Are Prostitutes Better Than Normal Women?

[Cap285Participant 6007]

BoycottBitches wrote:

1. Be a millionaire with top notch social skills and game

If you have money, you don’t need anything else. I am far from rich, but I get a substantial bonus every year. I go out with a wad of cash, flash it around and score. My social skills are poor to say the least.

Fuck this planet.

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

narwhal wrote:

And then there is the slippery slope. If prostitution becomes legal, what’s the next ‘immoral’ thing people start clamoring for? Notice how once homosexual marriage got legal, we started hearing about how transgender people are treated so poorly. If society starts accepting transgender as normal, what’s next? Pedophilia? Maybe it’s better to keep prostitution illegal so that we don’t move on to something else a little more out of the norm.

I agree. This is how moral decline becomes normalized. We need to stop the insanity. Soon we will be living in a society of hedonism like Sodom and Gomorrah.

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[QuellParticipant 2538]

I’ve never like the term morality. Morality is a subjective term dictating what is acceptable behavior in a civilized society. Another individual’s moral standards might greatly differ from mine due to religion, upbringing or personal qualms. I’m not advocating a complete dissolution of moral standards as without any morality you have anarchy. Consequently, too much emphasis on morality you have a nanny state however it should be the right of the individual to choose personal moral issues (religion, prostitution, alcohol, drugs, gay marriage, gun rights etc)

Legalizing prostitution makes sense as society benefits from it in the form of lower crime, taxable sale of goods and lower STD rates. My state legalized marijuana and it has been a windfall of revenue for the state. Only drawback is that is has drawn in a ton of homeless. I imagine legal brothels like in Australia or Nevada would have little affect on communities, much akin to strip clubs. Can any brother from Australia or Europe attest to this?

Take a look at this map of where prostitution is legal and illegal:

[BoycottBitchesSpectator 155]

A few guys have brought up the point that pussy is so freely available that what’s the point of paying for it. It all depends on one’s priorities.

Sure you can game women and get sex from them that way. Or you can just take the method where you pay money, bang them, and then leave. The second method leaves you with a lot more free time and also a clearer mind.

Another point to bring up is that prostitution in America has a very bad rap because the types of women doing prostitution are mostly drug addicted and f~~~ed up women. But in Asia, the prostitutes are all normal people. Not crackheads, just normal people.

So I can understand why a lot of American guys are hesistant for prostitution, but if you’ve ever travelled to Asia you will have an entirely different view of prostitution.

It also depends on how MGTOW are you? Do you want to completely avoid all relationships? Then the only option for you is prostitution. Because good luck finding women who will be cool with having casual sex without ever bringing up the topic of starting a relationship.

Stop trying to shame men who use prostitutes because I thought we were all trying to get away from male-shaming which is a common feminist tactic.

Let’s put it into simple terms. Let’s say you have two options for having sex. The following hypothetical situation takes place in Asia.

1. Find a girl through Tinder or street game or whatever and spend a few hours with her, perhaps a bit of money on her too buying drinks or whatever, and then get her back to your place and bang her.
Total time spent: 4 hours
Total money spent: 50 dollars

2. Go to a brothel and select a girl, pay money, and bang her and leave
Total time spent: 1 hour
Total money spent: 30 to 50 dollars approx

So you have spent the same about of money but saved 3 or 4 hours.

I guess it comes down to your priorities. What will you do with that extra 3 hours of your time? Study internet marketing or some business or income generating method? Play video games? Etc.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

As I read through the original post, I found myself agreeing, but also confused. The confusion resulted from his continued use of “prostitute” and “normal women” as though they were two distinct groups of people.

If you define prostitution as trading sex for money, how exactly does that differ from marriage? All I can see is that a prostitute trades sex for money with many different men, and a wife does this exact same thing with (allegedly) only one man. Exclusive, so what? It may sound cynical to say, but there isn’t a man out there who ever got married without the expectation of sex. And there isn’t a woman out there who ever got married without the expectation of financial benefit. Love, attraction, companionship are all variable. Those two expectations are universally reliable. So tell me again how it is that prostitution is actually different from marriage, other then the label applied to it?

Some women are housewives and get all their bills paid. Some divorce and take a load of unearned cash and assets. Some even work while married. But all of them expect, and essentially all of them get, a financially improved standard of living from being married to a man. How many people on this page ever had an interaction with a woman that involved sex where you came away breaking even financially? The only time that happens is if a woman is horny and wants to screw you anyway. Even then, there is often the mind games to see what, in addition they can get from you in the exchange for the sex they already want.

As far as I can see, the only difference between prostitution and marriage is the exclusivity. If it’s exclusive, we can chalk it up to love and attraction and companionship and a bunch of other made up things that are all famous for disappearing like a fart in a hurricane as soon as a man loses his job. As a man, if you commit to that exclusivity of source for all the sex you are ever going to get, that exclusive source will thereafter dictate price, and that price will never go down. As soon as you become unable to pay that price, you will find out very quickly how much of the sex you got was actually based on love, attraction and all that other fairly tale bulls~~~.

If you have a woman who is willing to have sex with you, and it is not costing you even one dollar, then congratulations. You are not engaging in prostitution. You have hit the moral and sexual jackpot. But there can be no cheating here. Not one dollar means: no fancy car to impress a woman, no dinners, tickets, drinks, etc to pay for anything of value for them. Average clothes, average car, average haircut… because you don’t ever spend on those things to impress men, or women you know you don’t want to have sex with. Not even cologne (because you know damn well you aren’t paying for that s~~~ to impress other men, or to impress women you don’t want to have sex with).

Now, if you think you have a woman who will, and is having sex with you without even the expectation of ever financially benefitting from it, go and ask her to commit to a relationship with you where you get continued sex, she NEVER can have sex with any other man, and she can NEVER expect to financially benefit from you for all the sex you get by even one dollar. Promise her that you will NEVER financially benefit her in any way no matter how much sex you get from her, and forbid her from ever having sex with any other man where she might benefit financially. Then come back and tell us all how long it lasted… :-P. As someone else noted on another post, you will learn that she was not your girl, it was just your turn.

But if you ever picked up the dinner check for a girl who later had sex with you, you just participated in prostitution by another name. If you were ever married, you participated in a very expensive version of prostitution by another name. All those gifts that women who don’t have sex with you could never hope to get: flowers, candy, jewelry etc. are all just monetary gifts that she didn’t have to actually take the money from your hand and go buy them herself. But it’s still money for sex. Doing the shopping for her with the money you pay to her in exchange for sex… is just prostitution by another name made slightly more convenient for her by removing the necessity of going shopping for herself with her sex-based earnings.

These exchanges have been happening for eons, and are the basis for interactions between the genders that the species could not survive without. Stop applying these labels in an attempt to control it. As I see it, the government punishes men for exclusivity, and punishes women for productivity, but the actual exchange is the same.

The reason is that government cannot figure out a way to reliably tax prostitution, but it can tax a man’s productivity. And historically, a man will necessarily produce more if the price he pays for his (exclusive) source of sex is higher.

If you call my opinion wrong, show me where…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[BoycottBitchesSpectator 155]

Exactly, BrainPilot. The truth is ALL women are prostitutes.

The only difference is, how much money and time will you spend on women.

If you want to have sex, you can do two things.

Pay 150 dollars to a hot prostitute for an hour of her time.

Spend weeks, months, years dating and marrying a woman, and also spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on her if you end up marrying her.

So if my goal is to have sex with as many women as possible? Obviously paying for sex with a prostitute is the better choice. I don’t think anyone can argue with that.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

No, because their both disease whores.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[BoycottBitchesSpectator 155]

bigboy83 wrote:

No, because their both disease whores.

My essay talks about STDs and how it is a massively exaggerated feminist scare tactic. Are you aware that AIDS is pretty much impossible to get? Even if you were to have unprotected sex without a condom with an AIDS infected woman, it would take like 700 times on average to get it. Penis to vagina sex cannot give you AIDS. And that’s without a condom.

If you USE a condom, you don’t have to worry about a damn thing. You might get herpes but it is not really a serious thing and if outbreaks happen you can get rid of them within 3 days with antibiotics and anti-fungal cream. And anyway, pretty much anyone who is sexually active already has herpes anyway.

STDs are just another scare tactic by feminists to keep men under their control.

[BoycottBitchesSpectator 155]

Stargazer wrote:

I agree with Pete. Although I am not a person of faith, I agree that wanton sex is immoral. Morality can be defined secularly as “that which promotes the well being of the individual” and ethics as “that which promotes the well being of the individual through promoting the well being of others”.

In this regard, The use of prostitutes can be seen as both an immoral and unethical act. Regardless of the law, engaging in meaningless sex with random partners does damage to ones sense of self… less so to men than to women, but it does… and when you engage the services of a prostitute, you damage your own self-worth as well as enabling her to damage her own (how many happy and well adjusted whores have you met?).

And before you say “I don’t give a f~~~ about women” let me state that I’m speaking of her as a human being in this case, not as a woman.

To speak of her as a woman… as Pete stated, when you hire a whore, you transfer your wealth to her and enable her to exist without materially contributing to society. I consider that an unethical act on her part and, by extension, on yours as well.

I say this as a man who has hired prostitutes in the past so don’t think I’m judging anyone.

And, finally, I will also underscore what Pete said about focus. If your mental math involves a cost benefit analysis that results with you getting the most sex possible with the “hottest” women, then I suspect your priorities are out of line.

I agree that marriage should be avoided at all costs but I disagree that the answer is to encourage prostitution. I’m not on the side of total abstinence… I think it’s perfectly fine to find and f~~~ a woman… but you present a false dilemma… that the only choice a man has is between expensive dating and marriage (and divorce rape) or hiring whores.

Let me offer some possible options: Pick a country whose culture and food you love and go there. I suspect you will find the women are willing to have anonymous sex with you just for the thrill of it. Then you leave.

Or go to a different town where nobody knows you and do the same.

Or go to a bar you never go to and do the same.

You don’t have to buy anything for anyone. You go for yourself and when someone approaches you, you let nature take its course. You make certain not to allow yourself to be identified (and take reasonable precautions against disease and knocking someone up) and then you get on with your life.

It’s called living, and it doesn’t revolve around trying to find a place to put your dick.

Anyone spending $400 on “dating” for the specific purpose of trying to get laid (who, one would assume, has ZERO interest in the woman as a person, her ideas, feelings or even the pleasure of her company) is a f~~~ing tool and an idiot. Dating is meant to be a way to identify a person of quality that you want to have a meaningful relationship with… not as a roundabout way of paying for sex. That buying whores is a better value proposition for this dick looking for a holster is no surprise.

Or instead of wasting hours and hours and days and days of your time searching for “local women who want to have sex with a foreigner”? You can simply find brothels or independents and PAY THEM MONEY TO HAVE SEX WITH YOU. ALL THAT TIME SAVED and now you have much more time to go see the local sights and tourism s~~~ and all that.

[Author]

Posts