Why men do not want to marry modern women anymore

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22527]

Picture says it all.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

Both holes.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22527]

All 3 holes.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Anonymous 18]

But she is not like the other girls.

[Anonymous 7]

A tadpole landwhale. Bitch is gonna ballon up and soon.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Picture says it all.

I can’t understand.
She’s good looking and smiling, where is the problem here?

For the “public entrance” joke: the trouble isn’t “women are having too much sex!”.
The trouble is the laws regulating marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation), and also the “always believe her” attitude when it comes at false accusations.

I would have zero problem cohabiting, for some months or even few years, until I’ll get tired of her, with a woman if there wouldn’t be the above problems.
I care nothing how many partners she had: in the wild male primates f~~~ a lot of females, without worrying about their former partners, they haven’t problems because there’s no such thing as alimonies, child support, false accusations.

The problem with “women are having too much sex!” approach are two:

First: it’s another way to put vagina on a pedestal – her vagina is very worthy if she had no former partners / few partners.

Second: it takes as a given, and it reinforce, things like alimonies and child support – that’s another form of gynocentrism since such things are meant for women’s benefits at the expense of men.

That’s why tradcon approach sucks: it alleges that alimonies and child support are good, you just have to find a virgin / semi-virgin.
Don’t trust tradcons, guys, they’re playing with your insecurities to turn you in a working horse for a virgin / semi-virgin. Virgins are a lot of work, not particularly worthy.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Let’s see.

A fleshlight costs around $50.00. It won’t nag, complain, cheat, give me a raging case of herpes, or call the cops on me.

My ex, who was a Sunday school teacher, cost me 300k, cheated, lied, nagged and wanted to cause me bodily harm.

I will probably go with the fleshlight.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

Eric Lauder wrote:

can’t understand.
She’s good looking and smiling, where is the problem here?

For the “public entrance” joke: the trouble isn’t “women are having too much sex!”.
The trouble is the laws regulating marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation), and also the “always believe her” attitude when it comes at false accusations.

I would have zero problem cohabiting, for some months or even few years, until I’ll get tired of her, with a woman if there wouldn’t be the above problems.
I care nothing how many partners she had: in the wild male primates f~~~ a lot of females, without worrying about their former partners, they haven’t problems because there’s no such thing as alimonies, child support, false accusations.

The problem with “women are having too much sex!” approach are two:

First: it’s another way to put vagina on a pedestal – her vagina is very worthy if she had no former partners / few partners.

Second: it takes as a given, and it reinforce, things like alimonies and child support – that’s another form of gynocentrism since such things are meant for women’s benefits at the expense of men.

That’s why tradcon approach sucks: it alleges that alimonies and child support are good, you just have to find a virgin / semi-virgin.
Don’t trust tradcons, guys, they’re playing with your insecurities to turn you in a working horse for a virgin / semi-virgin. Virgins are a lot of work, not particularly worthy.

I agree, but I think that’s part of the joke… it’s the mythological status of the holy vagina that they like men to believe in, when in fact it’s probably all used up and full of venereal disease because it’s a “public entrance.”

In the past, virginity used to be a sign of moral character. So if you married a virgin woman, at least you could hope that she had enough moral conviction to not commit adultery. You’re right–it’s not really about the vagina… but you could at least make some assumptions about her character if her vagina was all used up.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22527]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Picture says it all.

I can’t understand.
She’s good looking and smiling, where is the problem here?

For the “public entrance” joke: the trouble isn’t “women are having too much sex!”.
The trouble is the laws regulating marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation), and also the “always believe her” attitude when it comes at false accusations.

I would have zero problem cohabiting, for some months or even few years, until I’ll get tired of her, with a woman if there wouldn’t be the above problems.
I care nothing how many partners she had: in the wild male primates f~~~ a lot of females, without worrying about their former partners, they haven’t problems because there’s no such thing as alimonies, child support, false accusations.

The problem with “women are having too much sex!” approach are two:

First: it’s another way to put vagina on a pedestal – her vagina is very worthy if she had no former partners / few partners.

Second: it takes as a given, and it reinforce, things like alimonies and child support – that’s another form of gynocentrism since such things are meant for women’s benefits at the expense of men.

That’s why tradcon approach sucks: it alleges that alimonies and child support are good, you just have to find a virgin / semi-virgin.
Don’t trust tradcons, guys, they’re playing with your insecurities to turn you in a working horse for a virgin / semi-virgin. Virgins are a lot of work, not particularly worthy.

Dude you better f~~~ing care how many guys she’s had sex with before you.

Studies show – like actual scientific studies – if she has 4 or more sex partners before you, shes not gonna be able to form long term bonds with you.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html

And this really sucks because for men, oxytocin, the hormone secreted after orgasm, makes you want to bond to them more and avoid other women. Which explains why women file for divorce 4x as much as men.

Further studies show she will get bored with you, monogamy, and the sex will go away. No man is with a woman to stay celibate. So while sex bonds you closer to her, shes getting more bored with you the longer you two are a monogamous couple, and she also wants less sex with you.
http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2013/09/29/women-get-bored-with-their-monogamous-men-even-more-scientific-proof/

Further the more sex partners shes had the worse your monogamous relationship is going to be.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440.html

Further whatever number of guys she has said she was with before you, she is lying. She is giving you a lower number to make you think better of her and hide her slut past.

Scientific Research Confirms That Women Lie About Their Sexual History

And if you think having an open relationship is going to work, that’s just her being able to monkeybranch while you’re giving her security to find a better guy, and if you still even have sex, now you’re f~~~ing a pussy other guys are currently using, so, gross. And so not a great deal.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Black MaskParticipant 1572]

I’d hit her in the s~~~ter and glaze the brownies she’s got hidden in there.

"Man honesty is misogyny." - Patrice O'Neal

[IRuleMeParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Picture says it all.

I can’t understand.
She’s good looking and smiling, where is the problem here?

For the “public entrance” joke: the trouble isn’t “women are having too much sex!”.
The trouble is the laws regulating marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation), and also the “always believe her” attitude when it comes at false accusations.

I would have zero problem cohabiting, for some months or even few years, until I’ll get tired of her, with a woman if there wouldn’t be the above problems.
I care nothing how many partners she had: in the wild male primates f~~~ a lot of females, without worrying about their former partners, they haven’t problems because there’s no such thing as alimonies, child support, false accusations.

The problem with “women are having too much sex!” approach are two:

First: it’s another way to put vagina on a pedestal – her vagina is very worthy if she had no former partners / few partners.

Second: it takes as a given, and it reinforce, things like alimonies and child support – that’s another form of gynocentrism since such things are meant for women’s benefits at the expense of men.

That’s why tradcon approach sucks: it alleges that alimonies and child support are good, you just have to find a virgin / semi-virgin.
Don’t trust tradcons, guys, they’re playing with your insecurities to turn you in a working horse for a virgin / semi-virgin. Virgins are a lot of work, not particularly worthy.

Except a lion doesn’t contract an STD from f~~~ing another lion. If you’re going to bring the animal kingdom into the equation, then mention that the male species are not expected to “settle down”. Because that’s a glaring difference between the animal kingdom and the human race. When a woman gives it up to a man, the expectation is that he’ll now trap himself with the female. Another difference is that in the animal kingdom, even the beta male gets pussy on occasion.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22527]

IRuleMe wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Picture says it all.

I can’t understand.
She’s good looking and smiling, where is the problem here?

For the “public entrance” joke: the trouble isn’t “women are having too much sex!”.
The trouble is the laws regulating marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation), and also the “always believe her” attitude when it comes at false accusations.

I would have zero problem cohabiting, for some months or even few years, until I’ll get tired of her, with a woman if there wouldn’t be the above problems.
I care nothing how many partners she had: in the wild male primates f~~~ a lot of females, without worrying about their former partners, they haven’t problems because there’s no such thing as alimonies, child support, false accusations.

The problem with “women are having too much sex!” approach are two:

First: it’s another way to put vagina on a pedestal – her vagina is very worthy if she had no former partners / few partners.

Second: it takes as a given, and it reinforce, things like alimonies and child support – that’s another form of gynocentrism since such things are meant for women’s benefits at the expense of men.

That’s why tradcon approach sucks: it alleges that alimonies and child support are good, you just have to find a virgin / semi-virgin.
Don’t trust tradcons, guys, they’re playing with your insecurities to turn you in a working horse for a virgin / semi-virgin. Virgins are a lot of work, not particularly worthy.

Except a lion doesn’t contract an STD from f~~~ing another lion. If you’re going to bring the animal kingdom into the equation, then mention that the male species are not expected to “settle down”. Because that’s a glaring difference between the animal kingdom and the human race. When a woman gives it up to a man, the expectation is that he’ll now trap himself with the female. Another difference is that in the animal kingdom, even the beta male gets pussy on occasion.

Plus no alimony and child support in the wild kingdom. No f~~~ing “family” court. What a joke.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Picture says it all.

I can’t understand.
She’s good looking and smiling, where is the problem here?

For the “public entrance” joke: the trouble isn’t “women are having too much sex!”.
The trouble is the laws regulating marriage contract and palimony hidden contract (cohabitation), and also the “always believe her” attitude when it comes at false accusations.

I would have zero problem cohabiting, for some months or even few years, until I’ll get tired of her, with a woman if there wouldn’t be the above problems.
I care nothing how many partners she had: in the wild male primates f~~~ a lot of females, without worrying about their former partners, they haven’t problems because there’s no such thing as alimonies, child support, false accusations.

The problem with “women are having too much sex!” approach are two:

First: it’s another way to put vagina on a pedestal – her vagina is very worthy if she had no former partners / few partners.

Second: it takes as a given, and it reinforce, things like alimonies and child support – that’s another form of gynocentrism since such things are meant for women’s benefits at the expense of men.

That’s why tradcon approach sucks: it alleges that alimonies and child support are good, you just have to find a virgin / semi-virgin.
Don’t trust tradcons, guys, they’re playing with your insecurities to turn you in a working horse for a virgin / semi-virgin. Virgins are a lot of work, not particularly worthy.

Dude you better f~~~ing care how many guys she’s had sex with before you.

Studies show – like actual scientific studies – if she has 4 or more sex partners before you, shes not gonna be able to form long term bonds with you.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html

And this really sucks because for men, oxytocin, the hormone secreted after orgasm, makes you want to bond to them more and avoid other women. Which explains why women file for divorce 4x as much as men.

Further studies show she will get bored with you, monogamy, and the sex will go away. No man is with a woman to stay celibate. So while sex bonds you closer to her, shes getting more bored with you the longer you two are a monogamous couple, and she also wants less sex with you.
http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2013/09/29/women-get-bored-with-their-monogamous-men-even-more-scientific-proof/

Further the more sex partners shes had the worse your monogamous relationship is going to be.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440.html

Further whatever number of guys she has said she was with before you, she is lying. She is giving you a lower number to make you think better of her and hide her slut past.

Scientific Research Confirms That Women Lie About Their Sexual History

<iframe class=”wp-embedded-content” sandbox=”allow-scripts” security=”restricted” style=”position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);” src=”http://www.returnofkings.com/76042/scientific-research-confirms-that-women-lie-about-their-sexual-history/embed#?secret=bg2OLmSo8e” data-secret=”bg2OLmSo8e” width=”500″ height=”282″ title=”“Scientific Research Confirms That Women Lie About Their Sexual History” — Return Of Kings” frameborder=”0″ marginwidth=”0″ marginheight=”0″ scrolling=”no”></iframe>

And if you think having an open relationship is going to work, that’s just her being able to monkeybranch while you’re giving her security to find a better guy, and if you still even have sex, now you’re f~~~ing a pussy other guys are currently using, so, gross. And so not a great deal.

Are you endorsing signing a marriage contract with a virgin or a tradcon woman who just only had a long-term partner before you?
Because that’s the reasoning behind such scheme.

I have some news: even if you do the above then laws are still in place, you may have less chances to be screwed but IT’S STILL UP TO HER and she can screw you as she likes.

I’m not advocating for “open relationships”: I’m advocating for zero f~~~s given, even about semi-virgins/virgins.
Virgins are a lot of work, I know because I took the virginity of 6 in my life, and tradcon semi-virgins does NOT guarantee success: I married one of them, she was even great at cooking.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22527]

Im not advocating anything,I was pointing out Erics ideas about being with a woman in some kind of monogamous/exclusive relationship and not caring about what shes done before you, is f~~~ed and doomed to screw the guy over.

I dont advocate any guy being with a modern woman. Sex dolls or your favorite hand with porn you like is the safest thing for a guy today. I ADVOCATE NOT TO PLAY THE GAME.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Im not advocating anything,I was pointing out Erics ideas about being with a woman in some kind of monogamous/exclusive relationship and not caring about what shes done before you, is f~~~ed and doomed to screw the guy over.

I dont advocate any guy being with a modern woman. Sex dolls or your favorite hand with porn you like is the safest thing for a guy today. I ADVOCATE NOT TO PLAY THE GAME.

That’s good, since “modern women are unworthy because they aren’t virgins” basically amount to “virgins and semi-virgins are unicorns, don’t worry about misandric laws ruling divorces and DV accusations”
Tradcons want you to marry, but they aren’t going to change the laws, they’re actually making it slightly worse:

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/new-york/articles/2017-12-22/the-latest-trump-signed-tax-bill-scraps-alimony-deduction

http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/15/pf/taxes/alimony-tax-bill/

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Sign up. Then take a seat until your name is called.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

My ex, who was a Sunday school teacher, cost me 300k, cheated, lied,

Hold on: she taught MORALITY to kids in church? WTF? That doesn’t make sense.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

FunInTheSun wrote:

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

My ex, who was a Sunday school teacher, cost me 300k, cheated, lied,

Hold on: she taught MORALITY to kids in church? WTF? That doesn’t make sense.

My ex have been taught by nuns, she’s politically more conservative than me, she had just only a long-term relationship before me, she didn’t cheat on me (as far as I know).
Still it costed me the US equivalent of about 400k, and before that I had to spend a lot of sundays in a shopping mall: boring, very boring.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Dude you better f~~~ing care how many guys she’s had sex with before you.

Studies show – like actual scientific studies – if she has 4 or more sex partners before you, shes not gonna be able to form long term bonds with you.
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html

And this really sucks because for men, oxytocin, the hormone secreted after orgasm, makes you want to bond to them more and avoid other women. Which explains why women file for divorce 4x as much as men.

Further studies show she will get bored with you, monogamy, and the sex will go away. No man is with a woman to stay celibate. So while sex bonds you closer to her, shes getting more bored with you the longer you two are a monogamous couple, and she also wants less sex with you.
http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2013/09/29/women-get-bored-with-their-monogamous-men-even-more-scientific-proof/

Further the more sex partners shes had the worse your monogamous relationship is going to be.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440.html

Further whatever number of guys she has said she was with before you, she is lying. She is giving you a lower number to make you think better of her and hide her slut past.

^ Spot on.

I don’t know why any guy even needs an explanation for this.

The vast majority of men view women’s attraction/value inversely to the # of men she’s had sex with.

This is self evident. Not sure why it’s even a debatable topic amongst heterosexual, non feminist men.

Yes, there are other elements to criticize such as gyonecntric laws/court favoring/society favoring; but that doesn’t mean a man is also precluded from making the argument above regarding modern women’s whorish ways.

Interesting also to note, those very gynocentric laws and lack of socially stigmatizing women’s sexual promiscuity probably actually serve to INCREASE females sexual promiscuity.

Resident cynic.

[Old BuckParticipant 3596]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

I don’t know why any guy even needs an explanation for this.
The vast majority of men view women’s attraction/value inversely to the # of men she’s had sex with.
This is self evident. Not sure why it’s even a debatable topic amongst heterosexual, non feminist men.

Because men are programmed at birth by their mothers to be blind to women’s bulls~~~.

It’s not a debatable subject, its logic that must be taught.
There are whole generations that need to be unplugged from the womb.

Don't chase tail. Turn yours around, walk away, and live free!

[Author]

Posts