Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Define 'Chad' in Your Mind
This topic contains 84 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by 
Won'tGetFooledAgain 1 year, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
I stopped caring about labels like ‘Chad’. The reality is that a man can be a ‘Chad’ and the opposite of it all in the same week.
I’ve seen a dude that has the face of a model, shredded, 6 foot 2, ladies man, take a dildo up the ass from a woman because that’s his kink.
If a man does what he wants to do then he’s cool with me.
I’d love to see how many times the term ‘Chad’ has been used on this website.
I’m asking what people mean/think/envision when they use it.
Rather than receiving that, I’m getting a bunch of:
“NFG brah!” comments.
I don’t subscribe to the terminology at all; hence the question – WTF are you thinking when you use it?
If you don’t give a f~~~, then don’t use the term and don’t respond when someone asks why you use it.
The “IDGAF BRAH” mentality is turning into a f~~~ing echo chamber.
DGF? Then don’t bother responding.
It f~~~ing drives this place down hill when your trying to actually have a discussion, which is why I’m here.
Resident cynic.
Anonymous42I’ll give an answer that’s direct and to the point concerning the Chad.
Today’s modern women being repulsive in every way with no regard for others or ramifications for their actions and mutually despised by men of logic and fortitude are personified in Chad, he’s the offspring and mirror of feminism, same careless mentality for what lies on the morrow or take responsibility their actions and outcomes.
Chad is the last guy I’d hire! I prefer to work with MGTOW, sharp minds full of logic and knowledge, we’re a cut above the rest, we’re not ruled by the illogical, we improvise and overcome. We live more and suffer less. We play a different game of chess…
If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.
If you don’t give a f~~~, then don’t use the term and don’t respond when someone asks why you use it.
In my opinion, Chad is a mere self explanatory label like HO. At least for myself, there’s No real in depth thought process that goes into using common terms when it’s well understood in generalities what the label means.
Therefore, I don’t really understand why this particular label should need anymore clarification or in depth thought process when being applied then many other commonly used “MGTOW Labels”.
A Chad is a Chad, and a HO is a Ho. At least as far as I am concerned.
In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash
I’ll give an answer that’s direct and to the point concerning the Chad.
Thank you.
I appreciate an actual direct dialogue.
Rather than:
“IDGAF BrAaaAaaAaAaH!” Mentality.
Resident cynic.
In my opinion, Chad is a mere self explanatory label like HO.
A ‘hoe’ is simply a female who spreads her legs.
A ‘Chad’ is the classification of a man who virtually all women voluntarily spread their legs for.
It’s the difference between a slut and a stud. Any woman can be a slut, not any man can be a stud.
I’m really not sure how else to explain this.
Resident cynic.
Anonymous42That nose is a very bad idea for winter sports! The ice buildup would be tremendous!
A ‘hoe’ is simply a female who spreads her legs.
A ‘Chad’ is the classification of a man who virtually all women voluntarily spread their legs for.
It’s the difference between a slut and a stud. Any woman can be a slut, not any man can be a stud.
I’m really not sure how else to explain this.
I didn’t mean to insinuate that a Chad is a male version of a HO. I was merely making the comparison that both “labels” are commonly used without any in depth thought process. In my opinion, A label is a label. Nothing More…..
In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash
both “labels” are commonly used without any in depth thought process.
^Bingo.
Which is the purpose of my thread.
But, it doesn’t take much in depth through process to define a hoe. It’s simply a female who spreads her legs indiscriminately.
Resident cynic.
Labels are helpful. Without a common word that we can use we have trouble discussing concepts.
However it is true that I think Chad may need some definition. We may well not have a common definition, so this is a good thread. Thanks.
My input for what it is worth is that a Chad is an attractive man who likes having pointless sex with women. He buys the bargain they offer -“Bang me because you and I will like it and feel more worthwhile and affirmed as individuals by having had a pointless shag with on my side one of the high status males and on your side with a woman of fertile years.”
Women should want to be impregnated by quality males if possible, it is healthy hypergamy. Men should want to impregnate fertile women so long as they are the top 80%. The problem is this is not what is happening thanks to contraception (without which Chads and sluts would be far rarer). Chad is wasting his resources performing for women. If he is gaining many children then OK dumb sluts, well done Chad (maybe you are not a chad but a sly wolf with a cunning reproductive strategy after all) but if he is not then he is losing the game. The point of sex is bonding and reproduction. Chad is generally doing neither. That is my definition of Chad.
He is an attractive man who shags to have scored another notch on his c~~~ and to have had a thrill. He is therefore being used more even than he is using the slags as his resources will be diminished more than theirs.
A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own
Chad is just used as short hand. Like the 80/20 rule. 20% of guys are having 80% of the sex. I’m sure that’s not accurate, but it makes the point that women aren’t physically attracted to an “average” guy, whatever that means. Chad is the 20%.
My brother is a Chad. But he didn’t bang anywhere close to all of he women he could have. But when I’m around and he’s not, women have no problem sitting there talking about how hot he is or how great he is. My bro is narcissistic, but not a narcissist. And women eat it up.
I have a couple of other friends that are Chads. Women just flock to them. And they are both good guys. They just have “it”.
Chad just has “it” when it comes to women.
The biggest waste of time you can ever have is trying to define “it”.
Order the good wine
Branched Off –
Thanks for your direct input. Appreciated.
I think Chad may need some definition. We may well not have a common definition,
We don’t.
– AND –
We should.
The analogue of a ‘chad’ isn’t a ‘slut‘.
The analogue of a ‘chad’ is a ‘unicorn‘- A mythical creature which is used as the prototype of ideal for the opposite sex.
Can’t say I’ve met many, if ANY, in real life.
The term is used incessantly in the Manosphere, yet no-one can even define, let alone describe one.
On to your definition of a ‘Chad’:
Men should want to impregnate fertile women so long as they are the top 80%. T
In what context?
Marriageable women who are perceived as having the value to sustain a healthy family/household?
Under that context I would agree. We’re far from that context when dealing w/the modern SIW.
Chad is wasting his resources
What are his resources that are being wasted – his bucket of hot jizz?
performing for women
Masterbating into an orifice isn’t exactly a ‘performance’.
He’s not dressing up in tights and leotards on a Broadway stage giving his rendition of Shakespeare’s poetry in front of a bunch of third world orphans sipping hot coco for the sake of the community.
He’s getting his dick wet.
And – for his own satisfaction.
If he is gaining many children then OK dumb sluts,
‘gaining’ <—as though it’s accumulating wealth ‘children’ from sluts?
This is a cost, and net negative to any man today. It’s women who receive a paycheck from having children, not men.
We’re not talking about a third world farmer, from 100 years ago, where his children will be work-mules for him. We’re talking about a dude banging some broad in gynocentric society 2018.
if he is not then he is losing the game.
Wait, let me get this straight…If the dude F~~~S women indiscriminately, does NOT get them pregnant, then he’s ‘losing’ the game?
Interesting…
Seems to me he did precisely what he set out to do.
Resident cynic.
Chad is just used as short hand.
Yes, I ‘get’ that.
Actually, well beyond that.
They just have “it”.
So, you’re definition of a Chad is ANY man who most women like; is that a fair reading?
Chad just has “it” when it comes to women.
This doesn’t qualitatively describe or define ‘chad’ in anyway that I originally asked; which was the purpose of my OP.
The biggest waste of time you can ever have is trying to define “it”.
No. The biggest waste of time would be to relentlessly pursue a unicorn that doesn’t exist.
I’m simply asking what people mean/describe/envision when they use the term ‘chad’. To you it’s just any guy who women are attracted to.
Ok.
Resident cynic.
Chad .. best friends with frat bro Brad .. & they both wear pastel clothing.
Just another backstabber of the brotherhood.
Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.
Word gets thrown around a lot.
I’m curious what individuals here think of when hearing the term.
Is a ‘Chad’ defined primarily by physical characteristics?
If so, what are they?
Attitude?
If so, what?
Resources?
Been thinking about this for a while since i read this post early this a.m. To me, in the simplest terms, Chad is the other guy, the new guy, the guy she cheated with, or the guy she flirts with. Take your pick.
Quantify.
Do you know a Chad – C-Pig knows a few, so speak up =D – what makes you consider them Chads and what about them makes them a ‘Chad’?
Chad is the new Guy, the guy she cheated with, the guy she left you for, the a-hole she flirts with. He is many different types.
The most important thing you can do is ask yourself, what do I really want out of life. Really think about it, and always be true to yourself. Then Do it.
Men should want to impregnate fertile women so long as they are the top 80%. T
In what context?
Marriageable women who are perceived as having the value to sustain a healthy family/household?
Yes but also from an evolutionary point of view even a dumb slut that you will abandon is still a +1. Much better is a woman you value with whom you will educate a large family but the reason men are programmed to shag dumb sluts who offer is because it is still potentially an evolutionary +1.Under that context I would agree. We’re far from that context when dealing w/the modern SIW.
We are indeed bro.Chad is wasting his resources
What are his resources that are being wasted – his bucket of hot jizz?
Chad’s jizz is no real waste. I am talking his time and his money and his energy. lets assume chad is the ultimate one night stand specialist with a 100% hit rate (a total unicorn, they do not exist but lets assume it). I bet chad will work out a bit, I bet chad will buy some fashionable clothes, I bet chad will buy the best car he can afford. Chad will buy drinks. Sometimes Chad will buy a meal. Sometimes chad will pay for a hotel room. Sometimes he will pay to join dating sites. I bet chad will pay for entry to clubs. I bet he will pay for taxis. Most of all Chad will pay in his time. An evening to a slut is the impossible ratio. No hunter has a 100% success rate. In the real world chad will invest many evenings.Think what he could do with that time energy and drive? -secure resources for a large family when he marries later is the traditional answer, but whatever he does it will amount to more than what he achieves spunking it up skanky sluts.
performing for women
Masterbating into an orifice isn’t exactly a ‘performance’.
He’s not dressing up in tights and leotards on a Broadway stage giving his rendition of Shakespeare’s poetry in front of a bunch of third world orphans sipping hot coco for the sake of the community.
He’s getting his dick wet.
And – for his own satisfaction.
Its a total performance. Compare the situation in queers -meet in bushes or toilets and bum, then go. This is not the case with women. You must perform first and to the tune they call. That is what all those books on “game” teach you how to do -what buttons must I press to unlock the pussy vault. Answer -whatever buttons she says consciously or subconsciously but its her choice, you have to win approval.If he is gaining many children then OK dumb sluts,
‘gaining’ <—as though it’s accumulating wealth ‘children’ from sluts?
This is a cost, and net negative to any man today. It’s women who receive a paycheck from having children, not men.
Not in evolutionary terms. That is why sex drive exists. Nature did not make your dick an amusement park.We’re not talking about a third world farmer, from 100 years ago, where his children will be work-mules for him. We’re talking about a dude banging some broad in gynocentric society 2018.
No the third world farmer gains a lot, in gynocentric society you just pay.if he is not then he is losing the game.
Wait, let me get this straight…If the dude F~~~S women indiscriminately, does NOT get them pregnant, then he’s ‘losing’ the game?
Interesting…
Seems to me he did precisely what he set out to do.[/quote]
He did he set out to do exactly what he wanted to do -please women in return for which they let him have fake sex with them. Its a total blue pill thing to do. You please them women and they give you something meaningless in return for your attention and resources. You feel bigged up and walk chest puffed out but you are a blue pill simp. You lose they win. A transfer of resources and attention has been carried out and you have not go the one thing you are supposed to get to make it worth while.A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own
THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .
<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/MW0sk6_af6U?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allow=”autoplay; encrypted-media” allowfullscreen=””></iframe>
LOL =D
Resident cynic.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
