Irritating – MGTOWS, you are a drag on the economy

[TwistParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

A place where your wants, desires, and aspirations are honored like a trash barrel full of chopped up infants presented before GOD.

Well said. And with that, I’m going to finish my coffee, take a mile walk on this cool crisp morning, place my vote for Trump, and then go fishing.

F~~~ the rest of it.

[Anonymous 42]

I have to P.S. the post above to add justification to the bitter taste of tyranny left in my mouth, the kind that TOTALLY HARDENS YOUR HEART TO COPS BEING SHOT!

In the Massachusetts Brookfield State Police barracks in 1989 I was strip searched under the threat of physical assault by an officer of the State Police in Uniform. Need I say more? OK, I’ll say more, that was the day the government injected the desire to murder in my heart.

A man of Islamic faith would say “you’re not a man after another man does something like that, not until you take his life to get your dignity back.

Good thing I’m hanging on the the tattered and torn remnants of my faith, cause God as my WITNESS I could easily put a bullet into something like that!

Lookout officer Sunshine, some of your brothers have created hatred and disgust that can earn you an unsuspecting bullet in the back.

No go zones where men can escape the punkdown experience of belittlement by law officers has been established under Islamic rule under soft and hard forms of Islamic law.

Who me? I’m just a pussycat until somehow by some miracle I get my dignity back!

And women think they’re the only ones being raped? There’s storm on the horizon as many that ran to MGTOW 10 fold may run to Islam…

It was a better world when men respected men.

Remember, when it comes to the truth, you heard here at radio MG-Tower, broadcasting the bitter truth around the planet 24 hours…

[Anonymous 0]

I admittedly did not read the article since it seems no more than stupid dribble, however if their point is that MGTOWs are a drag on the economy, where is the logic in that alone? Are they just crying because men do not have to work extra to support a housewhale and its offspring? Wouldnt a MGTOW be more a good thing for the economy? Really shows how much more men pay into the system than women. It shows the truth andnthey cant handle the truth. I would say MGTOW has the opposite effect on the econmomy. As a MGHOW one is not wasting money on stupid s~~~ like diamonds and diapers. However as a MGHOW not wasting money on that crap, I for example am able to make bigger purchases in specialized industries, such as automobiles, air craft water craft, computers/technology, firearms, property. Become a land lord of several properties. The list can go on and on. Just seems like an illogical shaming article backed or entirely, or constructed by those industries hurt by MGTOW, like diamomds, diapers, toys, lawyers, courts, light up shoes, the same industries that f~~~ a man over ruthlessly so that he could provide some snot nosed brat or ungreatful selfish woman with their wants and needs with no thought to his own.

Of course the tax system is skewed because of vagina privlidge, cant have these little cupcakes actually living in reality, they might realize there is no wage gap. Or that their equality isnt so equal. That or it is butthurt signle moms that want men to paynfor her mistake the repells all the good men. Aka men with part a brain in their head. I would say women and their less than fair share being paid in are the drag on the economy. Kinda went off on a tangent there, I know.

No need to let that article bother you ~BS, it is pure horse s~~~.

[Anonymous 11]

F~~~ Rick Newman in the ass with a stallion’s c~~~.

I’ve know two men who have committed f~~~ing suicide due to failing to find work for over a year. Another one of my former over 50 coworkers, who got let go Thanksgiving 2015 has a pine tree right slap through the middle of his house thanks to Matthew. He had to go self-employed to even begin making money again.

You’re damn right I’m a drag. The sorry f~~~ers have ruined this country. I only spend money when I have to do it and pretty much fix everything myself. I also pay people under the table to help me with stuff I can’t handle.

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

You’re damn right I’m a drag. The sorry f~~~ers have ruined this country. I only spend money when I have to do it and pretty much fix everything myself. I also pay people under the table to help me with stuff I can’t handle.

Hey C-Pig, I work harder and longer than ever just to survive, but I make sure I don’t earn the government one single DIME, they’re enriching themselves at our expense, they’re ALLLLLLLLL INSIDE TRADERS TRAITORS!

I live in a legal NO GO ZONE under Messallchews~~~s Superior Court Injunction, I’ve been getting F~~~ED all my life, and like I heard it before, bide your time, what comes around goes around I will NOT be the only one SUFFERING!

History shows many politicians hanging from ropes or their heads on a pike, unfortunately that’s the course they charted. When living high on the ocean of destruction It’s only a matter of time before all the debris pierce the hull and send them to the bottom of the ocean of destruction. Meanwhile we’re small enough to cling to the drifting debris.

Providing my own fuel and fuel has kept my bow from going completely under!

I can’t wait to see bands of marauding gangs plunder the affluent neighborhoods of Washington D.C.

F~~~, I hope they hit with a cat 5 hurricane that stalls over the Whitehouse for several days! I encourage the wandering bandits of storm ravaged D.C. to burn everything they cant’s steal, every house, every business, EVERYTHING! Just to teach them how it FEELS!

[xenonParticipant 2007]

“I love the smell of rant in the morning” Ha. Good one. My plan was to bulldoze my house when the tax burden becomes so out of whack that only those working for the state in any capacity can afford to own one. There will be nothing left here but rubble.

[Anonymous 42]

xenon wrote:

“I love the smell of rant in the morning” Ha. Good one. My plan was to bulldoze my house when the tax burden becomes so out of whack that only those working for the state in any capacity can afford to own one. There will be nothing left here but rubble.

A-Men Brother! I have no neighbors to worry about on my VT property so burning it is no problem, I’ll even get a shrub burning permit! Cause that’s all it’s WORTH!

Here in MA, I have a neighbor to worry about, so an excavator to bust everything up including the well-head and septic tank and septic system. I’ll help them to return America back to nature, just as long as I get to hear them screaming; “first all the men vanished and now all their houses? What’s next? ME!”…

The ravages of war, GENDER WAR! The ladies really f~~~ed themselves good!

[narwhalParticipant]

I don’t equate men out of work with MGTOWs, not even close. In fact, the vast majority of those here seem to be working. A few seem to be disabled and unable to work. No doubt many don’t pay taxes and/or plan on retiring early. This article seems to be focusing on men living in their parents basements with no job and/or married with no job. I don’t see that as MGTOW.

We are right though, this is happening because men have lost incentive to work and because a man can chose not to work and survive in many instances. In some ways, I have issues with a grown man who doesn’t provide for his own food and shelter when he capable of doing so, but I do not see it as anywhere near a top priority. It’s much more of a symptom then a problem.

I am much, much more bothered by the volume of independent and equal women who are highly dependent on men and the government. If this article were actually interested in the truth, it would be blatantly clear.

If you were too assign a value to a person’s productiveness, saying 100 for full production and 0 for no production, it would look something like this.

100 = fully working man
20 = a man who is only working for his own needs at a minimum
-20 = a man who is dependent on someone elses labor entirely.
-40 = a woman who is dependent on government for survival. She get extra positive points for being a heavy spender and stimulating the economy.

-80 = a married woman who does not work fully dependent her husband and/or ex-husband.

Notice a fully working man who is married and supporting and non-working woman has the resources of a man who is only providing for his own basic needs.

Of course, this is made up numbers, but is it not basically inline with reality? If we were truly interested in stimulating the economy, the obvious solution would me to encourage women to work and provide from themselves while removing the yoke on men and providing good and services men are actually interested in.

Ok. Then do it.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Millions of families are suffering because a male earner has given up working.

What’s the matter?
Those men are stay-at-home dads! 😀

A better explanation might be that some men have a spouse who’s able to bring home an income, easing the pressure for them to do so.

It’s wonderful, isn’t it?
There should be more women around who are willingly to support a stay-at-home dad!

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

narwhal wrote:

I don’t equate men out of work with MGTOWs, not even close. In fact, the vast majority of those here seem to be working. A few seem to be disabled and unable to work. No doubt many don’t pay taxes and/or plan on retiring early. This article seems to be focusing on men living in their parents basements with no job and/or married with no job. I don’t see that as MGTOW.

Indeed, when you’re on your own you have to work.
The doormat is mainly complaining about men who lost their job and are now a burden to their working wives:

A better explanation might be that some men have a spouse who’s able to bring home an income, easing the pressure for them to do so.

and

Millions of families are suffering because a male earner has given up working.

Those “poor women” also would have an hard time dismissing their jobless husbands, because even in a gynocentric society laws are gender neutral and alimony is threat to working women with jobless husbands.

In Italy the courts invented an interesting concept, designed to not give alimonies to jobless divorced husbands: the alimonies aren’t granted on the grounds of how much both spouses earn, but on the grounds of “their potential of having an income” – naturally it’s been applied just only to divorcing stay-at-home husbands and not to divorcing stay-at-home wives…

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 1]

F~~~ economy, it is just a new way of slavery, money is nothing but pixels and paper.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

narwhal wrote:

I don’t equate men out of work with MGTOWs, not even close

No disrespect, but I agree to disagree.

Fortunately for myself, I decide whether I am a MGTOW or not.

I will not engage in a debate about it.

[AttonParticipant]

The Ponzi scheme is coming apart.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Maraudrz1Participant 2250]

In my opinion the author of the study is an idiot. He says women working are not the problem. They are part of the problem in two ways. One; They are taking jobs from men. I have to agree that in reality I don’t think it is that many. Two; The jobs women do are usually useless jobs. How much does a social worker, therapist, counselor or hairstylist really contribute to the economy? One thing the author doesn’t mention is how the economy is slow. There really aren’t that many jobs with decent pay out there that men can’t get without major career re-education and many men that had decent paying jobs are too old to get the education that may take years to get the sheepskin needed to switch. Besides with women being the majority in colleges ( 60% women to 40% men I heard) and college campuses being so toxic to men the education opportunities aren’t very good. With many men able to spend so little for their own needs many don’t need to work full time or work their whole lives. Then there men like myself that basically can’t work. I am not on disability but I need to be. I get Social Security but it is very little and I can’t even work to supplement it. There are others that only work enough to get by.

But what I see is Society starting to whine. As time goes on and more men work less to give their X-Wives less or even spend time in jail to avoid paying vaginamony, pay less in taxes and only take care of themselves I believe we will see a lot more whining in the future. The collapse is going in earnest and the nation is tipping over the cliff edge. Pretty soon it will be on the proverbial slippery slope. When that happens what is the Government going to do? Put men in labor camps and force work out of them. Borrow even more money? If so from whom? Raise taxes. If men aren’t working so much that won’t help the Government and definitely not the economy. I think most if not all of us are smart enough to know what is needed. Stop paying these women to pop out babies. Cut all funding to SJWs and Feminist organizations. Build that wall. Send all the Middle East “refugees” back. Truly rebuild our infrastructure instead of making empty promises. Stop all foreign aid. Rigorously investigate and prosecute corruption in Government. Change the laws that oppresses men. Tax the hell out of our special snowflakes and take away all these benefits for women that hurt companies and small businesses. Stop forcing those same companies and businesses to hire on quotas instead of on merit. Cut regulations to the bone. Politicians need to start ignoring the Feminist and SJWs.

These steps and many more will help the economy grow at a fast rate thus creating more jobs. Jobs that men can do without having to risk false rape charges because they have to go to a toxic college campus or having to spend years getting re-educated to get a decent paying job. Make it worthwhile for men to get up, feel excited about something again and at least look for work.

Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I just mentioned this not yesterday!

Missing that tax revenue are we?

F~~~ blue pill society and the horse it rode in on.

Fuck this planet.

[TriviumParticipant 1029]

The progressing economic collapse couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the final stages of a dying reserve currency and the bubbly goodness of the financial markets. Clearly it must be the fault of the people walking off the plantation.

Breaking a man down at every turn and stomping on him when he’s lying on the floor and on top of that not having the admiration of woman in any way shape or form is not going to motivate a man to do anything. Top that off with ‘benefits’ often paying more than a s~~~ty job (i.e. the only type of job still left over) and having more time to oneself by not participating.

Spit in someone’s face often enough and they will eventually feel like its supposed to be that way just like being caught out in the rain.

This is not the common man’s fault and blaming it on them is not going to help things at all.

"Listen to all, Follow none"

[Anonymous 0]

Cap285 wrote:

F~~~ blue pill society and the horse it rode in on.

Heres to that!
Especially, the horse it rode in on. Feminism.
Equality is great when it is true equality, not selective equality.

[sidecarParticipant 35851]

Anonymous wrote:

They’re barreling down on me with doubling and tripping the taxes by the art of OVER ASSESSING, this only DISCOURAGES any BUYERS.

The city and county of Detroit are seizing abandoned properties for non payment of property taxes. Then they are selling the properties at auction for $5 or less. That’s five George Washington dollars. We’re talking whole residential blocks for less than a cup of hipster coffee.

Then they turn around and tell the new owners they owe property taxes on property assessed for hundreds of thousands of dollars. And they expect back taxes as well. So a property that they couldn’t sell for $6 is somehow magically worth $260,000 or more for taxation purposes. And they expect people to pay $5 for a property for the privilege of being forced to pay thousands more in property taxes on it.

And then they wonder why people stopped paying even $5 for their taxed-into-worthlessness properties. They wonder why the properties continue being abandoned to blight and decay. They don’t seem to have any idea of the importance of having someone simply take custody of the property and rebuild it. No, they just want milch cows for tax slaughter, and nobody is volunteering for that. They simply can’t figure that one out. So they blame “capitalism” and “the one percent” and “corporations” and “underemployed men”.

The is the liberal socialist cloud cuckooland we are living in.

There is no way to fix it. It will eventually burn.

Bring marshmallows.

And in the meantime move as many assets as possible into things that are not indexed against the dollar or taxable. You’ll be glad you did.

Anonymous wrote:

their point is that MGTOWs are a drag on the economy, where is the logic in that alone?

There isn’t any logic in it. It’s just another not-actually-an-economist confusing the shuffling of numbers for the actual economy. The actual economy runs on wealth creation, not on shuffling paper. Men create 80+% of the wealth. Women do 80+% of the spending. It shouldn’t be hard to understand that it’s men’s productivity that powers the economy while female spending consumes it.

But now the men have stopped producing. And idiots like this have no clue what to do about it.

Basically women are a drag on the economy, and he’s blaming MGTOW for not pulling it out of the morass women have put it into.

Good luck with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Equality is great when it is true equality, not selective equality.

Not for women.

When women get actual equality, they starve.

But that is not our problem.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

sidecar wrote:

They don’t seem to have any idea of the importance of having someone simply take custody of the property and rebuild it. No, they just want milch cows for tax slaughter, and nobody is volunteering for that. They simply can’t figure that one out. So they blame “capitalism” and “the one percent” and “corporations” and “underemployed men”.

Detroit, greed, corruption and stupidity are synonymous. Been that way since I left there in 79.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Author]

Posts