Would YOU ever go back?

[LurchParticipant 3866]

Cap285 wrote:

What if I saw one one these?

If I saw one of those, I would be wishing for my Cherry 2000!

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Personally I think that there’s just only a kind of human that can be viewed, sometimes, as sub-human, just because HE willingly choose to be so: male feminists / manginas / doormats. They pander to women, so, since women are human beings, who choose to submit himself to normal human beings (women) is acting as sub-human – that’s pure logic.
Female feminists saying men shouldn’t have the right to legally give up to fatherhood (when women already can legally give up to motherhood): those women are just doing their best interests.
BUT
Male feminists saying men shouldn’t have the right to legally give up to fatherhood (again: women already can legally give up to motherhood): are they acting as full human beings? That’s the question.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Lurch wrote:

Cap285 wrote:

What if I saw one one these?

If I saw one of those, I would be wishing for my Cherry 2000!

Exactly. Me too.

That’s the entire point here. We’re dealing with complete fantasy. Which says droves about the OP.

“What if women changed?”

What if my aunt had a dick?

Fuck this planet.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

F~~~ no. It’s too far gone. Even if the laws were changed tomorrow, no. It has taken this mess that women have made to show how truly worthless they are. No getting that genie back in the bottle. No way. They’ve showed what they have to offer to the world, a wet hole to f~~~, and that’s all. They try to turn it around now? Too bad, we’ve already realized women are empty human beings, not worth thought or consideration. Oh, they’re all MRAs now? I don’t care. Oh, they’re all feminists now? I don’t care. My life no longer revolves around women. I don’t care if they renovated the plantation. It’s still a f~~~ing plantation.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[FullMetalExoParticipant 2383]

Cap285 wrote:

“What if women changed?”

What if my aunt had a dick?

Will not wait for women to do anything/change, will enjoy my life instead =)

-----------

[Total LeeParticipant 1573]

Yeah what if we can breathe in outer space, but the government just tells us we can’t so we don’t try to escape!!

What if we can’t walk through mirrors because our reflection is in the way?

What if Harry Potter is really a biography and only presented as fiction?

What if Das Auto is really Das Vagina?

[FullMetalExoParticipant 2383]

Total Lee wrote:

what if we can breathe in outer space, but the government just tells us we can’t so we don’t try to escape!!

What if we can’t walk through mirrors because our reflection is in the way?

The truth is out there. I was not prepared to face it.

-----------

[AreteParticipant 11]

Legal situation is just a part of the problem. The real one is different human natures between women and men. So no, I would never go back.

English is not my native language. Sorry for the mistakes.

[Wolf redpillmanSpectator 1658]

Plz.op.answer.that simple question we do not.want feminist.on here or.manginas

[Anonymous 3]

Keymaster wrote:

I see it as “If the laws of gravity didn’t apply, would you jump off a cliff?”

Yes that question of this topic is similar to that. And yes, if the laws of gravity did not apply (at least on me), then I’d definitely try that 🙂 Like adventures, but that situation is not likely to happen. And if there was a really good woman for me, who loves me for the next 40 years and does not annoy the s~~~ out of me, and does not want all my free time and money and kids and so child support, then I would consider her as a long time friends with benefits relationship. But that hypothetical situation is not likely to happen too.

Trying to find a really good woman for good relationship, and dating and trying again infinitely is like repetitively grabbing your camera every day and biking out to the local forest to shoot some good photos of a unicorn. One can spend huge amount of time but wont’t have any result ever. So, let’s be realistic, and find some beauty in existing available things or go downhill biking for adrenaline 🙂

sorry if I write too much symbolic bulls~~~, it’s 23 o’clock PM here and I’m high on beer 🙂

[Total LeeParticipant 1573]

Anonymous wrote:

if there was a really good woman for me, who loves me for the next 40 years

If she wasn’t with me during her best 10 years, I won’t be with her for her worst 40.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I would probably consider it.
As far as supporting women as a group – what kind of bulls~~~ question is that? First of, we’re already doing it big time without anyone asking if we want it or not. Secondly – why would you want to support a group? It’s all on the individual basis. It’s like asking – do you like muslims. I am fine with some of them. But do I support all muslims including wahhabist? F~~~ no.
Get out of here woman and take your bulls~~~ with you

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

OP that is a bulls~~~, rigged, loaded set of questions and you know it .

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[Anonymous 3]

Total Lee wrote:

If she wasn’t with me during her best 10 years, I won’t be with her for her worst 40.

See your point. And in addition to that, a 18 year old girl can be in her best years regarding looks, but without knowledge of life the conversations would be boring.

[DasAutoSpectator 4]

I applaud those who said no

.

Nobody’s forcing the rest to do anything. If you as a person and your society don’t listen to the words long written down… too bad! You can lead a horse to the water, but you can’t make it drink.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DasAuto wrote:

I applaud those who said no

Who cares what you applaud?

You ask everyone a loaded, hypothetical question – and actually expect answers.
But you can’t be bothered to answer the most simple and straightforward one.

DasAuto wrote:

You can lead a horse to the water, but you can’t make it drink.

You can lead a horticulture, but you can’t make her think.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Russky wrote:

I would probably consider it.
As far as supporting women as a group – what kind of bulls~~~ question is that? First of, we’re already doing it big time without anyone asking if we want it or not. Secondly – why would you want to support a group? It’s all on the individual basis. It’s like asking – do you like muslims. I am fine with some of them. But do I support all muslims including wahhabist? F~~~ no.
Get out of here woman and take your bulls~~~ with you

I don’t even get the meaning of “supporting women as group” in an equal society.
In a truly equal society women and men wouldn’t be viewed as belonging to different groups.
Das Auto is not for equality: there’s no such thing as a feminist who stands for equality.
Indeed, she’ll never answer to my example about giving men the right to giving up to fatherhood during the first 18 weeks of pregnancy.
Das Auto, being for her impossible version of matriarchy, is worried because she’s aware that it cannot work without collaboration from men.

My son: “dad, what is a matriarchy?”
Me: “it’s a society where women are in charge and they take responsibility of both women and men, for the good of all. There aren’t proofs that such kind of society ever existed”
My son: “it sounds very different from feminism”
Me: “indeed, the feminist version of matriarchy is women without responsibilities, caring just only about themselves and raising how much as they can the price of pussy”

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[DasAutoSpectator 4]

Keymaster wrote:

Who cares what you applaud?

Nobody would really care if you died tomorrow either…

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

DasAuto wrote:

Let’s suppose all women change color like chameleons and become hardcore men’s rights activists… and eventually we achieve absolute equality by law and by social standards. Let’s also suppose that women stop wanting our money.

In that event would you go back to dating, relationships and marriages? Would you start having female friends and support women as a group? Would you then become “normal” with the females and let your guard down by seeing them as “just human beings”?

Or would you still be a MGTOW?

I could never “go back”, because I was never in the position to let a woman have that kind of power over me in the first place.

In fact, I try to avoid letting anyone have that kind of power over me when I can possibly avoid it.

What is in a “marriage” for me ? Needing to ask a judge for permission to break up ? I don’t want kids, and I don’t care what a god thinks about my private life.

There is nothing in it for me in that scenario.

Frank V.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DasAuto wrote:

Nobody would really care if you died tomorrow either…

You don’t know that. You will say anything now because you got busted and your s~~~ is totally transparent. Furious inside because you tried to plant hateful s~~~ — thinking we would just blindly agree with you — and you failed miserably at it.

What’s really amazing is how you wish death/disrespect toward a man who schooled you personally on how women are not “sub-humans” — immediately after you finished saying they are.

So it’s far more likely nobody will miss YOU if you died tomorrow.
Especially women.

You lost today, sugar. But that doesn’t mean you have to like it.

Take care and don’t let the door hit your vagina on the way out.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts