Woman murders Man gets BIG pussy pass

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

I’m going to comment on Russky2’s addition to the thread. I think it is important to distinguish between revenge and an justice. I played the revenge game for a long time when I was younger and brother one really has to be careful or it will take you over. As for the clip above, it might be emotionally satisfying for the moment but in the end it will not be. Justice on the other hand is a product of the civil society and the rules we live by; this is why capital punishment is not immoral at all. I believe in administering justice; even if it is private justice but not sadistic torture for some kind of gratification. A bullet in the back of the head or a nice short rope and a tall tree is sufficient.

[Gravel PitParticipant 13205]

This video is a huge warning about situational awareness, of which this poor chap had none. The moment she got up and shut the door, he should have fled with force!

Apparently he had no idea it was even possible for her to try and arrest him. He was CLEARLY trying to be submissive and polite (for obvious reason because he didn’t want to catch an assault charge… he could have easily punched them both in the face and ran for it) but he didn’t do that, he kept his hands to himself and tried to get out the window. and then she murdered him!

This is appalling that she is not behind bars for murder.

[Anonymous 7]

Gravel Pit wrote:

jd anderson wrote:

In police training

In the Marines, we were instructed on what is called a “mobility kill”

Now there are probably many names for it but basically you purposely don’t kill the target, merely disable their mobility…shoot em in the legs!

I always say this when ever shootings happen that could have prevented a fatality where none was needed, why did they not go for the mobility kill. These people are sick f~~~s and should not be given weapons because they just want to smoke innocent people.

I was also taught, “two in the chest, one in head.” But that was for terrorist in which I had Positive ID, Hostile Intent, Hostile Action. This crazy bitch broke all the rules on engagement and shot a man in the back killing him.

Justice was not served.

The reason they are not just immobilized is because fear of litigation.

Years past there was criteria for marksmanship in the police force. You actually got a grade.

Now it is just pass or fail, so the lawyers can’t ask why you didn’t just shoot the gun out of his hand like they do in the movies.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Here is a good article about the powers of a bounty-hunter and their use of force. Really scary.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_gist/1997/09/bounty_hunters.html

[Gravel PitParticipant 13205]

This is the exact reason we see men totally flip out and go vigilante suicide style. Their backs are against the wall. Once you’re in the system you’re screwed, they know that.

Ever heard men say, “I’m never going back to jail.” Take heed of that warning because they literally will flip out and kill everyone and themselves. The system has EMOTIONALLY f~~~ed over SO MANY MEN that they will literally martyr themselves in an effort to stop being harassed and imprisoned.

There is nothing worse than having your personal liberty taken away. My Dad thought I was joking about how I’d rather take a drink or get married rather than ever going back to jail.

This is why many people simply opt out of social interaction. We’ve created a terrible fear environment for men, punishing them and paper-f~~~ing them for silly things that drive them to madness. Then you see them on 6 oCLock TV, killed 30 people and themselves. And everyone asks why. You can’t unlearn 2 million years of survival instinct.

You corner an animal and he will tear you to pieces. This guy tried every way to escape a hostile situation without force and it cost him his life.

There is no way out for these people, don’t become one of them.

[GregB0Participant]

PistolPete wrote:

fleeing then your life is no longer in jeopardy.

Quite right Pistol Pete, even if they are still on your property, you must be in jeopardy or fear for your like.

Anonymous wrote:

in disbelief because he realized it wasn’t warranted.

I believe that there “rest of the story” involved a set of stained bed sheets that she and the deceased shared.

Anonymous wrote:

what rights a bail bondsman has in detaining someone

They may detain “the defendant” for as long as is necessary to get them to the authorities. It was unclear to me what she said that she had seen/hear about the deceased, but the implication is that he has somehow violated his parole or had an active warrant against him.

Gravel Pit wrote:

I was also taught, “two in the chest, one in head.”

This was the result of engagements for Army personnel as well, no one rises up like a Zombie if you double tap them at the start.

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

[Gravel PitParticipant 13205]

Sorry I got too involved on the thread, wrote too much.

They should retry this woman for manslaughter or something. Very sad day for that man’s family.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Sorry Gravel–no retrial Manslaughter is a lessor included offense, so I’m sure the Jury Instructions gave them latitude to find her guilty of that. I’m also sure that the dead guy was the one “on trial”. I’m sure the jury was treated to all kinds of stories about his criminal record in order to justify the c~~~’s actions.

[phoenixgod1995Participant 3352]

What’s interesting is that in Criminal Law. We were talking about Self-defense and Necessity last week as well as deadly force. If you feel threatened, you may take action, but if the threat retreats, that’s the end of it, if he/she attacks after the threat has retreated, it’s deadly force and you have now used unnecessary force. The only time this does not apply is the “Stand your Ground” Law. If you are threatened in your home or a place where you are doing business lawfully, you may shoot the intruder to protect yourself. It’s known as the Castle Doctrine. This woman is guilty of murder no matter how you slice it. She can’t claim self-defense because the guy was retreating and she still attacked him. She definitely got a big pussy pass on that one.

Marriage and Divorce for a man is like getting a cactus shoved up your ass. It’s painful with all the spines that go in and it is painful getting all the spines out, meanwhile Wifey gets most of the money, your home, your kids, and practically everything you own.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

From the article I posted:

“The powers of bounty hunters are immense. When arresting a skip, bounty hunters need not read them their Miranda rights. They do not need a warrant to search the residence of a skip, even a hotel room. Nor are they required to announce themselves before entering private property, as police officers must. Evidence obtained illegally by bounty hunters can be submitted in court. Like police officers, bounty hunters are authorized to use “all reasonable force” to apprehend skips. This means they can shoot to kill if shot at. Also, they can transport skips across state lines without enduring extradition proceedings.

So the question is: was her use of force reasonable? Under the circumstances I would say no–neither she or her son were in physical jeopardy.

[Russky2Participant 3100]

PistolPete wrote:

I’m going to comment on Russky2’s addition to the thread. I think it is important to distinguish between revenge and an justice. I played the revenge game for a long time when I was younger and brother one really has to be careful or it will take you over. As for the clip above, it might be emotionally satisfying for the moment but in the end it will not be. Justice on the other hand is a product of the civil society and the rules we live by; this is why capital punishment is not immoral at all. I believe in administering justice; even if it is private justice but not sadistic torture for some kind of gratification. A bullet in the back of the head or a nice short rope and a tall tree is sufficient.

Well that’s the whole point of this movie dude. Is to administer capital punishment via torture, because the law now functions outside of moral justice and only on mere assumptions and false reactions. So the point of this clip was not to show that torture is great, but that sometimes it’s a good thing to resort to it when there is no justice.

MGTOW AKBAR

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

I see your point–BUT the very definition of evil is to take enjoyment from the suffering of others. Thus maybe its my sense of German efficiency but I prefer simple, quick resolution; God will administer any revenge that needs to be employed.

[Anonymous 7]

If this were to happen again in the future, make a citizen’s arrest.

I just read the rights of the citizen during a citizen’s arrest, and you are on fairly equal terms.

You can detain and use force required to perform the detainment.

As soon as the door closes and locks, I’m under the assumption that I am being held beyond my will, and/or kidnapped.

I would rather the lawyers hash it out in court, as to who wins, than be six feet under with nothing.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Good call Lonestar; the very definition of arrest is whether or not you are free to leave. If you are not free to leave then you are under arrest. So the question is—did the bail bond contractual arrangement give her the power to kill this guy—NO. And even if it did that is not something you can legitimately contract for.

BTW I love your avatar.

[Anonymous 7]

PistolPete wrote:

BTW I love your avatar.

Never ever give up, my friend!

If you ever find yourself in an encounter with a police officer and you feel like you are being harassed, just ask them if you are being detained or arrested. If they answer no, you are not… tell them to have a nice day and feel free to walk away.

Edit to add:
Pete, you are right on point.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5192]

He was trying to climb out the window, she shot him in the back, this is murder. She tries to use fear for her kid as an excuse, like a cowardly c~~~. This is how you know all liberal judges are cucks who must be hanged, and maybe a few of the gynocentric TradCuck cops who help enable this will get the rope soon after. They blocked the comments for this on FOX, that is the ultimate sign this is a Pussy Pass. #killthemall #nosurvivors #icethemout

Sovereignty above all else.

[Anonymous 54]

Gravel Pit wrote:

They should retry this woman for manslaughter or something. Very sad day for that man’s family.

They cant do that.
But it can be a mistake to offer the Jury one charge of Murder 1 only.
They should be offerd the options of Murder 2 or Manslaughter.

Although this is cleary Murder 1.
He is trying to get away from her.

No weapon.

No threat of Deadly force.

She calmly opens the drawer, pulls a piece out, and pops him.

The problem?

Female Jurors.

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

There is no logical reason why this woman was acquitted. It’s a disgrace.

Does the state in which this was tried have a death penalty?
And, can a higher court declare a mistrial or can the prosecutors appeal?

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Moresky:

this was Oklahoma so ask JD he lives there. No a higher court cannot declare a mistrial. Nor can the state prosecute her again as this would violate the double jeopardy clause of the US Constitution. Nope she is free as can be. We can only hope that one day justice catches up to her–in a nice dark alley.

[RemovedParticipant 4676]

She may made it out of court and the law of our corrupt system, but everything that knows her knows she is a murderer now. She did it without remorse or hesitation, because she was angry. I can guarantee that no person will feel safe with her from here on out.

[Author]

Posts