Deadliest Catch Star Sig Hanson Being Sued By His 27 Year Old Daughter

[TwistParticipant]

SunStorm wrote:

Child abuse isn’t a MGTOW front to defend

I have not seen a hint of this intention in the thread. What I see being defended is honesty and presumption of innocence, and specifically in terms of this somewhat unique case.

The leap to “MGTOW defending child abuse” is disingenuous and repugnant. And the dick sucking insinuation is pure ad hominem, with a side order of that familiar shaming we so often rail on about.

[Anonymous 1]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

The notion that every pedo just molests over and over again, molests every kid they see, all their kids friends etc is totally false. Some may only rape the child once, and move on, and may refrain from acting out again for years or even decades.

I’ll have to disagree with you on that one. From what I have seen, molesters are repeat offenders. For example the guy who got caught in my home town had done it before (many times). The priest I knew who was doing it, had done it before. In fact he had to change parishes, he was doing it so much. Usually they are impulsive people with self control problems. They will say “I can’t help it” or “I can’t control it.” My friend had this happen to his nephew, by a family member, same thing guy acted on impulse. They do it because its an addiction. Like smoking crack, you don’t do it once then wait a few decades to do it again. It doesn’t work that way.

[SunStormParticipant 1277]

Twist wrote:

SunStorm wrote:

Child abuse isn’t a MGTOW front to defend

I have not seen a hint of this intention in the thread. What I see being defended is honesty and presumption of innocence, and specifically in terms of this somewhat unique case.

The leap to “MGTOW defending child abuse” is disingenuous and repugnant. And the dick sucking insinuation is pure ad hominem, with a side order of that familiar shaming we so often rail on about.

Bulls~~~.

You should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that will wash.

I’m the only one here who begged that people keep an open mind…and consider that this may or may not be true.

Instead of talking of stoning to death someone because she reports being abused as a child.

F~~~ you and all the stupid psychopathic c~~~s like you.

You’re f~~~ed in the head. Welcome to the 6 O’clock news.

[UnicronParticipant 752]

Past sexual abuse is the ‘in’ thing at the moment, and wymyn are slaves to social trends, add to that the monetary assets of the accused and you don’t have to be Newton to figure out she’s lying.

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[SunStormParticipant 1277]

Unicron wrote:

Past sexual abuse is the ‘in’ thing at the moment, and wymyn are slaves to social trends, add to that the monetary assets of the accused and you don’t have to be Newton to figure out she’s lying.

No it f~~~ing isn’t.

Real paedophiles are the in thing…

MGTOW is a paedo free zone.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I defend anyone’s right to a fair trial.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[SunStormParticipant 1277]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

I defend anyone’s right to a fair trial.

The so called ‘mgtow’ discourse here has been stoning the plaintiff to death.

I agree that a fair trial is essential.

And noone need be stoned to death.

Why was it hard to figure that out?

[UnicronParticipant 752]

SunStorm wrote:

No it f~~~ing isn’t.

It is, autism was once the in thing, then gender nonsense, and now being a rape ‘survivor’ is the latest craze.

There has been an outbreak of celebrity women claiming they were raped in the past (yet they felt the need to keep quiet about it till their career starts fading) and every ‘revelation’ has never failed to get attention and sympathy from the sheep.

And noone need be stoned to death.

I agree, stoning is too OTT, a simple hanging or bullet to the back of the head would be sufficient.

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Sky-O wrote:

This is the first time that the alleged victim is taking him to civil court, as an adult.

Yes. That’s what I said. But she’s only doing so under a Washington State law that allows it, but which is unclear in cases where the defendant has already been taken to court and exonerated.

So technically, it is the first civil case: Filed by the alleged victim as an adult.

So “technically” we should allow people to continue shopping new plaintiffs until they get the winning combination of an incompetent or corrupt judge and jury?

And I’m not defending her. He already voluntarily, outside of court gave her $300,000 to keep her from pursuing things in a civil court.

Actually no. He didn’t actually give her that money. It was her who demanded $300,000.00, threatening to take him to court and “expose him” in the media if he didn’t give it to her. He called her bluff and turned her ass over to the police for extortion. However instead of prosecuting her greedy ass for extortion she got the pussy pass.

And she only filed the current civil suit, immediately following Sig going to the hospital for a heart attack. Which indicates she was up to date on his health and wanted to file a civil suit while he was still alive so if his condition got worse and he died, the attorney handling his estate in probate court would have to settle her pending case at some point.

Bingo! This is clearly a last ditch effort grab for cash. And she doesn’t care how many lives she ruins trying to get it. I guarantee she’s going to drag this out as long as possible, delay after delay after delay, waiting for him to die in the hopes that his estate will just settle with her to get rid of her.

How the f~~~ has she not been disbarred?

SunStorm wrote:

If you won’t stand up for little girls then that means you won’t stand up for little boys…And boys become us.

Virtue signaling. Nothing but virtue signaling.

Child abuse isn’t a MGTOW front to defend. Quit trying to make it one.

The f~~~ is wrong with you? Nobody here is “defending child abuse”. All we are arguing against are FALSE ACCUSATIONS.

I’ve been trying to avoid saying it, but Is anyone else smelling tuna here?

Twist wrote:

The leap to “MGTOW defending child abuse” is disingenuous and repugnant. And the dick sucking insinuation is pure ad hominem, with a side order of that familiar shaming we so often rail on about.

Definitely. It’s a total bitch argument.

SunStorm wrote:

You should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that will wash.

And now a sad attempt at shaming. That argument definitely isn’t dolphin safe.

I’m the only one here who begged that people keep an open mind…and consider that this may or may not be true.

Bulls~~~. Presumption of innocence is keeping an open mind. You’ve argued against that from the very beginning because: “Won’t someone please think of the children?”

Instead of talking of stoning to death someone because she reports being abused as a child.

Because she’s LYING about being abused as a child.

SunStorm wrote:

I agree that a fair trial is essential.

There have already been multiple fair trials. How many f~~~ing times do you need a man to be found innocent?

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

SunStorm wrote:

Gnostic wrote:

She ain’t the only one.

Dad accused of raping daughter saved by mention of ‘Fifty Shades of Grey’

So are all reported instances of child abuse erotic fantasy then?

Dude….NO.

For all your hard work in sucking MGTOWER’S dick to find that story I could show you a hundred stories in the same time frame of real abuse.

If you won’t stand up for little girls then that means you won’t stand up for little boys…And boys become us.

Child abuse isn’t a MGTOW front to defend. Quit trying to make it one.

How the f~~~ you come up with this conclusion?

Where did I say all reported instance of child abuse erotica fantasy?

How did I suck MGTOWER dick? Did I support his statement of stoning false accusasor?

How the f~~~ you can you come up with the conclusion that people here support child abuse? The maximum I see is some people like MGTOWER support death penalty for false accusers. Not victims, but false accusers.

Stop putting words people did not say in their mouth.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Beer wrote:

Even if the guy is guilty…why should she get money for it? If he was just an average guy and got busted being a pedo it would be jail time. Not a pay out

AH ^^ There it is. Someone finally said it.

Money can make women forget anything. Humiliation. Morals. The emotional well-being of her kids……. and because she wants a pay out, it means no traumatizing “molestation” ever took place.

She would pretend a fireman “molested” a child when rescuing it from a burning orphanage if it meant she’d collect a f~~~ing check. She was never “violated” when a wad of cash makes her grin like a cheshire cat when leaving the courtroom.

Violating this basic principal – and no moral compass – is how these women admit they are lying. She doesn’t want the guy in prison… she wants to GET PAID , and that will make everything OK for her. She’ll sleep just fine when she’s counting dollars.

Porn exists to show the world what kind of heinous s~~~ women will do for a little bit of money. So why the f~~~ does anyone wonder what lengths she’ll go to for a little more of it?

She’ll be happy line up for a chance to take a load to the face for $50.
And for another $4950, she won’t lie and pretend anyone “raped” her.

The female code of ethics.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Keymaster wrote:

Money can make women forget anything.

…until she wants more money.

This is not her first attempt at a shakedown.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

sidecar wrote:

…until she wants more money.

This is not her first attempt at a shakedown.

Or the first woman who attempted exactly the same s~~~. Frankly I’m surprised anyone still listens to a woman when she starts talking. I’m not even saying that to be cruel. I really am stunned.

“My father used baby wipes and grazed my coochy when I was in diapers 25 years ago. it was inappropriate. Give me money and everything will be fine.”

Who the F~~~ would even listen to her for one second. As her father I would disown her and remind her that I could have let her roam around with s~~~ in her pants – in the f~~~ing gutter – for all I cared.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Keymaster wrote:

Frankly I’m surprised anyone still listens to a woman when she starts talking.

And that’s really the problem right there. Every single one of these false accusers only make it harder to nail the actual child abusers. Just like all the false rape accusations make it harder to try actual rapists.

That’s why we have such zero tolerance for false accusers, regardless of how some don’t seem to get that because they would rather we “believe the women” and “think of the children”.

We understand that eventually the truth will come out, and then it becomes clear that “believing the women” and their false accusations is most definitely NOT “thinking of the children”.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I don’t care how hard it is to nail child abusers. I’m sure they try really hard.

I care about an adult suing their father for millions for inappropriate touching at age 2. That’s was already tried in court and found innocent.

Irrelevant of the effect it has on real child abusers, innocent men should not go to jail for a crime they did not commit.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Anonymous 42]

sidecar wrote:

That’s why we have such zero tolerance for false accusers,

False accusers get the pussy pass on perjury, escaping the record, then used as witnesses in the future with no record of their perjury from the past, they testify on the stand clean as a whistle with no prior record of the purjury she commited on the stand.

STAY THE F~~~ AWAY FROM WOMEN, THEY’RE NEVER HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE LIVES THEY DESTROY! THEY ARE EXEMPT FROM ALL WRONG DOING!

Their pedestal is reinforced by the governments that IGNORE ALL THEIR LIES!

Princess Snowflake is always treated better and they band together with the justice system to whitewash all their lies! Therefore women are better people in the eyes of blinded justice.

Best to stay the f~~~ away!

[narwhalParticipant]

I’m not for actual stoning of false accuser and I can’t say that MGTOWER is either. I don’t think he actually said that he was, he only pointed out what happens ‘over there’.

And it is possible he molested her as a 2 year old. It’s possible that any of us could have been a child molester. Absolutely zero evidence…which makes all the difference. To say that you do not believe a woman who makes a claim without evidence…does not make you a supporter of child abuse. No one said that the case should never have been looked into…it was.

It absolutely is a catch-22 situation when crimes are committed, yet no evidence available to know the truth. The guilty get away with crimes all the time. To me, this is where you let God, or whatever you believe in, be the judge and move on. The other option is to charge without evidence, which erodes trust and leads to a world where liars abuse the innocent…pretty much what we have now.

Ok. Then do it.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

SunStorm wrote:

Bulls~~~.

Calling bulls~~~ on your bulls~~~.

SunStorm wrote:

You should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that will wash.

@sunstorm Here’s a better one for you, YOU should be ashamed of yourself for thinking a woman who wants a f~~~ing check 25 years after the fact – has any f~~~ing integrity at all.

Are your circumcized? Let’s assume you are. Who the f~~~ can you collect a check from for that involuntary MUTILATION OF YOUR GENITALIA which you could actually PROVE 25 years after the fact?? You would be laughed out of the f~~~ing room for even trying that.

So don’t ever pretend others should be “ashamed” for not taking a woman’s word at face value on this stupid s~~~ about her own FATHER — as if its more likely true and we should all “keep an open mind”.

You should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that will wash.

SunStorm wrote:

You’re f~~~ed in the head and welcome to 6 o’clock news.

YOU’re f~~~ed in the head and are not welcome to address other members like that again.
Welcome to the 6AM news. Wake up dips~~~.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

Which is extremely questionable unless there’s video evidence or something much stronger than “I was 2 years old, and remember my father molesting me when he changed my diaper”

Yup, the replay reel doesn’t start recording in your head until you’re about 4-5

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

SunStorm wrote:

Yeah….there’s a lot of dick sucking going on here….

Something about feeling more secure in numbers I guess.

I’ve never been afraid to go it alone. Not a herd type of guy.

Regardless bro, you are going a on some moral crusade when all the facts have not been presented. Just virtue signal like a feminists lol. There is a thing called innocent until proven guilty. When dealing with justice, despite how egregious the alleged crime may be, we need to err on the side of innocence until facts say otherwise. Now, don’t get me wrong if new details arise, and she is determined to be lying. Then she is nothing more than a money hungry c~~~, and I hope she gets punished by the long dick of the law. lol I think a stoning is a bit far…

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[Author]

Posts