The trap of beauty

[Anonymous 3]

joetech wrote:

We always hear that men are visual. Bulls~~~…women are visual. They spend their time in the bathroom checking their hair & makeup and then ask each other how they look.

That is true!

Man, is everything we have been said false?

[joetechParticipant]

They’re always lying to us hoping we’re too busy looking at their t~~~ to really notice anything else. It’s pretty easy to get money from a guy once his dick is hard…which of course is true if the guy is blue pill stupid, wouldn’t you say?

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Beauty in a woman only serves two purposes for a man:

1) as an indicator of her ability to bear healthy children
2) to display his social status

So if you’re not looking to make a baby and you aren’t trying to prove your value by being with and/or being seen with a high-value woman, then it shouldn’t really matter what she looks like.

Believe me, if you’re taking the risk to f~~~ women still, you’re way better off with an average looking girl than a made up or even genuinely beautiful one. It’s been my experience that girls who aren’t pretty enough to get the free ride that “hot” girls get are generally more appreciative, have better skills in the bedroom and are less likely to be bats~~~ crazy narcissists.

They’re still women, of course, so all the standard warnings still apply… but if you’re going to mess with women, consider picking from the middle of the deck rather than fighting the other thirsty bros for the one or two hottest picks at the top.

[FermatParticipant 3478]

Anonymous wrote:

Im lucky cause Im done with it. Paid my dues. But you poor younger guys…Man just be careful Brothers!!!

Let me be the first of “poor younger guys” on here to openly admit I ceased (not given up, but deliberately stopped knowing I don’t have to) dating in 2013 and will continue this way for the rest of my life. I paid my dues as well, so well see where life takes me from here.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[HitmanParticipant]

Thanks for the photos of the shape shifter..!!!
Amazing how the war paint changes them..

[joetechParticipant]

Beauty is only skin deep, but ugliness go right to the bone.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[Anonymous 54]

Fermat wrote:

Old Sage wrote:

Im lucky cause Im done with it. Paid my dues. But you poor younger guys…Man just be careful Brothers!!!

Let me be the first of “poor younger guys” on here to openly admit I ceased (not given up, but deliberately stopped knowing I don’t have to) dating in 2013 and will continue this way for the rest of my life. I paid my dues as well, so well see where life takes me from here.

sorry I didnt mean to impley yall are pitiful or anything. When I was young I doubt I could I could have sworn off pussy!

[Anonymous 42]

Boning a hot chick is awesome!

Boning an ugly duckling is mental fatigue!

It’s really f~~~ed up when in the back of your mind you’re saying WTF am I doing here? Whereas the hot chick YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE DOING! No WTFks about it!

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Fermat wrote:

Old Sage wrote:

Im lucky cause Im done with it. Paid my dues. But you poor younger guys…Man just be careful Brothers!!!

Let me be the first of “poor younger guys” on here to openly admit I ceased (not given up, but deliberately stopped knowing I don’t have to) dating in 2013 and will continue this way for the rest of my life. I paid my dues as well, so well see where life takes me from here.

Here’s hoping one of your future dues is not knocking a stupid c~~~ up.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Stargazer wrote:

Beauty in a woman only serves two purposes for a man:

1) as an indicator of her ability to bear healthy children
2) to display his social status

So if you’re not looking to make a baby and you aren’t trying to prove your value by being with and/or being seen with a high-value woman, then it shouldn’t really matter what she looks like.

Believe me, if you’re taking the risk to f~~~ women still, you’re way better off with an average looking girl than a made up or even genuinely beautiful one. It’s been my experience that girls who aren’t pretty enough to get the free ride that “hot” girls get are generally more appreciative, have better skills in the bedroom and are less likely to be bats~~~ crazy narcissists.

They’re still women, of course, so all the standard warnings still apply… but if you’re going to mess with women, consider picking from the middle of the deck rather than fighting the other thirsty bros for the one or two hottest picks at the top.

Average looks (decently attractive, but not hot) is the way to if you must be dumb enough to be with a woman. Please get a vasectomy first though.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

Doc Fenderson wrote:

Beauty in a woman only serves two purposes for a man:

1) as an indicator of her ability to bear healthy children
2) to display his social status

So if you’re not looking to make a baby and you aren’t trying to prove your value by being with and/or being seen with a high-value woman, then it shouldn’t really matter what she looks like.

Believe me, if you’re taking the risk to f~~~ women still, you’re way better off with an average looking girl than a made up or even genuinely beautiful one. It’s been my experience that girls who aren’t pretty enough to get the free ride that “hot” girls get are generally more appreciative, have better skills in the bedroom and are less likely to be bats~~~ crazy narcissists.

They’re still women, of course, so all the standard warnings still apply… but if you’re going to mess with women, consider picking from the middle of the deck rather than fighting the other thirsty bros for the one or two hottest picks at the top.

Average looks (decently attractive, but not hot) is the way to if you must be dumb enough to be with a woman. Please get a vasectomy first though.

Hey NRJ, why don’t you at least give an introduction before you start giving advice.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

narwhal wrote:

I’ve developed a habit at looking at a woman’s muscle tone to help gauge her actual beauty. She can wear makeup, where the right clothes, etc, but she cannot fake muscle tone. It isn’t exactly an indicator of real beauty, but it is definitely a sign that she is less fake then the others.

Means she spends more time in the gym to make herself hotter and attract better (i.e. richer) men.

[Anonymous 54]

Anonymous wrote:

Boning a hot chick is awesome!

Boning an ugly duckling is mental fatigue!

It’s really f~~~ed up when in the back of your mind you’re saying WTF am I doing here? Whereas the hot chick YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE DOING! No WTFks about it!

So umm….how many ugly ones did you do mgt? haha ok…I snuck out a bathroom window in the middle of the night once!

[joetechParticipant]

I boned a hot one once that was just as cold as ice. Yuch! I had an ugly one that was awesome. So much for relying on looks.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[ZoidbergParticipant 965]

Anonymous wrote:

Zoidberg wrote:

Okay, I give up, where is the beauty in the first image the OP posted?

The beauty is that its the same girl, before and aftermake up.

Not much difference to me. If anything, I find her creepy with make-up. There are women who look much better without make-up than she does with it.

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

I was in a relationship with a seriously entitled, trust fund subsidized, elitist mentality slut that considered herself very religious, went to a women’s Bible study group, church every Sunday and considered herself morally superior to others.

She seemed to think that she was able to identify women that were ‘sluts’. Like, literally and almost scientifically: Had radar for being able to know if a woman was a ‘slut’ just by looking at her.

Meanwhile, the sex I had with her was the most porn induced fckng I had ever known in my life at that point. And in the end, it turned out she was cheating on me the entire time with at least two other guys.

They are really warped cyborgs.

[CataphractParticipant 2656]

If they invented an app that could detect even the most professionally done No-Makeup makeup and show you what she actually looks like without any makeup on, it could revolutionize dating and if you’re a MGTOW Monk, you can use it for s~~~s and giggles as well as reminding you why they are not worth it.

Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

If I, one day think that reproduction is something that I want, is not just the beauty that will be analysed. I will run a good background check on her family, some tests on DNA, if no crazy hereditary diseases were found, so I will proceed.

Beauty is one indicator that the woman have good genes, but there is so much that she can hide that would generate inferior proles.

@cataphract fakeup is something that really p~~~ me off. Woman go from 3 to 7 and they act like they are 9.

[RobbySpectator 71]

I think you really hit the nail on the head with this post GhostDog. I’ve been thinking about this a lot too as I don’t want to become another guy that gives into the lust and lives a life of slavery to some woman.

Anonymous wrote:

If we could get rid of eye liner the world would be a different place.

They just look like another dude with a hole in them.

That is something to think about what if women didn’t have all the artificial enhancements to their looks things might be a lot different. I do have to disagree with them looking like men without their makeup, that’s kind of an insult to us men (no homo). Women’s eyes droop down more than mens (illustrated below) so in a way I’d say they’d look like an ugly guy with a hole in them. I actually heard that there were times where women used to pursue men and men were considered better looking. Don’t know if it is true or not but I think it could be possible without all this deception we have now.

[Author]

Posts