Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Should 007 be a woman
This topic contains 42 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by
Gravel Pit 3 months, 1 week ago.
- AuthorPosts
What will they f u ck up next
THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .
Should the virgin mary be a man? Should we redo the Aliens movies and change Ripley to be a man? How about redoing Wonder Woman to Wonder Man? Make all the amazonians mgtow men.
Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.
This sjw/pc bullsh1t just shows massive disrespect to the original creators’ content and visions for their stories.
Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.
Aliens movies and change Ripley to be a man?
exactly … its ONLY okay when it disparages men or whites.
If we DARE remake films starring minorities, replaced with men or whites… its the end of the world! But they dont even bat an eye at sh!tcanning 50 year old cultural icons.
boycott Bond dude. I paid cash money to a movie theatre for Skyfall and Spectre premieres. I bought multiple tickets too because I brought a friend. Now I will not even Redbox that trash…. I dont give a flying fvck about any nuances. A ni66er woman cant be a double 0… quit feeding people buls~~~… I was in the fvcking infantry
i been using the N word alot again. Sorry. I had some N trouble and got a lil tangle in my tinsel. lol
I am tempted to say all these knobs who want to change the gender of characters should change their own gender first. Then again I fear some of them might like to do that.
Metrosexuality = benders
A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own
Should 007 be a woman
Not if you want to sell movie tickets.
Seriously, nobody wants to see a female 007. Not women and not men. And not enough to pay for it.
This movie is going to flop so hard. And when it does, they’ll blame “toxic masculinity” instead of admitting they fucked up.
it will flop.
I hope it flops too.
The reason that 007 should not be a woman in those movies is the same reason that real intelligence agents in real life are not women. And everyone knows very well what that reason is: espionage of the sort 007 engages in carries an enormous amount of actual personal risk to the person doing it. And that enormous personal risk is accepted by those agents in order to benefit people other than themselves (country, culture, fellow agents, etc). The vast majority of those people doing that enormously risky work to benefit people other than themselves are doing it with zero recognition, and not a lot amount of money.
Does this sound like ANY woman that you have EVER known?
This bulls~~~ is aimed at children, who don’t know any better. My question is wether or not their goal is to try to convince little girls that they should do these things, or to try to convince little boys that they should not.
At best, they may be trying to convince little girls that they have equal value to boys (as if there was ever ay doubt) by wrongly teaching them that they are equally capable of doing all the things men are capable of doing. But as someone (more perceptive than me) pointed out recently: our civilization does not need women to do all the things that men can do. It needs women to do the things that men cannot do. Until women understand this, birthrates will continue to be inadequate to maintain population survival.
Perhaps if women took more pride and value from having children (instead of aborting them by the millions), they would not need to try to steal that value and self worth from men by pretending to be valuable and worthy for doing the things that realistically, only men are ever going to do.
Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you
The “book Bond” was a hired asassin working for the British Government. He was a dark character. I don’t remember which book, but “M” wanted Bond to die in one of his missions. This was in early Bond, before the invention of SPECTRE,and the Female “M”.
The movie versions of the Bond books rarely shown Bonds dark side,obviously to make him more likeable.
I read that Bond becoming a woman was defined as the number 007 was “just an agent’s number”, and not specifically James Bond.
I can’t see the separation after 50 yrs of the two together.NO,…. I can’t see a woman or anyone else for that matter playing 007. If they want to start a new superhero for a new generation to emulate; they should have started completley from scratch.
I won’t watch it.Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)
boycott Bond dude.
Bond has arguably been a dead franchise since either Timothy Dalton or Roger Moore. Personal preference? Moore was the last objectively good set of Bond films. I saw the reboot with what’s his name, the eye candy who did the “venus from the sea” reveal in the speedo that historically was done by the Bond babes. Casino Royale reboot I think. Completely forgettable. The last good one I remember was “Live and Let Die,” and that was filmed at least a decade before I was born.
Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805NO,…. I can’t see a woman or anyone else for that matter playing 007. If they want to start a new superhero for a new generation to emulate; they should have started completley from scratch.
The only time I’ve ever bought into a female replacing a traditionally male part was in Terminator : Sarah Connor Chronicles and only specifically because it was a cyborg underneath and I could completely suspend disbelief that a woman could do more than 20% of the physical feats a man can pull off while hung over.
Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805boycott Bond dude.
Bond has arguably been a dead franchise since either Timothy Dalton or Roger Moore. Personal preference? Moore was the last objectively good set of Bond films. I saw the reboot with what’s his name, the eye candy who did the “venus from the sea” reveal in the speedo that historically was done by the Bond babes. Casino Royale reboot I think. Completely forgettable. The last good one I remember was “Live and Let Die,” and that was filmed at least a decade before I was born.
I grew up with the Roger Moore James Bond. I like all of his Bond movies. “Live and Let Die” is possibly my favorite James Bond movie. “A View to a Kill” is another real good one. “Moonraker” was kinda’ dumb, but I like it as well.
The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.
Supposedly, its “okay” what they’re doing, because they’re going to retire (kill) James from the position of 007 and his replacement just happens to be an English woman who happens to be black? So, first problem is, you dont retire or kill off Bond. WTF? Second problem, a woman simply cant function as a competent 00.
Not that Im an aficionado of what the plot is but that is the gist I got. Enough for me to completely ghost it.
Daniel Craig played a good Bond, I dont care what anyone says. Casino Royale and Skyfall were masterful. Spectre was a miss because it had too much of that yellow haired C u n t face and not enough Christoph Waltz. How do you fvck that up? A movie with Waltz at that time was a free slam dunk… but the writer and director managed to totally gutterball that LONG, boring, ridiculous film.
bah.
Not this horse hockey again.
Lets just put this plainly.
1. Birth Name – James Bond
2. Sex – Male
3. Ethnicity – Caucasian
4. Occupation – Secret Service – Special Operations Field Agent – Agent I.D Code #007 – Authorized to use deadly force without prejudice, aka “licensed to kill”.
5. Agent I.D number is discontinued upon “retirement” of active agent. Never to be used againSo..
1. Secret agent 007 can never be anything but a white U.K male.
2. James Bond can not be anything but a white U.K male.If you want to “expand” on the franchise, the agent must be new.
Bond…
James Bond…
But not THAT James Bond..Kind of like Jack Ryan suddenly becoming anything other than Jack Ryan
There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
007 just has to be a woman. It is necessary to re-write the history of Western icons to include the new female arch-types. It’s necessary for the revolution comrades. The new fem-Bond can have a weak stay at home husband that she cheats on because the bad guys just can’t keep their patriarchial hands off irresistable women like she-Bond. But she doesn’t love them. She’s using their sex drive against them and they will be more severely punished the more they go for her. She’ll be unusually close touchy feely friends with Q, who’s a young and very hot female.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Daniel Craig played a good Bond, I dont care what anyone says. Casino Royale and Skyfall were masterful.
Agreed GP,
BUT,
The producers/director messed up the “tempo” of the introduction of Craig as Bond. During the entire chase scene they filmed in Algeria, I was asking myself why??? why?? rather than the excitement of watching Craig escape multiple crazy attempts to end his life.
IF you do an intro like that; it needs to be short and sweet (Intro to “Dr No” comes to mind),like many prior Bond intro’s; not 15 mins of chase, but 3 mins of “What is Bond getting into?”
Craig’s acting was all that kept both movies afloat.Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)
Should 007 be Colin, hmmm.
I think I’ll stay 001, as I’m the best.- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
