The Pet Name S~~~ Test.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Recently, a woman who was attracted to me started calling me by a pet names. I was called baby cakes and I let her know that this was illegal in all states, and I didn’t support infanticide for the sake of confectionism. She was so perplexed by my response she just wandered off with a confused look.

This got me wondering.
Is calling a man by a pet name a s~~~ test for potential ownership, or a s~~~ test for submissiveness? Possibly both? I suspect this is a very subtle and gentle jab that could go undetected. Simply not responding is to fail. Then more tests will follow. A woman cunning enough to start out this low will most likely slowly escalate the tests over a long period of time. The man becomes the ‘frog on the stove experiment’ as the heat is increased so slowly, and over a long period of time, it goes undetected; and she begins assuming you are okay with a relationship you didn’t even know you were in. In her mind you failed the tests intentionally so therefore you accepted the relationship she concocted in her mind. Once you pull away the drama will soon follow with the fake hurt feelings because of the ol’ you led me on B.S. When in fact all you did was fail a series of well planned s~~~ tests, that socially-engineered you into a corner.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Y_Participant 4591]

Yes, yes and yes. Whatever they do is to see how far they can push you. Verbally, mentally or physically they need to show they are superior or are on top. They are all Miss Piggy.

[thisistheguy123Participant 2063]

FrostByte wrote:

Recently, a woman who was attracted to me started calling me by a pet names. I was called baby cakes and I let her know that this was illegal in all states, and I didn’t support infanticide for the sake of confectionism. She was so perplexed by my response she just wandered off with a confused look.

Hahaha, that made me laugh.

It’s ALL a s~~~ test man, even the f~~~ing diamond they end up unhappy with

[GeraldParticipant 3620]

I make up weird and funny pet names for my dog. Currently she is chicken head. Last week it was truffles. Next week who knows, at the moment something comical strikes me, her name chamges. Funny how dogs don’t notice, as long as you use the same tone of voice with them.

Women notice though, especially when the pet name is gold digger, rbf, or otherz…

No longer can we walk away, we must run. Remove the motive power.

[Anonymous 1]

I used to be called Rossy and it annoyed me. I actually asked her to stop because I’m not her pet dog. After a few months it came back though.

I think it’s a case of girls wanting to make you into their pet/child/plaything (not in a horrible way, just in a sort of infantile way). It’s cute to them, but to you it’s annoying and insulting

[NeroParticipant 1466]

Overusing the “awwwww” baby s~~~ when I say something is quite annoying. I’m a f~~~ing 40+ y/o man, not a f~~~ing toddler.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Anonymous wrote:

I think it’s a case of girls wanting to make you into their pet/child/plaything (not in a horrible way, just in a sort of infantile way). It’s cute to them, but to you it’s annoying and insulting

Yep
I get if from strangers sometimes, but it’s usually an older woman and it’s more of habit for her. When a woman is attracted to me and starts doing it, I get suspicious.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Y_ wrote:

They are all Miss Piggy.

That image is the s~~~ nightmares are made of.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[SlayherParticipant 2074]

Give them a pet name. Call them what they are: C~~~s.

S~~~ test over.

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

FrostByte wrote:

Is calling a man by a pet name a s~~~ test for potential ownership, or a s~~~ test for submissiveness? Possibly both? I suspect this is a very subtle and gentle jab that could go undetected

IMO calling you pet names is direct assalut on your sovereignty and compliance s~~~ test from master searching for slave/mangina.

I would deal with this with very clear communication that she can p~~~ off.

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

: “Whatcha doin Babycakes?”
: “Nuthin much Meatholes.”

That’ll put an immediate stop to their pet name bulls~~~.

[Anonymous 54]

Stud, King, Man I got sick of it.
Kidding.
Apparently my pet name is asshole.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Anonymous wrote:

Stud, King, Man I got sick of it.
Kidding.
Apparently my pet name is asshole.

Haha
The stud and king are used for when she’s getting your money, and asshole when she is not.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 42]

Reminds me of Pulp Fiction.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

FrostByte wrote:

Simply not responding is to fail.

I would think in this case not responding is to pass with flying colors, no?

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

I would think in this case not responding is to pass with flying colors, no?

If she gets away with it then she can get away with more.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[windbonerParticipant 2]

Hey FrostBye, absolutely it is. You need to put her in her place.

Grab her hair firmly and tell her ‘call me daddy from now on’. (If she doesn’t like it, too bad for her, find another one.. there’s lots of women that will submit to you as long as you assume a naturally dominant role.)

That will shut her up. Works for me. She’s trying to dominate you. You need to dominate her. Put her in her place. Never allow a woman to infantilize or commodify you.

Works with my 22yo gf who naturally adopted this role (incidently I am old enough to be her daddy, so she calls me daddy and ONLY that), but the married 32 yo I had to teach her as she’s calling me hun, f~~~ that, go talk to your husband like that.

Assume your natural role. I use examples from the 22yo to teach the 32yo how to behave around me. I am 47yo. I don’t date women who have hit the wall. There is simply no need to.

FWIW, I was married to a feminazi but the last 3 relationships lend themselves to this sort of understanding naturally. Thanks to the mgtow frame it corrected my bluepill thinking..

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

windboner wrote:

Grab her hair firmly and tell her ‘call me daddy from now on’. (If she doesn’t like it, too bad for her, find another one.. there’s lots of women that will submit to you as long as you assume a naturally dominant role.)

I think your confusing MGTOW with BDSM.
If she calls me daddy…. that’s a pet name..irony at it’s worst.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[narwhalParticipant]

Living in “the south” it’s not common from women you don’t even know to refer to you as ‘honey’ or ‘dear’. P~~~es me off. It is always used condescendingly, as if you need a mother figure to make it through your day. It’s along the same lines as ‘bless your heart’.

Ok. Then do it.

[TheStormWithinParticipant 778]

Another thing to consider is there are women who use generic pet names to keep from accidentally blurting out the names of other guys she might be banging. All she has to do is remember “babe” for all of them.

Aunt Esther: Fred, I'll have you know this body was blessed by Mother Nature!! Fred: Well, too bad your face was cursed by Father Time!

[Author]

Posts