Home › Forums › Political Corner › Politically, are you on the LEFT or the RIGHT?
This topic contains 34 replies, has 19 voices, and was last updated by 
JustAnotherGuy 1 year ago.
- AuthorPosts
Everyone believes they have a choice to make – are you on the political Left or the Right. Two opposite ideologies. So let’s take a moment to look at the real differences between the LEFT and the RIGHT. Take a read, and then tell brother Sandals which one you are. Let’s dive right in.
LEFT
-Believes females should have the right to work for a living, rather than be sent back to the kitchen
-Believes in “equal pay for equal work” for women.
-Believes that race is not real, and no-one, except government job applications, is even allowed to TALK about it. Keep your mouth SHUT and never discuss racial differences, such as intelligence and propensity for violence…
-Believes government should tax citizens at over 50% and spend money on social programs
-Believes government should print paper money by fiat and devalue the citizen’s purchasing power
-Believes in a woman’s right to choose to abort her baby, for any reason, and without the man’s consent
-Believes in open borders
-Believes in indefinite welfare for people who don’t work
-Believes in race-mixing by promoting section 8 hosing in suburban neighborhoods (even though race doesn’t exist)
-Believes in diversity, and is patently anti-white male
-Believes a women should be believed when she cries “rape”
-Believes in forceable affirmative-action for schools and employers
-Believes in further chipping away at gun rights
-Believes in endless war abroadNow let’s take a look at the opposite spectrum. The conservative spectrum that operates today.
RIGHT
-Believes females should have the right to work for a living, rather than be sent back to the kitchen
-Believes in “equal pay for equal work” for women.
-Believes that race is not real, and no-one, except government job applications, is even allowed to TALK about it. Keep your mouth SHUT and never discuss racial differences, such as intelligence and propensity for violence…
-Believes government should tax citizens at over 50% and spend money on social programs
-Believes government should print paper money by fiat and devalue the citizen’s purchasing power
-Believes in a woman’s right to choose to abort her baby, for any reason, and without the man’s consent
-Believes in open borders
-Believes in indefinite welfare for people who don’t work
-Believes in race-mixing by promoting section 8 hosing in suburban neighborhoods (even though race doesn’t exist)
-Believes in diversity, and is patently anti-white male
-Believes a women should be believed when she cries “rape”
-Believes in forceable affirmative-action for schools and employers
-Believes in further chipping away at gun rights
-Believes in endless war abroadOk, so those are our two choices, according to today’s zeitgeist. Pick one, and do tell which one suits you the best? Are you politically on the LEFT or the RIGHT???
Far right.
But some of your stuff you list for the right is absolute bulls~~~. About believing women who cry rape, you are very wrong. The libtard left is behind ‘she must be believed’, not the right.
Jesus.
Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.
Odd that you have to make a choice. I guess everyone likes parties.
You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
Hey where are differences in your post ? Your post is wrong.
Left – feminism… Right – Equality.
Left – Big government … Right – smaller government and more self determination
Left – more power to Family Court … Right – limit , reduce or dismantle the Family Court
Left – Socialism … Right – Keep more of what you earn.
Left – AOC … Right – Trump.My beliefs are on the RIGHT.
Swedastan cops vs Russian cops
Runs 1:59
Who would you choose to get s~~~ done ?
THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .
Your lists are exactly the same
-Believes females should have the right to work for a living, rather than be sent back to the kitchen
-Believes in “equal pay for equal work” for women.
-Believes that race is not real, and no-one, except government job applications, is even allowed to TALK about it. Keep your mouth SHUT and never discuss racial differences, such as intelligence and propensity for violence…
-Believes government should tax citizens at over 50% and spend money on social programs
-Believes government should print paper money by fiat and devalue the citizen’s purchasing power
-Believes in a woman’s right to choose to abort her baby, for any reason, and without the man’s consent
-Believes in open borders
-Believes in indefinite welfare for people who don’t work
-Believes in race-mixing by promoting section 8 hosing in suburban neighborhoods (even though race doesn’t exist)
-Believes in diversity, and is patently anti-white male
-Believes a women should be believed when she cries “rape”
-Believes in forceable affirmative-action for schools and employers
-Believes in further chipping away at gun rights
-Believes in endless war abroadNow what I will do is give you my opinion, and that of damn near everyone I personally know, FROM A FIRST WORLD NATION PERSPECTIVE,item by item.
1. Females have the exact same “right” as any other person regardless of gender/sexual orientation/ethnicity/religion/political belief, to seek employment outside of the home. Gaining employment is/should be dependent on qualifications and the ability to perform the functions of the position period.
Comparing the pay scale of a hairdresser/secretary/receptionist to management/electrician/engineer is ludicrous. If I find out the person holding a stop sign to keep people away while I’m wiring up demolitions is paid the same as me, I’m going elsewhere and wont be working with explosives.
2. Equal pay for equal work – ALL western nations have legislation (LAWS) in place to ensure this happens. Hence federal guidelines for pay scales. Show me 1 f~~~ing law anywhere it states otherwise. Again, it is people demanding wages not commensurate with their actual job.
3. There is 1 race, the HUMAN RACE, within the human race there are several cultural and ethnic variances, and yes they should be discussed.
4. I have never met anyone who identifies as conservative that espouses this view.
Conservatives want less taxes, less social programs, and a f~~~ of a lot less “foreign aid”.
A helping hand once in awhile, not a perpetual hand out is more the train of thought.
5. Tangible assets, not fiat money. But again someone somewhere will still f~~~ that up.
6. Absolute bulls~~~. Extremist on both sides of that card. The only issue I have ever heard of about abortion is the usage of the procedure as birth control vice any actual health reason.
7. No conservative anywhere believes in “open borders”
Immigration when done correctly and withing the confines of the laws of the “receiving nation” is perfectly acceptable. Mass Migration for political/economical/criminal reasons is not. Especially when the “host” nations taxpayers have to pick up the costs. I’m all for people who want “open borders” to be individually responsible financially and legally for every migrant that crosses a border.
8. What crack heads that call themselves conservative believes in that crap. Workfare yes, welfare no. You get money from the state you should be working for the state in some capacity or another.
9. Red herring statement. Most conservatives I know dont want section 8 (welfare housing) or low rentals in their areas. Regardless of race/gender etc. Because it increases crime rates and decreases property values as well creates slums.
10. Bulls~~~, difference and diversity are two different things. Most conservatives I know believe in unity not divisiveness which is what “diversity” is.
11. More Bulls~~~. Have proof ladies, hearsay isn’t proof. This is neither left or right.
12. Not in the least. Supposed affirmative action does more to exacerbate all issues than fix them. Equal opportunity and equal outcome are two distinct items. Some people just try to rig the system and cheat others out of the opportunity to succeed using the moniker of Affirmative action.
Name 1 right that every citizen in the “western world” does not enjoy, that a white man has, by country. You bloody well cant, because there is not a single one.
13. Again, what f~~~ing crack addicts do you call “conservative”?
Each western nation has its own constitution and bill of rights, partly based on the magna carta, and partly on other documents. Self determination, freedom of association, self protection, legal rights and responsibilities, etc etc etc.
Every conservative person I have met, is only against criminals having firearms and using them in crimes. The common refrain is GO AFTER THE F~~~ING CRIMINALS, not law abiding firearms owners.
14. Again bulls~~~. Maybe that is a common view in the USA, however I doubt it.
Again everyone I know wants well defended borders, and our military used at home for defence.Based on the offered options I wouldnt be either. I would probably be Carnage’s wet dream come true though
There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
Your post is wrong.
Is it?
Apparently, everybody is completely missing the point.
Left – feminism… Right – Equality.
Left – Big government … Right – smaller government and more self determination
Left – more power to Family Court … Right – limit , reduce or dismantle the Family Court
Left – Socialism … Right – Keep more of what you earn.
Left – AOC … Right – Trump.Really? Show me the politicians on the RIGHT who have done any of this.
Your lists are exactly the same
BINGO!!!
Those are your choices today, brothers. Do you see what the left has done?
Speech control is thought control. That’s how it’s done.
Really? Show me the politicians on the RIGHT who have done any of this.
That qualifier should have been right at the opening statement of your post.
The keyword is politician
Poly = latin for many
Tic = blood sucking parisite
cian = Class of “society”Politicians are mostly self serving, they only follow power and will mostly follow the wind to keep whatever power they can garner.
Kind of about as honest as when a woman says she’ll “love you forever”.There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
Really? Show me the politicians on the RIGHT who have done any of this.
That qualifier should have been right at the opening statement of your post.The keyword is politicianPoly = latin for manyTic = blood sucking parisitecian = Class of “society”
Politicians are mostly self serving, they only follow power and will mostly follow the wind to keep whatever power they can garner.Kind of about as honest as when a woman says she’ll “love you forever”.No, not only politician. Everybody. But I should have added the qualifier “American”, in retrospect.
Not a single conservative is willing to admit anything that is actually conservative. The blue-piller conservatives in America have been “pavlov-dogged” into believing that everything “left” is right. Actually, I don’t know where you are but pretty much all of your responses demonstrate my point exactly. Females have same rights even though they are the opposite gender, and incapable of taking resonsibility? No such thing as race? I disagree on both points. Ok. My point is made. LEFT and RIGHT – No difference in today’s zeitgeist.
And the hardcore MGTOW would never admit in public that women should not have equal rights (and they shouldn’t!), for fear of public retribution. I’m not saying they should – I don’t either. I am simply pointing something out that is interesting, to raise consciousness and awareness.
LEFT and RIGHT are the SAME. EXACTLY the SAME. And you didn’t even know that it happened!
And the hardcore MGTOW would never admit in public that women should not have equal rights (and they shouldn’t!), for fear of public retribution. I’m not saying they should – I don’t either.
You would be wrong. Women should and do have equal rights. However, men should, but do not have equal rights in the family courts. Inequality does no one any good, especially to make up for past inequality. Speeding up the pendulum makes everyone miserable.
A co-worker recently told me, "If you want to see who someone really is, divorce them." I have found out how true this is. When your wife drops the façade of being the caring partner, you will witness all of the greed, hate, and spite that she has masked. It is truly breathtaking!
Im center, right in the middle, at the dark spot in the crack between my left and right buttcheek.
F~~~ the left, f~~~ the right.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
It always seems to come down to the money, and the left constantly wants to reach into my f~~~ing pockets to pay for their social justice warrior agenda. Screw that s~~~!!
We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham
Anonymous1Three Years ago I would have agreed with you. There was almost no difference between the Bush Regimes and the Clinton/Obama Regimes.
Trump changed that. The Right is now different from the Left in a lot of ways. The Parties are getting more polarized. We see the Left literally going insane over Trump. Like that nut job in the Vape Store the other day. Look at those Antifa thugs.
We are living in very strange times politically.
Swedastan cops vs Russian cops
Runs 1:59
<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/rvRCKmqGVrw?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=”” allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture”></iframe>
Who would you choose to get s~~~ done ?To be honest, I would choose none. F~~~ the police.
I am an Anarcho-Capitalist. F~~~ the state, f~~~ the state thugs (police), f~~~ all that s~~~. Personal responsibility is the only way.
That s~~~ system we all are in is completely bulls~~~. Left, right, it is just one and the same, it is all designed to enslave us, so f~~~ that.I am not a slave. No masters, no gods. I go my own way.
"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.
Swedastan cops vs Russian copsRuns 1:59<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/rvRCKmqGVrw?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=”” allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture”></iframe>Who would you choose to get s~~~ done ?
To be honest, I would choose none. F~~~ the police.
I am an Anarcho-Capitalist. F~~~ the state, f~~~ the state thugs (police), f~~~ all that s~~~. Personal responsibility is the only way.That s~~~ system we all are in is completely bulls~~~. Left, right, it is just one and the same, it is all designed to enslave us, so f~~~ that.
I am not a slave. No masters, no gods. I go my own way.I’m mostly with Dark Kenshi.
I also believe society, whether it is theocracy Iran, communist USSR, monarchist 18th century France, or the modern “democratic” West, programs people from birth with complete and utter bulls~~~.
The idea that some religious leader has a greater understanding of God (if God even exists), LOL. The idea that some communist party official should eat caviar while common people stand in lines for bread, LOL. The idea that a king has right to rule via “divine right”, LOL. The democratic idea that those who govern derive their right to govern from the consent of the governed, LOL.
All of them are the same: the “right” to govern is not a right, it is simply the threat to murder people who don’t comply, even if they mind their own business and don’t hurt anyone else. “Consent” to be governed is false-consent under duress. If you withdraw consent to be governed, men with guns will ultimately come and kill you. Had the South abolished slavery along with seceding, Lincoln still would have invaded the South. He basically said as much. If I put a loaded 357 magnum to the head of a person who owns a Mercedes, and force them to sign a contract selling me their new Mercedes for $1, that is not a valid contract.
As far as “sovereignty” over a spot of land goes, that is only derived through murdering people, in the case of America, of Native Americans. Every society programs mindless sheep like computers, including our own. If people aren’t thrown into gulags for political beliefs like in the USSR, they are dealt with in other ways here. Corporations take up a lot of the slack where the government leaves off (in terms of violating people’s rights), which is convenient because corporations ultimately control government.
You don’t know how few rights you have until you step out of line, away from the official line. Goethe said “there are none so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free”. We don’t realize how enslaved we are until we don’t tow the official line — that is why the West has so much prosecution of essentially victimless crimes.
Consider this: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2011/01/03/how-education-psychology-and-cinema-should-destroy-free-will/
“It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries.” says Bertrand Russell, a British philosopher and a “father of analytic philosophy”. In his book, The Scientific Outlook, Bertrand Russell describes how modern science, culture and technology can give rise to generations of humans that “will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished”.
“Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. . . . It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . . Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .” Bertrand Russell,1953
Essentially, per Fitche, we are taught by public school system that “snow is black” and don’t question it. Related to this is Spengler’s analysis; wiki has a good summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decline_of_the_West#Democracy,_media,_and_money
Spengler asserts that democracy is simply the political weapon of money, and the media are the means through which money operates a democratic political system.[clarification needed] The thorough penetration of money’s power throughout a society is yet another marker of the shift from Culture to Civilization.
Democracy and plutocracy are equivalent in Spengler’s argument. The “tragic comedy of the world-improvers and freedom-teachers” is that they are simply assisting money to be more effective. The principles of equality, natural rights, universal suffrage, and freedom of the press are all disguises for class war (the bourgeois against the aristocracy). Freedom, to Spengler, is a negative concept, simply entailing the repudiation of any tradition. In reality, freedom of the press requires money, and entails ownership, thus serving money at the end. Suffrage involves electioneering, in which the donations rule the day. The ideologies espoused by candidates, whether Socialism or Liberalism, are set in motion by, and ultimately serve, only money. “Free” press does not spread free opinion—it generates opinion, Spengler maintains.
Spengler admits that in his era money has already won, in the form of democracy. But in destroying the old elements of the Culture, it prepares the way for the rise of a new and overpowering figure: the Caesar. Before such a leader, money collapses, and in the Imperial Age the politics of money fades away.
Spengler’s analysis of democratic systems argues that even the use of one’s own constitutional rights requires money, and that voting can only really work as designed in the absence of organized leadership working on the election process. As soon as the election process becomes organized by political leaders, to the extent that money allows, the vote ceases to be truly significant. It is no more than a recorded opinion of the masses on the organizations of government over which they possess no positive influence whatsoever.
Spengler notes that the greater the concentration of wealth in individuals, the more the fight for political power revolves around questions of money. One cannot even call this corruption or degeneracy, because this is in fact the necessary end of mature democratic systems.
On the subject of the press, Spengler is equally contemptuous. Instead of conversations between men, the press and the “electrical news-service keep the waking-consciousness of whole people and continents under a deafening drum-fire of theses, catchwords, standpoints, scenes, feelings, day by day and year by year.” Through the media, money is turned into force—the more spent, the more intense its influence.
For the press to function, universal education is necessary. Along with schooling comes a demand for the shepherding of the masses, as an object of party politics. Those that originally believed education to be solely for the enlightenment of each individual prepared the way for the power of the press, and eventually for the rise of the Caesar. There is no longer a need for leaders to impose military service, because the press will stir the public into a frenzy, clamor for weapons, and force their leaders into a conflict. <Ranger One notes: yellow press, Hearst, Spanish-America War, “Remember the Maine”)>
The only force which can counter money, in Spengler’s estimation, is blood. As for Marx, his critique of capitalism is put forth in the same language and on the same assumptions as those of Adam Smith. His protest is more a recognition of capitalism’s veracity, than a refutation. The only aim is to “confer upon objects the advantage of being subjects.”
For further political red-pilling:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Engineering_of_Consent (Edward Bernays, 1947, consumer psychology and marketing)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent (Noam Chomsky, 1988, same principles applied to political systems)All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.
Anonymous38More right if we’re going by most people’s retarded standards. But logically, I cannot choose either. Because I need to be able to disagree with any single idea or policy of the ‘right’ or ‘left’ and not follow the script. So really to say you’re right or left is to admit you identify with a huge group, which as a mgtow I do not.
Im center, right in the middle, at the dark spot in the crack between my left and right buttcheek.
F~~~ the left, f~~~ the right.Sounds like a dance song…
A f~~~ to the left…
A f~~~ to the right…
Now do the hokey pokey and f~~~ the middle!No longer can we walk away, we must run. Remove the motive power.
Im center, right in the middle, at the dark spot in the crack between my left and right buttcheek.F~~~ the left, f~~~ the right.
Sounds like a dance song…
A f~~~ to the left…A f~~~ to the right…Now do the hokey pokey and f~~~ the middle!Humm i like it, re, do, sol accords on the guitar and done, we have a hit summer song.
Lets call it “political gerald”
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
It is no longer “left vs right”, which is a false two side dichotomy. What it is now is populist vs globalist.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
