Search Results for 'Trump'

[joetechParticipant]

When you say breaking the law…I think of Watergate. Not Trump’s tax returns. All I know is when Billy was in office we pulled dead bodies out of our embassy in Nairobi. We were talking about dress stains. Hillary becomes Madame Secretary and we lose more ambassadors in Tripoli. Sometimes breaking the law is the least of the problem.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[HitmanParticipant]

they take money from countries that chop the heads off homosexuals,
saudi arabia..to begin with..
then turn around and scream how we must empower the lgbt community..
hypocrites..
how the hell can i know more about this than Trump’s advisers..?

[Bob ProxyParticipant]

Hitman wrote:

Bob Proxy wrote:

the Hillary Clinton campaign thinks they can gain ground by saying he’s not as rich as he says he is. A tactic which I’m sure is doomed to failure.

all Trump has to do is point to the clinton foundation and ask for their records..
we’ll see who has the money !

It would make my week to see him do that. I assume he’ll probably bring something up about it in the next debate. I’m sure she’s working very hard to make sure nobody finds out we’re all that’s money came from that they’ve earned over the past eight years. After all you can’t hide all the bodies in the same location.

Pity is the most destructive emotion because it leads to guilt. Guilt is the second. Love is the thrid because it will make you destroy yourself. Hate is fourth because love leads to hate.

[HitmanParticipant]

Bob Proxy wrote:

the Hillary Clinton campaign thinks they can gain ground by saying he’s not as rich as he says he is. A tactic which I’m sure is doomed to failure.

all Trump has to do is point to the clinton foundation and ask for their records..
we’ll see who has the money !

[BeerParticipant]

I don’t agree with breaking the law regardless of if it benefits a candidate you like or not…but what I can’t understand is wtf is the big deal about candidates releasing tax returns? Candidates running for office should all be audited by the IRS, but if they aren’t breaking any laws I honestly don’t care what they paid in taxes. We all know our tax system is broken, I can’t blame a guy for playing within the rules to lower his tax rate…if people are so upset Trump may not have paid any income taxes for a given year, maybe they should start voting for candidates who want to simplify the tax code and get rid of loopholes, writes offs, and deductions rather than candidates who want to soak the rich, yet only seem to hammer the middle class more and more.

[Anonymous]

Samsquanch wrote:

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

tommi190 wrote:

Shouldn’t she be talking about herself, bringing out some positive things about her (if there is any) and what she would do for the country and Americans rather than concentrating on Trump?

This entire campaign for president of the United States in 2016 has almost completely involved trying to get the media to focus on the flaws of the opponent, and then run the line that you have only two choices, so the opponent is so bad you have to vote for the other one. Neither one of them really is presenting a case of what they will do, in order to do things. Hillary has run on all this “experience” which has meant for her that she had been around things, not that she really did anything. The candidate gains whenever the media focuses on the opponent’s weaknesses. In the case of Trump, he can’t help but draw attention to himself. He won’t get out of his own way on things. If the idea was to make it about Hillary, then Trump isn’t the candidate to do that.

Well, with both candidates, when you get out of the bulk of the attack ads, you get some positive spin stuff. With Hillary, it is “She has a plan for X”. With Trump it is a “believe me” and then a bunch of spin on how he is the only one who can fix America, and his greatness, without really anything behind it.

So, when it comes to an attack ad, which this is, you end up getting framing your opponent badly. I had seen other ads by Hillary. I did see a few by Trump (ok, more like one ad several times). Trump is apparently saving money for some reason.

Is this the first US presidential election you’ve followed?

No, the first was in 2004 when Mr. George W. Bush was re-elected.

But I never really paid attention to those details until now when I see that haggard almost only talking about Trump, while she should be convincing the voters why she would make a better POTUS.

So recently the New York Times has posted three pages from Donald Trump’s 1995 tax returns from three different states. This in its self would not be a crime if the tax returns had been disclosed by Trump, but they weren’t. This actually make the publication a felony. Dean Baquet, the executive editor even said he would gladly go to jail to publish Donald Trump’s Tax Returns.

My question to you all is do you believe it is acceptable to break the law to defame a political candidate you don’t like. I don’t specifically mean what happened to Trump, that is just an example. Regardless of who you support what would you think if the law was broken to make them or one of their opponents look bad.

Here is a link to the story if you have not seen it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/02/the-new-york-times-risked-legal-trouble-to-publish-donald-trumps-tax-return/

Pity is the most destructive emotion because it leads to guilt. Guilt is the second. Love is the thrid because it will make you destroy yourself. Hate is fourth because love leads to hate.

[Bob ProxyParticipant]

As it turns out there was something wrong with his mic. According to a very short statement from the Commission on Presidential Debates there was a problem with his mic. (Here is the link)

http://www.debates.org/index.php?mact=News,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=69&cntnt01origid=27&cntnt01detailtemplate=newspage&cntnt01returnid=80

If you want a longer article with a bit more information here is a Washington Post article on it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/30/it-turns-out-donald-trump-was-right-about-his-defective-microphone/

As to if it was done on purpose as Donald Trump has suggested, I don’t know. Many things are done in the effort of discrediting an opponent. I would not doubt if it was, but I also would not doubt if it wasn’t.

As to if it was done on purpose as Donald Trump has suggested, I don’t know. Many things are done in the effort of discrediting an opponent. I wouldn’t doubt if it was, but I also would doubt if it wasn’t.

Pity is the most destructive emotion because it leads to guilt. Guilt is the second. Love is the thrid because it will make you destroy yourself. Hate is fourth because love leads to hate.

[Anonymous]

I have no faith in any of it at all. I think the rig job is so deep that I am convinced that even if Trump has it won, it will be fixed as Sidecar says in the count/recount.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

My bad if its fake.. normally a very reliable source.

Hey… could be the report that it’s fake is a fake. Then what.

Elections are all fake hocus-pocus donkey shows anyway.

Hilary saying “Whenever I think of Trump I get allergic” is fake too.
Fake fake fake.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GvmKwSC_x

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[SamsquanchParticipant]

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

tommi190 wrote:

Shouldn’t she be talking about herself, bringing out some positive things about her (if there is any) and what she would do for the country and Americans rather than concentrating on Trump?

This entire campaign for president of the United States in 2016 has almost completely involved trying to get the media to focus on the flaws of the opponent, and then run the line that you have only two choices, so the opponent is so bad you have to vote for the other one. Neither one of them really is presenting a case of what they will do, in order to do things. Hillary has run on all this “experience” which has meant for her that she had been around things, not that she really did anything. The candidate gains whenever the media focuses on the opponent’s weaknesses. In the case of Trump, he can’t help but draw attention to himself. He won’t get out of his own way on things. If the idea was to make it about Hillary, then Trump isn’t the candidate to do that.

Well, with both candidates, when you get out of the bulk of the attack ads, you get some positive spin stuff. With Hillary, it is “She has a plan for X”. With Trump it is a “believe me” and then a bunch of spin on how he is the only one who can fix America, and his greatness, without really anything behind it.

So, when it comes to an attack ad, which this is, you end up getting framing your opponent badly. I had seen other ads by Hillary. I did see a few by Trump (ok, more like one ad several times). Trump is apparently saving money for some reason.

Is this the first US presidential election you’ve followed?

[JimBoLeaParticipant]

I WAS ALMOST SOLD ON IT, BUT THE WORDS OF THE BALLOT BOXES GAVE IT AWAY.
NICE TRY , BUT GET SOME TIPS FROM ALEX JONES HE KNOWS HOW TO DO IT, AND DO IT WELL.
YES IM TRUMPING FOR 2016 !!!!

LILITH IS THE HEAD SUCCUBUS AND SHE LIVES ON THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

[KimmurielParticipant]

Alt right isnt inherently racist, but we are against free-loaders and weakness. BLM and 4th-wave feminism trumpet guilt and sympathy from white men because they dont have a leg to stand on concerning merit and personal responsibility.

Its always the racist that brings up the race card…because its the only card they’ve got. My white brethren get blamed for everything that women and blacks fail at

"You meet a few exceedingly forsaken, Sit around the cooler refusing domestication" Aesop Rock

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Anonymous wrote:

Shouldn’t she be talking about herself, bringing out some positive things about her (if there is any) and what she would do for the country and Americans rather than concentrating on Trump?

This entire campaign for president of the United States in 2016 has almost completely involved trying to get the media to focus on the flaws of the opponent, and then run the line that you have only two choices, so the opponent is so bad you have to vote for the other one. Neither one of them really is presenting a case of what they will do, in order to do things. Hillary has run on all this “experience” which has meant for her that she had been around things, not that she really did anything. The candidate gains whenever the media focuses on the opponent’s weaknesses. In the case of Trump, he can’t help but draw attention to himself. He won’t get out of his own way on things. If the idea was to make it about Hillary, then Trump isn’t the candidate to do that.

Well, with both candidates, when you get out of the bulk of the attack ads, you get some positive spin stuff. With Hillary, it is “She has a plan for X”. With Trump it is a “believe me” and then a bunch of spin on how he is the only one who can fix America, and his greatness, without really anything behind it.

So, when it comes to an attack ad, which this is, you end up getting framing your opponent badly. I had seen other ads by Hillary. I did see a few by Trump (ok, more like one ad several times). Trump is apparently saving money for some reason.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Faust For Science wrote:

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

And now he says Merkel is a great leader again, apparently, outside of the immigration policies he said he is very disappointed with.

Okay. This begs the question. Outside of her immigration issues and the issues those immigration issues are creating, what is wrong with Merkel’s policies?

I do not know. That is why I am asking this question.

I am not too familiar either. I assumed that in MGTOWsphere, the fact she is a woman would end up working against Merkel. What I saw is multiple changes in positions with Trump, when I tried to Google information on this.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Faust For Science wrote:

It is smears like this that help me realize the genius of Trump deciding to take the high road during the first debate.

If Trump goes into any sort of things regarding infidelity with Bill Clinton, as an attack, his background will be shoved right back in his face and backfire. In this campaign, I am surprised Trump could even find the high road, since he has traveled it so little.

In regards to this ad, Trump’s “colorful” past is going to catch up to him. When you had the past he has had, then it isn’t going to play with women at all. That is his past.

Also, Hillary baited him with the Ms. Universe contestant, and he has gone off on a Twitter storm, discussing the contestant, and ending up trying to get away from his comments, by speaking how bad the contestant was. His comments don’t play, and this news cycle allows Hillary to run ads like this. Had he left it alone, or came up with some sort of decent reply, and let it rest, he wouldn’t be subject to this. But he keeps going on and on and on. Trump has wasted nearly a week on the Ms. Universe, instead of economic policies and himself as an outsider. He apparently seldom, if ever, calculates anything he says. It just comes out of his mouth, without much thought to the consequences of what he will say. He does things repeatedly, without regard for the impact. Like he said he would of never did the Howard Stern interview getting him in trouble, if he knew he was running for president:

Trump Said If He’d Known He’d Run For President He ‘Wouldn’t Have Done’ Stern’s Show

You can see this also with Trump, in regards to discussing Bill Clinton:
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/donald-trump-hillary-bill-clinton-relationship-217191

“Can you imagine how controversial I’d be? You think about him with the women — how about me with the women? Can you imagine?”

But, you can believe whatever you want, it is your life.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[ResidentEvil7Participant]

I tell her to keep talking, or in her case, shouting, because people in their right mind won’t vote for that loud-mouth bitch! She tried to get the millennial vote with free stuff (and what millennial wouldn’t want things handed over to them), but then she might of just ruined it by saying they’re hopeless kids living in basements. Meanwhile she’s the same woman who laughed off about a 12 year old rape victim, she called the parents of fallen soldiers liars. She takes money from countries that oppress women. Lastly, she calls millions of Americans who don’t support her “deplorable” and bigots. So I tell Hillary, keep it classy for the next 38 days.

By the way, I’m an early millennial and I don’t live in a basement. Although I do feel hopeless, because I’m an autistic guy who can’t land a job. I have my own bedroom and it’s well decorated in manly décor and I love it. So, Hillary, restrain yourself on that “basement” comment.

She makes a reference on something Trump said to a fat Miss Universe contestant 20 years ago. You’re not bulletproof Hillary; you’ve said and done things to offend women and Americans the past 30 years. If she’s going to bring up what Trump said and did years ago, then she’s fair game of her sins from years ago, because she has a poor woman’s record.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Anonymous]

Shouldn’t she be talking about herself, bringing out some positive things about her (if there is any) and what she would do for the country and Americans rather than concentrating on Trump?

In light of the Gary Johnson Aleppo moments, they are now asking Clinton and Trump who their favorite leaders are. When I go look up Trump, in regards to Merkel, I saw one over a year ago, where he called Merkel great. Then he says Merkel has made a mess out of Germany. And now he says Merkel is a great leader again, apparently, outside of the immigration policies he said he is very disappointed with.

Anyone know where Trump stands on Merkel? I can’t even comment here on this, because I am not sure which would apply here. I am seeing possibly some pivoting, or something. But I don’t have a video clip on the latest.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[ResidentEvil7Participant]

It was all about little girls and making Trump look bad. What boys don’t count in her future of America? No it’s all about the oppressed girls with Hillary. She only wants to be president of female America while the other half are deplorable or living in basements that are hopeless.

Next time when she questions why she’s not 50 points ahead, it’s because she hates half the country on top of all the other things she did to the rest of the world.

https://themanszone.webs.com/