Why didn't women evolve?

[2muchtruthSpectator 130]

Hitman wrote:

they evolved..
from loving mothers and wives,
into today’s monsters..
toxic vampires looking to suck the wallets clean from any man they can…
then swing up the branch to their next victim.

this ! i’m convinced women weren’t always this bad, i could be wrong but i don’t think so

my theory is the government had alot to do with it after ww2 ….

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Russky wrote:

At first I thought that @diamond was a clam trying to provoke s~~~, but after reading his input, it doesn’t look like that. It actually look like he knows what he’s talking about. Can’t wait for the introduction, and welcome
P.S.: Piece of advice though- try to not to sound like a misogynist – you don’t want to jeopardize the MGTOW label and every single man here

As for sounding like a misogynist we should not really care all that much really unless he starts to advocate the beating of women (not in self defense or sexual) to keep them in line and s~~~ like that to try to ruin our name even more then the femc~~~s already do.

I am waiting for his introduction to see if he turns out legit or not.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[2muchtruthSpectator 130]

Russky wrote:

P.S.: Piece of advice though- try to not to sound like a misogynist – you don’t want to jeopardize the MGTOW label and every single man here

ummmmmmmmm didn’t that already happen when you let women and puas join the group ? because from where i sit ” you can’t be a man for life crew when you got a white woman like karen telling you what to do”

don’t even get mad… it’s true… it’s true…

i could do a entire rant on ”mgtow puas” but what’s the point ? people will just deflect and make excuses for them…

but what i will say is.. if im out there f~~~ing women every other day i’m not going to join some ”sexist” website that does nothing but trash women..

sorry but if i was having sex with women i’d have more respect for them than that…

i can say what i want because i’m a virgin, i was never in the game, and i morally disagree with it sooooo much i’d rather be alone…..so when i say women are whores not only do you know i mean it… it has credibility..

mgtow puas are like black people joining the nazi’s… s~~~ makes no sense to me… if i hate something i aint having sex with it… and if you do love women why are you a mgtow.. go be a pua and call it a day 🙂

i’ll never understand why people feel the need to be included in everything.. it’s pathetic.. can’t single guys have a group where we talk s~~~ about women… is that asking toooooo much or something ?

why are ya’ll so threatened by that ? scared the truth might get out about women and there silly little games ???

/rant (btw everything i said here also goes for the muslim issue, if they really are decent people you have no reason to silence the right wing because the left/ muslims will prove us wrong in end…right !? )

that’s how you know women and muslims are full of s~~~.. they need to silence people because what they believe is dogs~~~ and can’t be defended…otherwise they’d let me speak / make a dick of myself / and go about their day.. .the second you silence people is the second you’re saying ” i’m guilty and have stuff to hide”

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Diamond wrote:

What an utterly ridiculous claim.

Gnostic wrote:

Throughout history men has been sacrificing themselves to keep women safe and comfortable.

Are you not aware that in Ancient Greece women were not allowed to eat as much as men? Are you not aware that in Indo-Aryan culture women are supposed to eat the leftovers after their husbands? Have you not seen animals like dogs and lions pushing aside females when it’s eating time??

Men have not and should not give two s~~~s about “keeping women safe” unless they are producing our children. Apart from that their life has no value.

“One hundred women are not worth a single testicle.” Confucius

“Women were made either to be wives or prostitutes… If a woman dies from child bearing, it matters not. Let her die” Martin Luther

Widows have always been outcast from society, or in certain cases, burned to death. Whores have also always lived like the scum of the earth and outcast.

Traditionally women who fall out of line are supposed to be burned to death, stoned to the ground, executed etc. Wife beating only became a crime in the late-19th century and in places like Ancient Rome husbands were allowed to put their wives/daughters to death.

Female infanticide has also been common and son preference has prevailed. Women are not supposed to have a enjoyable life they are supposed to be confined to the house to produce children/serve men and beaten when required. If things go bad they DO NOT get to eat as much and/or get the worst quality of food available.

anonymousyam wrote:

Women had to evolve in a different way then men had to.

Women had to evolve to become better at manipulation then men. Because without the men the women would have died and could never have had children but without the women the society created by the men would go in ruins once the last man had died. So that forced us together for the past 6 million years or so of human existence.

Within the time women evolved a better ability to manipulate and the men become stronger and smarter then them and mgtow is just the men realizing that we are stronger and smarter then them so manipulation has less of an effect on us then your average man.

No they’re not “just different” they’re genetically less evolved. Thus they are much closer to chimpanzees and other primate ancestors. When the human genome was successfully mapped it was found that we have 98.7% identical genes to chimps, with the only exception being the Y-DNA which is over 30% more evolved.

As for being evil, telling lies etc. is concerned they are immoral just like filthy animals!!

What is the condition of Ancient Greece and Indo-Aryan?
They are very harsh just like some third world country today.

The men have to keep their strength to hunt and protect the family, so women are not allowed to eat as much as men because food is scarce. And in these times, men will die first protecting or providing for their family.
Considering the condition, women always get a better deal just like the third world country now. If the village is pillaged by another village, the women is rape and abuse but the men dies.

Like the Boko Haram thing where the media keep screaming how bad it is for the girls to be rape and abused, and ignore all the boys killed. Like Hillery that screech how war is bad for the widows but ignore all the men die in war. You ignore worst things that a man have to suffer through and just concentrate on what women suffer.

And no human behavior are not like Lions or dogs, they are more like Chimpanzee, but that is not an absolute of human behavior. You cannot say because a cat behave like this hence it is an indication of a dog behavior.

And yes women in olden times are put to death when they do a great wrong, just like the men. Our Ancestor see the bulls~~~ of women, so they have their rules then. But historically, women always have it better then the men.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[BigDParticipant 3024]

anonymousyam wrote:

BigD wrote:

We have salty tears
We have webbing on our feet and hands
Our babies can swim at birth
Our body hair is streamlined for swimming
Our feet are not made for this Earth
Our skeletal system is not made for this Earth
We can breath independently of our legs when running
There is nothing about us that has adapted to our surroundings
We adapt our surroundings to us
Our ligaments are attached to our skeletal system wrong (We’re weak physically for our weight)
Our eye sight is not that keen
Our hearing is not that keen
Our offspring is absolutely helpless

And why would a God make all this bulls~~~ about us then? it is illogical to think a Deity would put all of these errors in then Evolution would. It makes more sense that Evolution did all of this to us rather then a God unless God has a dark sense of humor.

The point is, if we evolved all men would look like Arnold Schwarzenegger and all the women would look like Dolly Parton. Our bodies would be more efficient and we would be a lot dumber.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

2muchtruth wrote:

Russky wrote:

P.S.: Piece of advice though- try to not to sound like a misogynist – you don’t want to jeopardize the MGTOW label and every single man here

ummmmmmmmm didn’t that already happen when you let women and puas join the group ? because from where i sit ” you can’t be a man for life crew when you got a white woman like karen telling you what to do”

don’t even get mad… it’s true… it’s true…

i could do a entire rant on ”mgtow puas” but what’s the point ? people will just deflect and make excuses for them…

but what i will say is.. if im out there f~~~ing women every other day i’m not going to join some ”sexist” website that does nothing but trash women..

sorry but if i was having sex with women i’d have more respect for them than that…

i can say what i want because i’m a virgin, i was never in the game, and i morally disagree with it sooooo much i’d rather be alone…..so when i say women are whores not only do you know i mean it… it has credibility..

mgtow puas are like black people joining the nazi’s… s~~~ makes no sense to me… if i hate something i aint having sex with it… and if you do love women why are you a mgtow.. go be a pua and call it a day

i’ll never understand why people feel the need to be included in everything.. it’s pathetic.. can’t single guys have a group where we talk s~~~ about women… is that asking toooooo much or something ?

why are ya’ll so threatened by that ? scared the truth might get out about women and there silly little games ???

/rant (btw everything i said here also goes for the muslim issue, if they really are decent people you have no reason to silence the right wing because the left/ muslims will prove us wrong in end…right !? )

that’s how you know women and muslims are full of s~~~.. they need to silence people because what they believe is dogs~~~ and can’t be defended…otherwise they’d let me speak / make a dick of myself / and go about their day.. .the second you silence people is the second you’re saying ” i’m guilty and have stuff to hide”

I don’t hate women, just like I don’t hate a snake. They just are, that is their nature. Keeping myself safe from them does not mean i hate them.

If being a virgin means what you said is valid, know that I am a virgin too. My religion told me not to have sex before marriage in my younger days, and when I am more mature to think for myself, sex failed my cost benefit ratio so I remain a virgin.

Because I am a virgin too therefore valid in your opinion, I would say you or me does not own the MGTOW label. We have no right to tell if another brother is MGTOW or not. If enough people identify as a PUA MGTOW, and all MGTOW should practice PUA, and conflict with my ideology, then I simply drop the MGTOW label since MGTOW is not an accurate description of me anymore.

I just see our PUA MGTOW brothers are taking a riskier path with less reward. (See some topic where prostitute want to be treated like a princess too.) But they will get around and evolve to higher MGTOW when they get older and see more s~~~. No need to bash them to level up immediately, they will get there eventually.

2muchtruth wrote:

i’ll never understand why people feel the need to be included in everything.. it’s pathetic.. can’t single guys have a group where we talk s~~~ about women… is that asking toooooo much or something ?

Why is there need to make people fit a label?
And what you are talking about, we are talking s~~~ about women every day as long it is true and justified. We just do not condone talking s~~~ about women that are not justified or truthful.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[Nice Guy EddieParticipant 527]

According to Borat (via a Kazakhstan government scientist), women have “brain the size of squirrel”.

Possibly the best feminist troll ever.

NGE

[~BSParticipant 3266]

women evolved to suck resources from men much much quicker

"He didn't marry until now, so he won't ever do it. Think about it, why would a man like him ever marry? It's too late to catch him. " ~some cunt

[AntipathyParticipant 4901]

Women evolved from, getting mens resources through compassion, care, and chores … to getting mens resources through offering nothing but the temporary illusion of sexual attractiveness.

They evolved into masters of manipulation, and deception.

The funny part is, now there are so many of them competing for male attention, they have to constantly try new things. I saw two girls i used to work with at my former job. One had dyed her hair bright pink, and the other steel blue. They were both trying to look like katy perry or something.

It must drive them mad there’s only so many hair styles and nail paints, only so many outfits and shoes. Then they hit the wall, and their only hope is to have a guy trapped and stuck with them before they hit 35.

[xenonParticipant 2007]

anonymousyam wrote:

And why would a God make all this bulls~~~ about us then? it is illogical to think a Deity would put all of these errors in then Evolution would. It makes more sense that Evolution did all of this to us rather then a God unless God has a dark sense of humor.

Too funny, for me my first theory of a god was god as a Marx brother. God-o Marx. The ultimate dark humor god. The poor get typhoons and other disasters and the wealthy get, well, we all know what they get.

[Buller100Participant 2189]

As has been said due to men pandering, now imagine for one minute.

Women need children they will cluck like an addict, if men withheld sex from all women who has the power ?

Western men have driven this, Muslims won’t have an inch of it.

They even get clerics making videos saying how to beat them, some African countries practice FGM to stop them wandering.

Amazing how they see women for what they are baby producers , cooks and cleaners.

[Buller100Participant 2189]

Unbelievableyetnot wrote:

They evolved as much as they had to to propagate the species. That’s all evolution cares about. If they didn’t evolve further that’s because it wasn’t required to overload the earth with humanity.

Hitman wrote:

they evolved..
from loving mothers and wives,
into today’s monsters..
toxic vampires looking to suck the wallets clean from any man they can…
then swing up the branch to their next victim.

Both spot on, in the past they would care as work was men’s work , so they cooked amd looked after kids , husband and house.

Now the fastest way to financial freedom for a women is marrying a couple of guys.

[DiamondSpectator 258]

Gnostic wrote:

…

Actually famines were pretty rare and there was plenty to eat most of the time in these societies, especially in very prosperous civilizations like the Indo-Aryan. My point is exactly that when there isn’t enough to eat, women will not eat or get the worst quality of food available.

In the event of war, men are not protecting women but they are protecting their freedom and their property (children, land, civilization, domesticated animals, baby making machines). Until feminism children were always considered the property of their fathers. As already stated, useless women are not to be given any protection and even allowed in civilization. Of course there will be no “unless” here because women are forced into marriage through arrangement or abduction.

..

Let me make a factual comment on war here, that women in power have always led to a significant increase in wars. Queens were not only more likely to attack, but also to continue wars of their predecessors.

..

Is it getting the better deal to be confined to the house for your whole life and be banned from roaming around freely… to not be allowed to choose what to do in life or with your body… to not be given an education, food when shortages occur, ownership of property, a voice in the house or public? It it getting the better deal to have your head covered the whole time in submission and live as a slave your whole life?

This is like saying oxen get the better deal because they don’t get killed in the rare event of war. That may be so but they’re still f~~~ing oxen and will be enslaved accordingly. Have men as leaders and the chances of war also decrease dramatically.

..

“For neither was man created for the woman, but woman for the man” – The Bible

“A bride serves her husband,
Just as she served her father
HER VOICE CANNOT BE HEARD
Nor can her body or shadow be seen” – Han Dynasty law (Ancient China)

“Girls are supposed to be in the custody of their father when they are children, women under the custody of their husband when married, and under the custody of her son as widows. In no circumstances is she allowed to assert herself independently.” – Indo Aryan law

..

As far as death is concerned, it’s certainly not just under extreme circumstances that women are to be put to death, but also if they fall out of line. Just a few examples:

According to Abrahamic law if a woman dares to have pre-marital sex the men of her city “shall bring out the damsel unto the entrance of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die”

As per ancient Indo-Aryan law which was only stopped in the 19th century “A virtuous woman is one who dies on the funeral pyre of her dead husband”

In traditional China women’s feet were not only broken at puberty, they were also to either live outcast as widows after their husband’s death or expected to commit suicide.

Assyrian law states “A prostitute shall not be veiled. Whoever sees a veiled prostitute shall seize her … and bring her to the palace entrance. … they shall pour hot pitch over her head”

In Ancient Egypt which was also one of the most prosperous civilizations, women who dared to commit adultery were burned to death in accordance with their scriptures.

..

Antipathy wrote:

Women evolved from, getting mens resources through compassion, care, and chores … to getting mens resources through offering nothing but the temporary illusion of sexual attractiveness.

Not at all!

They evolved to get raped, forced and abducted. As I have already made clear women have never been given resources, they have only been allowed to live like cows as long as they serve us… confined to the house.

..

Russky wrote:

At first I thought that @diamond was a clam trying to provoke s~~~, but after reading his input, it doesn’t look like that. It actually look like he knows what he’s talking about. Can’t wait for the introduction, and welcome
P.S.: Piece of advice though- try to not to sound like a misogynist – you don’t want to jeopardize the MGTOW label and every single man here

Thank you. I’m sorry I don’t want to get anyone else into trouble. It’s horrible that we are under constant threat from feminist society.

But I am a misogynist and all men should be misogynists. Women have always been hated… and rightfully so!

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[DiamondSpectator 258]

Of course we should forget these old traditions and move towards a gender equal society where women are treated equally. Both sexes should be respected.

Women’s lives have value and they should be cherished as individuals just like men. Their abilities should be honed and they should be allowed to live exactly like men.

https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/2/svg/1f642.svg

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Diamond wrote:

Gnostic wrote:

…

Actually famines were pretty rare and there was plenty to eat most of the time in these societies, especially in very prosperous civilizations like the Indo-Aryan. My point is exactly that when there isn’t enough to eat, women will not eat or get the worst quality of food available.

In the event of war, men are not protecting women but they are protecting their freedom and their property (children, land, civilization, domesticated animals, baby making machines). Until feminism children were always considered the property of their fathers. As already stated, useless women are not to be given any protection and even allowed in civilization. Of course there will be no “unless” here because women are forced into marriage through arrangement or abduction.

..

Let me make a factual comment on war here, that women in power have always led to a significant increase in wars. Queens were not only more likely to attack, but also to continue wars of their predecessors.

..

Is it getting the better deal to be confined to the house for your whole life and be banned from roaming around freely… to not be allowed to choose what to do in life or with your body… to not be given an education, food when shortages occur, ownership of property, a voice in the house or public? It it getting the better deal to have your head covered the whole time in submission and live as a slave your whole life?

This is like saying oxen get the better deal because they don’t get killed in the rare event of war. That may be so but they’re still f~~~ing oxen and will be enslaved accordingly. Have men as leaders and the chances of war also decrease dramatically.

..

“For neither was man created for the woman, but woman for the man” – The Bible

“A bride serves her husband,
Just as she served her father
HER VOICE CANNOT BE HEARD
Nor can her body or shadow be seen” – Han Dynasty law (Ancient China)

“Girls are supposed to be in the custody of their father when they are children, women under the custody of their husband when married, and under the custody of her son as widows. In no circumstances is she allowed to assert herself independently.” – Indo Aryan law

..

As far as death is concerned, it’s certainly not just under extreme circumstances that women are to be put to death, but also if they fall out of line. Just a few examples:

According to Abrahamic law if a woman dares to have pre-marital sex the men of her city “shall bring out the damsel unto the entrance of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die”

As per ancient Indo-Aryan law which was only stopped in the 19th century “A virtuous woman is one who dies on the funeral pyre of her dead husband”

In traditional China women’s feet were not only broken at puberty, they were also to either live outcast as widows after their husband’s death or expected to commit suicide.

Assyrian law states “A prostitute shall not be veiled. Whoever sees a veiled prostitute shall seize her … and bring her to the palace entrance. … they shall pour hot pitch over her head”

In Ancient Egypt which was also one of the most prosperous civilizations, women who dared to commit adultery were burned to death in accordance with their scriptures.

..

Nighthawk wrote:

Women evolved from, getting mens resources through compassion, care, and chores … to getting mens resources through offering nothing but the temporary illusion of sexual attractiveness.

Not at all!

They evolved to get raped, forced and abducted. As I have already made clear women have never been given resources, they have only been allowed to live like cows as long as they serve us… confined to the house.

..

Russky wrote:

At first I thought that @diamond was a clam trying to provoke s~~~, but after reading his input, it doesn’t look like that. It actually look like he knows what he’s talking about. Can’t wait for the introduction, and welcome
P.S.: Piece of advice though- try to not to sound like a misogynist – you don’t want to jeopardize the MGTOW label and every single man here

Thank you. I’m sorry I don’t want to get anyone else into trouble. It’s horrible that we are under constant threat from feminist society.

But I am a misogynist and all men should be misogynists. Women have always been hated… and rightfully so!

You mean food is not a problem for the Indo Aryan elites right. For the vast majority of Shudras and Untouchable, that does not hold true.
And how you know food is not a problem? In that time there is no fertilizer to boost crops production, no insecticide to keep pest away, no water transportation system as advance as today, no genetic / selective breeding of crops that the crops can be harvested twice per year, no machine to easily plough the land nor harvest crops easily. No advance terraces farming system that crops can be grown on hills. No electricity and water supply that everything had to be done on manpower & beast of burden. Please state your source that food is not a problem in that time. I get it that for the elites, food is rarely a problem, but elites does not represent the majority of men.

Diamond wrote:

In the event of war, men are not protecting women but they are protecting their freedom and their property (children, land, civilization, domesticated animals, baby making machines). Until feminism children were always considered the property of their fathers. As already stated, useless women are not to be given any protection and even allowed in civilization. Of course there will be no “unless” here because women are forced into marriage through arrangement or abduction.

Read your own sentence, men does not protect women, but they protect their property, the baby making machines.
Don’t you see a logical inconsistency here?

Of course useless women are not to be given any protection and even allowed in civilization, just like useless men are not given any protection and even allowed in civilization.

Diamond wrote:

Is it getting the better deal to be confined to the house for your whole life and be banned from roaming around freely… to not be allowed to choose what to do in life or with your body… to not be given an education, food when shortages occur, ownership of property, a voice in the house or public? It it getting the better deal to have your head covered the whole time in submission and live as a slave your whole life?

This is like saying oxen get the better deal because they don’t get killed in the rare event of war. That may be so but they’re still f~~~ing oxen and will be enslaved accordingly. Have men as leaders and the chances of war also decrease dramatically.

Who give you the idea that men of that time are allowed to roam around freely? Who give you the idea that men of that time are allowed to choose what to do in life of their body?
Men, or the majority of men that is not elites have to slave away in the fields, mines, construction sites. And because of they don’t have an extensive education system and free information over the internet like modern days, and people guard their knowledge jealously, their choice of what the men can choose to do are limited. There usually follow their fathers profession, because often only the father will be willing to transfer knowledge freely. Or toil in physical labor that does not need knowledge, which is most of the time because their father are not knowledgeable / skillful either.

Men able to roam freely or choose what to do in life or their body is only limited to the minority of elites. And on top of breaking their back in labor, they have to die first if s~~~ hit the fence.
Oh women being confined to the house is such slavery! Not be given education is such misery to the women! Never mind the men are hardly educated too, and have be confined to their place of work to make a living.
And how hard is house work at that time that it beats the men work? I have live without electricity and water supply before, it is inconvenient, but nothing like normal work.

Women at that time are treated as such because of their mental capacity and the value they can produce is not equal to men. They cannot perform the role of men as well as men. Women are not hated and men are not misogynists, because women cannot perform other roles and provide value as good as men, hence they are given rewards as good as the value they provide.
There is nothing misogynistic giving less compensation for less value.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[LightBringerParticipant 440]

Diamond wrote:

Men are significantly more evolved than women (who are close to apes)… But why didn’t women evolve?

There was literally just a topic about this by some guy ‘puffinstuf’ who made the same claims and that he was a doctor or something

Arthur Schopenhauer MGTOW Philosophy

Long story short not sure if you dont know better, but what you are claiming is not accurate. In that link I have the response and links to actual reading.

Your statements are misleading as well, yes woman ‘are closer’ to chimps than males are to chimps (for example 1 foot further over the distance of a mile), but they are NOT closer to chimps as a total than males of own species.

Again, I will refrain from saying anything slanderous as you might just not have known better but unless we start cleaning up our image here we look like circlejerking equivalents of feminists with pseudo science behind us.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

LightBringer wrote:

Long story short not sure if you dont know better, but what you are claiming is not accurate. In that link I have the response and links to actual reading.
Your statements are misleading as well, yes woman ‘are closer’ to chimps than males are to chimps

Yea, but its funny though. And I had fun thinking about the monkey alleles “waking up” and women being born with big blue asses like the primates at the zoo.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[OzguyParticipant 182]

Diamond wrote:

Of course we should forget these old traditions and move towards a gender equal society where women are treated equally. Both sexes should be respected.

Women’s lives have value and they should be cherished as individuals just like men. Their abilities should be honed and they should be allowed to live exactly like men.

And then you wait for the society to collapse and that philosophy to be displaced. Then a more traditional type of society outlined throughout history will replace it in which case your ideas won’t matter.

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

Self absorbed and no morals/conscience, an utter bore and eventually highly irritating with s~~~ half life. Why any man would want a woman for company is beyond me unless they were sexually motivated.

Todays women are so self serving and c~~~y, abrasive and domineering intent, that I f~~~ing despise being around any of them, especially at a work place. The old hags you see working at the supermarkets are all fat jabba the hut wenches, who are miserable and short fused.

What makes me laugh the most are ugly as f~~~ women wearing skimpy ‘check out my rolls of flab’ clothing and thinking they are hot s~~~.

When one of these eye cancer inducing ugly imbeciles cross your path giving you that “yeh, you wish you could f~~~ me” look, I point and laugh.

[DiamondSpectator 258]

@gnostic

1. There was no famine in Ancient Rome from 400BC till the collapse of civilization in 400AD. That’s a full 8 centuries without famine!! As far as Ancient Greece is concerned food shortages were again, rare. You can read more in this book https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wU9FCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA66&lpg=PA66&dq=famines+ancient+greece&source=bl&ots=NZjKRASyss&sig=Axrbaw64avtzYklqok2PFvC3IVg&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=famines%20ancient%20greece&f=false

Indo-Aryans were prosperous and they practised this. A quick look at the demographics of India shows that they are a majority of the population (Over 75%). Famines in India mainly began after the 18th century when the British started taking away the backup grain which was kept in case of crop failure.

There have been several civilizations (all strict patriarchies) which haven’t seen famines for centuries. You are factually incorrect. Modern equipment is NOT required for sufficient food supply. Saying that patriarchal systems are a product of food insecurity is ridiculous. Look at Saudi Arabia; it is one of the richest countries in the world and still a strict patriarchy……. No war, no famines.

..

2. Men didn’t protect them simply because they were women, but only the useful ones. We are in agreement. Their only use is producing children and even those useful ones are confined to the house, used as slaves and beaten accordingly.

Even useless oxen and sheep are not kept just like useless men….. but that doesn’t mean oxen are equal to men.

..

3. In case you aren’t aware of this fact, here in the west we used to have the “NO WOMEN ALLOWED” sign in public places, where men were free to go. Slavery of your own countrymen men was legal in Europe during certain periods but it was banned in Ancient China, India, Egypt and Persia….. where most of the human population lived.

Just because you have to stay in your place of work, doesn’t mean someone is forcing you to be confined to that area and forbidding you from going to other places. They are 2 completely different things. Again you’re factually incorrect.

..

Yes women have always been known to be mentally defective on account of which they were not given an education, control of wealth/property or even control over their own lives.

But women have also always been known to be evil and men have always been advised to stay the f~~~ away from them. Hatred of women is found in almost all religions, cultures and philosophies before the 20th century.

Wake up!! It’s not just about superior and inferior… it’s also about good and evil. If you’re not a misogynist you’re a feminist.

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[Author]

Posts