Stephen Hawking, World Renowned Physicist Dies at 76

[Anonymous 1]

Hermit wrote:

I’m not a world famous scientist, but math alone doesn’t prove anything. Proving a theory so that it becomes a scientific fact requires, among other things, observation. I like to believe what you’ve stated above about the singularity is correct, but it is not currently possible to closely examine and observe a black hole and what is in it.

^THIS nailed it!!

All of these Celebrity scientists make their claim to fame through pure speculation. All of their theories are conveniently un-provable. It is all pure speculation nothing more than Science Fiction, like Star Trek. Circular logic, going round and round ad infinitum.

[HitmanParticipant]

It’sallbs called stealthy a tuna.
Not smart.

[Anonymous 1]

Skeptisk wrote:

Well, reading that he was a feminist and a proponent of global warming (which in my eyes is a scam), proves only one thing, that he was just a man. Brilliant in his ways, but still a flawed man.

His contribution won’t be forgotten, and may he rest in peace.

I knew about Einstein’s theft, Wizard’s Pupil. But I disagree a bit with the;

The good scientists borrow from others, the Great Ones STEAL from others.

To me it goes like this; Mediocre scientists borrow from others, good scientists steal from other, brilliant scientists create new thoughts.

Ohhh, and speaking of speculation; my own theory is that reality has two sides to it; space-time and time-space; ,like two sides of a coin. Space-time is the singular reality we all share. Time-space is a different animal, here every choice that is possible will create an new timeline (reality). So, from the beginning of time an explosion of realities has sprung forth. It’s called the multi-verse btw. Haven’t done the math and can’t be arsed, but it’s a good enough theory for me to realize there are other parallel universes were *It’sallbs* doesn’t whine as much…

I agree, I’m just being a bit sarcastic. I don’t think plagiarism makes a scientist great. Every brilliant scientist should have their own personal theories about the things that cannot be proven Empirically. Why shouldn’t we have our own theories? It’s the way science has always worked, peer-to-peer communication.

Now with celebrity scientists, we are all just supposed to “Repeat After Me” like a good parrot. This is DOGMA, not science. Question everything.

[crushhighlanderParticipant 239]

I gotta say that even though I know that he was an intelligent man, this doesn’t mean he was free from his mistakes. He was mostly into speculation and I must say that he had to pay for his idea that God was not real.

No more hassles, no more nonsense, no more drama. Long live MGTOW!

[HermitParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Hermit wrote:

I’m not a world famous scientist, but math alone doesn’t prove anything. Proving a theory so that it becomes a scientific fact requires, among other things, observation. I like to believe what you’ve stated above about the singularity is correct, but it is not currently possible to closely examine and observe a black hole and what is in it.

^THIS nailed it!!

All of these Celebrity scientists make their claim to fame through pure speculation. All of their theories are conveniently un-provable. It is all pure speculation nothing more than Science Fiction, like Star Trek. Circular logic, going round and round ad infinitum.

One of the most aggravating ideas in today’s scientific world for me is the age of the Earth. To my knowledge, they still have no factual way to date anything. Carbon dating is a joke and shouldn’t even be considered. I have a difficult time believing that the world is billions of years old, but it seems many scientists speak as though it’s fact. They have no idea how long ago this planet was created, but yet they act like they know how old the universe is.

My theory is that the world is no older than 100,000 years, but what have I to base that on…????………the same observations as any of these scientists who insist that it’s billions of years old…… I don’t know and neither do they, but because they are “known” scientists, we’re supposed to believe them, yet they have no more proof than I.

The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Hitman wrote:

t’sallbs called stealthy a tuna.
Not smart.

Still telling lies I see.

Not smart.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[HitmanParticipant]

It’sallbs wrote:

Still telling lies I see.

Not smart.

your memory is still shot i see..
go to a doctor.

[Author]

Posts