Trump won the fifth debate!

[Anonymous 0]

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

Might as well make up some debate that didn’t happen, so that people can say who they think won, happening to correspond with who they want to win.

Quit crying. A debate did take place, get over it. It sounds like you either do not like how the debate went or the political disscussions and responses you have been involved with on the fourm here.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22524]

<<>> wrote:

She appealed to women in the urgent sense and most directly in her attacks on Trump’s supposed lack of respect for women in general mentally and carnally.

Actually, the Trump taps have played out. And in the debate last night, Trump pointed out multiple times how Hillary is an enemy to women. Such as supporting anti-women islamic regimes.

<<>> wrote:

We are talking about people who actually believe that burger flippers and under the table carpenters should be paid the same wage, that’s a huge demographic bovine idiocy.

Actually, I know some about carpenters. Entry level carpenters are paid less than most burger flippers. I agree the carpenters should be paid at least the same wages as burger flippers.

TaxGuy wrote:

Back to the NAFTA thing, my hometown was devastated by NAFTA. The people there know it but don’t exactly know why or who to blame. In short, for them they are right for the wrong reasons. He could do a better job of explaining why those trade deals matter and why he is the best one to trust to fix it. Just saying the trade deals are terrible and he is the only one that can fix it isn’t enough. Explain it.

Trump is saying that the people’s jobs are gone. Their social services are gone. Water, roads, bridges, are collapsing. People are losing their homes. People have lost their savings. People are seeing not futures for them, nor their children.

There is nothing more clearer that Trump can say in his messages about this.

Also, older income tax laws on the books from the 1930’s income tax laws allows the president to specifically target individual foreign entities and double their tax rates if the president feels that there is a trade imbalance. And the Supreme Court had ruled that treaties to do override laws.

[<<>>Participant 435]

Faust For Science wrote:

Actually, the Trump taps have played out. And in the debate last night, Trump pointed out multiple times how Hillary is an enemy to women. Such as supporting anti-women islamic regimes.

That is all well and good again, you and Trump are making rational appeals to the irrational. I am talking about vaginas and manginas voting for vagina because again, a FEELZ over REELZ mentality. We have to keep reminding ourselves that we live in a bubble of the reasonable the sane, what we are dealing with on the left is another animal entire a savage convinced that egalitarianism is real, that women should be police, fire(MEN), and POTUS for God’s sake it’s utter madness. I am with Trump all the way I am with sanity I feel you give the regressive left way too much credit.

Faust For Science wrote:

Actually, I know some about carpenters. Entry level carpenters are paid less than most burger flippers. I agree the carpenters should be paid at least the same wages as burger flippers.

This is sad I am a Jack of all trades and do demo and remodel and I always pay my crews at least 15 USD an hour under the table anything less is insulting and predatory in my view.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Anonymous wrote:

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

Might as well make up some debate that didn’t happen, so that people can say who they think won, happening to correspond with who they want to win.

Quit crying. A debate did take place, get over it. It sounds like you either do not like how the debate went or the political disscussions and responses you have been involved with on the fourm here.

There was no fifth debate. I would of posted that Trump won the third debate, before it happened. This is what goes on. Some people are so partisan, and into spin, they are incapable of honestly expressing how their candidate did. So, might as well just go off and say your candidate won the debate, before it happened, and go to sleep and not watch anything. For individuals who will do this, there isn’t even a reason to watch things.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Hitman wrote:

I think he was winning from the start.
He looked super confident .
Kept his composure.
Pressed good points.
CNN is busy trying to trash him right now. .
She is a “nasty woman ” !

Did you read the subject? I said the FIFTH debate. I didn’t say Third. I would of posted Fourth, but then it might of been confused with the VP debate in the mix. There wasn’t a fourth debate. Unless you were doing sarcasm here, and playing along, you didn’t even read anything I wrote.

Beer wrote:

Don’t know why your saying this crap. After the first debate not everyone on here was claiming a Trump victory and I thought a lot of guys on here gave some good criticism of his performance. I didn’t watch and wasn’t around to post after the second, but I think there are some pretty smart dudes on this forum that can see reality and not just tow a party line.

See my last point. People are so into their view of reality, it ends up being really difficult to see anything at all. The only “party line” I am seeing, if anything, is that it is a form of MGTOW groupthink, where it comes down to being so opposed to Hillary Clinton, you swallow anything and everything, no matter how much off it is. It is understandable to oppose Hillary, but to the extent you end up going into full spin and measure everything by opposing Hillary?

PistolPete wrote:

Pat Buchanan: “all you have to do to win the debate is meet expectations” and the bar was pretty low for the first two debates. Yes Trump missed some soft b~~~~ to be sure—I’ve been waiting patiently for him to say: “name me one country that taxed itself to prosperity?” Oh well.

Name one country that has prosperity without any form of taxes to end up paying for things? Is there a single Galt’s Gulch anywhere that actually works? Even the Laffer Curve, which theoretically is interesting but practically can’t be worked out, speaks of an optimal tax rate for generating needed taxers. It was also said that taxes are the price we have for civilization. Anyhow, it would be good to have no taxes, but then apparently there are expectations people have for civilization that apparently no one has found any other way to get to outside of government and taxes to make it so. There were a number of things Trump did miss in the last debate. He got totally pivoted off open borders and into Putin, and then goes and says Hillary has supported a wall. What is the point of that? It wasn’t spelled out sufficiently.

Faust For Science wrote:

Redpillbible wrote:

I also noticed she got mad at one point, she mad as hell.

That is going to politically hurt her.

Her performance in this debate could be one of the find straws to cost her this election.

By the way. Wearing white after Labor Day is a big no no for traditional trade-con women. And she did not wear her white suit well. White is not her color.

And if her debate performance was not bad enough. Right afterward, she tweeted herself into another scandal dealing with classified information she just shared with everyone: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/breaking-hillary-commits-another-crime-leaks-nuclear-secrets-debate-video/

Thing is that Trump is making so much noise, no one notices. The thing now saying that the only way he will be guaranteed to support the outcome of the election is if he wins, isn’t playing well. As much this may play well in some circles, for most people, it is an issue.

Trump keeps doing this. He keeps shooting himself in the foot over and over and over. Almost any other candidate would let Hillary implode, but Trump can’t NOT let the limelight be on him.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

Some people are so partisan, and into spin, they are incapable of honestly expressing how their candidate did.

lol, women. Lack of self awareness and can’t even hold themselves to the standard they hold men to.

[Anonymous 0]

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

SoylentGeneration wrote:

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

Might as well make up some debate that didn’t happen, so that people can say who they think won, happening to correspond with who they want to win.

Quit crying. A debate did take place, get over it. It sounds like you either do not like how the debate went or the political disscussions and responses you have been involved with on the fourm here.

There was no fifth debate. I would of posted that Trump won the third debate, before it happened. This is what goes on. Some people are so partisan, and into spin, they are incapable of honestly expressing how their candidate did. So, might as well just go off and say your candidate won the debate, before it happened, and go to sleep and not watch anything. For individuals who will do this, there isn’t even a reason to watch things.

Honestly, I do not care to keep track of debate numbers or who supposedly “won”, because to do so is rather pointless in the grand scheme of it all. However, a bit of a redaction is necessary on my part then: At this point most people have their mind made up on who they are voting for. The “debates” are just political games shows that are just missing an advertisement league from Budwiser and erectile dysfunction drugs. So, what does it matter if some people are so partisan to their side that they state who won what? It won’t change any minds or votes to point it out here or anywhere. People have been that way for some time when it comes to politics in the USA, it just more common now. Much more common. I’d think you would be used to that concept of extreme partisan politics by now. It is a problem, but it is what the system is now and will likely continue to be. Vote accordingly.

[Author]

Posts