Trump's breathing during the debate.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

So, I watched past the first 10 minutes of the debate, and was hearing exhaling out of Trump that sounded like sniffling. I saw others picked up on it.

Anyone else know how a defective mic could make it seem like regular breathing sounds like sniffling? Trump says he didn’t have any sniffles, and said he had a bad mic.

So, how can a defective mic make it sound like sniffling?

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[EekParticipant 1162]

If you are running it through any decent soundboard, you could easily turn the overall gain way up, then play with the frequency filters (bass, treble) to get it to sound normal most of the time, then freak out if it is bumped, touched, or breathed on right.

But remember never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Yup audio guys were probably trying to f~~~ with it in the soundboards or as mentioned incompetent. You don’t just hook up a microphone and walk off in a televised setting. Hell you would even do a test before everyone began to check the audio.

Hillary’s constant blinking was also noticeable and for some reason no media is bringing it up. Clearly she had some sort of dosage of pentazemin or something and was dealing with the lighting differences because her pupils were probably more dilated before going on stage.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Eek wrote:

If you are running it through any decent soundboard, you could easily turn the overall gain way up, then play with the frequency filters (bass, treble) to get it to sound normal most of the time, then freak out if it is bumped, touched, or breathed on right.

But remember never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence.

Overcompensating to account for Trump saying his mic had problems? The sound did fluctuation some during the debate there. I saw it spike and drop.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[EekParticipant 1162]

Really if they were going to do anything to help Hillary they should have done something to make her sound less like fingers on a chalkboard when she is talking.

[hansmolemanParticipant 194]

There was no defective mic. Trump had a problem with his nose.

Who gives a f~~~.

Hilary looked like she was on xanax…spaced out the entire f~~~ing “debate”, and looked like she was reading off a script.

[hansmolemanParticipant 194]

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

Eek wrote:

If you are running it through any decent soundboard, you could easily turn the overall gain way up, then play with the frequency filters (bass, treble) to get it to sound normal most of the time, then freak out if it is bumped, touched, or breathed on right.

But remember never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence.

Overcompensating to account for Trump saying his mic had problems? The sound did fluctuation some during the debate there. I saw it spike and drop.

You heard it spike and drop over a televised broadcast (or internet stream). It means f~~~all. Only people who were in the audience would know if there was a problem with Trump’s mic specifically.

Move on from this dumb s~~~ issue, this is nonsense. I support Trump. But I’m not blind to the fact that he’s a blowhard and will never admit a mistake. Never. He’ll take it to his grave.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

I don’t care what they did or didn’t do to the audio, he was f~~~ing sniffing. I heard it, everyone else heard it.

If they did screw something up in the audio, then somehow they managed to get it sounding perfectly when he was speaking, but then screw it up again just at the exact moment he was breathing in. Right.

Gimme a f~~~ing break.

Funny thing, I figured for sure he was going to say he had a cold or something, but his denial of that does have to make you wonder….

I’ve been around enough people doing blow to know what it sounds like. Just sayin’

Oh, and f~~~ Hillary. Not voting for her either. Third party for the win, or at least the intelligent protest vote.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[HitmanParticipant]

That third party vote is a waste. .give it to Trump.
Or Hitlery will be the president.

[Anonymous 11]

I’ll be sniffing just like Trump whenever my sinus allergies fire up. Sniffling is nothing compared to being dragged into your van or having a bobblehead crazy eye episode.

After a two days of reflection, I believe Trump won the debate. He was playing against a stacked deck and did a good job of handling it. The moderator hit him with some very hard questions yet only pitched Hilary softb~~~~. As for the third party voters, I do understand your desire to protest. A third party vote is a vote for Hilary by proxy.

Trump is not perfect. Trump is abrasive. The elites loath Trump which is a perfect reason to vote for him. Trump does have a proven record of getting s~~~ done. We can’t have a continuation of the Obama legacy.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I believe the guy running the soundboard did it to Trump. I happen to know how easy it is to adjust a mic to pick up tiny sounds. Broadcast professionals are careful not to do this. They can make breathing sounds and quiet sniffles disappear.

I am voting for Trump, and for everyone on my ballot with an R after their name.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

It’s naive to vote for a third party. I’ve been through enough elections/campaigns to know it’ll never happen. The establishment will never allow a 3rd party candidate into the White House. So yes, a third party vote = a vote for Hillary. I understand people wanting something new for the country, but it’ll never happen. Not unless there is some kind of significant civil unrest.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Samsquanch wrote:

It’s naive to vote for a third party. I’ve been through enough elections/campaigns to know it’ll never happen. The establishment will never allow a 3rd party candidate into the White House. So yes, a third party vote = a vote for Hillary. I understand people wanting something new for the country, but it’ll never happen. Not unless there is some kind of significant civil unrest.

Talk to a Democrat and a vote for third-party is a vote for Trump. You say it is otherwise. So, I guess voting for third-party means a vote for both Hillary and Trump. I guess not voting either is a vote for Hillary and Trump at the same time.

This idea that a vote for a third-party is a vote for another candidate reeks with presumptive hubris, that the vote belongs to your candidate of choice, and if you don’t get it, it means a vote for another candidate. As I see it, I am currently in a VERY blue state that Trump isn’t going to win, so then why should I bother voting at all? If I find Trump THAT horrible, and you are telling me a vote for third-party is a vote for Hillary, and I don’t like Trump, then tell me how voting for Gary Johnson ends up being counted as a vote for Hillary Clinton? They somehow add up the votes of Gary Johnson and Hillary gets them?

That line is utter and complete BS. A candidate has to earn my vote, or I won’t vote for them at all. And no vote for an opposition, because I hate a certain candidate, will make any difference in this. And yes, I find Trump that horrible. I find him as a candidate someone detached from reality to such an extent, that it could be dangerous. No matter how bad Hillary is, it doesn’t change how bad Trump is. This is a candidate, most recently, who stated if the USA blew an Iranian naval craft out of the water, it wouldn’t start a war. It won’t? Is the USA going to apologize to Iran over this, to prevent a war, under a Trump administration, or are we going to get the same stuff Trump is doing this election, by denying reality?

Again, I hold it is the job of the political body to give a damn about what I am concerned about, and not drop to the lowest common denominator of hating an political opponent to get my votes.

Anyhow, back to the question. Please show an example of how toying with a soundboard can make someone sound like they have sniffles.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Oh please stop with this passive-aggressive pro-Hillary s~~~ already.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Guess can’t change people’s mind. It might be easier to judge people by their enemies. H has the media, bankers and everyone who has donated to her foundation not to mention the globalist sin Europe. Trump has spent 1/10 of what she has, and its from the people. I put my faith in no man, but Hillary is the fast track to the horror of globalism. Note predictive programming of hunger games

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Russky wrote:

Oh please stop with this passive-aggressive pro-Hillary s~~~ already.

According to Michelle Obama, I can support Trump by not voting for Hillary. So, I can also not support Trump and support him at the same time:

Seriously, if you see being anti-Trump as being pro-Hillary, you are in a partisan tank so deeply, you can’t even breath the air of objectivity. I don’t frame the world as two choices, no matter how you do. I consider this frame of only two choices, as one of the normal people of the world, and partisans who sell their soul, give up their own way in life, and hope to get crumbs from being part of some partisan BS.

But, do whatever you will. I have flat out said I am anti-Trump. I am out in the open with this. And if you think that being MGTOW means you need to be pro-Trump, and how being not married and not marrying somehow means that you MUST support Trump, then you are into identity politics which reaches conclusions that wouldn’t reasonably make sense otherwise. And this mentality is why I find a need to really not use the MGTOW label, because it comes with things that I don’t agree with and didn’t sign up for.

Again, do damn well whatever you want here. I have more to life than worshiping the ground of an individual who shows decreasing attachment to reality.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Bob ProxyParticipant 13]

As it turns out there was something wrong with his mic. According to a very short statement from the Commission on Presidential Debates there was a problem with his mic. (Here is the link)

http://www.debates.org/index.php?mact=News,cntnt01,detail,0&cntnt01articleid=69&cntnt01origid=27&cntnt01detailtemplate=newspage&cntnt01returnid=80

If you want a longer article with a bit more information here is a Washington Post article on it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/30/it-turns-out-donald-trump-was-right-about-his-defective-microphone/

As to if it was done on purpose as Donald Trump has suggested, I don’t know. Many things are done in the effort of discrediting an opponent. I would not doubt if it was, but I also would not doubt if it wasn’t.

As to if it was done on purpose as Donald Trump has suggested, I don’t know. Many things are done in the effort of discrediting an opponent. I wouldn’t doubt if it was, but I also would doubt if it wasn’t.

Pity is the most destructive emotion because it leads to guilt. Guilt is the second. Love is the thrid because it will make you destroy yourself. Hate is fourth because love leads to hate.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

It was admitted the mic was messed up days later. Beyond that, *shrug*. It happened. It is now drifting into the past. At least the coke jokes hopefully will go away. I am curious how a mic can amplify inhaling though, but not seem to do anything with exhaling.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Author]

Posts