Just IN Vegas shooters weapons

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

The high-powered weapons also included a .308-caliber AR-10 rifle and an AK-47-type rifle — as well as four Daniel Defense DDM4 rifles, three FN-15s and other rifles made by Sig Sauer, according to reports.
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/inside-hotel-room-vegas-killer-gun.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&strip=all

This raises a couple of questions:

1. why have multiples of the same weapon (type)?
2. looking at the picture of the weapons lying around—mags are not taped together
3. Again looking at the picture at least one weapon has a red-dot sight. that sight is useless at the range he was at from the target(s)

something doesn’t add up here

[Anonymous 6]

All those weapons are legal. So what was the high powered weapon that he had?

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

BTW EACH DDM4 cost in excess of $1800, the FNs are about 2K each so 15K worth of guns just with these 7.

[OldBillParticipant]

Fifteen grand in seven rifles alone? It’s getting screwier and screwier with every press release.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 6]

OldBill wrote:

Fifteen grand in seven rifles alone? It’s getting screwier and screwier with every press release.

And that much ammo isn’t cheap either. I think that theory that this was an Arms Deal gone bad is starting to hold a little bit of water.

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

Interesting.

I would think that having to get everything up to the hotel room would have resulted in him having fewer rifles.

Like why risk detection or suspicion before it all went down by bringing and having that kind of firepower in a hotel room.

But then again. . . .

He did not bring those weapons into the room.

An unusual way to prove that he was a patsy would be for the manufacturers of those rifles to defend themselves in court during the wave of civil suits that are coming:

And make sure their attorneys have access to everything related to this incident. Everything. Then prove in a trial that there is/was no way that this guy could have done it.

While at the same time exposing the entity behind it. How it was done, orchestrated and the logistics behind it, including multiple shooter’s and points of fire.

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

And that much ammo isn’t cheap either. I think that theory that this was an Arms Deal gone bad is starting to hold a little bit of water.

I’m beginning to think that too.

The number and variety of guns, the amount of ammo, all of it. There’s no way he humped all that into the room by himself.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Agreed–if one is interested in a high rate of fire—why aren’t the mags taped?

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

So much s~~~ here doesn’t add up. I would not know where to start.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Katherine Herridge on Tucker last night said her sources confirmed guns were from NINE different manufacturers, that total cost was over $100,000 including scopes and tripods and that he started buying as early as June.

Basically: NO WAY could have used them all, so why buy them all? Why bring them all up?

It’s like buying a dozen SUVs to take the family cross country

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Starts at 7:15 in video

[DwightDavidParticipant 859]

Taking a damn long time to come up with a motive. I don’t know if this is them being careful with the investigation, or they aren’t ready to tell us. Working up to it, as it were. I watched the press conference tonight at 8 Eastern, someone, don’t know who he was, got a little hot under the collar about all the speculation. I’m not into conspiracies, but this is a little suspicious.

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

surfdude12 wrote:

Katherine Herridge on Tucker last night said her sources confirmed guns were from NINE different manufacturers,

False flag

‘Nine different manufacteurs’

If you can’t get laws passed banning assault rifles.

Ensure that civil lawsuits bankrupt the manufacturers.

[Anonymous 7]

It would make sense to have a backup rifle, a side arm and a shotgun. Not that any of this makes sense.

AFA an arms deal goes he bought them legally which means serial # and personal info collected. Unless the ones being sold weren’t the ones he recently bought.

F~~~ing fishy.

[Anonymous 6]

Sky-O wrote:

surfdude12 wrote:

Katherine Herridge on Tucker last night said her sources confirmed guns were from NINE different manufacturers,

False flag

‘Nine different manufacteurs’

If you can’t get laws passed banning assault rifles.

Ensure that civil lawsuits bankrupt the manufacturers.

This is what Hillary Clinton was talking about. I thought it was dumb then and i still do. How could you sue the manufacturer for their weapon being used? So by that logic, the people who were run over in Germany last year, can sue the truck company for negligence? That makes no sense.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Sky-O wrote:

surfdude12 wrote:

Katherine Herridge on Tucker last night said her sources confirmed guns were from NINE different manufacturers,

False flag

‘Nine different manufacteurs’

If you can’t get laws passed banning assault rifles.

Ensure that civil lawsuits bankrupt the manufacturers.

Fortunately, previous court rulings and a few laws prevent gun manufacturers from being held legally libel.

The false narrative to this is falling part so fast that the media has not start blaming all “white men” for the attack, even though many white men were injured or killed in the attack. Talk about blaming the victims.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

ISIS dude owned vans from 6 different manufactrers!!! Sue the van manufacturers!!!!!

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22510]

There was one scenario reported he was fbi doing a fast and furious gunrunning operation, similar to the ones in arizona.

His whole giving up and kiling himself with all that weaponry, plus no inside makeshift baricades to deflect gunfire, no body armor to survive longer, none of that adds up either.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22510]

It would also make sense to have body armor and fortify an area of the room to help deal with gunfire from the doorway. Also a gas mask.

If its real the guy knows hes not coming back to anywhere so his key goal is to live as long as possible to use up as much rounds on people as possible. Not kill himself as soon as a bullet comes through his door.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

I’m not a weapons expert, so I could be wrong. One of the anesthesia guys I work with was in special forces, and he opined that belt fed 308 weapons were used. (I forgot the models he mentioned) He said something about the rate of fire and the pitch.

One of the media sites claimed security personnel were chasing other security personnel and one security person was shot. Somebody opined that the actual perpetrators dressed like security guards to escape. This whole situation is screwball.

[Author]

Posts