Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Female Promiscuity
This topic contains 24 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by 
tripvan 4 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
I don’t know how much this topic have been discussed on these forums, but perhaps it is good to dwell on the matter from time to time:)
Some time ago, I had a conservation with a few of my classmates at the university I am currently studying at. The topic was promiscuity, and we discussed what it was and why it is so different between men and women. One of the women in the group stated that which all women always say when this topic is being discussed:
“Why is it so that when a man sleeps with 10 women in a week he is a stud, while a women sleeping with 10 men in the same amount of time is a slut?”
We have all heard this statement at some point i our lives I’m sure:) And each time I am rendered speechless, speechless because these women have absolutely no clue of what male sexuality is all about. And so, when you tell them the reason why, they always look at you like you are talking about witchcraft or something alien that they have never heard of before.
As I see it, the reason for women having this total lack of knowledge on this subject, has much to do with feminism and the “sexual revolution” in the 70s. What little women once have understood of male sexuality have been forgotten completely by women of today. Also, women tend to get their advice on men by other women…which is much like a plumber asking another plumber how to do the work of an electrician…pointless really.
While doing some research on my own, I came by an article written by a fellow who really nailed that topic well. I would recommend everyone to read it once you get the chance. This may be good to have in the back of your mind when you are having a discussion on this topic in the future:)
Link to article: http://uk.askmen.com/dating/curtsmith/42_dating_advice.html
Feel free to add your voice below if you have any thoughts on the matter;)
Cheers!The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal - Aristotle (384 - 322 BC)
I don’t know how much this topic have been discussed on these forums, but perhaps it is good to dwell on the matter from time to time:)
“Why is it so that when a man sleeps with 10 women in a week he is a stud, while a women sleeping with 10 men in the same amount of time is a slut?”
Because women can easily get sex, even the fat ones. With men you need to face rejection and have a game plan. Only a few men can get sex easily, mind you these men are more likely be muscular. Men are studs when they sleep around because they WORKED FOR IT and faced REJECTION. Women just wait for some guy to hit on her and this is why women hate mgtow because lately men aren’t approaching women at least for dates.
"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle
The reality of the “double standard” explained;
A key that opens many locks is a master key.
A door that is easily opened by many keys is just a s~~~ty lock.••••••••
Women wouldn’t have it any other way. . They don’t even want to change the standards for women. The entire stud / slut dichotomy is perpetuated BY WOMEN. Since they are “the gatekeepers of sex” ( men are the gatekeepers of commitment)….. they want to keep the standard for a woman to get laid to be as low as possible. And they want the standard / price / hoops to jump through for men to be as high as possible.
Well, as long as that remains ….. the stud’s respect increases, and the slut’s respect decreases.
Women are the CREATORS of “the double standard” they have such a big problem with.
They manufacture it themselves!Let’s imagine for a moment that the requirement for sex (for a man) would be only willingness and nothing else. No cost. No work. No years at the gym. No diet. No approaching. No getting numbers. No business success. No wealth. No fame. No power. He can be as dumb as a chimpanzee and still be “attractive” — just sitting on his ass getting asked out and all the blowjobs he wants on command. Let’s imagine that were the standard for men. ( I know it’s a big stretch, but try it. )
There would be NO possible value increase for him – nor any need to increase it.
He would be exactly in the same position as today’s common female. He would be Luke Slutwalker.But because women DEMAND and EXPECT outrageous standards for men, while they expect they can be fat and fugly STD ridden to the point of being grossly offended by any rejection……. they literally turn themselves into urinals.
•••••••
“Slut-shaming” exists because of women. They could put an end to it – today!. But they never will. In order to stop “slut-shaming”, women would have to make it as easy as cheap for men as possible. Then he can’t be a “stud” anymore.
When a guy is going through a dry spell, they would set up guys with their girlfiends (like women do in other cultures) and say “Hey I know a great girl you would like. She’ll take good care of you. Let me set you guys up”. That actually goes on in other countries!!! But an Ameriskank wouldn’t dream of it. She would rather point and laugh at you and say “aha! You’ can’t get laid!!!” like it’s the hardest thing in the world to do.
As long as women behave like “getting laid” should be difficult for men… they are perpetuating this double standard. The more tail he gets, the higher his social proofing value in the eyes of other women. Since they consider a man standing wth 3 women to be “higher value” than a man standing alone….. they create this double standard.
But it’s not difficult. The same girl will f~~~ someone else for NOTHING.
That’s why she gets “slut shamed” when she demands one man pay the biggest price he can pay…. while f~~~ing another for free. She can’t shame a man who “can’t get laid” when she lays back and spreads her legs for his best friend for nothing. In doing so, she has effectively made herself (and her vagina) valueless. No man needs to be everything she expects when she’s putting out for nothing.
The “double standard” will never change in 1000 lifetimes because women don’t want it to change. Western women want you to work as hard as possible to get laid. They try and behave like it’s “unattainable”. So when a man gets lots of tail, naturally he’s going to be MORE of a “stud” and social respect for him increases. Conversely, when she puts out easily and thinks all she needs to be is willing, respect for her will decrease.
It’s all a great big con game. And women are the losers. They make sure of it themselves.
Feminists really f~~~ed it up for the modern woman by misleading her into thinking she’s “empowered” for having more sexual partners than men today. But they actually turned women in to the very sex objects they claim “the patriarchy” labelled them as.
If I were a modern woman, I would be p~~~ed the f~~~ off.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Women do slutshame. The pussy cartel And they blame it all on men.Makes me very glad to be MGTOW. I extricate myself from the drama of female politics. Female politics is a bottomless pit.
frankly my dear i don't give a damn
Anonymous0I just lean closer and closer to GHOST with every passing day.
That whole post was brilliant, KeyMaster. Did that just come off the cuff, or do you register new usernames to set you up for a dunk, lol?
That whole post was brilliant, KeyMaster. Did that just come off the cuff, or do you register new usernames to set you up for a dunk, lol?
Actually I spent about 15 minutes writing it out (yeah off the cuff), and then realized I wasn’t logged in so I lost it and had to write it out AGAIN.
F~~~ it ….. so then I remembered I once wrote about double standards here.
/forums/topic/woman-writes-23-things-that-make-men-slutty/The gist was exactly the same so I pulled from that and elaborated here some more.
Glad you enjoyed!If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.A key that opens many locks is a master key.
A door that is easily opened by many keys is just a s~~~ty lock.Best explanation I have read on this subject to date, I enjoyed it thoroughly:)
And if you ask me, I think women know very well that they control the sexual market…they just act ignorant when you confront them with these facts:)
The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal - Aristotle (384 - 322 BC)
Anonymous42Let me through a nail of actual reality in this topic, women have ALWAYS been the gatekeeper of sex! They simply removed the gate with the ill advice of other women, acting collectively on their nature, we see it in all the babbling communication between them, they seem to have no internal compass.
The pool of male/female relations~~~s has become so corrupted and inundated by free sex, that a “real man” sees the herd of women as no better than animals, The modern woman has become spiritually bankrupt, and can only suck the sole out of a man to help fill the void. Feminism has delivered women to a living hell I want no part of!
I’m now the gate keeper to sex, and like every other f~~~ing thing, I have to do it myself! Women have become s~~~!
Funny thing is, I was never a pussy chaser, I never cheated, I never abused, but by the end of my ride on the c~~~ carousel, I found only corruption and selfishness in each and every woman.My life greatly improved since then! I live a fuller, happier, and healthier life! I haven’t had a mind-f~~~, or acid poured in my soul for more than 18 years, and in that time they still keep approaching like there’s nothing wrong??? I don’t mean to make them feel inadequate, my prior self would have slept with them for the instant gratification. I chose the abolition of feminism the only way I could, I tossed the baby with the bath water, because I no longer bathe in s~~~……
I’ll tell you what right now, if I lost an inch of length from my dick every time I f~~~ed a different woman then they’d be all within their rights to complain. Seeing as how that’s not the case, they can shut their f~~~ing mouths.
Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.
@km – great post, definitely will go into the Mgtow hall of fame with you..
@mgtower. – beautiful man. I put the ” threw the baby out with the bath water” piece on my personal wall of quotes i keep for those times I need a quick refresher.
Just rolling down the road
The difference:
If a man were to have sex with ten women in a month. And then he is asked by someone about the number of sexual partners that he had in the same month, he will answer honestly, with full disclosure and not have anything to hide.
If a woman were to have sex with ten men in a month. And then she is asked by someone about the number of sexual partners that she had in the same month, she will lie about the number, be deceptive and try to hide her behavior.
A man will be honest and truthful.
A woman will lie and be deceptive.
In both situations: Same number of sexual partners within the same time period of one month, yet a male will tell the truth and a woman will lie.
It has nothing to do with men that have ten partners in a month being ‘studs’ and women that have ten partners in a month being ‘sluts’.
It has everything to do with men owning their behavior and being honest about it, while women disassociate from their behavior and lie about it.
That whole post was brilliant, KeyMaster. Did that just come off the cuff, or do you register new usernames to set you up for a dunk, lol?
Actually I spent about 15 minutes writing it out (yeah off the cuff), and then realized I wasn’t logged in so I lost it and had to write it out AGAIN.
F~~~ it ….. so then I remembered I once wrote about double standards here.
/forums/topic/woman-writes-23-things-that-make-men-slutty/The gist was exactly the same so I pulled from that and elaborated here some more.
Glad you enjoyed!I see, I figured you might have pulled it from an earlier post of yours. I didn’t go back and check that thread after Grumpy’s post. Well done.
Although, I agree with the key-lock analogy, I don’t know that it really proves anything by itself. You could also make an analogy that a screw that can be drilled by many different types of screwdrivers is a useful screw, while a screwdriver that only works for a small set of screws isn’t that useful. Then again, the all-purpose screw is likely to be stripped rather easily, and not useful for anything rather quickly. Point is, analogies are greater for explaining how things work. They don’t prove anything.
However, it is a fact that a woman’s SMV will decrease with the number of partner’s she’s had. Even if she’s picky and only sleeps with high SMV guys, men will view her as less attractive if they believe she has been ‘too active’. Women as well are likely to disapprove because it makes it more difficult for them to trap a man. How do you catch a man in a mouse trap when there’s trap free cheese everywhere?
If a man has a higher number of partner’s, will his SMV increase or decrease? I honestly think that has more to do with his choice in partner’s then the quantity of partners. If a man has low standards, he’s not going to be too variably looked at by men or women. If a man has quality partner’s, other men will want to emulate him. Women will be more interested him, he’s a prize. What did these quality women see him? Looks, wealth, personality.
And BTW, quality women is going to be more looks then personality. If I guy gets with Kim Kardasian for example, it’s going to increase his SMV, despite her personality. Of course, if he has a relationship with her, it’s going to lower his SMV, and quite possibly ruin his career and entire life.
As an aside, I wonder if this reality is based on the nature of dick and vagina. A vagina is an unknown, you can’t see it. You don’t know what’s in there. What you do know is, the fewer the dicks in their, the cleaner it is, then less likely she’s already pregnant, etc. With a dick, it’s all there to see. Nothing is hidden. It’s doesn’t matter how many times it’s been used, you know that it’s clean and capable of getting the job done. No surprises. History matters much less. (Same goes for the lock and key. You can’t see what’s going on in the lock, but the key is clearly visible)
Ok. Then do it.
If a man were to have sex with ten women in a month. And then he is asked by someone about the number of sexual partners that he had in the same month, he will answer honestly, with full disclosure and not have anything to hide.
If a woman were to have sex with ten men in a month. And then she is asked by someone about the number of sexual partners that she had in the same month, she will lie about the number, be deceptive and try to hide her behavior.
I don’t know if that’s true, Long before “the Manosphere” , I’ve heard it put another way……
Ask a man about his notch counts, and he will multiply the real number by 3.
Ask a woman her “number”….. and she will divide the number by 3.I’m inclined to see the truth in that.
I’ve actually heard women say things like “Oh that blowob I gave to that guy in the toilet didn’t count“.……and then there’s……. “it’s just something that happened.”.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Although, I agree with the key-lock analogy, I don’t know that it really proves anything by itself.
No it doesn’t prove anything… but its very effective response to anyone who asks “why are guys studs and women are sluts”? I needs to be broken down in the simplest terms.
However, it is a fact that a woman’s SMV will decrease with the number of partner’s she’s had. Even if she’s picky and only sleeps with high SMV guys, men will view her as less attractive
….. she also loses her ability to bond with only one man.
3 dicks in a woman’s LIFE….. and she is twice as likely to initiate divorce.
5 dicks in her LIFE….. and the likelihood rises to 70%.
7 dicks in her LIFE… and you may as well just buy her a house.The #number / divorce ratio is real. The more dicks she allowed herself to be ravaged by, the less she will be mesmerized by any one of them. A man however, can have 50 shags or one-night stands while married and stay married and still love his wife. It’s just not the same thing for women. They aren’t biologically wired to detach themselves from it.
It’s always the one with the “thousand c~~~ stare” that uses the term “starter husband”.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.One of the things that has really bothered me with the supposed double standard between the ‘stud’ and the ‘slut’ is that no woman I have talked to ever managed to give a reply to “why do you women open your legs to studs so much that they accumulate that number?”
No one has answered that, not a f~~~ing one. The usual reply is NAWALT but that’s easy to shoot down by pointing out that its a defensive answer. The hard truth is that modern women don’t value themselves at all, both consciously and unconsciously, they may say that there is a double standard but it’s a double standard that it’s built and maintained only by them.
The studs, also known as Chad Thunderc~~~s, manage to f~~~ so many women at the first place nowadays because women like to get f~~~ed by a supposed Alpha male who doesn’t really give a f~~~ about them. He has everything that they crave and they offer themselves to him without much thought; in the end every stud hasn’t accomplished anything particularly difficult, he offers nothing to them but a lay with the alpha male and then he leaves for the next cumdumster which practically translates to 90% of the female population.
The so called ‘slut shaming’ is a societal anachronism from when women still valued themselves and their bodies, keeping their price high in the sexual market. A slut back then was someone who was ostracized, even beaten up, mutilated and murdered by other women because the slut devalued them all in the grand scheme of things. Women now use ‘slut shaming’ for general infighting among them and as a result it has lost the effectiveness it once had.
In the end there is no double standard, what women want is to get f~~~ed by studs and call the bitches that they don’t like sluts. The problem is that they are all SLUTS, they all want to be that and us thus the only solution for men who don’t find anything of value in the modern woman is to become MGTOW.
After all, what can a population comprised mostly of sluts offer to any man?
I do believe woman who have had fewer sexual partners will be less faithful. But let’s be careful here. To quote Victor Hugo: “Trêve aux généralités. Je précise. Voici des faits.” Well, let’s deal only with faits then.
Women who have had many sexual partners are more likely to divorce/be unfaithful. Fine, granted. But who’s to say what causes what? Is it possible that it’s what we take as the effect which is actually the cause?
To put it in clearer terms, perhaps it’s not the fact of having a lot of dicks that makes a woman unfaithful, but the fact that a woman is unfaithful is what causes her to have a lot of dicks?
That certainly requires fewer assumptions.
A man however, can have 50 shags or one-night stands while married and stay married and still love his wife. It’s just not the same thing for women. They aren’t biologically wired to detach themselves from it.
That seems like a pop-evolutionary psychology tidbit.
I think men try to keep marriages together because they have an interest in doing so. If a man keeps a marriage together, no matter how much he’s grown tired of his wife (and men grow tired of their wives all the time), then he keeps his house, his assets, his children, his reputation.
A woman, however, has no incentive to keep a marriage together. She’ll get everything if she divorces.
". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée
The only people I ever hear calling womem slut or skank is other women. It’s a form of c~~~ blocking or c~~~ blocking. They say to influence men in earshot to avoid the slut. Why? Jealousy, fear of competition and rivalry. Women don’t fight one on one. They try to get everyone on their side and have the other person hated and ostracized. Having everyone think her rival is a skank is an attempt to do just that.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
What women don’t get is that it’s easy for them to get sex when they want. Not a big accomplishment when it’s handed to you on a platter. Men have to work for it and we don’t have the advantage of getting it when we need it. Thus the mark up in value for men versus women. They don’t see it that way. Their pea sized brains can’t understand that they are not comparing apples to apples.
The analogy can work when describing why a man should make more money than a woman who is doing the same job. Because we do more work and handle larger amounts. We do it right the first time and faster as well. Just because a woman holds the same JOB TITLE as the man, doesn’t mean she is doing the same amount of work with the same level of quality. Women seem to have a hard time with that one as well.Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
