Pat Condell the rape of Sweden

Topic by qeeqo

Qeeqo

Home Forums MGTOW Central Pat Condell the rape of Sweden

This topic contains 90 replies, has 29 voices, and was last updated by Faust For Science  Faust For Science 4 years, 2 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 88 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #137328

    Anonymous
    5

    Not sure how this hate monger found himself on MGTOW. I personally don’t care for 3rd world migrants, but why in the world would a MGTOW care if a bitch got ‘raped?’ Especially when we know that the very definition of rape evolves and revolves around the feminist liberals and their mood swings..

    How has nobody called this out?

    … I care if a woman got raped, loads of women getting raped by third world trash whom the women are trying to help.
    Some women have been brutally assaulted, gang raped and murdered by these ‘migrants’, that is beyond despicable and the women didn’t ask for it, they were brainwashed into helping them and are simply victims of the media and these anamalistic third world scum.

    Call him a hate monger for speaking out against the mass rape of sweedish women that the media is covering up?
    What is wrong with you? i go my own way from women for obvious reasons but i respect their right to live and be safe and not be violated and persecuted for NO reason.

    I hope im right in thinking that your opinion is not the general consensus of this site.

    I remember I said something like that I got put in my place on here. too. Learning point indeed well said Peter.

    #137335
    JollyMisanthrope
    JollyMisanthrope
    Participant
    3356

    If they won’t listen, they’ll have to feel. Just like a kid who is told that something is hot but touches it anyway.

    The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.
    #137349
    Qeeqo
    qeeqo
    Participant
    1168

    I’m not trying to sound like an alarmist, but militant Islam IS in fact a threat to democracy, freedom, and personal safety world wide. Yes, there are many Muslims who are great people. In fact, the vast majority of Muslims are normal, everyday people like you and me. But they still listen to the extremist Muslims in charge and are too scared to speak out against them. America and Canada both need to look at what is going on in Europe and take preventative measures to make sure the same thing doesn’t happen here.

    As for the rape of women Condell speaks of, it is terrible. No one deserves to have that happen to them. Refer to one of the first posts I did on these forums entitled “Women Are Like Alligators”. Just because I choose to keep my distance from women for my own freedom and happiness, it doesn’t mean I necessarily wish harm against them.

    Militant Islam is a threat to western civilization, and civilizaton itself.

    #137360
    Jason
    Jason
    Participant
    282

    Another native Swede here. Thought I’d weigh in 🙂

    One interesting thing I’ve found over the years regards the difference in behavior between immigrants from different parts of the world.

    Africans: They behave themselves, generally. You get the occasional loudmouth braggart “macho” guy, but nothing worse than you get from the native Swedes.
    Asians: Much like the Africans, you get the occasional bad apple, but for the most part they behave. Heck, on average I’d say they actually qualify as more model citizens than the natives! Although, it does seem to depend a lot on what part of Asia they come from; Chinese, Taiwanese, Japanese, Vietnamese, and Korean immigrants all seem to behave well, while others…vary a lot more.
    East Europeans: Typically hard workers, but frequently sexist (as in, tradcons). Somewhat higher tendency toward criminal activity than the natives, but nothing overly alarming.
    South Europeans (further south than Germany): Plenty of loudmouths, braggarts, narcissists and the like, and very frequently tradcon, and somewhat higher tendency toward criminal activity, but again nothing overly alarming. Often very annoying, though.
    Middle-Easterners: Holy s~~~. Overwhelmingly tradcon (if a different kind of tradcon), very frequently loudmouth, braggart, “macho” and narcissistic if under age 40-45 or so, very high frequency of criminal activity, particularly ages 15-45 or thereabout; this seems to go hand in hand with the whole “macho” thing. Interestingly, this primarily applies to those who came to Sweden as children or young adults rather than those born in Sweden (they typically behave more-or-less as everybody else) or who came here in their middle age (usually tradcon, but with a tendency to keep to themselves and not bother anyone else – possibly because of initial, and lasting, language barriers). Behavior caused by some kind of combination of a weird inferiority complex and cultural identity crisis?

    There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

    #137401
    LonerBoner
    LonerBoner
    Participant
    358

    Africans: They behave themselves, generally. You get the occasional loudmouth braggart “macho” guy, but nothing worse than you get from the native Swedes.

    Do you feel this way about people from Somalia aswell?
    Where i come from in Sweden we have plenty of Somalis and basically all they do is live on wellfare, chew khat and the yearly vacation back to Somalia. They also rape and the younger generation have some sort of Sharia squad running around harassing other Somalis who dosent behave according to Sharia law.

    Keep clam i'm dyslexic.

    #137405
    LonerBoner
    LonerBoner
    Participant
    358

    his s~~~ is straight out of a south park episode! Are the people finally getting p~~~ed? Do you plan to leave?

    No, not planning to leave, but today in Sweden you have to plan where to live. I belive gated communities will be a hit in the following years.
    My family own land on the countryside so in the future i will build myslef a house in the forest away from the multicultural experiment.

    I may sound like a racist but i am really not, i do not judge people on the base of their colour. I have friends and collegues with very different background and even they agree with my opinion. And yes people are getting angry thats why the only party against this immigration is right now the biggest party in several polls. Lately several planned centers for housing immigrants have been burned to the ground, i dont support this but i understand the frustration.

    Keep clam i'm dyslexic.

    #137413
    Ancientwisdom
    Ancientwisdom
    Participant
    6089

    Lately several planned centers for housing immigrants have been burned to the ground

    If my government treated its own citizens this way then I would burn every PLANNED housing center to the ground. Obviously I wouldnt do this if people were living there or there was ANY danger to anyone; hence “planned” in caps.

    And you dont sound like a racist! Jesus your liberal media has done a number on you guys! Wish you all the best. Keep us informed. Our prayers are with you here in the states. Us Americans arent all stupid, lazy f~~~s despite what Euoro news says about us.

    Resident cynic.

    #137423
    Jason
    Jason
    Participant
    282

    @Limpan: I haven’t run into too many Somalians, specifically. The ones I have – mostly teenagers – have generally kept to themselves. You know, “ensamkommande barn”, not entire families.

    There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

    #137424
    +1
    Puffin Stuff
    Puffin Stuff
    Participant
    24979

    It’s hilarious to see a member decry men who appear “macho” as being the problem. Despite the propaganda of feminists, macho simply means male.

    It is hilarious to see a MGTOW poster accuse men of acting male and that the fact that they are male and act that way is leading to societal destruction.

    Perhaps these macho men need feminization concentration camps in north frozen tundra, like Stalin made, never to return because, as feminists say, even the most feminized male never stops acting “macho”.

    That’s why male only spaces are never to be allowed.

    #icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

    #137434
    Jason
    Jason
    Participant
    282

    When I say “macho” in this instance I do not refer to men who act traditionally “manly” – rather, I refer to men who feel the need to constantly validate themselves by making lots of noise (both literal and metaphorical), challenge everyone around them for absolutely no reason, and just in general allow childish pride, arrogance and lack of discipline to dictate their behavior. In short, “men” who behave like small children, or, put differently, women.

    There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

    #137437
    Ancientwisdom
    Ancientwisdom
    Participant
    6089

    When I say “macho” in this instance I do not refer to men who act traditionally “manly” – rather, I refer to men who feel the need to constantly validate themselves by making lots of noise (both literal and metaphorical), challenge everyone around them for absolutely no reason, and just in general allow childish pride, arrogance and lack of discipline to dictate their behavior. In short, “men” who behave like small children, or, put differently, women.

    I got what you meant by “macho”. I think more people would also identify your description with the term “douche bag”. Do you guys use that in Sweden? Its basically a self absorbed, superficial narcissist perpetually trying to PROVE himself typically by putting others down.

    Resident cynic.

    #137440
    +1
    Jason
    Jason
    Participant
    282

    @ancientwisdom: Yup, you hit the nail on the head. In Sweden we typically use the term “macho” to refer to a male who overacts the “macho” bit in order to compensate for his own lack of self-esteem. Sadly, I can’t think of a Swedish word that carries the exact connotations as the English “douche bag”. The closest I can think of, “skitstövel” (lit. “s~~~ boot” ) I think more closely corresponds to the English “jerk” or “jackass”.

    There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

    #137444
    +1
    Ancientwisdom
    Ancientwisdom
    Participant
    6089

    Lol “s~~~ boot” is now officially in my repertoire.

    Resident cynic.

    #137492
    +2

    Anonymous
    1

    BadKan wrote:
    We might have disagreements about a lot of things, not only women. But one thing must be clear: Mgtow is men GOING THEIR OWN WAY. Not the TRADITIONAL WAY. And that means not helping women because pussy. We should treat women as we treat men, when it comes to rights. And that includes, jump into the fire for them. I wouldn’t jump into the fire for another men just because he has a dick, why would I do that for a woman because she has a pussy? Specially when the MAJORITY of people WITH PUSSIES demonstrated, in one way or another, THEY WOULD WATCH ME BURN?
    Need proof? Here, have some:

    I’m not sure what you were going for here, I said in several different posts that I don’t support intervening on their behalf (politically), this differs if I see someone just getting raped, man or woman. That’s not some sort of trad-con twist either, that’s just my opinion of decency.

    Maybe you missed the videos I posted? I help people that are worth helping. If the MAJORITY a group of people have the history of INDIFFERENCE (on the best case scenario) towards a demographic that I happen to belong to, and said group is being attacked by another, I will NOT waste my time/resources/LIFE on the defense of the first. I defend the RIGHTS of INDIVIDUALS, but not ALL INDIVIDUALS are worth defending. I condemn the ACT of rape of ANY GENDER, but, as I said, I will not defend someone that is most likely to F~~~ ME OVER (pun intended) if the situation was inverted.

    Beside, what is this crap of not wanting intervening on their behalf (POLITACLLY)? What good does it make if you are going to disagree with them, but in REALITY you will still help them because: pussy? Would you help a man, that is being beaten on the street then? What if said man was a Muslim? What if a GROUP OF MUSLIMS were being attacked? Would you jump to their rescue? If your answer is NO, than that makes you an hypocrite (and a white knight). Muslims are also HUMAN BEINGS, so why wouldn’t you go defend them? Is it because, if a bunch of extremists caught you and beheaded you they would most likely not move a finger? You would not helping them “politically”, because not helping women (or anyone) “politically” doesn’t mean S~~~. They can VOTE, they can DO ANYTHING YOU CAN POLITICALLY. They don’t need/want your help on that area.

    BadKan wrote:
    Not really. White knighting is when a men side with a women because: pussy. He might not want to “get on her pants”. He might judge her incapable, with no competence, pitty her. The problem is when this same White Knight wouldn’t lift a finger when seeing a man in the same condition. This is gynocentrism. Not everything has to do with sex (not directly, anyway).

    Then you and I have differing opinions of what “pussy” exactly entails in relation to this label. I view it as “white knighting” if the goal is to enter the pussy. If you are saying that any defense can be reduced to “white knighting” because said party has a vagina, then you and I have drastically different views. I can view women as equals, as dangerous life wrecking creatures that I need to avoid.

    Yes, we do. You are moving the goal posts in order to be able to behave like one and not be called upon it.

    Let’s use YOUR logic regarding the migrants, shall we?

    You are claiming that, despite admitting that women are dangerous life wrecking creatures that you need to avoid, they are your equals and therefore men should help them. And you are doing that not because you want to f~~~ them, but simply because they are people.

    Fair enough.

    Than why in the nine hells are you complaining about the migrants?

    Right and conservatives can behave just as badly when it comes to pussy pedestal behavior, however, the right/conservatives are not letting hordes of illegal economic migrants into my country which may rape my 4 sisters. Additionally, the right/conservatives are not responsible for the current toxic incarnation of feminism, that’s entire liberal. Yes trad-con may still be a dry deal, but it’s a fading target next to the bleeding vag of liberal feminism.

    But they are HUMAN BEINGS, aren’t they? Why are you not helping them on the same grounds you would help women? They might be, you know, “dangerous life wrecking creatures that you need to avoid“, but they are your equals and therefore men should help them. You can oppose them POLITICALLY all you f~~~ing want, but you should help them if you see them trying to flee from BOMBS! Isn’t being thorn to pieces as bad as being RAPED? Shouldn’t you help them simply because they are people? Oh yeah, I guess if some of them catch you and behead you the fact that the rest would not do S~~~ to try to help you plays a big part on that, right? So it is ease to condemn them, but give women a break, isn’t it? I recommend your sisters to oppose them POLITICALLY, because, according to you, THAT IS ALL THAT MATTERS.

    Oh, and “Additionally, the right/conservatives are not responsible for the current toxic incarnation of feminism, that’s entire liberal” is total and utter bulls~~~. THEY ARE DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE. TradCons and Conservatives are the ones that were ok in giving women “rights” but not the RESPONSABILITIES, or lower the STANDARDS when it comes to it, the same way liberals are doing with the MIGRANTS. Just like you are doing RIGHT NOW.

    And I like how you tried to use emotional arguments too, mentioning your 4 sisters and all that. It is too bad that I treat ALL PEOPLE (not just men) as equals and therefore DON’T GIVE A CRAP about their genitalia. I use FACTS and REALITY to make my decisions (or as close as I can get) and as far as I can tell, women are as merciful to men as Muslims (or any religion, really) are to heretics. So no, I will not protect those that would watch me burn, NEITHER WILL I SUPPORT OTHER MEN TO DO THIS.

    You are welcome to jump off that cliff though. You know, for your 4 sisters.

    #137507
    Scandinavian
    Scandinavian
    Participant
    590

    The guy in the second youtube audio linked mentioned this. He said the media lied and told the public that the majority of immigrants from Syria were going to be doctors, teachers, and people in the tech field. That is f~~~ing insane! These politicians just want to ruin their own countries.

    As if this isnt enough, which it will be to bankrupt Europe, we havent even seen the terrorism yet.

    Syrians usually aren’t so bad. They are in general one of the most secular and civilized arab people. Problem is that the ones coming aren’t Syrian, at least very few are. Most are african, Afghan or other arabs. They have had big problems here trying to talk to the “Syrians” as they cannot understand the govt Syrian translators. What does that tell you, eh? ?

    I’d get the hell out there, the whole place is going underwater.

    I’m not so sure. The odds are absolutely against us, but Norwegians aren’t Swedes, they have a national spirit and their problem is not being indoctrinated so much as being giving and kind in nature, but when that trust is abused they can get really mean.
    Also our media is bad, but not nearly as bad as swedish media when it comes to migration.

    Besides; even IF it goes to hell, there is nowhere to run without at least an internationally valid BSc, only place to go would be a Europe more f~~~ed up than Norway and that is no win. If I go I will aim for Russia, otherwise I’m better off fighting than die tired.

    #137508
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    Let it also be known that in places where muslim’s dominate, they really don’t like it when someone kills one of their own. They tend to collectively see that as a mortal offense regardless of whether the slain did anything to deserve it or not. They then become enraged and go on the warpath and they may not stop at just hunting down the perpetrator.

    #137516
    Ancientwisdom
    Ancientwisdom
    Participant
    6089

    Let it also be known that in places where muslim’s dominate, they really don’t like it when someone kills one of their own.

    It requires MUCH less than that. All you have to do is draw a f~~~ing cartoon in the WEST, where they do NOT dominate, and they kill people FFS. How often is Christ mocked world wide and no civilized people bat an eyelash?

    I know not “all muslims” are like this. We have plenty where I live. But from certain countries and of certain ages they are barbaric and will not assimilate let alone even tolerate anyone elses culture. Thats why this is such an explosive environment with mass migration.

    All of this…over a f~~~ing cartoon. Let alone the killings.

    Resident cynic.

    #137517
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    Let it also be known that in places where muslim’s dominate, they really don’t like it when someone kills one of their own.

    It requires MUCH less than that. All you have to do is draw a f~~~ing cartoon in the WEST, where they do NOT dominate, and they kill people FFS. How often is Christ mocked world wide and no civilized people bat an eyelash?

    I know not “all muslims” are like this. We have plenty where I live. But from certain countries and of certain ages they are barbaric and will not assimilate let alone even tolerate anyone elses culture. Thats why this is such an explosive environment with mass migration.

    All of this…over a f~~~ing cartoon. Let alone the killings.

    <iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/B_kyNIevsIs?feature=oembed” allowfullscreen=”” frameborder=”0″ height=”375″ width=”500″></iframe>

    To sum it up they subscribe to the ‘eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth’ system.

    #137521
    Ancientwisdom
    Ancientwisdom
    Participant
    6089

    To sum it up they subscribe to the ‘eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth’ system.

    More like 12 LIVES for 1 CARTOON

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting

    Resident cynic.

    #137553
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    To sum it up they subscribe to the ‘eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth’ system.

    More like 12 lives for 1 cartoon
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting

    To them they see the casualties as part of a single act of revenge for mocking their ‘prophet’. Thus they fulfilled their mandate of eye for an eye tooth for a tooth. They even said when they were done “the prophet is avenged”.

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 88 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.