Women historian SHATTERS Male-centric history

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

The closest historical example of a society that was MGTOW I can think of is Sparta. Granted they have some white knighting going on but it was largely a MGTOW society. It would have been wonderful to live there. (Except when they were fighting Athens, then the Persians)

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

When I’m on my deathbed, hopefully not for many decades, I will have my fleshlight buried in my yard, along with a few other items, just so I can confound the stupid historians and archaeologists in the future who will think the fleshlight is some kind of religions artifact.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Y_Participant 4591]

iMickey503 wrote:

Ehh. I always thought that a woman’s greatest power is Emotional manipulation. As long as that is around, then its going to still be a big issue

Naah – it’s her pussy . Man must have pussy. So he will do anything for her to get pussy. Must have pussy.

No pussy no manipulation no lying bitches.

There you go.

[narwhalParticipant]

I thought the South American societies were no for sacrificing virgins to their gods? I would think if their are going to be any virgin sacrifices, women are going to make sure they’re in charging of picking the women. They also would want to be a priestess, as this would give them an aspect of being the ‘voice of the gods’ and thus give them some power over men. I have little doubt that women gained much power through this manner. Such a leader would likely have much say over the behavior and treatment in women, but unlikely to be involved in protecting the society or in keeping it running.

Men typically gain power by demonstrating strong leadership and/or by birthright from strong leadership. Seeing a woman rise to power in an age where physical capabilities were so dominate seems highly unlikely.

Ok. Then do it.

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

@pistolpete

Any culture that is ran by women is generally a 3rd world s~~~ hole.

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

All women have left to offer is sex and reproduction. Take control away from women on these two concepts and women have no power.

The first sentence is absolutely true (possibly male-mother-need too, they offer motherly sort of emo needs for men). The second is not true imo. We can’t exactly remove millions of years of instinct from either sex.

I agree that women use sex like currency. They spend it to get resources and security. They employ proxy agents for a multitude of benefits.

However, a sex banning society is sociologically naïve, it’s impossible. 1984 was a great book but a sex banning society would not work (the idea was purely for poetic and symbolic effect). It just can’t work because sex is a two way street. There is an asker and a taker. Men have a role in the high SMPV of women. Men pursue sex madly. The benefits women enjoy are irrelevant to the fact that men are going to get sex whether it’s free or not. They will take it if necessary.

If you remove the advantages that sex offers women (status, security, reproduction, legal rights). Imagine a society with artificial wombs taking over 100% of reproduction and government institutions raising children and legal misandry completely eradicated. Sex remains just as sought after as today. Women will still play the same instinctive games without reward. They will still emotionally manipulate and compete against other women for sex even if the sex offers them no proxy benefit. But what happens in a society like A Brave New World where sex is as common as eating lunch? Sex is valueless, merely a fun pastime.

The idea that a government or authority could stifle the human instinct to fornicate, let alone reprogram women to not hypergamize and men to not chase ass…no way, the people would run straight into the bullets and the system would not be stable. Sex is absolutely established and can’t be bridled. We can tailor it, redirect it, rob it of value but it can’t be erased or outlawed.

Anyway, very interesting.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

OK before anyone takes issue with this woman’s hypothesis (That women, not men ran the huge empires of pre-Columbian south america Inca, Aztec etc. ) I would like to offer a suggestion. I think she is right….but with a caveat. Once men successfully built empires, highly functioning prosperous societies etc women did what they always do—begin making demands and injecting themselves into positions of power and authority that they are not entitled to either based upon intelligence, ability or merit. And they eventually take over through the use of pussy power—then their nature tendencies and personal inadequacies asserted themselves and these great empires fell into ruin. There is a lesson here. Now the author of the book below isn’t interested in doing anything but re-writing history to validate the fad-notion that women are powerful, capable leaders blah blah. If she were intellectually honest she would have examined how female misuse of power, mismanagement and a host of other deficiencies all contributed to the decline and eventual obliteration of these societies.

Question? How is our society doing? Especially since we gave women the privalage of voting 100 years ago.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/women-ran-things-ancient-peru-study-argues-051952016.html

If I recall, there’s a few Native American tribes that will not go to war until they’ve been given the okay by the counsel of females. It’s believed according to these tribes, that the woman bring men into the world, and thus, only she can decide whether to take a life.

[Author]

Posts