occams razor

[Anonymous 14]

Doc wrote:

But returning to the true meaning of Occam’s Razor which may not apply here. The simplest explanation is usually correct.

Simplest explanation is Building 7 was demolished and since it takes much longer than a couple of hours to wire a building of that size for demolition and since we have no footage of an army of demolition experts running into this slightly burning smoke filled building it therefore had to of been rigged beforehand. THEREFORE the simplest explanation is that 9/11 was an inside job.

That is the lesson here in Occam’s Razor logic, anything else is just jumping through more and more complicated hoops to avoid facing the obvious.

Have a good day gentlemen.

[DocParticipant]

I just don’t know.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[ZarathustraParticipant 2246]

Or, for the first time in history a steel girder building (WT7) collapsed because of a simple office fire and despite this rather alarming engineering problem the U.S. government has done nothing to change building codes to prevent a similar catastrophe in the future.

[ZarathustraParticipant 2246]

Sorry Roadmaster 743 brings up a good point… Since Dan Rather and the rest of the main stream media told us what happened an hour after it happened without any investigation whatsoever, it must be true. I forgot, after all these years, about that rather convincing argument.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

EVEN today if information came out that it was inside job. The media would run with it for weeks on end.
It would be THE biggest breaking news of the past 100 years. No one would be talking about Trump, North Korea, anything. This would be the news.

No proof, no proof, no proof.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Doc wrote:

Ok. Here’s my final thought.
Perhaps I struggle to accept that Goverments could act in such a way. I won’t deny that.

I remember the first time I sa the collapse of WT7 real time and even then thought it fell in the same way buildings drop under controlled detonation.

But maybe I have just accepted the official narrative and find the alternative to crazy for my mind – which tries to be rational – to accept.

But returning to the true meaning of Occam’s Razor which may not apply here. The simplest explanation is usually correct.

It would be insane if classified documents are realased to our descendants that reveals the government were behind the whole deal.

IF and it is one hell of an IF, it was an inside job. You still have to account for 100’s of police and fire fighters that were working the area and looking for evidence. ANY one of these people found something it would have been front page new in the NY times and the whole city would be talking about it.
This big so many police and firefighters no way it could have been kept secret, not in NYC.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Sky-OParticipant 18949]

There are videos on YouTube of a skyscraper fire in Dubai a couple of years ago.

An almost one hundred story building, with only about 60% of the structural integrity of the WTC buildings.

It was literally engulfed in flames – the entire building, and for hours.

Weird. The next day, it was still standing.

[DocParticipant]

Couldn’t resist definitely nailing my colours to the mast.
It’s an Occam’s razor. Even tho we will never know for sure.
Despite the probability being extremely improbably that 20 men hijacked 4 jetliners crashing two into WTC one into Pentagon and a failed United 93 hijack it is still more proabale than alternative explanations.

Sorry Zarathustra – you have compelling argument and you might very well be right but despeite th narrative that we have been sold it seems most plausible.

But – without the HARD evidence we will never know.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[Sky-OParticipant 18949]

And, a billionaire submitted a plan to the US government to have him pay for and construct an exact structural replica of one of the WTC buildings in the desert in Arizona.

Then have a remote controlled 737 with the same amount of fuel, fly into it.

He was told that is illegal and he would be stopped and arrested.

Weird again. Because replicating a scenario or crime scene is the number one way of figuring out what happened in any situation in a court of law.

BTW: Those buildings collapsed systematically,
efficiently and quickly: controlled demolition style.

And liquid thermite (dust) was found in the ruble and around the area.

Steel beams were still literally on fire (& melting) and could not be put out with traditional methods even 2-3 days later.

The way the buildings collapsed and the undeniable presence of liquid thermite: Occam’s razor.

And. Liquid thermite doesn’t come in ‘pounds / lbs’ It comes in gallon form: And is brushed / painted on. Yep, you guessed it – Applied to steel.

Wow.

[Sky-OParticipant 18949]

And it’s weird:

Twenty suspicious guys were not noticed by the government as all having plane tickets in September 2002, the same month intelligence reports (in June) indicated an attack on the WTC would occur.

BUT: For example, the IRS can track someone down that owes $500 from a ten year old tax return and levy their existing bank account.

N-Pleeeeez

[ZarathustraParticipant 2246]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash

Did you guys know is WWII a bomber crashed into the Empire State building and nothing but a small fire ensued? No buildings coming down…

How does a bomber laden with explosives do less damage than a 747 flown into a building with 50 years extra of construction improvements?

[Sky-OParticipant 18949]

ACDALT:

All Controlled Demolitions Are Like That

[Sky-OParticipant 18949]

Maybe the WTC buildings were structural unicorns.

Only they go down like that because they are not like other buildings.

[Sky-OParticipant 18949]

False Flag Law:

Collapse of buildings is determined by how the government can benefit. Where no benefit can be obtained, there is no quick and systematic collapse.

Previous laws of physics have no relevance to government motives when determined building collapse method.

Increased chance at using a false flag premise for starting wars and securing oil is always decided by the government.

Where no such benefit exists, buildings are allowed to collapse normally.

Liquid thermite: Chemical hypergamy.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

How about United 93 and Pentagon crash sites? Where NO WRECKAGE FOUND???

Occams razor:

(A) Planes crashed at both locations but somehow VAPORIZED, despite melting point of titanium material of plane being MUCH greater than burning temperature?

or

(B) Planes didn’t crash there.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

743 roadmaster wrote:

What do you need to do the job. Millions of pounds of explosives. 100’s of industrial grade tools. In order to get the job done in a timely manner 100’s of explosive experts.

Why does it need to be done in a “timely manner”?? If you were assigned this task, wouldn’t you plan it out over months or years?? Wouldn’t that make it much easier?? The beauty is you can start as early as you want.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

The biggest hole in the insider/demolition theory is the event happened on live TV. It was the news for days on end. Everyone watched it. The 2nt plane was a live event.
From the plane flying into the building to the clean up after it was all world wide live news.
IF any evidence to the contrary it would already be accepted as fact.

It is called a conspiracy theory for a reason.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

743 roadmaster wrote:

IF any evidence to the contrary it would already be accepted as fact.

NO WRECKAGE is evidence to the contrary. Titanium planes don’t disappear.

[Anonymous 1]

@743roadmaster, do your homework. Many of the questions you have asked can be answered in about 10 minutes of research. Yes there are pictures of cut beams, thermite residue and First hand testimony from fire fighters. The simplest explanation is a controlled demolition scenario. Pancake theory is overly complicated and contradictory. Use Occams Razor properly and visit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. There is an overwhelming amount of proof that you can find, if you really have the will power to investigate…

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

[Anonymous 11]

WTC7 was what first opened my eyes that very day. The Patriot Act sealed the deal for me.

Look into what it takes to make a building free fall into its own footprint. It’s a major engineering challenge. All three were brought down in a controlled manner with a series of perfectly timed explosions.

My pet conspiracy theory is that the aircraft that augured into the ground in Pennsylvania was destined for WTC7.

[Author]

Posts