Why didn't women evolve?

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Your a girl.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Diamond wrote:

bobphilo wrote:

Nonsense. There are no studies by any biologist or geneticist that show that men are more genetically evolved than women. I have studied medical genetics in medical school and thought these these subjects to college students. Unlike you, I keep up with all the current research without bias.
What the hell do you mean by pseudo color blinded any way? No such thing. One is either color blind or not. I never claimed that most men are color blind. Merely stating the fact that there are more color blind and hemophiliac men then women because the Y chromosome is too small to counteract the effect of this condition on the X chromosome. Since women have 2 X chromosomes one of them can correct the error on the other. That does not make them any more or less evolved, just less likely to have these conditions.

There are enough valid reasons to criticize women without wrecking the argument with this rubbish. Your angry rants are a great recruiting tool for feminists since they paint all MGTOW men, and men in general, as bunch of angry ignorant misogynist buffoons.

http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2010/01/13/men-more-evolved-y-chromosome-study-stirs-debate

Sorry to burst your bubble but there is undeniable proof for the FACT that while the rest of the human genome is only 1.3% different from chimps, the YDNA is 30% more evolved.

Color blindness is a misleading term. It’s actually called Color Vision Deficiency. This is generally the vision difference:

It only affects a tiny 6-7 per cent of men

You failed to mention this part of the article:
“Before men get too impressed with themselves, lead author Jennifer Hughes offers some words of caution: Just because the Y chromosome, which determines gender, is evolving at a speedy rate it doesn’t necessarily mean men themselves are more evolved.”

As far as color blindness is concerned, please stop misquoting me. I made it clear that it does not affect most men. The fact is that it affects many more men than women because the small Y chromosome does not have anything to counter the effect of this condition from the X chromosome. Women have a 2nd X to correct this so they are much less likely to have the condition. Does not make them any more or less evolved.

[DiamondSpectator 258]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Your a girl.

No but you ARE a product of feminist society. Also, I don’t expect anything other than false accusations from people born and bred in feminist society.

bobphilo wrote:

it doesn’t necessarily mean men themselves are more evolved.

Does not make them any more or less evolved.

See the bolded parts? Genetically it’s very clear.

The X chromosome is actually far closer to ape DNA. Maybe if it had evolved more it wouldn’t be defective 6-7% of the time! xD

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Diamond wrote:

No but you ARE

whatever you say bounces of me and sticks on to you, now go make a sandwich.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[DiamondSpectator 258]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Diamond wrote:

No but you ARE

whatever you say bounces of me and sticks on to you, now go make a sandwich.

Don’t lie now… you’ve been born and bred in it

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[KeymasterKeymaster]

If women are so “evolved”, then why are they still so fascinated and entranced by little shiny things?

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[,Participant 1301]

Syphilis = Sybil or Sybil as in multiple personalities.
Then some claim past lives: egods.

with joy/without hate

[DiamondSpectator 258]

Keymaster wrote:

If women are so “evolved”, then why are they still so fascinated and entranced by little shiny things?

Another feminist claim that has no basis in fact. Women are subhumans, we always knew that.

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Diamond wrote:

Women are subhumans, we always knew that.

WTF??? Wrong forum for that.

Are you trying to be funny?

Women are not “subhuman’. They are HUMAN. That is the floor for every HUMAN BEING. What they are beyond that is entirely up to them. In another thread, you said “all women are whores ….. that goes without saying” and I directly asked you to elaborate, for a specific reason.

Before you say “all woman are whores that goes without saying” and “women are subhuman we all knew that” ( on behalf of others )… you’re going to have to back it up.

/forums/topic/new-article-out-misogyny-and-bachelorhood/page/2/#post-306242

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I’m starting to think this is some kind of an elaborate setup we have here

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Russky wrote:

I’m starting to think this is some kind of an elaborate setup we have here

She’s 100% pure c~~~. Now we just need to wait for her response.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[DiamondSpectator 258]

Keymaster wrote:

They are HUMAN. That is the floor for every HUMAN BEING.

“women are subhuman we all knew that”… you’re going to have to back it up.

You don’t need to write it in caps like a feminist. Yes women are humans, no doubt, but they are lesser humans and should be treated as such. There’s enough scientific evidence that women are different in both body and mind. Also, the YDNA is what makes us far more evolved and superior humans.

It’s easy to back up. Going back to Confucius and Aristotle you can see how they preached about women’s inferiority 2500 years ago. The old testament is also 3500 years old and the Indo-Aryan scriptures almost 4000 years. There are so many such things but I’ve made my point.

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[DiamondSpectator 258]

Women are not just subhumans, they’re evil subhumans

"One hundred women are not worth a single testicle."

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Diamond wrote:

You don’t need to write it in caps like a feminist.

Yes I didn’t write it in caps like a feminist. I wrote it in caps for EMPHASIS. Because you clearly didn’t get it. And you LIED. Women are humans. It’s a FACT. And it’s not debatable.

Diamond wrote:

Yes women are humans, no doubt, but they are lesser humans and should be treated as such.

Well that’s a different opinion – and it’s YOURS – but you tried to make it ALL OF OURS. Don’t ever include me in your “we” again.

Do you have a dog? Do you treat it “less than human”?
Because it’s “less than human” too.

Personally, I treat women according their own behavior. Not as “lesser humans” because they are female. Is that clear? Or do I need to use caps like a feminist.

Diamond wrote:

Women are not just subhumans, they’re evil subhumans

OK that’s it. You are now history.
You can take that s~~~ elsewhere.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Diamond wrote:

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Your a girl.

No but you ARE a product of feminist society. Also, I don’t expect anything other than false accusations from people born and bred in feminist society.

bobphilo wrote:

it doesn’t necessarily mean men themselves are more evolved.

Does not make them any more or less evolved.

See the bolded parts? Genetically it’s very clear.

The X chromosome is actually far closer to ape DNA. Maybe if it had evolved more it wouldn’t be defective 6-7% of the time! xD

Yea, real clear to someone who is ignorant on genetics. Like all chromosomes the X it evolved as well as evolution demands. Pity the Y chromosome evolved as such a puny thing that cannot correct any small defects on the X chromosome.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

OK that’s it. You are now history.
You can take that s~~~ elsewhere.

[/quote]

Thanks KM. This ignorant fool was full of crap from his stupid beginning of this topic.

[OzguyParticipant 182]

“Why didn’t women evolve”

Who cares..!

[Author]

Posts