Search Results for 'Trump'

[FreeGhostSpectator]

Was working all day today, good for Trump though. I am glad he refutes the ostracism that he is currently enduring from both left and right wing platforms. Makes me more confident he isn’t a pawn to be manipulated into positions he does not conform to.

[FreeGhostSpectator]

Never bought into the “hope and change” the leftism scumbag Obama paraded to us. I really do not feel that Trump is a puppet dangling from the strings of corporations. It appears that he could bring a manufacturing basis back to the country, which is very well needed considering our sickening “real unemployment rate”.

[AncientwisdomParticipant]

Did you guys see his live press conference today? This is the first time in my life I have been EXCITED by a “politician”. Is he electable by the MASSES (idiots)? Not sure.

Some ass hat member of the press tried pushing him on his “immigrants are rapists”. Trump basically told the guy to Shut the f~~~ up lol! He said “this is what you people do. Take things out of context”. Dude tried to talk back and Trump just said “youre done” the crowd appluaded.

Only problem is, the democrats have created a constituency of zombies who feed off of their hand outs. That is why they encourage sancutaury cities and illegal immigration. Those, feminists, and any other minority group views Trump as just a “rich WHITE MAN”. F~~~ing BS.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous]

Trump does not give a flying f~~~ which I highly respect. The establishment is running scared of him which is a good thing IMHO. Even Bernie Sanders is a threat to Hitlery. The natives of all stripes are getting restless and sick of this corporatism run amuck.

Even though I am more paleo-conservative than Trump, I’d still vote for him. America needs a real leader who is not 0wned. At 10 Billion net worth he can tell all of them to f~~~ off.

Fire up some popcorn and enjoy the show!

[FreeGhostSpectator]

I have faith in Trump honestly, if he is lying it is a brilliant ploy by the elite. Regardless, his stance on illegal immigration and our lack of a manufacturing basis is entirely correct. A billionaire that may be on our side? Sounds like a modern day Thomas Jefferson or Benjamin Franklin on our side. The constant chastising of him via the media may allude to him being an honest candidate for president.

[AncientwisdomParticipant]

FreeGhost wrote:

In grammatical terms, “billionaire’ would be deemed lowercase, yet I do understand your assessment. Anyways, I don’t see Exxon, Goldman Sachs, Google, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, etc contributing towards Donald Trump, so he seems not to be a puppet towards the establishment. He seems to have lost sponsorships with NBC, univision, and other affluent businesses being outspoken towards illegal immigration. I do not believe he is a pawn for the system.

The “capital B” is a figure of speach to put emphasis on something. But if you want to be pedantic about it:

http://www.ask.com/math/abbreviation-billion-42de94782db92555

 

Of course Trump isnt a political pawn. That’s the entire point. And he cant be outspent.

Resident cynic.

[FreeGhostSpectator]

In grammatical terms, “billionaire’ would be deemed lowercase, yet I do understand your assessment. Anyways, I don’t see Exxon, Goldman Sachs, Google, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, etc contributing towards Donald Trump, so he seems not to be a puppet towards the establishment. He seems to have lost sponsorships with NBC, univision,  and other affluent businesses being outspoken towards illegal immigration. I do not believe he is a pawn for the system.

[AncientwisdomParticipant]

money places heads on television screens, which leads to more votes.

Of course it does. But do you seriously think anyone can out spend Trump? Hes worth ten Billion, with a capital B.

Resident cynic.

[LuciusParticipant]

I can’t wait until he begins firing people.  When Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers it changed his Presidency for me, although I love him before that.  When Reagan took office Iran gave back the Hostages.  I can see a lot of Reagan in Trump.

 

[kpak76Participant]

Think this is my first post?  Anyways. Trump seems like the man to lead this country great again.  I personally prefer to live in a wealthy country and would rather want to avoid the bread lines and all and such.  We are heading there now.  He is right, we are going to be Greece magnified at this rate.

[Anonymous]

Trump sucks.

I voted Libertarian last election, and plan to do so again if I bother voting at all. I have no real interest in voting but the general peon public makes a big deal about it, so I guess if I’m roped into it I will do so.

All MGTOWs should be voting Libertarian. Gary Johnson says he is running again in 2016. Don’t know who he is or why he’s better than the 2 party candidates? Well then, you prove flightspace right and you’re part of the reason this country is the mess it is now.

However IF Gary Johnson did somehow get elected, either the elites would rig the results otherwise, try to buy him off, or outright kill him. But at least we should force them to do those things instead of being stupid sheep and taking a “choice” between Trump and Hillary or whatever garbage candidates they’re going to give us again.

[Schaefe89Participant]

Gabriel A. King wrote:

I’m not sure who “flightspace” supports for 2016… but wow he sure threw Trump under the bus ! lol. However… providing no real evidence for his claims of Trumps alleged impropriety outside of a Vanity Fair hit piece…. I can only conclude flightspace has ulterior political motives. It would be interesting (and perhaps damning) to ascertain if there is anyone flightspace does endorse for 2016. The fact of the matter is, Trump is a business genius who used the laws to his advantage… and won the game. Amounting a staggering personal fortune. Trump has created more jobs than he has lost over his career. From what iv’e seen thus far there are no real stories of any proven hardcore “villainy” associated with Trump. He is however very patriotic… so I would love to see him apply his business skills in favor of America. Trump is also not someone who can be pushed around and projects strength- vital for US Presidents. I also look favorably on Rand Paul. So if “flightspace” has any endorsements or thoughts on 2016 i’d love to hear it.

 

flightspace supports Hillary and is currently memorizing the flashcards he wrote to back up his support for Hillary.

[Schaefe89Participant]

flightspace wrote:

Donald Trump is a fraud, a bigot, and his fortunes are built on his celebrity personality alone and he has milked every business he’s ever owned for all its worth, leaving it bankrupt, and filling his own pockets, just as he will do with the united states. To believe anything that man says makes you nothing less than a complete and total idiot. http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/06/donald-trump-companies-bankruptcy-atlantic-city

 

So in other words trump is a success and you’re not. I see that you are bringing up the Atlantic city story again. Classic. If you want to dump on trump try again, or get in line with macy’s, espn, or nascar. Just because you are a pussy, doesn’t mean the rest of this forum has to pussify as well. I suspect that your brain functions at a similar rate as the people who write for vanity fair. If you did your research instead of copying and pasting articles from vanity fair I might be more inclined to respect your post more.

[nangidkramParticipant]

Brothers! I’m going to keep on trumpeting my theory that Human Females exist solely to garner attention through deceptive ruses. Every breath, action, thought and consideration is a deceptive ruse.

Our Classical World is preceded by a Quantum World and by the power of observation we exist.

A baby is an attention-collecting vessel produced by an attention-collecting vessel solely to collect attention. Human Females have further babies because they miss the attention.

Go watch my vid for the easy to understand science. Ok it’s a boring ten minutes but after you’ve done your time you’ll understand what your red pill was really for.

Enjoy and great MGTOW Forum question by the way!

[13-JzzalParticipant]

peterfa wrote:

Well, if you reduce morals to feelings then there can be no rational discussion on ethics or morals since when does one’s feelings trump another’s? I used the term “torturing babies” because it’s a token moral issue that comes up in debates precisely that it’s hard to justify it. I want to use it to demonstrate that should torturing babies is wrong, then how much more so is torturing unborn babies. Inasmuch as this isn’t torture, the baby is certain murdered in the process of abortion. This can be very painful and the language from that famous video, “I can crush below…” which sounds pretty painful to me. Regardless, the issue isn’t that of pain, it’s that of dignity. That’s a human who doesn’t deserve this and my real focus is how similar using the tissue for experimentation purposes. That’s exactly how the Nazi’s viewed human life and dignity. They saw this is just stuff. Human’s had no dignity, so do what you please. You’re seeing the outworking. The difference is that the Nazi’s were more honest with what they’re doing. We’re picking on these fetuses because they can’t cry, and because we can’t see them.

i don’t think you quite understood what I meant.

I do not think that a few cells that have no brain are already a human. Therefore it is not murder. My entire postition is based on the assumption that in the very early stages of pregnancy there is no person inside the womb.

Also I am not equating morals to feelings. What I am saying is that your lizard brain causes a strong emotional response to an embryo being killed. Your morals are informed by this emotional response but that doesn’t mean equating them to feelings.

I think it is necessary to think rationally about stuff like this. If you disagree that is fine.

What I should mention is that i made a mistake. I said I am fine with abortion during the first few weeks and I should have specified that by that I meant 5 weeks. Aborting a fetus(week 11+) is not ok as the brain formation has proceeded to far in my opinion.

Here is the timescale of fetal development I am basing my statements on:

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002398.htm

On a side note: I think appeals to emotion are not valid arguments and I will ignore them as soon as I recognize them.

[peterfaParticipant]

Well, if you reduce morals to feelings then there can be no rational discussion on ethics or morals since when does one’s feelings trump another’s? I used the term “torturing babies” because it’s a token moral issue that comes up in debates precisely that it’s hard to justify it. I want to use it to demonstrate that should torturing babies is wrong, then how much more so is torturing unborn babies.

Inasmuch as this isn’t torture, the baby is certain murdered in the process of abortion. This can be very painful and the language from that famous video, “I can crush below…” which sounds pretty painful to me. Regardless, the issue isn’t that of pain, it’s that of dignity. That’s a human who doesn’t deserve this and my real focus is how similar using the tissue for experimentation purposes. That’s exactly how the Nazi’s viewed human life and dignity. They saw this is just stuff. Human’s had no dignity, so do what you please. You’re seeing the outworking.

The difference is that the Nazi’s were more honest with what they’re doing. We’re picking on these fetuses because they can’t cry, and because we can’t see them.

[Just MikeParticipant]

Quoted from Wiki:

The proliferation of internet porn, along with sexually-themed anime and role-playing games and such like, has reduced much of the shame associated with masturbation, with the possible consequence that “two-dimensional” females are now more attractive to men than three-dimensional ones.

Knew about this phenomenon but never knew they were called herbivores. Looked it up on Wiki, started reading, and this made me laugh hard. Gee, I wonder: in what ways could an artificial woman, probably created by men who know what men really want from women, ever possibly trump the real thing? :p

 

Society: I refuse your stick and carrot. If you try to beat or shame me you'd better take me down first time. If I want smoke blown up my ass I'll buy a cigar and a length of hose.

[I_Walk_AloneParticipant]

As always:

Fat, with no intention of doing anything about it.

Tattoos.

Kids from a previous relationship – or multiple kids from previous relationships.

Anyone who has used online dating can also add her mountain of debt to the mix.

The usual – 0verweight and tattooed with a mountain of baggage and debt, yet they feel that they are 100% entitled to a 6ft+, facially aesthetic, muscular hunk who hits the gym regularly, with a bank balance akin to Donald Trump, a Ferrari encrusted with diamonds, and no kids – yet he must be giddy with excitement at the thought of paying to raise several other men’s.

O where have all the good men gone? Why WOULDN’T a fit, athletic, rich and successful man want to date Honey Boo-boo’s mom?

[flightspaceSpectator]

Lazarus Long wrote:

flightspace wrote:

He’s the epitome of the 1%.

Exactly so lets get him in office so he can help the rest of us get there. He understand business so he should push to deregulate, and to get the government out of our affairs. There was a time when people used to look at the rich and think how do I become rich, what can I learn from him, now sadly all they think is look how evil he is.

flightspace wrote:

his interest in ISIL is only as a scapegoat for financial exploitation just like al quada has been for bush and obama.

Do you have any facts to support that assertion?

flightspace wrote:

ISIS is a symptom of us being places we dont belong.

No, ISIS is the result of the re-radicalization of muslims. Before World War II (and after about 1400 years of terrorism) muslims were in a relatively moderate state and were mostly getting along with other people. AMIN AL-HUSSEINI (alleged great-uncle to Yasser Arafat) who was denounced by the muslim leaders of the time came to power because the British, against the local Muslim vote, appointed Amin Al-Husseini as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He then went on to found one of the largest divisions of Hitlers army, radicalize muslims and started the muslim brotherhood. The muslim brotherhood has continued to wage a total war on the rest of the world to subjugate all peoples since.

 

Somehow they keep deleting my responses to your utterly idiotic argument. How about the part in his announcement speech where he literally said he wants to go after ISIS for their oil? At least george bush actually bothered to lie about his intentions.  Oh and you can bet your ass Trump is going to do with the United States exactly what he’s done with every business he’s ever owned:

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/06/donald-trump-companies-bankruptcy-atlantic-city

milk them for every penny and leave them failing and bankrupt.

Oh by the way, we armed ISIS, by doing business with their partners in the iraqi military who sided with ISIS because they’re enemies of the taliban. Now we’re giving weapons to the kurds to fight isis, who will likely side with the taliban being the major player in the area who is in opposition to ISIS.

 

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/09/taliban-call-on-kurds-and-turks-to-join-the-afghan-jihad

thats not even taking into account our codependent relationship with israel who doesn’t even want to fight for their own damn country and are committing war crimes on our watch in opposition to hamas, who isn’t much worse of a regime than israel itself.  we’re fighting on three different sides of al clusterf~~~ of a civil war, arming each of them to fight each other, and then complaining when they use those weapons to turn on us, because we’re also arming the people they fight against. Our partners are partners with our enemies, our weapons spread through the area like STDs and our intervention only exaccerbates the problems and arms insurgency, or at least, what we deem to be insurgency, which could really be applied to any group in the middle east at this point because its basically a massive anarchist gang war free for all. And our troops and drones lack neither the understanding of the political landscape nor even a means of detecting peoples identities before they kill them and their families with drones, all they know is its some dude with a gun shooting and that doesn’t really bode well if what they’re trying to do is stabilize the region. If we weren’t there, they would kill each other, and a new nation would rise from the fallout, but because we pick sides and because we CAN’T pick a side, because the sides are poorly drawn and look more like a series of confusing venn diagrams, there is no resolution and we can thank only ourselves for that.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

The Moth Attracted to the Flame wrote:

I MOSTLY would like to side with Donald Trump. He’s a change when compared to other candidates. I believe, though, that’ he’s so good and casual that most people won’t vote for him.

He is likely to suffer a death by a thousand soundbites.  In his latest round he went after Johm McCain apparently, calling him a “dummy” and then did a sound bite where he said he wasn’t a war hero.  It is able to be cut off, and made to make him look back.  He also goes “perhaps he is a war hero”.  He ended up pretty much implying he didn’t like POWs either, at least what would be called a “war hero”.  His off the cuff comments can be seen as refreshing and amusing, but opening up mouth and saying that will mean shoes incoming back at you, ending up in your mouth.

The are reasons why people running for office don’t talk like this, if they expect to win.

Here is an article on what I was talking about:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/07/18/donald-trump-disparages-john-mccains-military-service-did-he-finally-go-too-far/

 

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.