“Please, please, please: f~~~ me!”…the sex robot will beg…

Topic by Eric Lauder

Eric Lauder

Home Forums MGTOW Central “Please, please, please: f~~~ me!”…the sex robot will beg…

This topic contains 27 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Eric Lauder  Eric Lauder 3 months, 1 week ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 21 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #913817
    +2
    IMickey503
    iMickey503
    Participant
    12465

    Here is another way to do it!

    You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

    #913818
    +2
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Thank you, Mickey.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #913819
    +5
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    That’s not how war works when your enemy is divided.

    I now understand your position better. You are stating that some feminists actions will be advantageous in the long game.
    I say feminists ARE THE SYSTEM. What first appears to be progress reveals itself later as a great setback in freedom, especially for men, and especially when women are involved.
    Let me just remember that before no-fault divorce men got screwed over by female cunning, as for example: when the man would be thrown out of the house, to later find the wife claiming he had “abandoned the family” making him the guilty part. Women always gamed the system.I am sure that no-fault divorce was initially seen as finally an end to all this fraudulent divorce setup. But they only changed the setup to be more fraudulent and with even more unfair settings. It got worst, not better.
    You cannot play against the system. Like a casino, the house always wins.
    This is not a war, its a massacre. Most men are not at war and never will be. Most men are blue pill simps that will white knight against those fighting for them!
    Notice that you are speaking of an enemy divided and fighting against itself because they have no foes. You are hoping that they shoot themselves at the foot! That is his desperate and hopeless it is.
    There is only one way to win, and its not to play. John Galt simply went on strike, all he did was to explain truth to the men keeping the machine working. Has they went on strike to, the system collapsed.

    Not exactly.
    The feminists are WITHIN the system, they aren’t the system.
    The system is complicated, extremely complex, and contradictory.
    We aren’t fighting against a stone monolith, we are fighting against a dirty blob made by a weird mix of very different gels and garbages.
    There’s another article scheduled for tomorrow, but it’s in Italian and I’m not going to translate it: it’s very long, 10 minutes to read (most are 2-3 minutes).
    It explain how to exploit the system in SOME/FEW cases, exploiting its contradictions.

    It may suffice to say that: Mike Pence isn’t, generally, our friend. He just wants men back to plantation. Trump is slightly better. Gary Johnson’s even better, but he have no power.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #913821
    +2
    EG
    EG
    Participant
    1851

    a dirty blob made by a weird mix of very different gels and garbages.

    Thus all the blue and purple hair these days?

    #913830
    +3
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35837

    Said it before: I don’t need a sex robot. I need a robot that’s realistic enough to get me into the carpool lane.

    But the real problem is that “enthusiasts consent”, “passive consent”, or “vehement refusal” are PROGRAMMED FEATURES. Machine so far HAVE NO WILL, thus they do not GIVE CONSENT or REFUSE CONSENT.

    No.

    The real problem is that women hate competition but have made such liabilities of themselves they are also unable to compete against lifeless hunks of silicon rubber for men’s attention (a.k.a. resources). So they come up with whatever bullsh​it excuse they can to block that competition. No matter how you counter their bullsh​it excuse, they’ll only come up with more bullsh​it.

    The correct response is to tell feminists: “I don’t care. Go fu​ck yourselves. Because nobody else wants to.”

    #913837
    +2

    Anonymous
    3

    No.
    The real problem is that women hate competition but have made such liabilities of themselves they are also unable to compete against lifeless hunks of silicon rubber for men’s attention (a.k.a. resources). So they come up with whatever bullsh​it excuse they can to block that competition. No matter how you counter their bullsh​it excuse, they’ll only come up with more bullsh​it.
    The correct response is to tell feminists: “I don’t care. Go fu​ck yourselves. Because nobody else wants to.”

    Yes, I agree!

    This is a bulsh1t issue.

    #913839
    IMickey503
    iMickey503
    Participant
    12465

    I like to bring up something. When is Phil at the Doll house going to Install these chips? Never!. That is the only answer you need. You also have to ask? HOW are they going to enforce this? Are they going to have the dolls call 911? Cus that would be great!

    You don’t understand. Just like Eric said he could not post, PEOPLE will find a way. And guess what? When the start calling 911 or Emergency numbers? Not only Sex dolls will be on issue. This will also be all sorts of Kids toys as well. Get a few, set them up at your Favorite feminist house and have them come to their doors all night long!

    People on our side are already thinking about this, and KNOW quite well how to take advantage of any system in place they put into action.

    I will say this. Be careful for what the Other side wishes for. Just like Eric spoke about in his article? Men may demand that WOMEN get CONSENT CHIPS! LOL. So that they have the things they need in order to make sure that they are safe. Even having a ROBOT SEX NANNY! Now imagine that? Being able to take away all the responsibility, and put it on someone else? THE STATE IS NOT GOING TO LIKE THAT. Why? RESPONSIBILITY! LOL!

    Just like the APP that went out of its way that gave men consent? WOMEN HATED THAT APP! So… When Robot sex dolls get the government involved? You are going to see so many of them in place and in use? WOMEN are going to be hard pressed to compete. THEY CAN’T!

    You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

    #913965
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    There are differences between men and women:

    Women are programmed to find a way to get resources from sex.

    But men are programmed to find a way to get sex.

    So the obiouvs conclusion is:

    Men will have sex with robots.

    SOME famous /beautiful women will get money from the above sex, by selling the rights to use their body to shape many sex robots.

    But this way the outcome will be:

    SOME women will get money from sex robots

    MANY men will pay 100 $, 200 $ and even 300 $ mopre to have sex robots shaped like their favorite actress.

    MANY men will not care, and they’ll f~~~ very similar and beautiful robots, paying 100/200/300 $ less.

    The above is already happening with fleshlights: you can get the basic model for 49, OR a basic model molded on a pornstar vagina for 99, OR a TECHNICALLY improved model (Blade, Turbo Copper) for 69.
    Obiousvly, the best choice is either the 49 basic model or the 69 TECHNICALLY improved model.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

Viewing 8 posts - 21 through 28 (of 28 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.