“Please, please, please: f~~~ me!”…the sex robot will beg…

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

https://theindependentmanitaly.wordpress.com/2019/10/20/please-please-please-f-uck-me-the-sex-robot-will-beg/
PLEASE NOTICE THAT THE LINK DOESN’T WORK DUE THE AUTOMATIC CENSORSHIP WITHIN MGTOW.COM: TO MAKE IT WORK REMOVE THE LINE IN F-UCK WITHIN THE ADDRESS.

English version, there’s both English and Italian version in the blog.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

Sex bots is not my cup of tea, but if you really think about it, men who are into such a thing will squeeze out their poison. This in turn will shift his mind temporarily into the no-f*cks-given state when it comes to chasing tail. Just like a guy who squeezes one out right before heading off to a nightclub, only to quickly realise that he has zero interest heading out. This means that at that moment of clarity, he cannot be easily manipulated by a woman’s beauty.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

MGTOW_Mike wrote:

Sex bots is not my cup of tea, but if you really think about it, men who are into such a thing will squeeze out their poison. This in turn will shift his mind temporarily into the no-f*cks-given state when it comes to chasing tail. Just like a guy who squeezes one out right before heading off to a nightclub, only to quickly realise that he has zero interest heading out. This means that at that moment of clarity, he cannot be easily manipulated by a woman’s beauty.

I could care less about sex robots, I’m just very interested in their social implications.
I have been on holiday for a week, on my boat: I didn’t even think about women/robots/human shapes.
Still I had orgasms.
With Copper – Coppy for her friends

And Pilot – Pilly fo her friends:

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 3]

Eric,

Your point of view is that the robots could be programmed for “enthusiasts consent” thus solving the feminists problem.

But the real problem is that “enthusiasts consent”, “passive consent”, or “vehement refusal” are PROGRAMMED FEATURES. Machine so far HAVE NO WILL, thus they do not GIVE CONSENT or REFUSE CONSENT.

The “professors” know this. Their position is logically untenable, thus what are they thinking?

They are thinking on PROGRAMMING REFUSAL. That is it. If they cannot ban the product they will render it useless. This so much so that some simply ask for a ban, while others use this subterfuge.

The real problem is a sociological one, they cannot let man escape the plantation. The STATE cannot let men escape the plantation.

Sexrobots, if they ever get commercialized, will be banned. These articles are just creating the (nonexistent) issue.

Eventually sex-bots will be contraband. Banning them will be the greatest mistake feminists ever made. Because I will render sex-bots more desirable.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Eric,
Your point of view is that the robots could be programmed for “enthusiasts consent” thus solving the feminists problem.
But the real problem is that “enthusiasts consent”, “passive consent”, or “vehement refusal” are PROGRAMMED FEATURES. Machine so far HAVE NO WILL, thus they do not GIVE CONSENT or REFUSE CONSENT.
The “professors” know this. Their position is logically untenable, thus what are they thinking?
They are thinking on PROGRAMMING REFUSAL. That is it. If they cannot ban the product they will render it useless. This so much so that some simply ask for a ban, while others use this subterfuge.
The real problem is a sociological one, they cannot let man escape the plantation. The STATE cannot let men escape the plantation.
Sexrobots, if they ever get commercialized, will be banned. These articles are just creating the (nonexistent) issue.
Eventually sex-bots will be contraband. Banning them will be the greatest mistake feminists ever made. Because I will render sex-bots more desirable.

No, I’m saying that feminists are shooting in their foot.

And it’s not accident that the two academics are men: most feminist men do NOT understand the true goals of feminism, they tend to use the ideology in a coherent and “fair” way.

“Enthusiastic Consent” = Taking Sexual Initiative / Approaching / Initiating Sex / Making the First Move / Making Most of the Work

The above feature was ALREADY likely to be preferred by most sex robots users even BEFORE the two morons published this “new concept”.

Advanced and relatively cheap sex dolls are ALREADY commercialized in China, and NOT banned by the STATE:
https://www.made-in-china.com/manufacturers/sex-doll.html

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 3]

Eric Lauder wrote:

No, I’m saying that feminists are shooting in their foot.

And it’s not accident that the two academics are men: most feminist men do NOT understand the true goals of feminism, they tend to use the ideology in a coherent and “fair” way.

I understand your position, but its a trap. The moment you allow them to put a foot inside the door is when you lose the house. Having a law about what can be programmed into a sex-bots allows that first foot, and it is an unreasonable one.

To believe that feminists are “fair” in any way is another trap. The whole ideology is based in false assumptions, and even the best intentions can create the greatest problems.

Its the same as inviting a cow into your house, the cow in its best behavior will still sh1t all over the place.

The assumptions these “scholars” have is that men are inherently rapists, thus must be protected from their own instincts, less they fulfil their fantasies with real women.

That is why men have to stay away from women and anything remotely feminist.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

That is why men have to stay away from women and anything remotely feminist.

Let me clarify this.

If I had any emotional investment in this society and its future I would be advocating an activism against feminism.

But I have no such investment. It is all so screwed up that I dont see anything salvageable. I wouldn’t know where to start. So, let it burn. Let nature take its course.

Therefore my position is of self-interest and self-preservation. I must protect myself, as best as I can, from the insanity of this disastrous society.

And the assumptions of feminists about men are POISONOUS. I will not let poison into my system. I do not agree that my nature is inherently evil, rapist and violent. I know myself to be the opposite.

To even enter a discussion with feminists, that is based in that assumption, is the trap. It is accepting the veracity of the assumption.

Being society what it is, it will be accepted and people will react based in that assumption. They are not discussing a product, they are discussion the nature of MEN and will deem men to be evil, legislating accordingly.

As a red pill I can only point this out to blue pills. Maybe some will wake up if things get bad enough. That is what I am saying: things will get bad enough.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

MGTOW_Mike wrote:

Sex bots is not my cup of tea, but if you really think about it, men who are into such a thing will squeeze out their poison. This in turn will shift his mind temporarily into the no-f*cks-given state when it comes to chasing tail. Just like a guy who squeezes one out right before heading off to a nightclub, only to quickly realise that he has zero interest heading out. This means that at that moment of clarity, he cannot be easily manipulated by a woman’s beauty.

Yep. THIS is the part they fear most. They wouldn’t care about the sex dolls if not for the fact that because of them, men will not be the easily manipulated marks for their vagina validation that they would be if they didn’t have any way to release the pressure. It’s too late ladies. The cat is out of the bag, so you can keep YOUR cat in its bag.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

No, I’m saying that feminists are shooting in their foot.
And it’s not accident that the two academics are men: most feminist men do NOT understand the true goals of feminism, they tend to use the ideology in a coherent and “fair” way.

I understand your position, but its a trap. The moment you allow them to put a foot inside the door is when you lose the house. Having a law about what can be programmed into a sex-bots allows that first foot, and it is an unreasonable one.
To believe that feminists are “fair” in any way is another trap. The whole ideology is based in false assumptions, and even the best intentions can create the greatest problems.
Its the same as inviting a cow into your house, the cow in its best behavior will still sh1t all over the place.
The assumptions these “scholars” have is that men are inherently rapists, thus must be protected from their own instincts, less they fulfil their fantasies with real women.
That is why men have to stay away from women and anything remotely feminist.

They aren’t arguing for a law, they’re arguing that sex robots with consent-module are beneficial: so the foot is in the feminists’ door, not in ours.
Every time someone on the other side argues something like “sex robots are generally bad, but in those two cases they can be beneficial” then there’s a flaw in their attacking line – this is a war.
Same for prostitution: there’s another article scheduled for publication, there’s a war between NOW (the largest femminist organization of the world) and “black queer feminists” – in this specifical case “black queer feminists” are unwillingly and unknowingly working to men’s benefit: the more available and cheap pussy is, the more women lose power.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Manfred wrote:

That is why men have to stay away from women and anything remotely feminist.

Let me clarify this.
If I had any emotional investment in this society and its future I would be advocating an activism against feminism.
But I have no such investment. It is all so screwed up that I dont see anything salvageable. I wouldn’t know where to start. So, let it burn. Let nature take its course.
Therefore my position is of self-interest and self-preservation. I must protect myself, as best as I can, from the insanity of this disastrous society.
And the assumptions of feminists about men are POISONOUS. I will not let poison into my system. I do not agree that my nature is inherently evil, rapist and violent. I know myself to be the opposite.
To even enter a discussion with feminists, that is based in that assumption, is the trap. It is accepting the veracity of the assumption.
Being society what it is, it will be accepted and people will react based in that assumption. They are not discussing a product, they are discussion the nature of MEN and will deem men to be evil, legislating accordingly.
As a red pill I can only point this out to blue pills. Maybe some will wake up if things get bad enough. That is what I am saying: things will get bad enough.

That’s not how war works when your enemy is divided.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 3]

Eric Lauder wrote:

That’s not how war works when your enemy is divided.

I now understand your position better. You are stating that some feminists actions will be advantageous in the long game.

I say feminists ARE THE SYSTEM. What first appears to be progress reveals itself later as a great setback in freedom, especially for men, and especially when women are involved.

Let me just remember that before no-fault divorce men got screwed over by female cunning, as for example: when the man would be thrown out of the house, to later find the wife claiming he had “abandoned the family” making him the guilty part. Women always gamed the system.
I am sure that no-fault divorce was initially seen as finally an end to all this fraudulent divorce setup. But they only changed the setup to be more fraudulent and with even more unfair settings. It got worst, not better.

You cannot play against the system. Like a casino, the house always wins.

This is not a war, its a massacre. Most men are not at war and never will be. Most men are blue pill simps that will white knight against those fighting for them!

Notice that you are speaking of an enemy divided and fighting against itself because they have no foes. You are hoping that they shoot themselves at the foot! That is his desperate and hopeless it is.

There is only one way to win, and its not to play. John Galt simply went on strike, all he did was to explain truth to the men keeping the machine working. Has they went on strike to, the system collapsed.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22510]

Lets not forget, we must make all dildos and vibrators be able to say NO to women, and deflate, if they don’t want to participate with the girls.

And women buy 6% of sex dolls and that percentage is going up. Make sure the male sex dolls can say no and go limp.

Its just so idiotic, their levels of thinking.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[EGParticipant 1852]

Eric Lauder wrote:

AUTOMATIC CENSORSHIP WITHIN MGTOW.COM

Incidentally I can’t see anything new since the iPhone update. Carry on…

[EGParticipant 1852]

Anonymous wrote:

Sexrobots, if they ever get commercialized, will be banned.

So it comes down to a question of whether man can invent a machine that’s better at getting him off than his own hand.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Hmm. Lets see if this one works.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

And lets try this one.

“Please, please, please: FRACK Fruk Pound My Silicone Wings! me!”…the sex robot will beg…

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Jack HarperParticipant 2863]

What I love about this forum; you never can tell what kind of topic may spark a thought provoking discussion.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

iMickey503 wrote:

Hmm. Lets see if this one works.

iMickey503 wrote:

And lets try this one.
“Please, please, please: FRACK Fruk Pound My Silicone Wings! me!”…the sex robot will beg…

iMickey503 wrote:

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Eric Lauder wrote:

https://theindependentmanitaly.wordpress.com/2019/10/20/please-please-please-f-uck-me-the-sex-robot-will-beg/PLEASE NOTICE THAT THE LINK DOESN’T WORK DUE THE AUTOMATIC CENSORSHIP WITHIN MGTOW.COM: TO MAKE IT WORK REMOVE THE LINE IN F-UCK WITHIN THE ADDRESS.
English version, there’s both English and Italian version in the blog.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Author]

Posts