Why is it women aren't interested in creating/building/innovating things?

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

Anonymous wrote:

No, it’s Nikola Tesla.

My bad.

[Anonymous 1]

Boar wrote:

creates, experiments, builds, fails, learns, succeeds

manipulates, lies, consume, demand, shirk, blame

That sums it up nicely. When I was in engineering school, it was all men. There was one female in class. She was overweight annoying as hell and extremely lazy. I would rate her about a 5 out of 10 in the looks department. She surrounded herself with a harem of beta boys and used them to do all of her engineering home work and projects. Always got them to help her study for exams. None of those guys got any sex from her either, they were “just friends.” The beta boys would get help from me, when they couldn’t figure anything out. I would spend my time studying alone and graduated top of my class. Now imagine if 50% of the engineers were women. It would be a disaster, you would be spending all of your time helping them with Ohms Law and other simple stuff.

Its bad enough with the quality of engineers now because these guys had mostly female teachers all their lives and spent most of college taking classes on “how they feel about things.” Seriously, I had to spend a lot of time reading old books from the 1800’s to get actually get an education. The feminists had complained engineers were too one sided, they needed to take “women’s studies” and a get a well rounded education. Engineering college was becoming a joke and now they want the whole industry to become one. Oh Well, I guess its time to go Tesla. Keep inventing, brothers.

[BalthazarParticipant 722]

Dashing Young Dissident wrote:

Women are destructive creatures, and do not possess creative abilities.

This…

Women’s general state of being and influence is destruction. They create instability. Men build civilizations and women destroy them

Things Classically Associated with Masculine Energy:
The sun, light, substance, the wind, creative force and progress, higher morality, connection to godliness and higher spirituality, stability, even, balance, square, objective reasoning and logic etc etc.

Things Classically Associated with Feminine Energy
The moon, darkness, emptiness and void, instability, destruction and regression, animal instinctive behavior, connection to lower levels of organization, odd, imbalance, circle, empirical observation, irrational feeling etc. etc.

women give birth because they had to be given the most primary creative force of our species in order to balance out the fact that they are otherwise totally destructive.

This body holding me is a reminder of my own mortality. Embrace this moment. Remember, we are eternal and all this pain is an illusion.

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

Right on.

[Rafe GBParticipant 474]

GE is probably doing it because more women in STEM means that wages will drop for everyone.
More engineers/IT pros = saturated labor market and lower wages across the board.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it had something to do with Trump’s Administration looking hard at worker visas.

As far as the main post querry, why should women care about creating/building/innovating when they already have slaves to do that for them?

MGTOW: The silent heralds of cataclysmic societal change. AGAIN!

[GrumpyParticipant]

Rafe GB wrote:

As far as the main post query, why should women care about creating/building/innovating when they already have slaves to do that for them?

I am of that opinion as well

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Shadow1275Participant 1178]

They used to be able to maintain a house, but then along came feminism.

It’s simple, women stayed home in the cave, men went out and conquered nature.

And how did they do this? Trading blood, sweat, and tears in exchange for inventions such as the wheel, vaccines, automobiles, etc.

He who is Brave is Free - Seneca

[DarkRyuParticipant 2354]

I’ll just say it because it’s f~~~ing true. Women are only good for f~~~ing, cooking, and cleaning. They don’t create or invent ANYTHING. Any woman that’s good at anything useful usually looks like a f~~~ing guy because she got a lot of guy hormones and/or genetic s~~~. It’s so true. EVERY woman that was good at s~~~ all throughout school looked like a f~~~ing guy, had NO interest in sex, and was basically just like a f~~~ing guy in every conceivable way.

It’s just the way things are. Women are f~~~ing useless, and trying to make them create something is like trying to teach a monkey how to build a skyscraper. It just doesn’t work any anyone that’s unfortunate to have female coworkers ends up having to pick up their slack. And seeing as MGTOW aren’t interested in sex and contact with women, they have absolutely NO purpose in our lives.

[Anonymous 5]

It’s about who’s better prepared at that job some women who have no experience and men who been doing it for years all because of a gender imbalanced ratio male vs female so basically it’s I have vagina hire me just because . Or hire a man and get the job done right these companies need to realize it’s the experience that counts not gender equality .

[~BSParticipant 3266]

DarkRyu wrote:

I’ll just say it because it’s f~~~ing true. Women are only good for f~~~ing, cooking, and cleaning. They don’t create or invent ANYTHING. Any woman that’s good at anything useful usually looks like a f~~~ing guy because she got a lot of guy hormones and/or genetic s~~~. It’s so true. EVERY woman that was good at s~~~ all throughout school looked like a f~~~ing guy, had NO interest in sex, and was basically just like a f~~~ing guy in every conceivable way.

It’s just the way things are. Women are f~~~ing useless, and trying to make them create something is like trying to teach a monkey how to build a skyscraper. It just doesn’t work any anyone that’s unfortunate to have female coworkers ends up having to pick up their slack. And seeing as MGTOW aren’t interested in sex and contact with women, they have absolutely NO purpose in our lives.

women aren’t even good for those things. Nowadays they refuse to cook or clean, and use sex like a bartering chip.

And I dispute that the majority of women were ever good at cooking. In my experience, men are better cooks in general because when they cook, they “creating/building/innovating”. Women have no creative spirit, and treat cooking like a chore, and want to get away with the least effort possible.

"He didn't marry until now, so he won't ever do it. Think about it, why would a man like him ever marry? It's too late to catch him. " ~some cunt

[ConstantineParticipant 4419]

Jesus, am I ever sick of hearing the term “male-dominated”. At this point they’re just buzz words.

Nobody can stop a woman from going into that field if she wants to. If a woman takes an interest in that path, have at it. The reason why there are fewer women doing so is because women are not generally interested in those kind of subjects.

And as such, this 50/50 bulls~~~ is ridiculous. People should not be given a job “just because”. They should only be given it if they’re qualified for the position. You wouldn’t hire a comedian to fix your kitchen pipes would you? Firing hard-working, qualified men and having women take over their jobs “because these professions should be 50/50” is just as stupid as replacing a whole lot of hard-working black workers with white.

“Women need more role models”? I think it’s more important that women have good role models. And there’s nothing good about this – hiring a woman based solely on positive discrimination.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[qeeqoParticipant 1168]

Women aren’t interested in these things because the only thing that interests them is shopping and themselves.

[Author]

Posts