Search Results for 'Trump'

[sidecarParticipant]

bobphilo wrote:

Sidecar, your views on Trump has restored my faith in the political wisdom and common sense of members of this forum. He is nothing but a con man and reality star who prospers on the stupidity of the public.
He inherited his fortune from his father and bankrupted 4 casinos putting thousands of workers out of jobs. He ripped off several others with his phony Trump University and is under investigation by the New York Attorney General for fraud.

And yet for all that he is STILL a better choice than Sanders or Clinton.

bobphilo wrote:

Not to mention that he would kill the families of terrorists, including women and children.

Because terrorists have such consideration for the families, women and children included, of other people…

Menorahman wrote:

You know, I said a whole lot more than the snippets that are being responded to.

And there’s a lot more to an iceberg than just the tip, but it’s still all the same ice.

[bobphiloParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

Menorahman wrote:

Socialism is where we should be heading,

Menorahman wrote:

Trump is our last hope.

Unbef~~~inglievable.

This guy is all over the map with the self contradictions. I can’t figure out if he’s (?) a troll, a woman, really really young (and parroting the wrong teachers), really bad at English (is this a google translation I’m reading?), or just really really stupid throwing out buzzwords he doesn’t understand.

Sidecar, your views on Trump has restored my faith in the political wisdom and common sense of members of this forum. He is nothing but a con man and reality star who prospers on the stupidity of the public.
He inherited his fortune from his father and bankrupted 4 casinos putting thousands of workers out of jobs. He ripped off several others with his phony Trump University and is under investigation by the New York Attorney General for fraud.
Not to mention that he would kill the families of terrorists, including women and children.

[sidecarParticipant]

Menorahman wrote:

Socialism is where we should be heading,

Menorahman wrote:

Trump is our last hope.

Unbef~~~inglievable.

This guy is all over the map with the self contradictions. I can’t figure out if he’s (?) a troll, a woman, really really young (and parroting the wrong teachers), really bad at English (is this a google translation I’m reading?), or just really really stupid throwing out buzzwords he doesn’t understand.

[Big BossParticipant]

Hombre Libre wrote:

Check out this article from USA TODAY:

Trump hits Clinton for ‘off the reservation’ remark

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/05/02/trump-hits-clinton-off-reservation-remark/83820070/

This criminal c~~~ might as well have said “off the plantation” !!

Have a good week my brothers!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Menorahman wrote:

Trump is our last hope.

This is Men Going Their OWN WAY. Are you one? Because you are placing an awful lot of faith and hope on the winner of an election. When it really doesn’t matter who is in office, and it never did. The presidency is much bigger than any one man. How different would the last 4 years of your life have been with a different president?

Voting is actually…. giving consent to be governed.

“Trump is our last hope” and “socialism is where we should be headed” are virtually ass backwards values of a Man Going His Own Way. You’re queuing up to follow the leader.

SO… why are you here?

To lecture everyone on how right woman are about how too many men are pathetic?

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MenorahmanSpectator]

I didn’t mean a literal socialism, that’d be silly. Those are just buzz words to me now.

Most of us want a utopia, and it can be achieved by renovating our system.

Trump is our last hope.

[MenorahmanSpectator]

The US is showing all the signs of Rome before its collapse, and Rome was around for 1000 years or so. That’s what happens when the top 1% gives no f~~~s about anything but more money.

The sad thing is, occupy wall street had it right, but people have the attention span of a gnat these days, so the media delegitimized the movement and then went into divisiveness overdrive…and people bought it.

Now everyone hates each other. Everything is racist, sexist, etc. I honestly believe that Trump is our last hope. The media calls him racist because the top 1% are worried. In fact, he is the ONLY person I’ve heard say that we need to be all inclusive, and that means everyone. Meanwhile the elite want to continue their divide and conquer because it benefits them.

[Anonymous]

Trump nailed the elephant in the room of her statement ( but no political protest comments from anyone else about it )

Trump on Monday suggested that the remarks also were unfair to men and said he and Clinton are treated differently by the media on such things.
“If I made that statement about women, then there’d be front page headlines,” he said. “I think it’s a very nasty statement to men and if I made that statement it would be a big, big story.”

It just goes to show how desensitized society and men have become to demeaning statements about men when the usual male derogatory shaming is shoveled out by a woman.

All the media cared about was the indigenous phrase “Off the reservation”,,,and not the whole insulting statement to men.
No one even gave that a passing thought, except Trump (Daddy)

[HitmanParticipant]

She’s as dirty as a politician can possibly be.
Trump is right, if he made a remark like that about women it would be a huge deal.

Check out this article from USA TODAY:

Trump hits Clinton for ‘off the reservation’ remark

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/05/02/trump-hits-clinton-off-reservation-remark/83820070/

This criminal c~~~ might as well have said “off the plantation” !!

Have a good week my brothers!

[finallyfreeParticipant]

Doc Fenderson nailed it pretty good. Nothing more I can really say except – Are you effin serious? Why on Gods green earth would you bring some eye candy into a small business that you obviously want to succeed?? Nothing good can come from this. I think you just want a hot lady around because you are the owner and you know she would be kissing your ass regularly, eventually having sex with you ( I understand that need, but….). You even wrote ” I kept women out for good reasons”. So the fact that she is hot trumps all the good reasons to keep women out?? Long sighhhhh. You can’t be serious. Lmao

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant]

Hillary is a god-damn lying c~~~. I screenshoted this post on /pol/ before it got deleted.

Why is she asking for donations? Doesn’t she have around $250 million for Super PACs and other donations?

WHAT THE F~~~ IS HAPPENING HERE?

Trump is budgeting himself, even though he’s a billionaire. But this bitch, THIS F~~~ING BITCH, has had a timeline of scandals and government/tax money she took for herself, then she gets THIS MUCH money in donations, and wants to ask for more donations for the “woman card”, and baiting people to donate.

F~~~ this bitch. I’m not voting for her in the slightest.

People want to talk about money not being the factor to winning the election, when Clinton is just proving them wrong.

And stuff here that I mentioned.

[Blue SkiesParticipant]

the unfortunate truth is……she is the most likely to be the next president of america…….Do you really think most women will vote for Trump?

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[John DoeParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Hi JD, good to see ya! Chips are the future for a one world government, No more shifting monetary exchange rates, baseline pay, medical, housing, everything contained within a chip.

\

You to Tower, along with everyone else here. What I will be interested to see is the “lifestyles” of those who refuse the chip. Will they (we) be rounded up and imprisoned/tortured/killed? Will they (we) be left in the streets/remaining wilderness to forage for whatever is available? That is the question I want to know. Also if one owns property, how will they pay their taxes? You see where I am going.

Now there are some sociologists, I cannot remember the names or the studies but you can google them, that pointed out along with a neo-feudal system (state corporate powers in control as kings) will also be a reemergence of “neo-tribalism” where people will band together (like gangs but not limited to young men only) to survive. Is that the future? Will these tribes be allowed to survive on their own without a chip? Or will they be squashed? There is a whole host of questions to be answered.

RoyDal wrote:

I am afraid you’re right. There is always somebody who wants us to sacrifice ourselves for their cause. If they have the means, then they will try to force us under their thumbs.

I agree and with the digitization of everything, which reduces life to nothing but a cheap commodity/sensory experience, the younger generations (maybe mine too) will not think twice about taking a chip or contemplate the gross violation of human dignity that occurs.

Anonymous wrote:

Apps for phones have excessive amount of permissions, not explained why.

You hit a critical point which should be expanded further on a more abstract level, with the general secular/economic/religious/cultural/etc. confusion out there people will be more than happen just to “sign on” to whatever will alleviate the “chaos”.

Anonymous wrote:

A lot of workplace uses RFID keys now

Try the skin:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31042477

Anonymous wrote:

Yes it is sort of chaos.

With the advance weaponry, it almost has to be fought as a small level until somebody flips the f~~~ out and launches a nuke.

Hitman wrote:

if money is all electronically transferred via a chip,
how will the lobbyists bribe senators without a briefcase full of CASH ?

There is always a bigger greedier fish. Not to get too far off topic, but with the promotion of Trump and Sanders one can obviously see a push past the senatorial system of old and right to the people who a quire the money on their own terms. It is like getting rid of the senate, because it takes bribes, and hiring the people who gave them the bribes.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant]

Hitman wrote:

i think she MAY have burnt them off smoking crack years ago..
whoopi is ONE F~~~ED UP BITCH..
ugly as sin to boot..
……….how do you p~~~ off Martha Stewart twice ?
f~~~ her in the ass , then wipe your dick off on her curtains !!
last one for tonight .. good night brother ..
hasta manana ..

I think she smoked weed, not crack. Either way, could explain what happened.

But Whoopi is the joke. She threatened to leave for Canada if Trump becomes president, and disrespected Ben Carson, a man who has helped more lives than she has and will ever help.

[numbCruncherParticipant]

If Trump wins, he says he will build a wall to keep Mexican men out.

If Clinton wins, the wall will have to be built to keep American men IN.

Either way, that wall is getting built.

Ironically, they’ll probably have to use Mexican labour to do it.

You say "love is a temple, love the higher law" ...You ask me to enter, but then you make me crawl. And I can't be holding on to what you got, when all you got is hurt

Hi guys,

Been a while since I logged in, been pretty busy.

I recently went to a Philosophy in Pubs meeting, the title of which was “Is there a Crisis in Masculinity?”

I was naturally interested, and decided to attend, thinking that it would be almost exclusively men. How wrong I was! About 40 people, evenly split amongst men and women. The compere introduced the topic, and gave his anecdote about having asked all his associates this title question, to gauge their response. He said that almost all of them said yes, there was a crisis, but no one was talking about it. So he gave a few intro leads as to why this might be, some of which stuck in my throat (feminism not reaching men, etc.), and then asked us to group around tables to discuss for 45 mins. He did a quick straw-poll of the participants to see how many agreed (with no discussion or definition) that there was a crisis in masculinity. This blew me away –

less than 50% of the men thought there was.
more than 90% of the women thought there was.

I found myself on a table where I was the only man, with 2 lesbians, and 3 hetero women. It was fun to hear their opinions about patriarchy and feminism, and then gently remind them that the studies and evidence actually showed that women were just as bad as men, and then hear them agree with me! HAHA!

Specifically – in the introduction, another anecdote from the compere was his observations of men’s competitive behaviour, in his domain in the swimming lanes. He observed lots of Alpha tricks going on, and when a woman entered the lane, she quickly left again, as she couldn’t stand the games. The women around my table latched onto this as evidence that men couldn’t just be nice to each other. I reminded them that women compete every Saturday night, to which they all nodded sagely, and told me (as if in secret) that every single one of them competes to get the most compliments, but whoever wins is hated by everyone else. One of the women openly stated that “getting dressed up and going out” was all about HER, and no one else. The others nodded. Without a hint of shame, they told me that dressing up was an entirely self-centred event, designed to extract compliments out of friends and strangers. The women went on to say that they had had personal experiences of being in female-only workplaces, and how bitchy that was, but when a man entered, they all completely changed and fawned over him, competing for attention.

Point proven.

Next we discussed Domestic Violence, which of course they had particular views on. Unfortunately for them, being a man, and a DV survivor, I trumped all their inbuilt victim-status programming (due to the event being about MEN), and they had to listen to what I said (no victim-shaming, remember!). When I pointed out that research had showed that if women were given excess estrogen, the same proportion of them got violent, as men given excess testosterone, and how that explained why DV rates were identical, and also explained why a proportion of women found the estrogen-only contraceptive pill problematic, they all nodded sagely again!

Another point proven.

The two lesbians had decided that the reason that there was a crisis in masculinity was that women had been “liberated” by feminism, and could show “masculine” traits, but men had not been liberated, and did not feel free to show “feminine” traits. I carefully countered their argument, by showing that although women say that they want men to show their feelings, what men have found is that women are instantly turned off when they do! So men know that they don’t get laid if they show their feelings, and thus are never going to be “touched by feminism”. There was general nodding of agreement.

45 minutes is not enough time to discuss all issues we face, and even though there were at least 6 different groups within the room, collectively we still missed stuff. Other tables covered suicides, homelessness, education, lack of support centres, and many other things.

We concluded that there most definitely is a Crisis in Masculinity, but no one knows how to deal with it. The general population seem to know it’s there (women especially), but no one is talking about it, and no one knows what to do.

Currently it is dangerous to be a man.

Stay safe, my brothers!

Quietly.

[ResidentEvil7Participant]

If she thinks her only qualification to be president is being a woman, then she has nothing to run on. Because if that’s her best message, she’s got nothing to prove to America she can lead and defend us and help out the working people. She screams (she always screams) “Wouldn’t you love to see a woman as president for a change” while she’s got her hands up in the air. Every time that screaming woman comes on TV, I just mute her and wait until she’s done yelling at the microphone. I wouldn’t want anyone as president who acts like it’s always that time of the month for her. How would she deal with ISIS; nag and scream them to death?

Speaking of which, what is the deal with liberals always screaming and getting in people’s faces to get their point across? Every time I hear a Democrat talking, they’re always loud and flailing their hands around.

Again, if she thinks being a woman is the best she can come up with, then she doesn’t deserve a vote. Right now the country is going broke, people are struggling with work, ISIS is still threatening us, and I want someone who can prove to turn things around and that is why Trump gets my vote. I won’t vote for someone just because they’re a woman. I vote for credentials, not image.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[ConstantineParticipant]

What the hell’s it for? Is it just for the election? Or is it some kind of card that will act like a senior citizen’s card, getting women reductions at certain places?

When Obama was elected, did he issue a “black card”? How do you think people would’ve reacted if he had?

I have mixed feelings about Obama. But when he made it to office, I can still remember his speech. He said, “For those of you whose respect I have yet to earn, I will be your president too.” If Hilary gets elected (heaven forbid), is she going to say something similar? “I will be everybody’s president”?

Because how the f~~~ can she expect people to believe that when she’s only catering to women???

I feel so bad for Americans right now. Because I’m not that crazy about Trump either. So it just means that when the time comes, the choice is literally reduced to the arsehole – or the other arsehole.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant]

He thinks Trump is racist.

That turned me off completely for him.