Search Results for 'chivalry'

[FrankOneParticipant]

Keymaster: Absolutely. To a social justice warrior, there is only equality of OUTCOMES. And if you want equality of outcomes, you cannot have equality of opportunity. If UCLA says it must admit 14% Asians and 7% blacks to mirror the California population (presumably, equality of outcomes), you cannot have equality of opportunity in admissions for the highly academically qualified Asians.

Nobody says the NBA is racist because blacks are over-represented. Nobody says UCLA is racist because Asians are over-represented there. But any time white males are over-represented in a field, it’s due to racism and patriarchy. Why aren’t there more male nurses? Sexism? Or personal choices?

As for ‘chivalry’, isn’t that just sexism that FAVORS a group? Isn’t the United Negro College Fund a racist organization by definition? I understand giving scholarships to the underprivileged, but limiting it to one gender or race is sexist or racist. So let’s call it what it is.

[RedDawnParticipant]

The irony is that women are woman’s biggest enemy, while mangina’s and white knights are men’s biggest enemy. If women were able to remove feminists from power and chivalry wasn’t the norm for men then there would be greater equality. Though equality really is an idealistic notion, much like communism which has already been proven not to work, with it’s failures still evident today in North Korea and Russia.

Courage is the key to life itself - Morgan Freeman

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Yeah you kinda have to laugh when women say things like “men are such wimps” ….. “where did all the men go”…. and my personal favorite……

“They don’t make em like they used to!”.

“No problem honey. Just how far back do you want to go with this remember-the-time stuff??”

FACT: 9 out of 10 dudes will NOT hit a woman back even if she is throwing repeat punches. So I can’t imagine what these women are complaining about . NINE OUT OF TEN!!! THAT”S 90% OF MEN – DRUNK NIGHT CLUBBING MEN – WILL NOT F~~~ING TOUCH HER EVEN WHEN SHE IS BEGGING FOR IT.

There is still WAY too much chivalry in the world.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[CodeBleuParticipant]

Hitman wrote:

” why did you buy this for me ? ” i said because i love you and it matches the earrings ….SHE says ..get this … ” you didn’t buy me diamonds because you love me ! you bought them so you can THINK you are a good husband , but these DON’T MAKE YOU ONE ! ”

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Women force chivalry through s~~~ tests. When you go over her head to do something nice on your own, they think it’s ass kissing or has an agenda behind it. There is no pleasing them. I’d take the earrings back too.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

A little to the party on this one…..

WARNING: Contains scenes of extreme Chivalry. Viewer discretion is advised.
/video/women-get-a-taste-of-gender-equality/

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[BeerParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

And because women don’t initiate, their options are severely limited to “choosing” only from the group of men who FEEL LIKE showing interest.

This one is so true. I was in a restaurant a few weeks back and heard someone walk up behind me in line. I turned my head to look…just a natural reaction, and it was a decent looking girl…probably late 20s.(the wall is near lol) I gave her a little smile, she smiled back…but I would have smiled if it was an old guy or land whale, I really didn’t mean anything by it. I didn’t say anything to her, didn’t try to strike up a conversation or anything. It was a small take out joint, and once I get my food I’m heading for the door, and she is sitting right by it. She’s got her chair c~~~ed at an odd angle, her leg half way out in the aisle, and she’s looking directly at me. I walked around her leg, didn’t look directly at her, stopped by the door to grab a napkin and a fork, turned 90 degrees, at which point I could see her looking at me with a look of frustration, and I proceeded out the door.

I was laughing hysterically inside. If a guy had done that to a woman they’d be complaining about manspreading and that creep that was staring at them, but here was a chick doing the same s~~~ trying to get my attention. She could have just said hi and I’d have stopped to chat, but instead she’d rather let the guy do all the work and remain limited to only those guys willing to do all the work. Its really interesting how this dynamic is changing between men and women…they want equality and chivalry at the same time and it seems like more and more guys are simply saying f~~~ it, this game sucks, why do I still have to play by the old rules and women get to rewrite them as they see fit?

Something else similar happened just last week. I live in a large building…100+ units…so I have a lot of neighbors. There are always new people in and out so I don’t really keep tabs on who is who…I know about a dozen or so of them that have also been here for a while and I’ll stop and shoot the s~~~ when I see them, but for the most part, most of the people here I’ve never talked to more than a basic hi or hows it going in passing, as most the time, unless its someone I start to see on a regular basis people are just a friend or something coming for a visit, so I’m not going to bother stopping and introducing myself to every person I see around here.

Anyways…I’m talking to this old retired guy last week….he’s always hanging around bored just looking for people to talk with, so he keeps up on the new people and who is who a lot more than I do. He asks me if I met the new girl that just moved in yet, and I say I probably saw her in passing but I’m not sure. He then proceeds to tell me how he was talking to her and she was asking about me…she thought I was cute and sees me walking the dog all the time, and asked if I’d like him to introduce us. I said “No thanks, I’m happy being single,” and his jaw almost hit the floor, it was like we both completely understood I practically had some pussy waved in front of my face and could care less lol. On one hand I’m thinking…I have no clue who the hell he is talking about, just going with the odds its going to be a land whale or single mom, and I’m not really sure dating someone who lives a 20 second walk down the hall from you is going to be a wise decision as I don’t plan on moving for at least another year and if she just signed a lease for a year I don’t want to be locked in to at least a years worth of drama, and on the other hand I’m thinking if she sees me walking the dog all the time is it that hard to cross paths? I’m not a stalker or anything, but take a walk out to the dumpster when I’m outside, or “forget” something in your car so we cross paths and “Hey cool dog, what kind is that?” Conversation started. Nah apparently its easier to try to get the talkative old guy to play match maker than to just say hi, because apparently its taboo for an interested woman to act like a normal human being.

I used to think women had the upper hand in dating, but then I realized they only have the upper hand if you give it to them. If you stop giving them the upper hand you begin to realize women actually suck at flirting and dating these days. You just have to remember dick for pussy is an even trade…if you offer a lot other than dick, and other than pussy her life is a train wreck…she should be chasing you, it should never be the other way around. Even if they still can pick up blue pillers/manginas, or get pumped and dumped by “bad boys” that would pump and dump practically anything with a wet hole, they aren’t ending up with what they want in the long run, they just end up desperate, bitter post wallers wondering where all the good men have gone lol. Meanwhile us MGTOW type are simply realizing how toxic modern women are, and the fact that a lot of them lack the skills to even start a basic conversation with a guy makes it even easier to avoid them!

[Cheeky BastardParticipant]

It’s amazing how a woman can be so called socially intelligent and emotionally competent when they can’t even articulate a simple biological necessity. Then the Borg collective rally round her incompetent communication as solidarity without even questioning the interpretation. Women will pee themselves waiting for others to pick up on the idea by telepathy that they have a problem.

Women need to understand that in the current climate of the 21st century in violating men’s rights that chivalry to cover their incompetence is not going to cut it. Shaming men for misunderstanding you is not going to help anything but make men more resentful.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[Cheeky BastardParticipant]

Not to be a downer on this subject but I am recalcitrant fact dispenser and a graduate of meat science and pre-med as a part of my neuroscience degree. So this response may not be as clear cut as it seems.

This retort “I have a vagina” could have just been a miscommunication if she was over the age of 30 because 37% of women are “Urinary Incontinent” and 70% of women are occasionally urinary incontinent and accidentally wet themselves.

Even with this scenario she is still at fault in not communicating this. The reason why men don’t know that 70% of women are occasionally urinary incontinent and have trouble holding urine even from a young age is because women expect men to know what by ESP.

The biggest problem is they expect chivalry to cover it, so they’re not embarrassed by this fact, so this situation is far more complicated than a simple entitlement belief. Women need to come into the 21st century and communicate with men sensibly or s~~~ like this is always going to get out of control.

Women get it into your head that ESP is not real.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[ScandinavianParticipant]

Sword wrote:

When even the unattractive bottom of the barrel females can be swarmed with attention from beta males and manginas it becomes apparent that somewhere down the line, something went horribly wrong.
When it comes to online dating, the one thing that has drastically f~~~ed us over is preconceived notions of chivalry. More specifically! the idea men must chase and initiate the first move, this is the foundations of an unbalanced “game” that has been exploited to its fullest at our expense.
The reason in which we first created these unwritten rules is now obsolete due to the shift in power that now favours the female as the dominant species. Now I know what your thinking…….but try and explain what power we actually have over women in this day and age? And Lettuce be cereal, if a man hits a woman in public he is demonised and punished, but if the tables are turned he is laughed at and ridiculed.
Our power is meaningless and holds no true value beyond pure aesthetics and in most cases…not even once.
We now find ourselves submissive to the decisions of a female and the outcome of our actions will rest entirely in her decision, whether it be casual sex or a cup of coffee.
To further complicate matters and create even more unbalance is the sheer amount of competition you are up against.
The layers upon layers of makeup that these females wear has significantly affected the playing field and made the game almost unplayable for the less attractive males who would otherwise stand a fair chance at meeting someone they could be happy with.
This has led to men being willing to offer financial security for a piece of the action, which In turn has created a domino effect causing many of the more desirable females to pursue this as well.
For many of us, We are playing a game we can’t win, Many will fall and some may even give up all together and join the other team.
We need to take action and stop putting these girls on a pedestal because as much as they would hate to admit it, they need us.

You are chasing something you do not want. You pretty much know what women are like, otherwise you wouldn’t be here. So why? Why put energy into getting toxic waste just because someone said toxic waste is desirable? My point being; let the “whatever greek alphabet”-manginas get their females! They play a losing game anyhow. Just don’t be envious as their “success” will be their downfall.

[Cap285Participant]

1. Cry
2. Wait for man to stop and change the tire
3. Tweet about how chivalry is dead when you’re still sitting there with a flat. Do not call Roadside Assistance first. Bitch on social media.

Fuck this planet.

[FrankOneParticipant]

Spending by Men on Women on pay-for-V day is about twice spending by Women on Men http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2015/02/11/valentines-day-spending-to-approach-19-billion. Guys $hell out $190.53 and Women $96.58.

And NO, this is NOT $exism, the article explains the disparity as ‘Chivalry is not dead’. The women tend to shop at discount stores, the men, department stores.

As for me, skip the gifts, I’ll take a Day of Silence, haha.

I would also like to look up what percent of household expenses, mortgage, etc women pay for vs their significant others but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a survey on that. I have seen time diaries indicating women spend far fewer hours in market labor than men (though more on household labor). I’d also expect fewer women than men buy homes in their 20’s when they’re single, but again I’ve never attempted to look that one up.

[TheBardParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

How do you tell a lady you’re going Dutch?
An American entitlement bitch (like this) will go out of her f~~~ing mind.

Notice how the women in that video talk about social norms of the man always paying and that is what they are supposed to do yet if they were told to stay home with their children instead of working because that is a social custom for women they would lose their s~~~. Typical women logic. Chivalry when it benefits them, sexism when it doesn’t.

Maillesmith wrote:

Dating as equals
First time I saw this, it was posted here. Seems like an applicable place to repost it

That video is great. All women who claim they want equality should be forced to watch it.

[Anonymous]

The old ways of being a “gentle”man are all but gone. Thank the rude and obnoxious behavior programmed into western society via mASS media! I’m talking decades of further and further degradation into Gynocentralia. Not only common manners are gone, but along with it chivalry (justifiably so).
I’ve noticed the overall drone mentality when men “follow” women. Only about 1 in 9 million men actually lead “their” women, and none in the western world, why? “Their” not our property, they belong to the hive by the common rule of LAW that places them as tyrannical dictators over the lives of men.
Unfortunately men just kept being pushed off their platform and into the abyss of aggressive feminism mandated by law.
That is until MGTOW! Women loose everything under MGTOW, No drone, no children, no family, no society, EVERYTHING!
The price to pay for f~~~ing with the spirit of men!
And what do we get? EVERYTHING! Our lives, our dignity, our property, and our fortunes!
They created a vast monstrosity that will end up consuming and burning Western society to the ground.
MEN DON’T NEED WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THIS SOCIETY’S FURNACE OF FEMINISM! HE NEEDS ONLY TO GET OUT ALIVE! PREFERABLY NOT BURNED!

[Anonymous]

If you consider a woman that wants men to go back to the plantation good woman, than yeah, you found one.

Somebody commented here on this site, that on her book, “Men on Strike”, her main worry is not the mistreatment of men (God forbid men having actual rights), but the death of chivalry for women.

Cause, you know, holding women accountable for their actions and expect them to pull their own weight is misogynistic.

[Dark KenshiParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

DarkKenshi wrote:

That is soooo MEAN! I like it!!!
hahahahahhahahahahahahha

Since when is insisting on compensation for your time and trouble “mean”?

Never is, brother… You are absolutely right!

I just tried to respond with sarcasm, but I failed. Sorry about that.

They expect us to compensate them for their time and “troubles”, while we never pushed them over our troubles, like they do.

In fact, marriage for men is “Ok, now I have a thousand or more extra problems. How would I deal with these?”, while for women is “I have my own problems. How do they expect me to deal with their problems?”.

That is the essential difference. That is why chivalry is for men to men.

That is how we help each other and recognize their troubles and struggles, and the accomplishment that they deserve.

Chivalry is anything, but dead. We just saw WHAT, WHY and TO WHO chivalry really is, and use them with who it was made for.

From men to men.

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[MERCHParticipant]

Burgundy wrote:

Chivalry isn’t for women any way, it was meant between two knights, honouring and showing respect for each other.

Gentlemen still exists though, just between two men, since there mutually respect and trust still exists..

so i googled it and got nothing but pictures of knights and the like. then i researched the definition, and understood a smidgen more.
it seems that chivalry is in fact dead. seems it died sometime around the late 1960’s. who knew?
apparently being a gentile has taken its place.
gentlemen now rule the once chivalrous world, they are respectful towards other men, but have no agenda other than to give and receive respect from others. on a very strict scale.
seems like cause worthy title.
MERCH

[SonicParticipant]

aeragoan wrote:

Chivalry is dead!!! And women killed it…lol..enjoy..

So true, it died when they got the right to vote and work, they just haven’t worked out what equality actually means.

[Dark KenshiParticipant]

Well… The last time I checked Chivalry’s Code, there was just one thing about c~~~s, and that only tells me to respect them, not to be kind, generous and s~~~. Just respect. I respect them by not even talking to them, by not pandering, by not giving a f~~~ to them.

Unless, she puts up a glove, hit me in the face, and don the armor. Then I will just mop the floor with her sorry ass really, really hard.

“Draw your sword, wench. I will bleed you, right here, right now, and it will not be blood from your c~~~, bitch!”

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[aeragoanParticipant]

Chivalry is dead!!! And women killed it…lol..enjoy..

[BurgundyParticipant]

Chivalry isn’t for women any way, it was meant between two knights, honouring and showing respect for each other.

Gentlemen still exists though, just between two men, since there mutually respect and trust still exists..