Making MGTOW Illegal

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

It’sallbs wrote:

They are deliberately manipulating a collapse so that they can bring in, bit by bit an ever more totalitarian regime.

That was the plan with putting Hillary in charge. The s~~~show went sideways when President Trump was elected.

[Anonymous 42]

MarketWatcher wrote:

Don’t give me any ideas. I already have a history of irresponsible gun issues.

METOO! You can hurt someone back with one of those things!

[RomulusParticipant 4667]

and controlling all ideas and modes of thinking that all men might be exposed to….

Well, lets see. You can hit a guy over the head real hard to get him to do what you want him to do, and that’s good for that specific thing you want him to do.

Or you can so arrange the social structure, legal system, educational process, and mass media, to softly shape men in to the thing you want. The advantage is, you don’t have to hit him over the head, and he’s good for multiple acts not just the next one.

Think about where we are in our culture when it come to men. And how early it starts. Just as a quick example. We arrange our early school years to be very unfriendly to young males. All that positive energy is expected to be desk bound. Recesses cancelled. Gym classes are tapped down so no girl feels insecure….no dodge ball please…..When the energy can’t be so easily contained, we tell the boy there is something wrong with him and drug him with powerful medications to arrest that energy. All those wonderful passive well behaved traits we associate with females.

I haven’t even gotten to early adult education, college, TV and Movies, social norms, so on.

No, this process is well underway, and continuing.

How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

Trailboss wrote:

Hmmmm…they could use census data to survey the number of households owned by single men. Government inspector shows up to survey the property, says you can afford to house a landwhale and 7 of her hellspawn in your 1500 sq ft home, then imposes mandatory quartering of single mom landwhale and offspring. You complain, you go to jail. Fail to support your new family, go to jail. Dare spend a dime for yourself: go to jail. Easy! #MANOUT!

This is what happened in the early days of the Soviet Union. Large homeowners were forced to accept several poor families to all live in the new “collective” housing. And yes… if they complained, it was off to the gulag.

This is one reason why history is important. Although I don’t think MGTOW will be outlawed per se, all of the freedom we enjoy by living lives as we choose will be severely restricted. They can effectively ban MGTOW by imposing all kinds of taxes and/or responsibilities on single, productive men, and rewarding men who get married and produce children for the state.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

Anonymous wrote:

No one knows I’m MGTOW.

How will the government identify MGTOW?

By what mechanism could they make it illegal?

I live on my own and support myself and myself only.

As far as I’m concerned I’ve never heard of MGTOW.

Yeah right.

For one, google knows what websites you visit. Facebook also tracks you all around the internet. Then who knows how many ad trackers. Your ISP has a log of websites you visited. And so on. And I have little doubt this data is later sold forward.

They are not there yet, systems are not merged, but with rise of big data and machine learning AI I would be very surprised if there is not already in place a secret version of chinese obedience score in western countries, google sesame credit.

It will not be forbidden, but you will pay more taxes, will be ineligible for bonuses, jobs, will be double checked on airports, etc.

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[Anonymous 14]

Faust For Science wrote:

It’sallbs wrote:

They are deliberately manipulating a collapse so that they can bring in, bit by bit an ever more totalitarian regime.

That was the plan with putting Hillary in charge. The s~~~show went sideways when President Trump was elected.

Firstly, yes, the collapse is being engineered to a degree to grasp more power. Patriot Act? Those of us without our heads completely up our asses know 9/11 was bulls~~~, yet here we are still living under this s~~~. The E.U. is being intentionally destabilized, and more power will be consolidated and grabbed due to it, sold as the solution. In the U.S. the same thing is happening, yet more slowly. Wars by the U.S./Israel keep shuttling refugees into the E.U., not surprisingly though Israel takes in nobody.

Now, as far as Trump and Hillary? I don’t see much difference thus far. Trump has doubled down after saying he wanted to pull back in the Mid East, just as Obama did, and nothing would have been different with Hillary. Presidents are clearly no longer driving the bus. I don’t see any solid evidence of the same people not being in control and getting what they want at almost every turn.

Everything keeps heading in a more Orwellian direction.

[DocParticipant]

They can ban the expression of an idea. But not the idea itself. We are Ghosts.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Doc wrote:

They can ban the expression of an idea. But not the idea itself. We are Ghosts.

Ideas are thought.
They can ban certain thoughts.
And trust me, they will.

Monk

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Romulus wrote:

Or you can so arrange the social structure, legal system, educational process, and mass media, to softly shape men in to the thing you want. The advantage is, you don’t have to hit him over the head, and he’s good for multiple acts not just the next one.

But, that only works if the man in question gets benefits and respect as well. This was the whole social marriage pact was all about.

That pact has been destroyed and men are walking away from a bad deal.

[DocParticipant]

Meister wrote:

DocDJ wrote:

They can ban the expression of an idea. But not the idea itself. We are Ghosts.

Ideas are thought.
They can ban certain thoughts.
And trust me, they will.

I see what you say but they can’t know what we think. Only if we express it.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[Anonymous 54]

By stock in tin foil companys.

[DocParticipant]

Or concrete. Always need plenty of that. Ha ha

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[Anonymous 54]

How did u tube know I was thinking about tie downs. I hadnet searched for anything simmiler.
There was no pattern to predict my thought.

They porobably have the technolagy already.

Read our thoughts.

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Doc wrote:

Meister wrote:

DocDJ wrote:

They can ban the expression of an idea. But not the idea itself. We are Ghosts.

Ideas are thought.
They can ban certain thoughts.
And trust me, they will.

I see what you say but they can’t know what we think. Only if we express it.

Thoughts are electromagnetic impulses in your brain.
Within our lifetime computers will be able to read thoughts.

Monk

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

F~~~ Sandman.

[Anonymous 54]

Doc wrote:

Or concrete. Always need plenty of that. Ha ha

They used it for ” Over shoes ” where I come from!! Hahh

You wore them in the Harbor! Haha

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Anonymous wrote:

By stock in tin foil companys.

Are you posting from the last millenia or something?

Computers reading thoughts isn’t exactly far fetched …

https://www.livescience.com/53535-computer-reads-thoughts-instantaneously.html

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130819141641.htm

Monk

[Black MaskParticipant 1572]

MGTOW is a way of life and isn’t a tangible thing that can be destroyed or banned. Men will find a way. Can you imagine if they force American men to date like in South Korea? I’m f~~~in’ surrounded by lesbos, dykes and women who are already taken. What would I get stuck with? A mop?

"Man honesty is misogyny." - Patrice O'Neal

[Black MaskParticipant 1572]

sidecar wrote:

F~~~ Sandman.

His run-on monotone bothers the hell outta me.

"Man honesty is misogyny." - Patrice O'Neal

[ViciouscunningtreacherousParticipant 823]

I agree Doc. Ideas are what people live and die and fight for. I know what my personal line in the sand is. And. I exercise the 2nd amendment VERY well!

For in much wisdom is much grief, and he who increases knowledge increases sorrow.

[Author]

Posts