The Silliness of a Hypothetical War 'tween Mexico & USA

[VladParticipant 210]

Well, have you been to Mexico? The may be really hardworking people, but quite passionary, driven by emotion. They have higher numbers of SJW, than in americans to appear under same conditions.

While emotionally motivated, they really can do great things, but motivating them in the right direction is political nightmare, often completely diminishing returns.

There is ship(t)load of work to make their political and education system right, and no one wants to touch that, cause that one will surelly collect all blame for what happened in Mexico for last 10 years.

Marriage is the tomb of love (c)Giacomo Casanova

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Me? yea a lot. Not only along the border but have spent time in several of the “vacation” areas. Also a lot of time in Texas. That is why I stated things the way I did,….potential. Could be changed if the right person steps up to take it on.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Anonymous 14]

Vlad wrote:

Well, have you been to Mexico? The may be really hardworking people, but quite passionary, driven by emotion. They have higher numbers of SJW, than in americans to appear under same conditions.

While emotionally motivated, they really can do great things, but motivating them in the right direction is political nightmare, often completely diminishing returns.

There is ship(t)load of work to make their political and education system right, and no one wants to touch that, cause that one will surelly collect all blame for what happened in Mexico for last 10 years.

Look man, the only thing decent to ever come out of mexico was Charro and that was some 40 odd years ago.

[VladParticipant 210]

Anonymous wrote:

Look man, the only thing decent to ever come out of mexico was Charro and that was some 40 odd years ago.

I told you

Vlad wrote:

often completely diminishing returns

which is PC formulation of clusterf~~~ that happens when you try to do something of real scale and significance there 😉 .

Marriage is the tomb of love (c)Giacomo Casanova

[Anonymous 14]

Vlad wrote:

Dark Lord of the Sith wrote:

Look man, the only thing decent to ever come out of mexico was Charro and that was some 40 odd years ago.

I told you

Vlad wrote:

often completely diminishing returns

which is PC formulation of clusterf~~~ that happens when you try to do something of real scale and significance there .

You told me? I can’t even translate half of what you are trying to say. Mexico will not change. That so called nation is in a stranglehold by a group of oligarchs and has been for a very long time, yet this is a key factor of which you fail to even recognize.

The only thing that will change this is a U.S. invasion. My point stands.

[Anonymous 14]

Just for you Vlad:

“Tourists at a Mexican beach resort were shocked to find the body of a murdered man floating ashore on what was once a family friendly holiday destination.

The body was found on a beach in Acapulco, Guerrero state, on Sunday, after a suspected shooting.

The incident took place just over a week after 14 people were murdered in 36 hours in Cancun, another Mexican tourist hotspot plagued by gang violence.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5620413/Body-shooting-victim-floats-ashore-tourists.html

[VladParticipant 210]

Anonymous wrote:

The only thing that will change this is a U.S. invasion. My point stands.

To which I’ll answer you don’t understand the Mexican way of thinking. And that you’re a big optimist. It would take much more than succesful invasion and occupation to break these views and ways deeply ingrained into their society.

Marriage is the tomb of love (c)Giacomo Casanova

[Anonymous 14]

Vlad wrote:

Dark Lord of the Sith wrote:

The only thing that will change this is a U.S. invasion. My point stands.

To which I’ll answer you don’t understand the Mexican way of thinking. And that you’re a big optimist. It would take much more than succesful invasion and occupation to break these views and ways deeply ingrained into their society.

I beg to differ. Added to that, when at war we deploy military psychological warfare units to change their way of thinking. What’s more, if I had my way, we’d push them South so we no longer have to deal with them. Furthermore, how can infantry mounted upon burros go up against:

[VladParticipant 210]

By riding away among fires and metal debris so smart munition useless 🙂 . Dats will be very asymmetrical warfare, and economically pretty draining for America with little to no gain in the end. To control occupied territory it will be even more costly. Very few targets for bombing.

War is costly, especially near your borders. Start a war with no visible gain in sight? I don’t recall that ever happening in history, and hypothetical war with Mexico promises to be exactly that.

If Mexico government surrenders, it will give exactly nothing. I doubt their current government even have enough control over territory in social and economic aspects.

As for topic of psychological warfare… Picture psychological warfare efforts required to silence all SJW and feminists. Then triple that for Mexico to achieve any positive result. I’m s~~~ting you not, dats how messed their society is.

And if you think any kind of war there will not produce overwhelming amount of armed mexican refugees in all directions, including US, you don’t know first thing about wars.

In short, no war effort will solve problems originating from Mexico, so no sane American politician would do it.

Marriage is the tomb of love (c)Giacomo Casanova

[Anonymous 14]

FFS! Speak f~~~ing ENGLISH!

Vlad wrote:

Dats will be very asymmetrical warfare, and economically pretty draining for America with little to no gain in the end.

Again, NO. We gain a reprieve in savings from tax money spent on the illegal parasites that are already here, which will be pushed back across the border.

Vlad wrote:

War is costly, especially near your borders.

I disagree simply on the costs of shipping munitions and the price of jet & tank fuel.

Vlad wrote:

Start a war with no visible gain in sight?I don’t recall that ever happening in history, and hypothetical war with Mexico promises to be exactly that.

Were you born in a barn? Where have you been the last 17 years? Libya, Iraq, SYRIA, and so on………

Vlad wrote:

If Mexico government surrenders, it will give exactly nothing.

Surrendering? NO, complete and utter capitulation/decapitation. They have nothing to offer except their bodies to grease the treads of our tanks.

Vlad wrote:

As for topic of psychological warfare… Picture psychological warfare efforts required to silence all SJW and feminists. Then triple that for Mexico to achieve any positive result. I’m s~~~ting you not, dats how messed their society is.

You realize we are talking about Mexico here and not the Mujihadeen? Now granted, it will be tough to get the lazy sons of bitches off their asses to move South, but it is very possible.

Vlad wrote:

And if you think any kind of war there will not produce overwhelming amount of armed mexican refugees in all directions, including US, you don’t know first thing about wars.

In short, no war effort will solve problems originating from Mexico, so no sane American politician would do it.

They won’t be heading North unless they dare face immediate annihilation. As stated above, the tax money saved would pay for this war, let alone the monies generated from absorbing Mexico and it’s mineral resources.

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

No need for a war.

BUILD A WALL

With that being said. If there was a ‘war’ the biggest problem would not be winning the war.

It would be the 8-10 undocumented immigrants / sleeper cells and their anchor babies in the US.

They might freak out guerilla warfare style.

[Anonymous 42]

Sky-O wrote:

No need for a war.

BUILD A WALL

Just add salt and sharks to the Rio Grand, let nature handle the rest!

[Author]

Posts