Inherently Sick

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5097]

Anonymous wrote:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

Good post. You are talking more about survival of the fittest, do what you need to do to survive. I am talking extreme cases such as genocide, child killers, necrophilia etc These are borne out of survival instincts, borne out of control, spite, frustration, power, and above all evil. Theses aforementioned acts can be labelled as absolute evil, but as mentioned, we as a species can’t be absolutely evil, nor good.

There has been many studies on what drives these people. The Serial Killer phenomena. These people are Psychopathic. They are addicted to the “Rush” that they experience when raping and murdering children.

The Jimmy Saville types.

If you look into the most heinous Evil crimes in any time period you will find a smirking Psychopath is usually the cause of it.

Anonymous wrote:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

Then “evil” is like any other tract. Subjective. What is deemed evil to some, may be justified in another.

No, I believe Jimmy Saville knew what he was doing was Evil. That’s what got him off. He knew he was committing evil and getting away with it. It’s a big “Rush” to these people. They are addicted to Evil.

Possibly. Do you believe he is suffering now somewhere, paying for the evils he never paid for in this life?

[Anonymous 1]

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

Possibly. Do you believe he is suffering now somewhere, paying for the evils he never paid for in this life?

I hope so, but as far as Jimmy was concerned he “Got Away With It.” That is the ultimate reward for the Psychopath. He did what he knew was Evil and he got away with it. He cheated Karma and that was why he was snickering and smirking all the time. Those Smirking Eyes of a Psychopath.

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5097]

Branched off wrote:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

Goes back to my point about subjectivity

The world we know is only our brain’s interpretation of its sensors’ information and what it has learned from life.

This also explains some clever people being libtards. -its here their experience and what they learned took them.

Is that not more about upbringing, social standing, and education. I could be wrong, but aren’t most liberals middle/upper class, silver spooned by mummy and daddy, minimised to the actual real world, whereas the working-class are in the s~~~ and mire, and can see the world/people for what it really is?

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5097]

Anonymous wrote:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

Possibly. Do you believe he is suffering now somewhere, paying for the evils he never paid for in this life?

I hope so, but as far as Jimmy was concerned he “Got Away With It.” That is the ultimate reward for the Psychopath. He did what he knew was Evil and he got away with it. He cheated Karma and that was why he was snickering and smirking all the time. Those Smirking Eyes of a Psychopath.

I read somewhere, that 3% of the worlds population has sociopathic/psychopathic tendencies. That’s a lot of fruitloops about?

[Anonymous 1]

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

I read somewhere, that 3% of the worlds population has sociopathic/psychopathic tendencies. That’s a lot of fruitloops about?

Yes, but only a small percentage of Psychopaths will get addicted to the “Serial Killer” pathology.

Most of them will find their Rush in other ways. Drug addiction, Military Service, Fire Fighting etc.

Jimmy Saville and others like him are rare, even amongst Psychopaths. However, in certain Elite circles it becomes more common. We see this in the upper echelons of Society. Especially, when Psychopaths are interbreeding with other Psychopaths.

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5097]

Anonymous wrote:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

I read somewhere, that 3% of the worlds population has sociopathic/psychopathic tendencies. That’s a lot of fruitloops about?

Yes, but only a small percentage of Psychopaths will get addicted to the “Serial Killer” pathology.

Most of them will find their Rush in other ways. Drug addiction, Military Service, Fire Fighting etc.

Jimmy Saville and others like him are rare, even amongst Psychopaths. However, in certain Elite circles it becomes more common. We see this in the upper echelons of Society. Especially, when Psychopaths are interbreeding with other Psychopaths.

CEOs, Politicians, Bodyguards….can be subtly delivered in many forms. I personally believe I have met sociopaths, maybe one borderline psychopath. The psychopath was a woman, maybe not evil but certainly a wicked person.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Dostoevsky provides an answer assuming the Biblical explanation is insufficient: “When there is no God, men can do anything”. Meaning any evil act can be indulged with impunity when moral codes are abandoned.

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5097]

PistolPete wrote:

Dostoevsky provides an answer assuming the Biblical explanation is insufficient: “When there is no God, men can do anything”. Meaning any evil act can be indulged with impunity when moral codes are abandoned.

Well this is what the liberals want, to impose their twisted, depraved lifestyles/ideologies onto the rest, which correlates to the fact most of them don’t believe in God, or you could look at it the extreme opposite of Islam where God himself supposedly has set the boundaries of what is deemed good/evil, and the irony being, if any don’t agree, then evil will befall them.

[Branched offParticipant 11036]

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

Is that not more about upbringing, social standing, and education. I could be wrong, but aren’t most liberals middle/upper class, silver spooned by mummy and daddy, minimised to the actual real world, whereas the working-class are in the s~~~ and mire, and can see the world/people for what it really is?

Yes I agree. That is what I was saying. Many liberals come from intelligent families of successful people. The are sheltered and they have never had to make a hard choice. They are educated by liberals and innocently believe what they are taught. Their subjective world is very different to that of many others. So when they take in information from the world they arrive at different conclusions. The problem of subjectivity is a huge one in ethics. Reality is out there but how we process it is subjective.

One still has to make conclusions and act on them but certainty of the validity of one’s conclusions is in short supply.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Don’t we have a philosophy forum for threads like this?

[Branched offParticipant 11036]

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

PistolPete wrote:

Dostoevsky provides an answer assuming the Biblical explanation is insufficient: “When there is no God, men can do anything”. Meaning any evil act can be indulged with impunity when moral codes are abandoned.

Well this is what the liberals want, to impose their twisted, depraved lifestyles/ideologies onto the rest, which correlates to the fact most of them don’t believe in God, or you could look at it the extreme opposite of Islam where God himself supposedly has set the boundaries of what is deemed good/evil, and the irony being, if any don’t agree, then evil will befall them.

I would take this a little further and say that liberals and Muslims are both confident of their truths and both believe that one does evil if one departs from those truths. Liberals are quite dutiful and religious. Equality is their creed, liberalism is their faith. They believe they are saving people and, like Tony Blair proved, they can also believe when necessary that the ends justify the means when it comes to imposing their ideology.

Liberalism is the established religion of the ruling classes of the west. People look too rigidly through the lens of competing theories of monotheism to spot that you do not need to believe in an omnipotent god to have a religion. You need people to have shared doctrines, values, beliefs and practises. Western liberalism has all of these. Salvation and reward in an afterlife are just things that become popular in escatological monotheism.

The liberals are more dangerous than the muslims. They are a fairly new arrival. Islam has stood the test of time. It has provided just if harsh laws for centuries. Mohammed had a sound understanding of human nature he just came from a harsh place. Liberals come from a sheltered world and deny human nature. Islam has recently become quite fundamentalist in some places and its peoples have become the enemy of our people. We must fight them but the enemy we should fear more is the one within. Liberals would emasculate us and open our gates to the enemy outside, failing to understand they will not be so generous with us.

I would not say that any evil act can be indulged with impunity when moral codes are abandoned. I would say that is a myth of the religions that have orthodoxies. Bad acts punish us and those around us. If you kill your family you are not helping yourself or your family. It is evil. If you steal from your place of work you are likely to do yourself no favours. What does harm is evil. For this reasons most religions agree on a broad set of things that are evil. Its where they disagree that it tends to be just bulls~~~ -like liberals say that if you deny equality you are doing evil and Muslims say that if you innovate and depart from the teaching of the Qu-ran (shirk) you are doing evil. Both agree that you should not steal or kill the innocent who are not your enemies.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5097]

Branched off wrote:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

PistolPete wrote:

Dostoevsky provides an answer assuming the Biblical explanation is insufficient: “When there is no God, men can do anything”. Meaning any evil act can be indulged with impunity when moral codes are abandoned.

Well this is what the liberals want, to impose their twisted, depraved lifestyles/ideologies onto the rest, which correlates to the fact most of them don’t believe in God, or you could look at it the extreme opposite of Islam where God himself supposedly has set the boundaries of what is deemed good/evil, and the irony being, if any don’t agree, then evil will befall them.

I would take this a little further and say that liberals and Muslims are both confident of their truths and both believe that one does evil if one departs from those truths. Liberals are quite dutiful and religious. Equality is their creed, liberalism is their faith. They believe they are saving people and, like Tony Blair proved, they can also believe when necessary that the ends justify the means when it comes to imposing their ideology.

Liberalism is the established religion of the ruling classes of the west. People look too rigidly through the lens of competing theories of monotheism to spot that you do not need to believe in an omnipotent god to have a religion. You need people to have shared doctrines, values, beliefs and practises. Western liberalism has all of these. Salvation and reward in an afterlife are just things that become popular in escatological monotheism.

The liberals are more dangerous than the muslims. They are a fairly new arrival. Islam has stood the test of time. It has provided just if harsh laws for centuries. Mohammed had a sound understanding of human nature he just came from a harsh place. Liberals come from a sheltered world and deny human nature. Islam has recently become quite fundamentalist in some places and its peoples have become the enemy of our people. We must fight them but the enemy we should fear more is the one within. Liberals would emasculate us and open our gates to the enemy outside, failing to understand they will not be so generous with us.

I would not say that any evil act can be indulged with impunity when moral codes are abandoned. I would say that is a myth of the religions that have orthodoxies. Bad acts punish us and those around us. If you kill your family you are not helping yourself or your family. It is evil. If you steal from your place of work you are likely to do yourself no favours. What does harm is evil. For this reasons most religions agree on a broad set of things that are evil. Its where they disagree that it tends to be just bulls~~~ -like liberals say that if you deny equality you are doing evil and Muslims say that if you innovate and depart from the teaching of the Qu-ran (shirk) you are doing evil. Both agree that you should not steal or kill the innocent who are not your enemies.

Good points, however the irony with those who promote and inforce liberalism is they are the most close-minded and judgemental of all. I personally lived with two different militant feminists, who were naturally liberals, their policies only applied to those they deemed repressed ie the LGBTq community, immigrants, ethnics and so forth. People such as ourselves, white, working-class, hetrosexual, masculine males weren’t allowed to have a voice. We obviously are the ones preventing people living their lives according to their own set of rules, but we are not allowed to live ours. These two aforementioned, were two of the most bitter, spiteful, hateful, repressed humans I have had the displeasure to interact with.
Regarding Muslims having conviction in their believes, which ones? As with Christianity, there is a deep fraction within the Islamic community. There is supposedly 1.6m Muslims, how many of those really believe, many are forced Muslim. The extreme ones who interpret the Koran/Hadith/Surah in order to justify their actions, or the moderate Muslims who only believe in the good said in the books. Who is doing good?. Both believe they are living according to Allah, but to any balanced human, the former is obviously performing evil. Comes back to subjectivity again.

[Author]

Posts