Home › Forums › Political Corner › Russia vs Sweden
This topic contains 25 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by
Elric Greenstone 3 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
Our government have been doing it since 1917 with Loyd George’s National War Aims committee.
From a BBc website
New techniques of persuasion
World War One propaganda posters
World War One posters: images courtesy of Getty and Mary Evans Picture Library.
The pressure of war had driven the government to try to change the way people thought. We can see a range of sophisticated new techniques being used to speak effectively to the whole population.
Associate the enemy with evil
During World War One, Germany became associated with death, destruction and harm. The public was motivated to respond with purpose and urgency against an ‘evil’ enemy.
Tap into the group mentality
The war was portrayed as a shared endeavour in which every member of society had a stake. Everyone was urged to look around to see what others were doing and work together towards the common goal of victory.
Use children to evoke powerful feelings
Posters played on people’s natural concern for their children, and their fears about what might happen if Germany won the war.
Feature famous faces to provide authority
Well-known figures – including King George V himself – lent their support to the campaign, appealing directly to the public and providing a ‘celebrity endorsement’ very familiar to today’s audiences.
These techniques seem surprisingly modern. So does the government still use them in its campaigns today?Come on wake up and smell the bulls~~~. You think they don’t use the same techniques today re Syria -cause they do.
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
Personally
I fail to see any reasoning for Russia to intervene in the internal problems of any European country, unless Russia is physically threatened.
I would secure my own borders and sort my internal problems out first, while letting the others get destroyed from within. Once they are well and truly f~~~ed, I would walk my troops in, eliminate the problem and take over with minimum loss to my people.
Now Putin is a much better educated man than I am, and I daresay more intelligent than I, or a majority of the “common folk” in the world.
I’m pretty sure he thought of that as well.Why waste my people when I cant let them waste theirs and walk in after?
There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
It would be nice to see all these strong independent women get shut the f~~~ up by some Russian soldiers. Then they can go on their little slut walks and then get their asses deported to Siberia.
Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.
I am not defending anything Putin has done, but I have read several of his speeches or statements and they are more sane and logical than 75 percent or more of what the American politicians put out. Russians understand war, having lost immensely in World War II. They are no fools and to launch an pre-emptive strike on Europe is of no benefit to them. I have talked with people while formerly working with the VA, including a Russian doctor (psychiatrist) and she agreed that Americans are generally totally ignorant that without the Soviet Union, the other Allies would have had an extremely difficult and casualty costly battle defeating the German Army, with or without Hitler in charge. By far the majority of the German Army was in the Eastern Front, that is the Soviet Union. The Battle of Kursk was the greatest tank battle in history. All of the American military agreed to let the Russians take Berlin because they realized the horrific Allied casualties that would have ensued. The Russians understand the cost of war!
What to hell would they want Sweden for? What does Sweden have that is so important. The Crimea was part of the Soviet Union, just as Hong Kong was part of China. Russky can better explain all of this better than this. He is right, turn off the damned TV and the people who are always fear mongering to stampede the populace into dumb actions. Remember the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
Europe has already been invaded and conquered my friend. The ECB (European Central Bank) based in Frankfurt dictates the monetary and fiscal policy of other countries. Berlesconi was got out by Merkel and Sarcosi. Bankers in the formerly sovereign countries who refused to impose austerity demanded by the ECB were dealt with.
But apparently all us vote leavers are uneducated (un indoctrinated),stupid racists -ok hipsters whatever you say.
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
Absolutely not.
Mostly repeating what others have said, but:
There is nothing – nothing – in Sweden that Russia would possibly want. Even if no other country on Earth but Sweden was willing to defend Sweden, why would Russia possibly want millions of angry, captive, potential fifth columnists? Sweden’s economy is the same socialistic free fall of doom as the rest of the West. Less and less is made in Sweden, and structurally their economy has been declining for decades. What would the point be?
What is increasingly likely is that much of Eastern Europe is going to decide that the EU is a goddamn train wreck, and that they’re better off serving as a neutral buffer between the West and Russia – leaning towards Russia. Finland and Austria did quite well in that role for a very long time, and was less of a headache to Russia as well than were captive nations that required resources to manage and subjugate. The EU has been quite busy subjugating Eastern Europe for some time to the benefit of the globalists and the West, and Russia looks like a better option right now than does the morally and intellectually bankrupt West.
The globalists desperately want war with Russia. G-d willing, they won’t get it. As for Sweden panicking for no reason . . . perhaps the Swedes just like to pretend they’re still relevant. I can’t see anyone invading them for any reason whatsoever. Desperate Muslim immigrants aside . . . who mainly want welfare and gimmedats, not the collapse of the free ride. Britain likes to do this as well. No one would invade Britain. There’s nothing worth having there. Poor people are everywhere; no reason to go conquer some. Britain has shown itself completely incapable of winning any war of aggression since the Boer War, which took them far, far too long. They fought a stalemate in WWI, lost WWII for all intents and purposes, backed down at Suez, gave up all their colonies, and have just spent the last fifteen-ish years fighting unsuccessfully in the Middle East.
Something went very, very wrong with Britain a very long time ago. They’ve been spending their capital and assets for decades, with nothing to show for it. I have no possible idea what philosophy they espouse, but its not one that anyone in their right mind would be willing to go to war for. It’s a declining idea that has been contracting for almost a century. So many of Britain’s ex-colonies are so completely corrupt and f~~~ed up places, so ready for good government, that any aggressive external-looking expansionism would be sure to succeed . . . ah, but the key is that Britain itself would have to offer something better. CHAVs (Council Houses and Violence) are not something the rest of the world particularly wants. Pacifism isn’t an expansionist philosophy, moral relativism never won a beachhead, and societies without religion collapse within two generations. One can substitute the word ‘Sweden’ for Britain in most of these paragraphs. Having friends from both, and being from the States, I see no real difference between the two countries, at all. One blur of Hellenism and shopping mall land. The language is different – whatever.
If the Swedes and Britons would like to save themselves, lighting the swords of Lutheranism and Anglicanism might be a good place to start. I say this as a member of the Despised Race – we have saved ourselves only through our new adherence to the short sword, spear, and bow. Those among the tribes who have refused to rearm are disappearing – quickly – through assimilation into WalMart nothingness and television pudding land.
I read the ‘Girl with a Dragon Tattoo’ trilogy some time ago. It was admittedly an unfinished work, but . . . f~~~, Sweden is so, so very screwed. I despised both protagonists by the second book, and realized that there was in fact a country I wanted less to live in than the United States – Sweden.
F~~~ globalism, f~~~ the West, f~~~ the vacuum that is modern morality and philosophy.
Russia has something like 1/4 of the world’s useful resources, and too few souls. What they need are immigrants, not prisoners.
F~~~ the globalists. Serve G-d, fight the socialists and the bankers.
"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
