Women historian SHATTERS Male-centric history

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

OK before anyone takes issue with this woman’s hypothesis (That women, not men ran the huge empires of pre-Columbian south america Inca, Aztec etc. ) I would like to offer a suggestion. I think she is right….but with a caveat. Once men successfully built empires, highly functioning prosperous societies etc women did what they always do—begin making demands and injecting themselves into positions of power and authority that they are not entitled to either based upon intelligence, ability or merit. And they eventually take over through the use of pussy power—then their nature tendencies and personal inadequacies asserted themselves and these great empires fell into ruin. There is a lesson here. Now the author of the book below isn’t interested in doing anything but re-writing history to validate the fad-notion that women are powerful, capable leaders blah blah. If she were intellectually honest she would have examined how female misuse of power, mismanagement and a host of other deficiencies all contributed to the decline and eventual obliteration of these societies.

Question? How is our society doing? Especially since we gave women the privalage of voting 100 years ago.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/women-ran-things-ancient-peru-study-argues-051952016.html

[Anonymous 12]

Men built things mostly to acquire wealth and to impress women. Women would then try and rule by proxy just as they are doing now. When it all goes pear shaped they blame men, just as they are doing now.

A MGTOW run nation, now that would be interesting.

[RomulusParticipant 4667]

There is very little evidence to support her conclusions.

The main basis for her theory is that………remains have been found in a few locations where the female is dressed in garb of a wealthy powerful individual, and on two occasions the burial site contained a couple of items one would associate with political power.

Its conjecture on her part (bad science while good PR) to conclude…….based on such flimsy evidence, that women in large numbers held political power independent of a male.

I suspect she has arrived at this summation because it fits well with today’s common theme of female empowerment, and not because she has uncovered any evidence that turns our understanding of power on its ear.

For example, a more common explanation could be that this woman was a regent, (as the mother) of a future king who not old enough yet to take title. Her husband had passed and the son was too young to take the thrown. Mothers often acted as the Regent…….a very common feature in history.

Or perhaps she was married to a very wealthy and powerful man and was simply vain and wanted to be buried with those items.

There is simply not enough evidence to support this jump the researcher makes that concludes women held political power in large numbers.

How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

[Y_Participant 4591]

PistolPete wrote:

Once men successfully built empires, highly functioning prosperous societies etc women did what they always do—begin making demands and injecting themselves into positions of power and authority that they are not entitled to either based upon intelligence, ability or merit. And they eventually take over through the use of pussy power—

Thank you Pete – a series of good points.

All societies that I have studied – without exception – were built up by men. I can find no evidence that the building process over possibly decades or centuries included females other than in the family role.

A possible exception would be as a religious totem or in the form of a ‘divine’ queen. We tend to forget how religion ruled society for over 2000 years, and still do to a degree.

The writer argues and hypothesises that these female Inca rulers and religious figures achieved their status through their own merits not by birth or social privileges.

I submit thee are the ONLY two ‘professions’ that require birthrights and social privilege to be valid.

To me the running of a country depends the network of men of all social classes that make the system work in spite of whom is in charge. I see nothing in her findings that show these tasks (or aspects of them) to be carried out by female to the same degree.

The other point this female makes is quite asnine. It is well known there are a few smart females; just because a few of these were able to (possibly) achieve some sort of social status or recognition – other than religious or royal – does not mean the Incas were run by these individuals. Again there is no proof of such females here.

The author seems to rely on superficial data to support her claims on female superiority. I do not find her ramblings persuasive. She needs rest and treatment at the nearest mental institution.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

That women, not men ran the huge empires of pre-Columbian south america Inca, Aztec etc. ) I would like to offer a suggestion. I think she is right

Nah mate!

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

That explains what happened to Chichen Itza. Nice little society they had going…….

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Paradise Island is the ultimate matriarchy ruled only by woman.
Wonder Woman is the ultimate woman a goddess of female empowerment.

You do realize both of those were created by a man.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Y_Participant 4591]

FrostByte wrote:

You do realize both of those were created by a man

36-22-36 – of course!!

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22520]

Anonymous wrote:

A MGTOW run nation, now that would be interesting.

That would be interesting.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22520]

To add to my previous comment. I believe a MGTOW lead government and culture would be so authoritarian towards the common “blue pill” population that it would make Judge Dread seem like an anarchist.

If you want to see an example of what I am talking about, one could make the argument that the culture under the control of Raymond Cocteau in the film Demolition Man was a MGTOW lead culture to the point that sex was banned and pregnancy was controlled by the state.

Still, I would find a MGTOW lead nation to be interesting.

[MACHOParticipant]

Morale of all this.. When Females start taking over any given people.. the end is near!

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[GregB0Participant]

PistolPete wrote:

And they eventually take over through the use of pussy power

that or they assassinated them during the night. Evil Woman

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

[GregB0Participant]

Anonymous wrote:

Women would then try and rule by proxy

It’s aways about getting and keeping resources, always others however.

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

[Gravel PitParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

And they eventually take over through the use of pussy power—then their nature tendencies and personal inadequacies asserted themselves and these great empires fell into ruin.

A brief summary of about 2 million years of hominem evolution, nice. Very eloquent.

PistolPete wrote:

How is our society doing? Especially since we gave women the privalage of voting 100 years ago.

Not too good I’m afraid.

Nice post Pete. You’re one of most white collar intelligent dudes here. The avatar is so misleading. For example those Friday Night Organ posts. Here is a red skull guy posting classical music and then explain that music in ways that far exceed our ability to understand. Top notch my brother.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

sex was banned and pregnancy was controlled by the state.

I always laugh at the dystopian fictions where they ban sex. I don’t understand why. Sex, when used safely and with birth control, would be harmless (like in A Brave New World or Logan’s Run. The banning of sex in 1984 makes little sense to me.

I actually would support the state controlling reproduction and child upbringing under certain conditions. This would actually solve a great deal of problems. And sex should be merely for recreation (no pun intended). We all know the reasons why prostitution is banned in America…..

Anyway, we’re still living in the Middle Ages. I always say this. I laugh at the primitive people who get psyched up over new cell phones and Tesla crap cars. They think they’re in the future. They can’t even imagine what a proper, solid future looks like.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

If you are too busy fighting for survival, and battling the elements, you put up with a ton of things and give thanks for a good harvest, so your tribe doesn’t die off. Moment civilization begins to take serious hold, first world problems sink in, and there is a ton of pettiness that manifests and becomes part of politics and social stuff, which then becomes the realm of relationship, and thus women. Yes, there are some exceptions, but you see the normal differences between men and women as far as the culture they manifest in society, so you get tons of petty BS, as is seen with the media realm. Such is a battleground of perception and reputation above all. The “woman demands” here are ones of pretty BS and making things “tidy” or perfect, and justice in social area.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[NerdTunnelerParticipant]

This is weemins logic nowadays…I just copied this but their logic is similar…

Studying Archaeology
After digging to a depth of 100 meters last year, Japanese scientists found traces of copper wire dating back 1000 years and came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a telephone network one thousand years ago.

Not to be outdone in the weeks that followed, Chinese scientists dug 200 meters and headlines in the Chinese papers read: “Chinese scientists have found traces of 2000 year old optical fibers and have concluded that their ancestors already had advanced high-tech digital telephone 1000 years earlier than the Japanese.”

One week later, the Greek newspapers reported thefollowing: “After digging as deep as 800 meters, Greek scientists have found absolutely nothing.”
They have concluded that 3000 years ago, their ancestors were already using wireless technology.

I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22520]

Gravel Pit wrote:

I always laugh at the dystopian fictions where they ban sex. I don’t understand why. Sex, when used safely and with birth control, would be harmless (like in A Brave New World or Logan’s Run. The banning of sex in 1984 makes little sense to me.

Banning sex is the ultimate form of control and stripping of power at the individual level. But, more so for women than men. All women have left to offer is sex and reproduction. Take control away from women on these two concepts and women have no power.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Whoa, Hold on there partner! MGTOW being Athortive and telling each other what to do?

I’m thinking more Dirt Pools and 4×4 trucks. I doubt any man sane MGTOW run society would be totalitarian like that. Actually, I think just the opposite.

It would be a ton like this one without ALL OF THE BULLS~~~. Homelessness would still be there. All of the things that suck would still be around. It’s just that you would see a TON less of it.

And being the nice guy would not hurt so much.

If I felt like having BLADE cover for me for the week, so I could go out and help old folks take care of the chores around the house, and just help out and be charged up to go to work next week, or even take care of little Timmy, that would be possible since the other guy would get the overtime hours.

Honestly, I would see a ton more hard work celebrated. Guys with gauges filled to the brim with car parts, electronics, Modeling stuff, Mini game rooms for the kids. You know fun stuff.

And realistically, Women would be a S~~~ mega ton Happier overall. Mainely our daughters. I don’t see a ton of marriages either. Not because it is slavery for a man. But I really think that about this time, women are really going to have to work into a man’s heart since a sex bot can do so much more than a woman van ever offer a man.

The weird thing is, I don’t see women out of the workforce. There just happy doing jobs they actually like to do that have real sense of purpose.

I’m sorry, but I never minded being the dude helping to make lemonade stands, or showing how to bake the ultimate cookie or mastering cake decorating.

See, that the funny thing with accomplishments. People when given the choice just do what they want to do. Not what they have to. And when you don’t force f~~~ it down people’s throats. Good things happen.

It’s not perfect, and that’s what makes it great. There is always room to tinker or improve. But the real crimes that are of today would just not be there as they are now.

There would still be female nature. And all the crap that comes along with it. It’s just that you get a real sense of what’s really important.

One things for sure, the world would be a more fun place. There would be a TON less crime. And men would once again take the Initiative to be driven again.

The one thing that would be absent would the be Bulls~~~ about MEN Vs. Women on some Bulls~~~ Feminist Scale.

And Looks? Well those are still going to be there. But the thing is, yea. We love a good looking women, and there would be more of them. But the basic idea would be the one thing that actually matters to any man. Truth and loyalty would be the highest achievement factors.

Women would still be treated with White gloves since we can all finally be honest and they are indeed children level minds for the most part.

And there would still be plenty of the same women who are good at doing things that men are good at would be in those positions. But it would be the same great women we have in the ratio right now that CHOSE to do this.

It’s amazing if you think about it. But the only bad thing I do see is that since women are going to master the caring portion, there is going to still be some f~~~ed up ideas brought in that will have to just be dealt with.

Bascily, Money is going to have to take a second place next to innovation, and true value of ideas and ability.

I don’t think there is going to be this mad rush or slavery in the trades. I do see a ton of happy men doing their jobs, and enjoying their days off.

The real problem comes as to where that balance is going to be. And how to deal with the male dominance instinct.

Its going to be hard keeping that momentum going if things get to good. But realistically? I don’t know how to get there since as soon as you bring in a woman, it kind of tears all of that apart.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Faust For Science wrote:

GravelPit wrote:

I always laugh at the dystopian fictions where they ban sex. I don’t understand why. Sex, when used safely and with birth control, would be harmless (like in A Brave New World or Logan’s Run. The banning of sex in 1984 makes little sense to me.

Banning sex is the ultimate form of control and stripping of power at the individual level. But, more so for women than men. All women have left to offer is sex and reproduction. Take control away from women on these two concepts and women have no power.

Ehh. I always thought that a woman’s greatest power is Emotional manipulation. As long as that is around, then its going to still be a big issue.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Author]

Posts