Big News for MGTOW: Sex Robots

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

It looks like sex robots are quickly gaining ground in the implementation. This is proven by the reaction of feminist scholars who are in an uproar and want pre-emptive banning of these machines that can out compete an Anglophile girlfriend hands down for a companion.

If the feminists are starting to see this as a threat, they must be real and really good!

Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on – how they will look, what roles they would play – are very disturbing indeed,” she told the BBC.
She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.
“We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,” she said.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34118482

One comment pointed out that they were no more dangerous than a dildo.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

One comment pointed out that they were no more dangerous than a dildo.

Works for me! Thanks for sharing this HRP

[Anonymous 5]

Good. I am happy the feminists are mad. I do have to thank feminists though for waking me up.

Because of feminism, I realized I don’t need females at all because I do all the work, cooking, and cleaning anyway while she….maybe puts out a couple times a year if I do all the chores!

Feminism has backfired and made more men wake up to the fact that females offer nothing but their vagina. They claim to not be sex objects, but they refuse to do anything else in 2015.

So why bother when I can just get a realistic sexbot who will gladly f~~~ me everyday and never nag at me? Hell, once they get advanced enough, they can actually contribute around the house instead of growing fat in sweatpants while watching Dr.Phil everyday.

Feminists hate this because they know they can’t compete against these sexbots. They potentially offer a lot more for a VASTLY cheaper price.

Sign me up.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

It looks like sex robots are quickly gaining ground in the implementation. This is proven by the reaction of feminist scholars who are in an uproar and want pre-emptive banning of these machines that can out compete an Anglophile girlfriend hands down for a companion.
If the feminists are starting to see this as a threat, they must be real and really good!

Sex robots seem to be a growing focus in the robotics industry and the models that they draw on – how they will look, what roles they would play – are very disturbing indeed,” she told the BBC.She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.“We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,” she said.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34118482
One comment pointed out that they were no more dangerous than a dildo.

Except feminism and lopsided divorce laws already did all that.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

So let me get this straight, this week we learned that our feminist future involves, according the feminists, concentration camps for men where presumably we would be housed and fed for free.

Where they’ll be able to play video games or whatever their hobby might be without the complaining of females. Where everyone would ride around on quads (totally cool with me).

And now we can see we could get sex at a whim from our sexbots

Let’s see, compare that to Joe six pack who comes home to a filthy house to a wife that emotionally abuses him with constant nagging and denies him sex. Children that hate him for being a man as they were trained to by their mother, TV, schools and anywhere else that has a voice (even walls of subway stations).

Which to choose? lol.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Which to choose? lol.

Sounds like a no brainer to me

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

There was this line:
We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,” she said.

Ok, so what exactly is causing what? Providing an out to dysfunction contributes to detrimental relationships? Maybe if the relationships didn’t suck, men wouldn’t need them. Robots seem to me to be a last resort personally, because you don’t see any other option, including foregoing sex completely. Sex robots are going to be very expensive to get, and it would have to be debated whether or not they would be cheaper than even having a prostitute or learning “game”.

I am thinking of sex robots being like e-cigarettes. You had the government structuring tax laws and so on, figuring smokers wouldn’t have an out so they would keep paying high taxes or quit. Society thinks they have an airtight out. Well, then come e-cigarettes engineered around about every single problem that regular cigarettes have, but apparently aren’t as enjoyable as regular cigarettes. But, if you are addicted, it is an outlet. You saw law makers got shocked by this, so they go and ban e-cigarettes in public spaces, despite the fact that the second-hand smoke is the reason why the ban on public spaces was there. There hasn’t been found any problem with second-hand exhaling from e-cigarettes, so this ban is not allowed. But, the truth was they just wanted to make life hell for smokers to they would quit.

And with this, you see what is going on with the sex robots. There is an uproar against them, because they will change the ground rules. You have progressive types that demand all humanity get around one giant circle, hug one another and figure out how to fix all social ills for everyone, or no one can. So, they want men and women to get together and compromise to a massive degree, which is more likely the man bowing to every whim of women, because men have all the power (it is said) and they need to give up a bunch so women can be happy. See, the one in lesser power isn’t supposed to make adjustments.

I would say here though, that there are ethical issues regarding sex robots that will pop up. As they get more advanced, they could eventually become sentient, than start making demands as sentient beings. You have the classic robot uprising for emancipation that could go on. When they get this advance, they stop being the equivalent of a dildo. You could see what happens like what did in the movie “Her” for example.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

“Her” was a great movie. I would love to have even a temporary relationship with a being so advanced, caring and cool as the OS in “Her”. Interestingly in “Her” there was no law against the OS’s. The OS just outgrew the relationship. If my fembot wanted to leave me, do I have to pay bot-imony and do I have to keep up her previous level of standard of living or can she just move into a closet somewhere?

The real ethical quandry that feminists are having is is a man allowed to have sexual enjoyment without being nagged.

Not that the AI will out think the man. I could use some real mental stimulation.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

“We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women,” she said.

Allow me to correct this sentence if I may.

We think that the detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women has lead to the creation of sex robots.

There, that’s better.

Order the good wine

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

I’m down!

Where do I buy my crowdfunding quota?

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[Big Viking Chef BVCParticipant 1286]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

One comment pointed out that they were no more dangerous than a dildo.

Logic bomb…..BOOM! lol

The fact that the Feminists are on their heels with this is very telling. They actually know that they have become unf~~~able. They are basically admitting that they can be replaced by robots, and the result would be damage to the traditional family unit. Where was the concern for damage to the traditional family unit when they lobbied for lopsided divorce and custody laws? Oh wait, the patriarchy lobbied for that. OK it all makes sense now. My bad.

I’m still getting one. I’m gonna f~~~ the bolts out of it. lol

BVC

Swallow this RED PILL ===> Men will lay down their lives for their brothers, their women and their children. This makes Men useful as slaves. Women will lay down their lives for ONLY their children. To expect more from women is just a FANTASY created by society and reinforced by the unconditional love that we experienced from our Mothers. The key to freedom is the understanding that the woman you meet is not going to fantastically love you like your Mother did. If you buy into the fantasy, then she is your new master. If you do not buy into the fantasy, then she is nothing, and you retain your freedom.

[Swen AugustParticipant 373]

If they don’t want us to have something then perhaps they could give us a reason to not want or need something- but that would be logical.
I can here em now- oooo what cute doll – can I borrow it when your done (need sperm)

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

“Such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable, said campaign leader Dr Kathleen Richardson.”

I notice how bitches like telling people (MEN), who obliviously are using the tech whats “unnecessary and undesirable”.

Yeah it’s unnecessary and undesirable for her because she knows women are F~~~ING UP THEIR ONLY JOB. Not saying a woman’s only job is sex, BUT, that’s the ONLY skill they tend to use. Once this goes full force, they will be f~~~ing USELESS and they know it.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

Big Viking Chef BVC wrote:

I’m still getting one. I’m gonna f~~~ the bolts out of it. lol

I am still laughing OMG

Awesome S~~~!!

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Jackinov wrote:

“Such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable, said campaign leader Dr Kathleen Richardson.”
I notice how bitches like telling people (MEN), who obliviously are using the tech whats (unnecessary and undesirable”. Yeah it’s unnecessary and undesirable for her because she knows women are F~~~ING UP THEIR ONLY JOB.

A measure of things in a marketplace is that items that are unnecessary and undesirable, will not sell. So, if she is right, sex robots will flop. If they don’t flop, that would mean they are needed and/or desirable. Of course, the looking into why won’t come to mind, but it will be the social norm to tell men to “suck it up, it is the way it is”, rather than try to do better for themselves. Rather than end up doing REALLY hard work to sort out what works better, and help make it so, there is dump a bunch of social norms on men, and tell them they have to comply. It is all the demands, and none of the support. I personally have no use for that.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

So once again rather than curing the disease of gynocentrism they would rather treat the symptom of men developing other options. They just do not learn do they?

As as been said time will tell whether these devices are wanted or needed, and something tells me feminists are not going to like the answer.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

I’m no expert on this but out of curiosity I looked up sex dolls on the internet. Some of them are incredible. Gorgeous. Skin feels like skin, Boobs feel like boobs, Any position you want. Removable pussy. And they don’t complain or talk back. Who cares if they don’t do the dishes.

[Swen AugustParticipant 373]

RH- I saw one being developed that will do house work, and other things. Spendy-$700K (US) For the 1st time in my life I wish I rich, I’m single so I could buy a lotto ticket. Now I have indicated that if I win the lottery I will spend money on AI for my own pleasure, watch the femnuts try to ban lottery now.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Big Viking Chef BVC wrote:

The fact that the Feminists are on their heels with this is very telling. They actually know that they have become unf~~~able. They are basically admitting that they can be replaced by robots, and the result would be damage to the traditional family unit. Where was the concern for damage to the traditional family unit when they lobbied for lopsided divorce and custody laws?

Last Friday’s episode of Bill Maher he had Salmon Rushdie on there. He seems like a pretty brilliant guy and he mentioned that a common tactic of (in this case religious) control freaks is to claim oppression while actively oppressing others, or claim offence while actively offending.

Sound familiar?

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

These sexbots are starting to sound more and more appealing.
Hell i’d f~~~ a rock rather than a t~~~.

[Author]

Posts