Would YOU ever go back?

[FullMetalExoParticipant 2383]

Anonymous wrote:

The question presupposes that we do not regard women as human beings.

That’s the line that made me go “Wtf? This crap again”.

-----------

[KeymasterKeymaster]

narwhal wrote:

I see the hypothetical question as a means of identifying what exactly are your issues with marriage and women

I see it as “If the laws of gravity didn’t apply, would you jump off a cliff?”

This question involves posing a total irradication of female nature. The legal system is actually set up to exploit female nature.

Example: Divorce.

The bloodsucking lawyers know that a woman awarded $10M in a divorce settlement will never give $1M back and say “thanks very much, but I don’t need all $10M. $9 million is plenty more than I deserve. I loved you and I’m very sorry it didn’t work out. Buy yourself a house with it instead”.

No women ever did that. But a woman once sent a $975,000,000 check back to her husband and said “that’s not enough”.

That’s female nature. So the question is bulls~~~.

One woman could single-handedly change the legal system forever. She would set a precedent with that. Tiger Woods wife. Any one of Robbin Williams wives. The oil tycoons wife. She could FLATTEN it all by telling the judge “F~~~ YOU!!! NO MATTER WHAT YOU AWARD ME IM GIVING MOST OF IT BACK!!!”

But they know no woman ever will.
I’m surprised the OP would even pose the question.

In order to even bother thinking about it, first it would have to be at least SLIGHTLY possible.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[experiencedParticipant]

As soon as it happens I’ll be happy to give my response.

In the meantime, with all respect, No Intro plus Question =

I do hope I’m wrong and welcome to mgtow!

I f I’m right….

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

The feminists envisioned attempts to roll back the offences of feminism. They made that very difficult to do because arch feminists, school teachers, are all women and all hardcore. In my sisters school in NY they don’t even call the girls “girls” anymore or boys “boys”. They use a gender neutral term like “readers” and “non-readers”.

Then in college the brainwashing is finished and polished until a new scrubbed face social justice warrior, still wet behind the ears, is born.

I don’t suppose we’re going back to the 50’s housewife (who owned your ass up and down, you couldn’t say boo or she’d take out the rolling pin).

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

DasAuto wrote:

Let’s suppose all women change color like chameleons and become hardcore men’s rights activists… and eventually we achieve absolute equality by law and by social standards. Let’s also suppose that women stop wanting our money.

In that event would you go back to dating, relationships and marriages? Would you start having female friends and support women as a group? Would you then become “normal” with the females and let your guard down by seeing them as “just human beings”?

Or would you still be a MGTOW?

You’re a woman, aren’t you?
Define “equality”, sister…
I took a gender studies course in Sweden (it’s not my degree, it was just an integrative course, optional) and I have read more feminist literature than 99% feminists.
Actually, it’s mainly all the feminist books I have read – but also some laws and policies – that convinced me to be an MGHOW.
Women are human beings and women also have more biological value than men, in the wild. That doesn’t mean that within a civilized society we men we should passively accept our biological disposability and bow to sexist laws and policies targetting us just due our sex. That’s the point.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Eric Lauder wrote:

You’re a woman, aren’t you?

If DasAuto is female, this is her final chance to log out and leave peacefully.

The OP was freely given posting permissions ahead of others who are waiting.

Since we are speaking in hypotheticals, then the OP won’t mind us saying: If you are a man ( and you had to agree to that in order to join ) then why don’t you answer that question before anyone else answers yours.

Please don’t make us regret approving you. Thank you in advance.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

Never.

If the laws can be changed to get men back into marriage they can just as easily be changed back once the men are married, pardon me but I’m in no rush to jump into that.

This might have caught me when I was young, stupid (ie. thinking with my c~~~ instead of my brain) and had nothing to lose, now that I’m older, hopefully wiser and have assets to lose, forget it. My work, my money, my choice.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Keymaster wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

You’re a woman, aren’t you?

If DasAuto is female, this is her final chance to log out and leave peacefully.

You were freely given posting permissions ahead of others who are waiting.

Since we are speaking in hypotheticals, then the OP won’t mind us saying: If you are a man ( and you had to agree to that in order to join ) then why don’t you answer that question before anyone else answers yours.

She’s a woman and also a feminist.
Her question is meant to bait us: if men here would answer that, no, we wouldn’t go back not even if laws and policies would be changed, then she would have her victory, showing that we are misogynists beyond redempition.
That’s why I think that at such point, she should be allowed to define what are, according her, equal laws and policies.
In example: in Belgium divorce laws work so: the house is assigned to the children, BOTH PARENTS HAVE TO LEAVE THE HOUSE, then both parents live in the house 15 days per month each. That’s the better solution for children and it’s (when correctly applied) absolutely equal.
In example: in Sweden the young section of the Liberal Party proposed to give men the legal right to surrender fatherhood during the first 18 weeks of pregnancy – if that proposal would be law then men would be allowed to give up to all rights and duties regarding the child, just like women can do through abortion and even through the option to give the baby in adoption just after the birth. Such proposal will never pass: feminists and tradcons opposed it, feminists saying it’s “misogyny”. Such proposal had already been rejected. But such proposal would have been equality.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Damage is already been done. What makes us think they won’t go back to the same old bulls~~~?

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Eric Lauder wrote:

She’s a woman and also a feminist.

The user has 24 hours to contact us and answer the question honestly.

“IF” the user does not, then “she” asked the question KNOWING the situation is totally unacceptable for men in every possible way. So the days’ not a total loss.

“She” doesn’t get to ask a totally unrealistic question and expect not to answer a simple one.

Eric Lauder wrote:

Her question is meant to bait us

That’s obvious.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[DasAutoSpectator 4]

This was always known, but there is enough scientific proof that woman is different from man in both mind and body. Modern western liberals/feminists say crap like “people are people” all the time and that we are “just human beings.” They try and imply that men and women are the same while hiding the fact that women are lesser, and evil sub-humans.

The nature of women has been accurately pointed out by men since time immemorial. Legal reforms and a change in social attitudes will never change this.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DasAuto wrote:

women are lesser, and evil sub-humans.

WHAT? Women are not “lesser and evil sub-humans”.

Their actions might be from time to time, but that’s not the same thing at all. So be careful there.

Women are humans. Not sub-humans. That’s the absolute floor.
Whatever else she is above that …… is entirely up to HER.

Now its’ your turn to answer the question.
If you don’t, you’ll be deleted. You have 24 hours.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

bigboy83 wrote:

Damage is already been done. What makes us think they won’t go back to the same old bulls~~~?

I haven’t been damaged so much, personally: I lost the family house, and I have my kids with me for 6 days per month, officially, more in fact, especially the boy. My ex-wife hadn’t been an harpy: she don’t get any money for her, and the money I give for the kids is reasonable.
Still, she COULD HAVE DO IT, due laws: when I have read the laws about divorce I shuddered.
Now I have a partner who wish to live with me, but I’ll never give her the keys of my home: in Italy they’re introducing a law GRANTING ALIMONIES FOR COHABITATION!!!
If I’ll split why I should pay money to a woman FOR HAVING ALLOWED HER LIVING IN MY HOME FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS??? I would do NOT want the rent for such two years she would have lived in my home, but I think that giving her ALIMONIES would be VERY UNFAIR!
Not counting that SHE HAVE HER HOME, HER JOB AND HER CAR, so she wouldn’t need support! But I have two houses both larger than her house, and I earn more than her (it may be due I have a degree and she hadn’t, also I work 9 hours per day and she work 6 hours per day…) so I would be screwed.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Wolf redpillmanSpectator 1658]

Let me.put.it.this way hell noo i love my freedom to much

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

DasAuto wrote:

This was always known, but there is enough scientific proof that woman is different from man in both mind and body. Modern western liberals/feminists say crap like “people are people” all the time and that we are “just human beings.” They try and imply that men and women are the same while hiding the fact that women are lesser, and evil sub-humans.

The nature of women has been accurately pointed out by men since time immemorial. Legal reforms and a change in social attitudes will never change this.

Nope.
Hypergamy is good in the wild: it means women in the jungle have more chances to have a surviving offspring.
Hypergamy is a natural feature, just like the spider and the mantis eating the males after the copulation: all those things ensure the best for the offspring. The female spider is not evil: she even sacrifice herself for her offspring.
The matter is that we aren’t animals anymore.
That’s why feminism and feminist policies are bad: actual modern feminism encourage primitiveness in women.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

As we use to say in boot camp: SPY AT THE HATCH SIR!

What if I saw one one these?

Women are going to magically change? Give up their cake and eating it too? My ass.

I’m never going back. Not. Ever.

Because f~~~ all the cool s~~~ I’ve been buying the past 4 months. Let me go back and put money down the sinkhole of dating.

Yeah, let me trade this:

http://www.parksabers.com/arcwave.html

and this:

and this:

For this?:

No.

Fuck this planet.

[Anonymous 0]

DasAuto wrote:

Let’s suppose all women change color like chameleons and become hardcore men’s rights activists… and eventually we achieve absolute equality by law and by social standards. Let’s also suppose that women stop wanting our money.

In that event would you go back to dating, relationships and marriages? Would you start having female friends and support women as a group? Would you then become “normal” with the females and let your guard down by seeing them as “just human beings”?

Or would you still be a MGTOW?

NO – NO MEANS NO AND GONE MEANS GONE

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

Something stinks!!! I smell fish ! GTFO ! MGTOW.COM is for MEN ONLY !

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[FullMetalExoParticipant 2383]

DasAuto wrote:

proof that woman is different from man in both mind and body.

No s~~~ Sherlock, unless we all become hermaphrodite snails all of a sudden, Humans actually have 2 sexes for a reason.

Bodies do have some differences. Unless someone cloned you Im 99.99% sure some Woman aka Female Human got impregnated by a Male Human gave birth to you at some point.

Still, we are Human, whenever you like it or not.

Maybe you want to identify as Boeing AH-64 Apache helicopter, reality sucks right?

-----------

[The Long WalkParticipant 1282]

Why? Since the ‘Red Pill Rage’ subsided I’ve enjoyed a relatively quiet life, almost undisturbed by the daily drama and nit picking inherent to life around women. I see the occasional thing that irks me, but it’s become a lot easier for me to just take a step back and remind myself ‘I’m glad that’s not my problem.’

[Author]

Posts