, according to a lawsuit. To one, a dorm counselor, she described the sexual encounter in language that suggested it was consensual and she wrote, “It’s pretty obvi [obvious] I wasn’t an innocent bystander.’’
To the other student, she sent text messages inviting him over later that same night to “entertain” her — an invitation that resulted in a second sexual encounter, according to text messages and an affidavit by the male student. The accuser testified during the disciplinary hearing that she had texted a friend to come over after the alleged attack.
In the 13 months since the expelled student obtained the texts and gave them to college officials, it appears Amherst has taken no public steps to revisit its decision to expel the student. On Friday, his lawyer, Max D. Stern, filed a lawsuit in US District Court in Springfield, arguing that the college is guilty of a miscarriage of justice against his client, who is identified as “John Doe.’’
In the weeks after he was expelled and ordered to leave campus, Doe was alerted to the existence of the text messages and obtained copies of both sets of texts with the help of friends, according to Stern. The text messages are included in the lawsuit.
Citing the text messages, Stern charged in his lawsuit that Amherst’s investigation of the episode by an outside lawyer was “grossly inadequate,’’ overlooking signs that Stern says would have cleared his client. What’s more, the lawsuit also asserts that the action taken against John Doe, who is Asian-American, is part of a pattern since 2013 in which the college has sanctioned only “male students of color’’ for sexual misconduct.
Pete Mackey, the Amherst College spokesman, said in a statement that the college’s disciplinary process is consistent with federal requirements and is fair to all parties.
“That process was followed in this case,” he said.
“We are confident that the process the college followed was appropriate and that the court will conclude that the College’s process was fair,’’ Mackey said.
His statement did not address a question from the Globe about whether the college is still confident that the decision was right. He did, however, say that the charge that only male students of color have been disciplined is “incorrect.”
Doe’s accuser, who is identified in the lawsuit by the pseudonym Sandra Jones, did not respond to requests for comment.
The lawsuit is also likely to further fuel an ongoing debate about the tough new standards on sexual assault adopted by colleges and universities under federal government pressure, standards that many legal scholars believe violate the rights of those accused of sexual misconduct.
Under the standard ordered by the US Department of Education, Doe was judged guilty under a “preponderance of the evidence,’’ meaning the three-member disciplinary board — made up of officials from neighboring colleges — found it more likely than not that the allegation was true, said the letter to Doe expelling him. In the past, Amherst and other colleges had used a tougher standard of proof — clear and convincing evidence of guilt.
Meanwhile, the expelled student is in academic and professional limbo. His transcript, which he would need to finish his degree or get a higher position, says he was expelled for disciplinary reasons, according to the lawsuit.
Now 22, he was looking forward to a career that probably would have been enhanced by a degree from one of the country’s most prestigious liberal arts colleges
For now, he said in an interview, he works at a small company where he started as an intern last year before getting his first promotion.
His superiors wonder why he did not finish college. And he said he is so embarrassed about what happened that he stays home at night, and is so ashamed of being seen by former classmates that he wears sunglasses when riding the subway.
He has a teenage brother. “I had wanted to be a good role model for him, so this is so disappointing,” he said, as his eyes filled with tears. His father knows he was expelled, but not why.
He asked that he not be identified. Though he wants his name cleared, he said he does not want notice of the case to follow him on Google for life. As for his accuser, it is the Globe’s policy not to identify alleged victims of sexual assault unless they decide otherwise.
The sexual encounter that is now in dispute occurred in the early morning of Feb. 5, 2012, months before Amherst became prominently ensnared in a national maelstrom over insensitivity to women students who had been sexually assaulted.
In October 2012, a former student, Angie Epifano, published a harrowing account of how Amherst had her involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility after she resisted pleas by Amherst’s sexual assault counselor to forget about her rape and forgive her alleged assailant. In 2011, Amherst was one of 55 colleges and universities threatened with the loss of federal funds unless they moved quickly to investigate and punish sexual abusers.
<p id=”U81223586360kWF” style=”letter-spacing: -30;”>With alacrity, Amherst shifted gears: It forced out the sexual assault counselor. It adopted tough new guidelines governing student behavior and the reporting of sexual misconduct. And it implemented a new disciplinary process designed to deal expeditiously and forcefully with sexual misconduct, in part by adopting the “preponderance of the evidence’’ standard. Doe was the first Amherst student tried under that standard.</p>
The disputed sexual encounter began late on a Friday night, when Jones, the accuser, and Doe were sophomores. He had been dating her roommate, who was out of town, for a month.According to accounts by the accuser and witnesses given to Allyson Kurker, the outside investigator brought in by Amherst, Doe arrived in a fourth-floor dormitory lounge where several friends had gathered. He was very drunk. She was tipsy.
Within minutes, they were “making out’’ in front of the others, and then left and went to her dorm room.
In her initial written complaint, Jones said that in the dorm room, the entire encounter was forcible. But in her interview with Kurker and during the hearing, she said the oral sex was initially consensual; then, after Doe boasted about “hooking up” with both her and her roommate, she told him to stop. He refused to do so, she said, according to the hearing transcript.
In his defense, Doe said he was not the kind of person who would do such a thing. But he told the disciplinary board he was so drunk that night he had no memory of the encounter.
During the 2013 hearing, Jones’s roommate testified that she had learned Jones had exchanged text messages with a resident dorm counselor just after the alleged rape. But the school made no effort to contact the counselor or obtain the texts, according to the hearing record.
When a hearing officer asked Jones about those texts, she replied: “I didn’t want to address what had happened to me and I was in no position yet to accept that it had been rape. So in my text messaging [to counselor] I only said things about the hook-up as if it had been consensual.”
In the lawsuit, Stern argues that the texts contain evidence that make it clear the sexual encounter with Doe was consensual and initiated by Jones; that she deliberately misled the college’s investigator and the hearing board; that she was motivated to make the allegations so her roommate would not blame her for what happened; and that Doe, who was incapacitated that night, is the real victim in the case.
In the texts, which extend over several hours, Jones and the dorm counselor exchanged the following messages:
Jones: “Ohmygod, I jus[sic] did something so [expletive] stupid.”
Counselor: “What did you do?”
Jones responded that she had sex with Doe. Then she expressed concern that her roommate would find out, noting that her roommate’s friends had witnessed the start of the encounter.
The counselor’s recommendation was to blame Doe for the encounter. Her reply: “But I mean [roommate] knows me it’s pretty obvi I wasn’t an innocent bystander.’’
As she was texting with the counselor, Jones was also texting another male classmate to come to her room: “I mean I happen to have my room to myself this weekend if you wanted to come over and entertain me.”
Hours later, Jones had another text exchange with the counselor that indicated she and that classmate had sex after hours of conversation.
In an affidavit he signed in April 2014, the classmate, who turned over his text messages to Doe early last year, said he had sex that February night with Jones, who was friendly and flirtatious, and did not appear “anxious, stressed, depressed or otherwise in distress.’’
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/05/29/amherst/4t6JtKmaz7vlYSrQk5NDyJ/story.html
Then also this locally:
Innocent boy’s jail nightmare
A 16-YEAR-OLD boy who was acquitted on Friday night of multiple rape was locked up for almost a year awaiting trial. Audio: Solicitor Laura Timpano discusses this case with 6PR’s Millsy and Tony Mac
Patrick Waring, then a 15-year-old Catholic college student, was dragged out of bed by police a year ago and refused bail on nothing but the say-so of a lying 17-year-old girl who cried rape.
Just before the trial started, the girl admitted lying about her sex life the whole time. She had insisted she was a virgin.
DNA tests excluded Patrick from her claims of rape.
She finally admitted she had had sex with a man at the back of a cinema the same afternoon, two hours before claiming Patrick raped her at Joondalup’s Central Park after following her from the railway station on March 30 last year.
She also admitted to having been in a sexual relationship with her boyfriend at the time.
Patrick was originally denied bail when a police officer told the Children’s Court that Patrick had phoned the girl and threatened her — a fact the police later admitted was wrong.
Patrick’s father, Terry Waring, said his family had been torn apart for a year. His and his wife’s belief in the justice system had been shattered.
“Shoddy work, cruelty and seeming vindictiveness cost us our house, financial security and a lifetime of savings for a three-week trial,” he said.
“The emotional cost to the family has been incalculable. Personally, I have not cried as much since my brother was killed in Vietnam.”
The girl’s new story included being raped by two different men in two hours. She said the cinema sex with a 20-year-old, who she had met on the internet, was rape, but she didn’t want him charged because it might affect her compensation claim.
The girl had previously lied to interviewing officers, the Sexual Assault Resource Centre doctor who examined her and to prosecutor Amanda Forrester.
Director of Public Prosecutions Robert C~~~ dropped his opposition to bail and Patrick was allowed home on strict conditions on the eve of his trial, but Mr C~~~ pressed ahead with a three-week trial in the District Court.
Yesterday, while Patrick was enjoying his first day of complete freedom for exactly a year, his family was still suffering from the trauma.
“The accusations came out of left field,” Mr Waring said.
“We are a very close family and Patrick had never been involved in anything.
“The biggest issue we had with him before was that he cycled to school without waiting for his mother to see him across a main road, and he was grounded for two weeks.”
The Warings had to re-mortgage their house in Beldon to pay for the trial and they moved to Canning Vale to be close to the Banksia Hill Juvenile Detention Centre so they could visit Patrick daily.
Patrick’s mother, Marie, resigned her nursing job at Joondalup Health Campus and his father took leave from the commonwealth public service to cope with the trauma.
“It’s the finish of school for Patrick,” Mr Waring said.
“He’s lost virtually all of Year 11 and the start of Year 12 and he’s had to grow up very fast. He lost his youth in there.
“We didn’t tell anyone at school what had happened to him. He just disappeared. And now we couldn’t send him back there to face the ramifications of this.”
Patrick’s 24-year-old brother, Michael, also lost a year of study for his degree in computer science and information systems because of the ordeal.
His 25-year-old sister Danielle has changed her plans to study civil law and is studying criminal law at Notre Dame University.
Patrick was charged while his shocked parents were still making their dash back to Perth from a Walpole holiday and before DNA results were obtained.
It took PathWest seven months to provide the results.
It was only when defence counsel Tom Percy QC and Jonathan Davies consulted DNA expert
Brian McDonald to interpret those results that another male’s DNA, not Patrick’s, was found in the girl’s underwear and in her mouth. Only then did she admit her lies.Mr Percy told the court that the case was dangerous and based on the lies of a complainant who was bizarre. In his closing address, he told the jury that the girl’s evidence was riddled with inconsistencies, was most implausible and totally dishonest.
He said she had lied to people in positions of authority on the night and deliberately lied for a long time, her lies only discovered last month.
Ms Forrester told the jury in her opening address for the prosecution that the girl’s account would be corroborated in each and every way by the independent evidence gathered by police.
But nothing to substantiate the girl’s claims was found during a forensic check of the Joondalup park on the night and the SARC doctor found no evidence of sexual assault.
SARC’s Dr Catherine Nixon, who told the court the girl was clear, composed and cogent on the night, agreed on cross-examination that abrasions on her back could have been caused by carpet burns.
PathWest biologist Janine Bennett said in cross-examination that the prosecution’s claim of a two billion-to-one likelihood of DNA on Patrick’s jeans being a mix of the girl’s and Patrick’s, was not valid if you allowed for the possibility of a third person being involved.
Mr Percy said it was the only calculation PathWest did on the samples and it ignored the possibility of a third contributor found by Dr McDonald.
After a three-week trial before Judge Philip Eaton, the jury found Patrick not guilty of four counts of aggravated sexual penetration without consent, one count of deprivation of liberty and one count of aggravated indecent assault.
Mr C~~~ defended continuing with the trial, saying there had been some corroboration of the girl’s story by other witnesses and the jury’s 10-hour deliberation supported the view that there were serious issues to consider.
Patrick admitted in court that he had lied about not ever speaking to the girl. He acknowledged in late November that he had had some innocent, non-sexual social contact with the girl on March 30.
He told the court that after seeing the girl at Joondalup train station and talking to her for a while at Central Park, he exchanged phone numbers with her and went home.
In court, police conceded they had not followed best practice in the case.
Various officers said that the Central Park scene was left unguarded from 1.25am on the night, it was a week before it was searched, and the same officers had visited the homes of the girl and the accused which allowed for contamination of evidence.
The male DNA found in the girl’s underwear was not identified by PathWest as not belonging to Patrick because it was excluded under PathWest’s reporting levels.
The trial in the District Court cost taxpayers about $90,000 and has left Mr Waring demanding answers to the failings in the justice system, citing flaws in the police investigation, delays in PathWest testing and its interpretation levels.
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/innocent-boys-jail-nightmare/story-e6frg12c-1111113259916
He did an AMA on reddit which is worth a read about his experience in jail for that year where he got the s~~~ beat out of him regularily:
http://www.reddit.com/r/AMA/comments/2qm8o8/i_am_the_15yo_guy_who_was_falsely_accused_of_rape/
Then this on the other hand:
Intern’s $23 million payday after being slut-shamed by Wall Street CEO
A WOLF of Wall Street has to cough up $23 million for sexually harassing and then trashing online his pretty Swedish underling, a Manhattan jury has ruled.
Plaintiff Hanna Bouveng, 25, scored the massive payday after filing suit against her married former boss, Benjamin Wey, the 43-year-old CEO of New York Global Group.
The big award came from punitive damages, with the federal jury handing Bouveng a total of $20 million for defamation that included Wey smearing her on his Webzine after their breakup and emailing her father a vicious note when he found another man in her bed.
Bouveng also landed $650,000 in compensatory damages for sexual harassment that ranged from Wey openly panting over her at the office to pressuring her to sleep with him. When she finally fell into bed with him, he lasted just 2 minutes, she said.
Jurors awarded Bouveng another $1.95 million to compensate her for Wey’s defamation.
The four-man, four-woman jury was upset by the trial’s intense and graphic testimony.
“It was a pretty disturbing trial. I think everybody was troubled by the nature of the case,” said the jury foreman.
A female juror bashed Wey for defaming Bouveng.
“We hope it will make companies and individuals think twice before personally defaming someone else,” the female juror said of their award.
“We felt she was hurt in everything that came out on social media and in the media.”
Asked whether she would spend a night in a hotel room with Wey — as Bouveng testified she was pressured into doing on multiple business trips — the juror smirked and said, “No comment!”
Bouveng’s suit had sought a total of over $1 billion.
The jury awarded Bouveng $US1 million for the retaliation she suffered after she called it quits with Wey and he fired her. And then they deliberated several more hours over punitive damages before awarding the final $20 million.
“I saw a 6-foot-tall homeless black man named James lying on her bed. The man was totally naked, dirty, totally drunk and perhaps on illegal drugs,” Wey wrote to Bouveng’s father, Nils Sundqvist, in one e-mail entered into evidence.
The pretty brunette gave a small smile to her lawyers as the initial verdict was read.
Also in court was the other man she’d been in bed with, James Chauvet — a sharp-dressed club promoter. The pair shared a long hug after the verdict.
“I think it was a good verdict,’’ Chauvet later said.
Wey, who had been in court every day for the trial with his wife, was not in the courtroom.
His lawyer, Glenn Colton, declined comment.
One of Bouveng’s lawyers, David Ratner, bashed Wey for not showing up to hear the verdict.
“He’s got b~~~~ when he’s hiding behind his stupid magazine, but when it comes to facing the jurors, he doesn’t show up,” Ratner said.
“The jury said yes, she was sexually harassed, yes, she suffered retaliation, yes, she suffered defamation — and they rejected everything Wey had to say,’’ the lawyer said. “She’s ecstatic, and we are very, very pleased.”
The kid who spent a year in jail didn’t even get an apology, let alone compensation because the Police didn’t want to admit they f~~~ed up badly as well as his treatment inside jail and even during the trial with it being heavily biased towards the supposed ‘victim’ favour with evidence submitted (he covers the bias in his AMA), or the woman who raped the passed out dude gets off scott free.
Makes my f~~~ing blood BOIL, what f~~~ing equality? Last time I checked EQUALITY MEANT EQUAL!
They want to be ‘more equal’ than men.
Topic: The loyalty of bitches.
Just warning if anyone wants to skip this post, I am just making a personal rant to blow off steam but also hopefully see some support within the manosphere because I can’t seem to find it in the real world.
So here is the situation.
A few years ago I had been unfriended by some girl I knew whom I thought was a friend, actually she gave me the cold shoulder well before this. Yes I know big deal! Move on because girls aren’t worth crying over. However it bugged me because I could not think of anything that I did to warrant such mistreatment. In fact during my blue pill days I had helped this girl at the cost of my masculinity. I was upset by this and felt that I had least been old some explanation. I was left wondering had I wronged a friend, am I not allowed to rectify any ill feelings that one may have of me? I finally got a response that I apparently was getting on her nerves with my hellos. I simply messaged twice every three years with a 5 month bridge between months and all it would have required of her was a response telling me she didn’t want to chat.
Anyways this isn’t what is bugging me but rather when I shared it with friends.
I had one male friend show his loyalty by saying some offhanded mean things, and I liked that support and because I did so some of my other female “friends”. Chimed in to admonish my behavior telling me to take a higher ground. I spend so much time being the nice guy am I not allowed to be nasty once in awhile? Why in the hell are they defending someone they didn’t even know, instead of supporting me?
In retrospect I know exactly why I was ignored and unfriended and it had nothing to do with my hellos but rather my SML I had been the nice guy and in turn was nothing but the typical chump that gets walked over by broads like her and the irony is that she had just escaped from an abusive relationship with a guy that beat her. Someone like myself isn’t worth speaking to and someone like that was worth dating?
I f~~~ing hate bitches and I am trying so hard not to weigh my own value through them and yet it makes me feel so worthless inside.
Hi Guys,
after reading here quietly every once in a while for a few weeks now, finally I feel like engaging in discussions. So before I do so I’d like to introduce myself.
I’m a 36 years old German. I studied economics and computer science, and have been working as an IT-consultant ever since. Having lived abrought in the US and Latin America as well as having backpacked throughout SE-Asia, I have gotten some cultural understanding – also about women and relationships. Wherever I went, I did get envolved with women. At the beginning, my interactions were driven by instinct, later I built my own theories which I built on what I like to call “evolutionary psychology”. Basically I ended up with a lot of theories that are basis of “games-theories” which PUAs use.
Still I kept dating girls in the form of fixed relationships, which I found the most comfortable way for me. Also from an emotional point of view. At this point I have to add, that from my 10 months stay during highschool times plus my ongoing contacts with my old mates I got the feeling, that women are slightly more bitchy in the US and Canada, and also jurisdiction seems to be less favorable for men. When I read through the posts here, people rather expect to be sued for rape and whatnot, for no reason, which is something that would create quite some outrage in my home country.
For example: When a man gets devorced he cannot be forced to pay for his wife as easy any more. He will have to be forced to py child support though. Prostiution is legal in Germany as is known. This really makes sex a way smaller deal. There is no reason to make a clown out of oneselve in a bar buying drinks to some chick who will then take her golden vagina home with herself. Men can just pay their 50-100 bucks and buy their sex somewhere else.
Also in German culture it’s part of the culture, that women pay their own way. At least many women do it, and they do it with pride. When I get to know women, I pay for dinner, but when they repeatedly don’t pay in return, I either call em on that behavior, if I like them, if not – which is more frequently the case, I just let em go. Still women everywhere have tendencies to tie to men. I have found that women get exploited by their children, while women exploit their man. It’s just like a tomatoe plant that dies in fall while pushing her last ressources into the ripening tomatoe. That’s nature.
Personally I ended my last relationship with a german / Russian woman mix. She was cooking dinner for me washed my cloths. She dressed sexy, she was doing many of those things that some MGTOWs here require. But then she gave her best to take over all of my life. She put pressure on me to join every singe family party of hers. People would continue to speak russian there so it was boring to me. Also she would be more then distracted by her nephew and niece while we were there. So she would kiss those disgusting bugger-noses instead of me. Unfortunately I gave in to joining those events for too long. The reason was that they were really interesting and thus enjoyable to me in the beginning. Through women I have gotten many deep insights into foreign societies in the past. Finally I resisted letting her rule my life any more, told her I never ever want a kid from her, and after that she left me.
What really struck me, was that all those Russian-German men were total family slaves. Her father had gone to the basement, hanging out in the garage in his spare time, while her mother reigned the living room. But it was him who brought twice the wage home as his wife.
Her brother married the worst bitch while I was with her. She had gotten impregnated after 3 months of relationship. That was after he had lost half of his belongings to his ex wife. Still he married this even worse one. Really creepy to me is the fact that my ex said: “he needs that. He likes to be the provider to feel important. While her brothers fat bitch once tried to shame me for not willing to support my lazy girlfriend financially “you just don’t want to take responsibility”.
Her sister has 2 kids. That womans husband works in a lower management position at a great German automotive manufacturer, and makes good money. She didn’t work for years after giving birth to her kids, always blaming him that she had given up her “career” for her family. A career that she had never really started anyways.
The experience of her being so captative to me really got me stop wanting another relationship for now. So I spent the winter working while digesting the pain of getting away from her. Recently I spend my time reading MGTOW and relationship related things, which helps me sort my thoughts. Besides that I follow my own passions. Already 2 years ago I had quit my old job, making me a less interesting as a provider. I now earn exactly enough for my own needs. My garden and the lil (crappy) house is payed off, so is my old rusty car. I only work less than half of the year working as a freelancer for money. The rest of the year I work on that lil house repair the car by myself, or push my garden towards self sufficiency. If I feel like it, I leave to the tropics in the winter. And all of this I get to do within the brotherhood of men that live closeby and have similar interests.
I am really happy to have found this community since I always feld like a person driving the opposite direction on a road. Even those guys I gang out with are still pretty purple minded. After a while I started wondering: “who is the wrong way driver here”? So thanks for sharing your thoughts.
So, there was a female that I used to deal with a few years ago. We used to hang out regularly, but she disappeared for a few years and recently popped back up into the picture.
Back during the time we used to hang out together, she would mention all the time about how smart I was and how much further ahead I should be in life and how I should have a house on the ritziest side of town and how I should be driving a luxury car.
These “you’re so smart” comments were made on the premise of me already having a really good job and I was working on getting all of my ducks in a row and cleaning up my life (financially) from stupid female driven decisions I made in my 20s. Also, I was already MGTOW at the time I was dealing with this particular female and was doing things on my own accord as far as getting my life together because I knew my situation better than anyone else and if it didn’t make sense, I didn’t do it.
Since I lived in a decent apartment, she didn’t push the house thing as much, but she really pushed the idea of me having a luxury car. When I mentioned to her that I didn’t think it made sense to drive a luxury car while living in an apartment, her response was something to the effect of “everyone needs reliable transportation”. I am shaking my head as I type this out………
Anyway, I continued to stay in my apartment and kept driving my old car with over 350,000 miles on it and it broke down on me one weekend and in addition to this, I had issues with my pickup truck so I couldn’t drive either of my vehicles. We had plans to meet up for dinner that weekend and I sent her a text asking her to come pick me up because both of my vehicles had issues. Needless to say, I never got a response from her and in addition to this, she disappeared for good after mentioning both of my vehicles had problems.
I ended up reaching out to a mutual friend (another female) to come pick me up so that I could go to the auto parts store to get the parts I needed to get my car up and going while I was waiting on the part to come in for my truck. The mutual friend came over and took me everywhere I needed to go. The mutual friend pointed out how that particular female was on the shallow side and was all about guys with money and status (even though she didn’t have it herself).
Well, time passed and I got another job………and this one was the one that put me into the big leagues as far as my career was/is concerned. I finally got rid of the old car I had (as I had privately planned to do so) and bought a brand new car. Still wasn’t a luxury car, but it was a nice one. And I bought another used car as a daily driver to keep the miles off my new car. I somehow think the mutual friend mentioned all of this to her at some point because the mutual friend had a relative that had been at the company for over 20 years and she also saw how things progressed with me over the years.
Fast forward a few years and out of the blue, that same aforementioned mutual friend sent me a text stating that the female I used to hang out with wanted me to call her because she needed a favor dealing with one of my areas of expertise.
The mutual friend thought that I wouldn’t want to talk to the chic, but I went on and told the mutual friend to send me her number and I called the chic. So, after getting in touch with this chic, she told me her sob story about taking in her ex that got out of jail (presumably an ex drug dealer) and how she lost everything behind her ex (including her business), had health issues as a result of depression, having to start over again, has bad credit as a result of her ex, etc.
Since I knew I wasn’t going to do anything with her anyway due to the stunt she pulled when both of my vehicles had broken down a few years back, I went on and stayed in touch with her. And this is extremely petty on my part, but I knew I was about to make some moves, so I wanted to keep her around and underhandedly rub it in her face a bit to see what happens………
Last week, she reached out to me for another favor (she paid me and took me to dinner afterwards) and during the course of talking to her, I mentioned that I was in the process of closing on a house in the city and after I close on that house in the city, I’m going to be buying a few acres out in the country and eventually make that my off grid weekend getaway. Side note: I’ll be posting on this in another thread later on.
While we were riding out for me to do what I agreed to do, I offered to show her the house in the city that I’m closing on, so I took her by the house and her mouth fell open and her whole attitude changed (I think the 3 car garage might have done it), so I already had an idea of what was going through her mind.
Fast forward to earlier this week, I got a text asking if I needed boxes and help packing my stuff. Mind you, this chic has never offered to help me on anything and left my ass hanging before getting back in contact with her. At this point, (in my mind) she is clearly plotting to make a move to find herself as a permanent fixture inside of my new house, but that s~~~ sure as hell isn’t going to happen with her or anyone for that matter.
Out of curiosity, I’m just going to play naïve and see how far she’ll go for something that she had nothing to do with acquiring. She has absolutely nothing to offer me and is phonier than the real “faux” pearls they used to show on TV. This, I know to be fact.
I don’t have a reason for posting this other than to provide more proof about what everyone else on here already knows and has been saying for years.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
