MGTOWphilosopher already made a YouTube video

[X11Spectator 4520]

This thread just builds the profile of mgtowphillosopher.

There is no such thing as bad attention for attention whores.

[Anonymous 11]

OldBill wrote:

It’s called “brigading”

Yeah, we discussed this heavily on Zoom over the weekend. I did not know it has an actual name. Thanks!

One could easily hide hundreds of malicious starring accounts among that number of dormant accounts.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Funny, I never heard of this guy, and he comes in here like he’s some kind of celebrity? Checked out his channel, all his videos have a ton of comments with heaps of up-votes sucking his dick. Even the best MGTOW channels have constructive criticism in the comment section, but with this guy it’s just ‘ur awesome i have wet dreems about you’.

He’s a loser with a c~~~-jerking circle of followers whom he probably knows personally. From what I can see, there aren’t any real MGTOW who take him seriously.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah, we discussed this heavily on Zoom over the weekend. I did not know it has an actual name. Thanks!

No problem, brother.

One could easily hide hundreds of malicious starring accounts among that number of dormant accounts.

Yes, and that’s one of the reasons I’m worried.

What’s currently working our favor is the fact that up-votes don’t really amount to anything and down-votes don’t exist.

The recent Peter Pan incident, however, shows that a troll with either control of or help from malicious dormant accounts can cause a lot of confusion regardless of whether up-votes mean anything or not. That troll “received” 500 up-votes in almost an eye blink.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 11]

It’s trivial to cobble some code that could run multiple dormant starring accounts.

I’d be turning up the logging level.

[Jack HarperParticipant 2863]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

Funny, I never heard of this guy, and he comes in here like he’s some kind of celebrity? Checked out his channel, all his videos have a ton of comments with heaps of up-votes sucking his dick. Even the best MGTOW channels have constructive criticism in the comment section, but with this guy it’s just ‘ur awesome i have wet dreems about you’.

He’s a loser with a c~~~-jerking circle of followers whom he probably knows personally. From what I can see, there aren’t any real MGTOW who take him seriously.

Well in the comments of TFM’s video several people are saying Philosopher censors his comments sections.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

OldBill wrote:

I’m not even going to pretend to understand what happened or what he think happened

Well that’s another “MGTOW Philosopher” – at least with a different registered email.

The exchange I mentioned earlier in this thread was specifically for a member who introduced himself as a youtube author. That account was not a participant yet.

If this is the same guy (but with a different email), then I would like to know what “problem” he has because this member was already made a participant.
/profile/26366/

We won’t delete this member at this time because it’s not the same email we received that message from. If there is any future friction or problem with this member . . . please inform at once.

Big thanks.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 1]

OldBill wrote:

I have no idea either.

On the one hand, I do know that Keymaster did a huge amount of work to “removing” Stealthy and all his posts from the forum.

On the other hand, placing someone in “spectator” status seems relatively easy. While their posts don’t disappear, their ability to post is gone

Good point about stealthy, but when you mentioned “clear out” it wasn’t obvious what you meant.

So is your proposal to reduce non active members to spectators? Do we not then have to assess each member who wants their account re-activated? That will be lot of work, in addition to the new members looking to to be given forum participation.

It was you that mentioned “clearing out” non participants. Stealthy was “cleared out” and that took a whole weekend for the admins.

What is it exactly you want to see happen?

[OldBillParticipant]

I checked the profile you linked, Key, and the 26366 profile is the guy who went ape s~~~ yesterday.

He started two threads; one in Introductions and one in Central.

His intro wasn’t too well received. It was just a few lines about how he has a MGTOW channel on YouTube, is well known, and how we should all check it his work. He forgot to include a link to his channel in that first post and had to post it later.

His second thread was the duplicate topic I mentioned in my post. Earlier that day, pheonixgod1995 created a thread linking to a video. Profile 26366 then created a thread linking to the same video. Both members used the same thread title so I spotted the duplication and posted my standard “duplicate thread” message. That’s when 26366 went nuts for whatever reason. You can read his post in the thread I linked to this one.

It might be one guy with two accounts using two emails. It might two guys using the same name with two emails. I don’t know. All I know is that the guy in the profile you just now linked is the same guy who had a meltdown here yesterday.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

And as usual I’m out of the loop. All these internet dramas just annoys me, so NFG…

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[KeymasterKeymaster]

OldBill wrote:

I checked the profile you linked, Key, and the 26366 profile is the guy who went ape s~~~ yesterday. He started two threads; one in Introductions and one in Central.

His intro wasn’t too well received. It was just a few lines about how he has a MGTOW channel on YouTube

OK well then it must be the same guy with two different registered emails. Will look out for an email response from him. At the same time, if he stirs up any further friction please shout ASAP.

If there is no response, will deactivate because he made a point of saying he was “leaving the forums”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[OldBillParticipant]

Skeptisk wrote:

NFG…

NFG here too, despite being on the receiving end both here and on his YouTube channel.

Keymaster did ask a question, however, so I tried my best to answer it.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 1]

OldBill wrote:

NFG here too, despite being on the receiving end both here and on his YouTube channel.

Despite a legitimate conversation with no personal attacks, you have opted to bait and switch.

With respect, others can read this.

You have chosen to ignore something you think may question your perfect opinion.

Disappointed.

EDIT – Old bill reserves the right to call out anyone that he doesn’t agree with, but also reserves the right to say nothing and play a victim when he realises he could be wrong.

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

You have chosen to ignore something you think may question your perfect opinion.

Not exactly. I’ve chosen not to engage in fight which can’t be “won” for a “prize” I do not covet.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 1]

OldBill wrote:

Not exactly. I’ve chosen not to engage in fight which can’t be “won” for a “prize” I do not covet.

This is what I find very odd. It wasn’t a fight until you decided you had no response.

Very bizarre. You’re not a victim and neither am I.

You decided to play a victim when KM turned up.

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

You decided to play a victim when KM turned up.

No, not at all.

I answered Keymaster’s questions to the best of my ability. Nothing more.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

Well. if you check out TFM’s video called “The Great Redpill War”, you’ll see a pattern emerge. It’s all about taking down the “enemy”. In the case of feminists/tradcons etc. it’s PUA’s, MRA’s and us. Right now they’ve sharpened the tools on other websites that has not connection with MGTOW, PUA’s or MRA’s. But I think it would be prudent to expect them to attempt this on MGTOW.Com. It’s both hilarious and scary to think this website has been declared a “hate-site”, because we’re “different”, we “don’t conform”. Anyway, the tools are (and I’ll copy from the description-box at TFM’s video):

1. Dox
2. Deplatform
3. Appropriate

And it wouldn’t surprise me if those fake accounts are made merely to start on point number 1, doxxing MGTOW-members. Or at least to prepp for point number 2.

Anyway, it’ll be interesting to see what happens.

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

What is it exactly you want to see happen?

I missed this post and now understand where the stick up your ass came from.

I want non-posting accounts to be terminated. There’s no real reason to join and then not post. You can read everything posted here as a visitor, albeit with certain words censored and with a slower refresh rate.

There’s no good reason to be a both member and a lurker because you can lurk equally well as a visitor.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[OldBillParticipant]

Skeptisk wrote:

And it wouldn’t surprise me if those fake accounts are made merely to start on point number 1, doxxing MGTOW-members. Or at least to prepp for point number 2.

Thank you for that. In one post you were able to explain what I haven’t been able to in three threads.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[SESQUI ano estParticipant 2534]

I heard TFM’s response to MGTOW Philosopher earlier today. MP Sounds like a bit of a dick to me.
A sidebar:

Cú Chulainn wrote:

This one sounds like a real c~~~ holster though.

I was listening to John at MGTOW is Freedom earlier today and heard him refer to the c~~~ holster below a woman’s nose.

That is the first time I’ve ever heard someone’s mouth referred to as a c~~~ holster, and twice on the same day no less. Learning something new every day.

Everyday above ground is a good one. Everyday above ground while single...better still.

[Author]

Posts