Why feminism is good for men ! Part One

[Anonymous 11]

I got you Dave. Jan’s cool, but he is some autistic per his admission and has some trouble sniffing out sarcasm. I’m extremely sarcastic so I’ve begun to add the /sarc tag to my sarcasm to help our brothers out as well as p~~~ off feminist and mangina lurkers more effectively.

I double dog dare any non-Chad male to attempt any of this “equality” stuff Mr. Dave outlined for us and report back to the board on the results. Prior to doing this, please PM me your mailing address so I can send you a basic first aid kit.

I f~~~ing love feminism. The value of pussy has plummeted to zero. STDs and bastard children are everywhere. Women are no longer feminine. Mangina is the new standard for men. Slut marches are all the rage. Top it all off with female led relationships with a sprinkle of androcide, and we have the makings of very solid cultural foundations. /sarc

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DocF’s comment just inspired a thought ….

I don’t really care if “feminism is good for men” ( even when it benefits men ) because it’s simply not good for anyone. The fact that the “rules” can be easily flipped around to p~~~ feminists off, makes all of it’s bulls~~~ values an extreme joke.

A man can easily enjoy the f~~~ out of it and shove “equality” right back in her face because the feminist was brainwashed to think “gender equality” is achievable.

Go out there and tell a feminist that “all women are the same” and watch the expression on her face. That’s what “equality” really means and when their own values are shoveled back at them, they end up eating their own.

A couple of days ago a big fat land whale pig feminist made the tragic mistake of announcing that a tranny is “not really a woman”. That’s “CONTROVERSIAL” to those f~~~ing feminist idiots.

Even if you swallow all the bulls~~~, “equality” is a task that has an end. However, if feminism ever achieves this imaginary task, thousands of know-nothing, over-educated bitches will be out of a job faster than their cats will resort to eating one another to stay alive in the real world. Feminism isn’t about achieving anything. It’s about staying in business.

Feminism is about creating more feminist problems.
And that’s not good for anyone. Especially MEN. Because men are BUSY.

IRL, it’s not even worth talking about and I reject any utterance of the word. If I hear “feminism” used in a sentence, I excuse myself from the conversation immediately. “lol I don’t speak to feminists”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

DaveV wrote:

I don’t hate feminism, in fact I think, if anything, it reduces the world’s population, saves men from getting married

That’s a circular argument – marriage today is horrible because of feminism. Thus it doesn’t “save” men from marriage. Marriage would be perfectly ok but-for feminism. I doubt that men in 1820 needed MGTOW.

[DaveVParticipant 450]

surfdude12 wrote:

DaveV wrote:

I don’t hate feminism, in fact I think, if anything, it reduces the world’s population, saves men from getting married

That’s a circular argument – marriage today is horrible because of feminism. Thus it doesn’t “save” men from marriage. Marriage would be perfectly ok but-for feminism. I doubt that men in 1820 needed MGTOW.

Valid point SurfDude, it’s also a badly written sentence on my part.

What I had in my mind as a point, as others and yourself indicate, is that feminism is essentially imposing unfair rules which favours women, and screws up decent guys (via the courts). It has nothing to do with equality. Consequently, they will put off future generations of men from ever getting married or even having kids with a woman, ie MGTOW. The population of the (developed) world will ultimately decline. I was trying to be clever (and kinda failed !) with the ‘tongue in cheek’ comment that,’this will save men from getting married’. Marriage is what feminists want, because the western legal system f~~~s the guy up totally once he does. I was thinking of adding the point (in Part Two) that this would also lead to an economic contraction as, guys will wake up and realize that indebting themselves for their entire lives is stupid (i.e. mortgages, car loans, kids college/university fees etc). Since the entire fractional banking system relies on people being in debt, the money supply will dry up.

But its not just marriages this ‘ism’ has messed up. I now have to be careful at work as well, as HR sent me on a ‘sensitivity’ course a year ago for being abit too direct and ‘challenging’ new EU ‘Equality Laws’…well their statement was ‘ do that course or get sacked’ ultimatum. I am not allowed to swear or use expletives, and cannot disagree with these new rules, even if I make logical arguments to why it’s not practical to implement them. And according the T&C on my employment contract, this applies to work, my private emails if addressed to work colleagues. Social media is excluded, unless it makes headline news, and I am named and/or the company believes it tarnishes their image. Hence my reaction has been to be more indirect and make ‘tongue in cheek’ comments. Saying a certain rule is bollocks, would have me up for disciplinary punishment and my contract would be terminated.
Feminism hasn’t just screwed up marriages, it’s pretty much screwing up everything…and the rate it’s going, humanity as a whole is doomed….but at least that would keep the environmentalist happy.

The only option is MGTOW. Leave them to the giant hole they are digging themselves for.

However I am gonna hold off new posts for the time being, and read abit more here in the forums.

D. G. I. Don't. Get. Involved. (Be happy, and stress not)

[DaveVParticipant 450]

Keymaster wrote:

A man can easily enjoy the f~~~ out of it and shove “equality” right back in her face because the feminist was brainwashed to think “gender equality” is achievable.

Totally agree with you. I can give you several examples in my work place, where we were forced to make impractical changes because we had to demonstrate we were implementing ‘gender equality’ laws. But most my bosses were too scared to challenge it. When I challenged it (using reasoned logical arguments), I was told to go on a ‘sensitivity awareness course’..or be sacked. In the end, the company didn’t implement the changes because it would cost too much, but wanted to give the appearance they had on paper.

Keymaster wrote:

Go out there and tell a feminist that “all women are the same” and watch the expression on her face.

Outstanding point ! Gonna use that one !

Keymaster wrote:

A couple of days ago a big fat land whale pig feminist made the tragic mistake of announcing that a tranny is “not really a woman”. That’s “CONTROVERSIAL” to those f~~~ing feminist idiots.

That was one of the gender equality problems we had. We had a 25 year old, normally unmanned offshore rig. It had one urinal, and one cubicle toilet (WC i think the term is for our cousins in the US). it was a rust bucket, run down, everything was dirty, grimy as s~~~. It was hazardous. I was told to modify the design to deal with all the listed genders the EU announced we have (which is apparently four ??!!!). I argued there is only one urinal and one cubicle, how the f~~~ am I going to design for that? No woman was ever going to go out there. If I made the cubicle a woman only, wtf were the guys gonna use ?? When they started to tell me we had to put in a ramp for disabled access, I thought wtf…we are 100 km offshore, where the f~~~ is someone in wheelchair gonna come from. They can’t be part of the maintenance crew as you have to do a survival course which requires you to simulate a helicopter crash. So I did what I was told to do…had to design for 3 more cubicles, plus a new module, plus water supply, power etc….costs came to GBP£175,000 (USD$220,000). I gave to the management….they said ahh it’s not economically viable and decided not to do it…i swear the workplace is just going crazy

D. G. I. Don't. Get. Involved. (Be happy, and stress not)

[Author]

Posts