The US and an Evolving NATO Alliance

[Anonymous 2]

It’sallbs wrote:

If you look at that situation and the ethnic cleansing that went on and you look at how various people were and are connected and look at the EU.

Maybe I’m not getting your point here, but still…not NATO business.
This is what they say on their official site about themselves:

NATO’s essential purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of its members through political and military means.

I don’t see anything about meddling with other nations business.

It’sallbs wrote:

The EU is teh 4th reich.

It’s exactly that.
A union to strengthen Germany economically.

It’sallbs wrote:

Have you not heard of the battle of Britain?

We have the best fighter pilots in the world

Of course Brits are very skilled at war too.
Every nation that is a world power or had an empire is justified to say so.
In the battle of Britain, the RAF indeed had the handicap going in and, and the edge coming out.

Considering Germany didn’t have any historical empire or too much military experience, they really showed great skill in WW2.

[MagusParticipant 424]

PistolPete wrote:

Roosevelt was like Churchill a German -hater through and through. Let us remember it was Churchill as 1st Lord of the Admiralty that “directed” the Lusitania into hostile waters for the purpose of being torpedoed and drawing the US into WW I…did he care about the lives lost.

Churchill was certainly a hater. He took advantage of what was probably our first gay president while our president’s lesbian wife was about with her lover. Nor do documents dwell on how Churchill would be nude or in bathrobes with Roosevelt. Funny times back then. And everybody knew the Lusitania was full of weapons headed to the UK. Germany, being too honest and simplistic, published paid for warnings in many of the news papers in the USA. Including the NY Times. Stating it was planning on sinking the Lusitania. At the time the boat filled up with crazies daring Germany to sink it. Of course our government spun propaganda to the public about how this was a sneak attack.

Kind of like how our government spun the BS about Pearl Harbor being a sneak attack.

A great man once said: “Of course the people don’t want war. But after all, it’s the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it’s always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it’s a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.”

His words have summarized every war the USA has ever fought.

[Author]

Posts