Women to serve in close combat roles in the British military

Topic by Anthony

Anthony

Home Forums MGTOW Central Women to serve in close combat roles in the British military

This topic contains 22 replies, has 18 voices, and was last updated by Jack reacher  jack reacher 3 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #263758
    +11
    Anthony
    Anthony
    Participant
    2281

    Looks like Britain is allowing women to fight in close combat as well.

    And now British women are reacting the same way American women reacted.

    Kate Medina said:

    We are physically different from men. It is a biological fact that the average women has a third less upper body strength and when it the comes to hand-to- hand combat – a fight to the death one-on-one; woman against a man – we will be at a physical disadvantage.

    Hey, you c~~~s wanted equality and now you got it. Don’t come crying to us now.

    I find this entertaining as hell. Women wanted equality, but now when it’s given to them on a silver plater, they reject it if it doesn’t benefit them in anyway.

    Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

    #263878
    +8
    Nerevar
    Nerevar
    Participant
    8040

    “Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.”

    GET THAT OUTFIT ON, MAGGOT! SHUT THE F~~~ UP! TO THE FRONT LINE! CHAAAARGE!

    *splat* *maim* *limbs everywhere* *women crying hysterically* *f~~~ton of bombs raining down, accompanied by some sort of toxic gas* *all women die*

    Welcome to equality, bitches!

    "One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

    #263883
    +7

    Now that they have to deal with some of the negative side effects of being a man, they back track so hard. Turn the f~~~ around now that they have to put their money where their mouth is. Of course, general policy is, at least in the states, is for women to get pregnant to avoid combat deployments. And of course the military will let them stay and all that.

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

    #263891
    +8
    The Long Walk
    The Long Walk
    Participant
    1282

    If they want to play soldier, so be it. I do feel for the fighting men who’ll be put at risk by these little girls, not to mention having to listen to their crap in an already stressful situation.

    #263892
    +7
    Nerevar
    Nerevar
    Participant
    8040

    Now that they have to deal with some of the negative side effects of being a man, they back track so hard. Turn the f~~~ around now that they have to put their money where their mouth is. Of course, general policy is, at least in the states, is for women to get pregnant to avoid combat deployments. And of course the military will let them stay and all that.

    If I were I high up in military I’d say “f~~~ it, don’t care if you got pregnant. You have a duty to your country. Now report to your officer!”

    "One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

    #263905
    +11

    Anonymous
    3

    Last time I checked, you were all strong, independent women who don’t need no stinkin weakling men.

    #263910
    +6
    Constantine
    Constantine
    Participant
    4420

    Tungus Khan wrote:
    Last time I checked, you were all strong, independent women who don’t need no stinkin weakling men.

    This.

    To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

    #263935
    +5
    Varun
    Varun
    Participant
    2981

    I thought Britain (Europe) already have a population problem…
    So are they doing this because there aren’t enough ‘men’ soldiers, or are they doing this so that women will become all ‘reproductive-mode-on’ and produce more babies?

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    #263960
    +7
    STORM
    STORM
    Participant
    738

    I would not want to go on any mission with a female. I don’t care how tough or strong they are, nor do i care how accurate they are with a weapon. Here’s why …

    It is not in female nature to place herself in grave danger for a man, what do we hear time and time again when s~~~ goes down ? “HEROIC BOYFRIEND TAKES BULLET FOR GIRLFRIEND WHEN GUNMAN OPENED FIRE”

    As men, we can place our bet that our fellow man has no problem being the first in the door and taking fire, and in some cases, has no problem with diving on a grenade to save the lives of his unit. Would a women ? I highly doubt it.

    If we listen to a female at all, It's no longer to find out if they're crazy, we know they're crazy, It's to find out what flavor.

    #263974
    +7
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    women can do anything a man can do

    I hope men give these women some white feathers

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #263983
    +5
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    When women start getting their heads smashed in on the battle field, war comes to an end.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #263996
    +8
    Zuberi Tau
    Zuberi Tau
    Participant
    10606

    How many of those trollops are going to falsely accuse male soldiers of rape so they can sue the military?

    #264010
    +5
    Dr. Sable
    Dr. Sable
    Participant
    1064

    Yeah, how nice.
    You guys should see them p~~~ and s~~~ their pants in supporting roles let alone up front where
    you eat dirt from mortars and spaying bullets.

    Zero Tolerance

    #264055
    +3
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    almost makes me want to go to war against the uk, except the likelihood of hand to hand these days are slim and none. they’re worried and complaining about nothing.

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #264063
    +2
    Madman
    Madman
    Participant
    772

    Liberals are useful idiots. Once they have fulfilled their purpose of ushering in the new socialist order, the gooberment wont need them anymore and they will be the first ones to go.

    #264070
    +4
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Participant
    10809

    You have to feel sorry for the men who will be assigned to active combat roles with these women. A man and two ladies going up against a squad of ISIS men- what could go wrong?

    Well the front line women will probably demand to be promoted to generals anyway. Maybe the women can get some designer shoes to coordinate with their combat fatigues.

    #264428
    +4
    Chuddox
    Chuddox
    Participant
    585

    The military should just enforce birth control (Shot, or IUD), or force abortions.

    “My body, my right”

    F~~~ you bitch, for the rest of your service term your ass BELONGS TO THE QUEEN, and she says “Suck it up, Buttercup”

    “Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard

    #264430
    +3
    Jack reacher
    jack reacher
    Participant
    751

    I went through basic training and have vivid memories of the 4 broads who had a chit to get out of PT one morning. That is 4 broads and only 4 broads.

    The rest of us were up at 0500 running circuits while all handing off full jerry cans to each other, at the same time wearing gas masks, and the “sick” bitches got to polish artillery rounds sitting on their asses.

    Even with affirmative action policies and cushy non combat roles, bitches are at about 25-30 percent of most western forces. Many stories of them getting knocked up when deployment approaches, look at the stats for deaths and injuries during deployment, its still the guys.

    #264433
    +3
    Solitude
    solitude
    Participant
    346

    But the Army’s research suggests fewer than 5% of its 7,000 women would pass the current infantry fitness test.

    So why on earth are they in the military?

    I also think a blanket approach to opening up all ground combat roles to women is too ‘cookie-cutter’.

    I see no reason why women couldn’t serve in front line armoured regiments that aren’t quite as physically demanding as, say, the infantry. These units do see direct combat, but the soldiers are ‘mounted’ in fighting vehicles, so there is less physical fitness required and they do not engage in hand-to-hand combat unless their vehicle is disabled and over-run by the enemy.

    I’m sure men would love to be afforded this opportunity.

    #264441
    +3
    STORM
    STORM
    Participant
    738

    But the Army’s research suggests fewer than 5% of its 7,000 women would pass the current infantry fitness test.

    So why on earth are they in the military?

    I also think a blanket approach to opening up all ground combat roles to women is too ‘cookie-cutter’.

    I see no reason why women couldn’t serve in front line armoured regiments that aren’t quite as physically demanding as, say, the infantry. These units do see direct combat, but the soldiers are ‘mounted’ in fighting vehicles, so there is less physical fitness required and they do not engage in hand-to-hand combat unless their vehicle is disabled and over-run by the enemy.

    I’m sure men would love to be afforded this opportunity.

    This is exactly what bothers me about women in military. Even if they are in front line combat units, i believe they’ll still find a way to waffle their way out of it. So what should happen, is they should have a seperate boot camp where they are trained for support roles. Everyone saying “good these bitches will get what they asked for” don’t understand that they actually won’t, they will get recognition from everyone for making the cut, and in the end, they will never see a day of CQC.

    If we listen to a female at all, It's no longer to find out if they're crazy, we know they're crazy, It's to find out what flavor.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.