- AuthorSearch Results
- 2019-02-06 at 7:09 AM#888205
In reply to: SOTU Roundup
On a side note, during President Trump’s speech, the only female democrat politician whom showed any signs of intelligence last night was Congressional member Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. From what the cameras shows, a few times she almost stood up by herself and during these times she looked at her other democrat seniors whom would not let her. She clearly knew President Trump had trapped them and she was trying to figure a way out, but she was stuck being henpecked by the other democrat women to follow the flock.
By the way, it is considered a major western cultural taboo for women to wear white during the winter.
2019-02-06 at 7:04 AM#888204In reply to: SOTU Roundup
Kind of an aside, but the democrats seems utterly idiotic with their politics these days. They correctly determine that Trump has some personal and personality issues as a weakness. Attacking that does win points in their favor. However, they continue to distance themselves by the success we’ve had the past two years, trying to pretend it’s not there. If they would just get on board with commonsense legislation and presidential actions, then they can negate the President’s accomplishments as a reason to vote for him in 2020. If the only significant difference between Trump and a democrat challenger is personality, then Trump losses.
Politicians, both the democrats and republicans, continually fail to realize that people support Trump not because they like him, but because he actually tries to represent them. Politicians still believe that they can say the right words without accomplishing anything any people will still vote them in.
Ok. Then do it.
2019-02-06 at 7:01 AM#888203In reply to: SOTU Roundup
President Trump’s speech was good, not great, but good. He played to his strengths. I give his speech an 8 on details, but a 6 on enthusiasm, to average a 7.
The good news is even the corporate media admits President Trump’s SOTU speech was well received, with around three quarters of those surveyed finding the speech to be positive.
Meanwhile, the DNC rebuttal was a trainwreck in so many ways. The DNC woman whom lost an election and refuses to concede the race she ran was given the roll of speaker for the rebuttal. I guess Hillary declined giving the speech, so they picked her. The woman falsely claims that voter suppression was the cause of her defeat, when in truth it was the fact that GA laws prevent voter suppression through ballot stuffing that lead to her defeat.
The optics on the DNC rebuttal are horrible, in some ways worse that last years DNC rebuttal of the SOTU speech. While President Trump used his speech to look towards future successes, the DNC used their rebuttal to remember past defeats. This rebuttal by the DNC is an omission that DNC has no political platform, just political attacks, insults, and false accusations.
The DNC could have used their rebuttal to give air time to one of the democrats running for president, and use President Trump’s positive speech as a spring board for their own positive speech. Doing so would have blunted President Trump’s speech. But, as it stands now the optics for last night was President Trump being like a shining kind on top of the mountain giving a speech about success of the people, while the democrats are in the deep valley, look up, while the democrats claim about sour grapes.
2019-02-06 at 6:47 AM#888201In reply to: SOTU Roundup
I thought that democrat/liberal women took a huge step back last night. They made several mistakes and came across looking like immature naive children.
First they made a mistake of wearing white, contrasting themselves from everyone else. In a speech that was geared towards unity, it showed that they wanted to set themselves apart from everyone else and draw attention. It looked like they didn’t even know what they were supposed to be about, waiting for Polosi to tell them how to behave, with her even caught on tape sending them hand signs at least one time.
Trump did a brilliant job of trapping them in a box Two highlight were we contrasted freedom and liberty against socialism. They had to chose to either support these long American principles or support socialism. Sitting down was not the right choice. The other point was when Trump discussed late term abortions/infanticide, and the ‘ladies’ again decided to sit down, making them look like little brats who couldn’t see beyond themselves.
I also thought it was telling when Trump gave the stats regrading the accomplishments of women this past year. They decided to stand up for this, clearly the right move, but instead of being well behaved, they decided to act as if it was they themselves who had reached the achievement. As if they believe that their whining and nagging had been the reason for success, not changes in the tax code, deregulation, and everything else that’s been a positive effect on the economy. In fact it seemed to undermined the efforts of everyday women who actual got a job and improved their own lives. And Trump handled it perfectly. He let them put on their display for the cameras to see.
It wasn’t a prefect speech, and SOTU addresses tend to only have short term effects. Trump would be wise to push hard for a wall while the iron is hot, and the media will regain control of the narrative rather quickly.
Ok. Then do it.
2019-02-06 at 12:23 AM#888180In reply to: SOTU Roundup
State Of the union in its entirety:
<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/O18k-sA7r1I?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen=””></iframe>
I’m only about 30 minutes in to the actual speech, but my initial takeaways are:
Buzz Aldrin didn’t have to salute the president, was under no obligation whatsoever to do so, and yet he did.
Same goes for the WW2 vets although they chose to give him the thumbs up instead.
Occasional-Cortex and cohorts looked like complete t~~~waffles in their white shirts and bitter scowls because orange man bad.
Full disclosure: I never liked President Trump before I voted for him, but goddam if he didn’t bring a tear to my eye and a lump in my throat tonight. Nobody has ever tried to look out for us like this guy is trying to right now.I hate goddam socialists who want to keep everyone down except their special elite rling inner party oligarchies. They claim to care more, they care f~~~ing less as they take away any means for people to better themselves, which is totaly opposed to the human spirit. I hope they all f~~~ing die horribly. Trump is the only guy who really fights them.
Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.
2019-02-05 at 10:07 PM#888174Topic: SOTU Roundup
in forum Political CornerState Of the union in its entirety:
I’m only about 30 minutes in to the actual speech, but my initial takeaways are:
Buzz Aldrin didn’t have to salute the president, was under no obligation whatsoever to do so, and yet he did.
Same goes for the WW2 vets although they chose to give him the thumbs up instead.
Occasional-Cortex and cohorts looked like complete t~~~waffles in their white shirts and bitter scowls because orange man bad.
Full disclosure: I never liked President Trump before I voted for him, but goddam if he didn’t bring a tear to my eye and a lump in my throat tonight. Nobody has ever tried to look out for us like this guy is trying to right now.
"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,
2019-02-05 at 8:52 PM#888167another Recession is coming due to the Policies of Donald Trump
Trump has a policy?
So, is it also a violation of the first amendment to NOT TAX churches?
There no such thing as a bill of rights. You have no rights. Nobody does. This isn’t 1830. The idea of Rights in America is a joke today.
Before government comprised 37% of economic output, we had charities
You’re probably not aware of is, but 97% of all studies are completely made up statistics. And that’s been absolutely proven.
No one is forcing you to be a ‘worker’ — you can start your OWN business.
Have you heard of ever hear of what happened to the silver backed Liberty Dollar business? Sure, you can sell furniture or cars. But try starting a bank. Or a competitive court. Or a Law practice. Or a telecom company. Or a radio station. Or a psychology practice. Or a medical practice. Oh wait, let me guess… You think doctors know about medicine, just because they have a medical degree…
2019-02-05 at 5:29 PM#888144In reply to: David Duke Endorses Tulsi Gabbard

AnonymousDuke also backed Trump…But what happened is Trump did not live up to his campaign rhetoric of pulling back from waging war eternally for Israel, so, many Libertarians and war weary types on the Right will not be voting for him again. One and done.
Gabbard has my vote. The David Duke smear did not work against Trump, and it will not work against Gabbard. Deep State was against Trump because they were afraid he would deviate from the plan, yet he has done nearly zilch to derail it once in office, just like Obama who campaigned on pulling back from Bush era wars vs. Iran’s allies that Israel wants only to double down all the while clutching a Nobel Peace Prize in one hand and pointing at who to kill for Israel with the other…
You sound like Deep State Israel First Mainstream Media as they are starting their smear campaign early on Gabbard as well. Fact is, Trump is done, the Ron Paul wave of Libertarians that got him elected are jumping ship and Gabbard is now their choice, we will not be giving Trump another four years.
Who signs your checks Roadmaster? I notice that when Duke backed Trump you made no fuss about it, why do you now?
I already said it yesterday, she will come out on top of the DNC if it is not rigged by a Jew again. Either that or she runs as VP with Sanders. And guess what? Sanders/Gabbard will win. Trump’s only chance is another DNC rig job.
No matter who gets in office one constant remains the same, what Isreal wants done, gets done. And those who would deviate from such course are conspired against during the primaries. Paul in 2011, and Sanders in 2015, next will be Gabbard in 2019.
What is the agenda of those who seek to divide and conquer? All you need to know is what keeps getting done despite what presidents say to get elected. Three presidential election winners in a row have gone to the one with the strongest anti-war stance, and what has happened? No change. Who is it that keeps getting what they want despite a Left or Right winner? That is the Deep State right there. Israel’s interests are the Deep State.
From MGTOW.COM-
2019-02-05 at 5:19 PM#888142In reply to: Tulsi Gabbard 2020

AnonymousTell ya what THX: If you hate Jewish people and Trump so much, go put on a burqa and march around with the socialists.
Firstly, I am Jewish, but unlike many Jews I am an American first, Jewish second, a Patriot, unlike you and many others who are Israel firsters, which is what Trump has turned out to be.
Secondly, I do not hate Jewish people, I admire many of them, most however not Zionists.
Thirdly, I wanted Trump over Clinton, but he has kept zero promises, just another puppet of Israel, as Obama was, as Bush was, as Bill Clinton was, in fact the last guy who wasn’t was JFK, and he caught a bullet in the head and just by cohencidence a Jew (Abraham Zapruder) had the best footage of the event.
At what point do we get a president who says he is going to pull back from never ending wars in Israel’s interest and then it actually happens?
Oh, also, I am a Libertarian… So trying to lump me in with socialists is a laugh. For me the most important thing is not having my money fund wars in other countries interest. I am sure if we were on Iran’s side in this mess you would be a Patriot then, right? However, you and many others are NOT Patriots… Just Israeli cucks. I mean you do realize the displacement of the Muslims you clearly hate so much are due to never ending wars of aggression that Israel wants, right? Yet they take in no refugees… Walls for me, open borders for thee.
2019-02-05 at 12:45 PM#888114In reply to: David Duke Endorses Tulsi Gabbard
I’m actually looking forward the democratic primary debates. There’s no chance I’m voting for any of them, but we haven’t really seen democrats debate each other in a decade. And since the goal these days seems to be as anti-trump as possible while being woker than woke, it should be very interesting.
Ok. Then do it.
2019-02-05 at 10:31 AM#888097In reply to: Tulsi Gabbard 2020
If the DNC is not rigged by a Jew again Tulsi Gabbard will beat Trump in 2020. Said it here first, mark the date.
Deep State puppet MSM, including MSNBC, who never saw a war they didn’t like, is already smearing her.
Trump was elected mostly due to riding the Isolationist Libertarian America First Ron Paul wave that had been growing for many years within the GOP at the ground level, and hasn’t delivered at all on that front, he is one and done. Many on the Right will not be voting for him. The last three presidential election cycles have gone to the candidate that seemed the most likely to move away from the never ending wars for Israel, Trump has done zilch, cya bro!
https://www.rt.com/usa/450613-nbc-gabbard-new-knowledge-smear/
Acording to your previous posts the Jews run/control everything now so why say DNC rigged? Why not just say gabbard will be the next president.
mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/
2019-02-05 at 7:04 AM#888087In reply to: Tulsi Gabbard 2020
I knew there and then that Trump was helped into power by the Israelis, not the Russians.
now that is the correct answer and it’s an embarrassing joke that the media is claiming Russia helped trump. All indicators point to Israel. When trump, right after inauguration, stood side by side with Netanyahu, and declared his unfaultering allegiance to Israel, anyone with a brain cell could see before them the enabler in chief who had aided Trump to presidency.
Israel has the US in its grasps as shown in the video below.
Also, in the following video you will see what is to come: unfortunately, our next war in Venezuela.
God bless peace and freedom.
2019-02-05 at 6:42 AM#888085In reply to: Tulsi Gabbard 2020

AnonymousI couldn’t believe it when Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in December ’17. It would have to be one of the most stunning, insensitive and biassed political moves made by the United States this century.
Other than payback his real masters, the Israelis, there was no logic to justify such a profound incendiary move.
I knew there and then that Trump was helped into power by the Israelis, not the Russians.If there’s one country on the planet I’m glad I wasn’t born in, it’d have to be Palestine, but the rest of the Western world has been paying and is still paying for the ongoing horror treatment the Israelis have inflicted on Palestine since 1948.
All modern terrorism is rooted in Zionist terror.
2019-02-05 at 2:45 AM#888066In reply to: Tulsi Gabbard 2020
Tell ya what THX: If you hate Jewish people and Trump so much, go put on a burqa and march around with the socialists.
We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham
2019-02-04 at 5:18 PM#888033Topic: Tulsi Gabbard 2020
in forum Political Corner
AnonymousIf the DNC is not rigged by a Jew again Tulsi Gabbard will beat Trump in 2020. Said it here first, mark the date.
Deep State puppet MSM, including MSNBC, who never saw a war they didn’t like, is already smearing her.
Trump was elected mostly due to riding the Isolationist Libertarian America First Ron Paul wave that had been growing for many years within the GOP at the ground level, and hasn’t delivered at all on that front, he is one and done. Many on the Right will not be voting for him. The last three presidential election cycles have gone to the candidate that seemed the most likely to move away from the never ending wars for Israel, Trump has done zilch, cya bro!
https://www.rt.com/usa/450613-nbc-gabbard-new-knowledge-smear/
2019-02-04 at 10:28 AM#887988The idea is that College is now forced to be used on Loans for the majority of People and getting a degree (no matter how good or bad) is not indication on whether or not you will get a Job after College especially in 2008 where the People who were well Educated had to take up Minimum wage Jobs due to the fact of the Economy being s~~~ with it being predicted that another Recession is coming due to the Policies of Donald Trump causing it (low taxes on the rich, deregulation ever growing Wealth inequality etc) and by Wealth inequality i am not bitching that CEO’s and Workers should be paid the same but it is common for Workers to get 7.25 an hour and the CEO to make many Millions a year to where the Worker cannot make ends meet for one Person.
Dude, it’d be rather helpful if you used some punctuation. And it looks like you’re actually blaming the 2008 economy on Donald Trump.
But whatever. As far as K-12 public education, I don’t have a big problem with it. I used to think about this a lot before I had kids. Why am I paying a school tax when I don’t have kids? It made sense that living in a society where everyone has a basic education benefits me. I also don’t like the idea of all those left with nothing to do all day long. I’d rather see a voucher system, and I see now reason why the tax amount should be based on the market value of my property, but it is better than the alternative.
I would make some changes though. I’d cut out the last 2 years of school. I’d do this because kids seems have already established whether they are going to get in to drugs and other trouble or whether they are thinking about their future. I don’t see the point of forcing kids that don’t give a crap to be subjected to school anymore. As well, 16 year olds can get their licence and be fully employed. I think most people who say they learned more about life from working during those then they did from going to school. This would mean also mean that these ‘kids’ would have an extra 2 years to consider what direction they wanted their lives to go, as well as save up some money for college.
Ok. Then do it.
2019-02-04 at 8:05 AM#887978. People who do things to keep their loans minimal or avoid loans all together aren’t the ones complaining about their loans because they didn’t borrow stupid amounts of money.
The idea is that College is now forced to be used on Loans for the majority of People and getting a degree (no matter how good or bad) is not indication on whether or not you will get a Job after College especially in 2008 where the People who were well Educated had to take up Minimum wage Jobs due to the fact of the Economy being s~~~ with it being predicted that another Recession is coming due to the Policies of Donald Trump causing it (low taxes on the rich, deregulation ever growing Wealth inequality etc) and by Wealth inequality i am not bitching that CEO’s and Workers should be paid the same but it is common for Workers to get 7.25 an hour and the CEO to make many Millions a year to where the Worker cannot make ends meet for one Person.
And this is a result of a lack of Unionization (aka the death of Unions), the lack of a Living wage and the lack of high taxes on the Rich which would force them to invest more into their Companies or be taxed at a higher rate (like what occurred from the 1930’s till 1981).
how does it become good for society for Anonymousyam to get that same communications degree with me and you paying for it?
Did i or did i not state there are multiple ways to go about this? of course you don’t need it to be free for every degree but in the fields which improve our Nation the most you should have free or reduced cost College to where People are on a equal level of getting an Education despite their Wealth. Even if it is just in Medicine, Science, Engineering, Education etc then it should be free or at least avaliable to where Students do not need to take out loans which takes decades to pay off if they do so.
Everyone else opts out. Its how all these systems work
It depends on what system of free college you mean as if it was free for all (even bulls~~~ degrees) 3 out of 4 would benefit and if it was for the more important degrees 2 out of 4 would benefit. In both systems College is still free and Education is still promoted.
he has no real life experience, he’s probably never held a full time job,
Do you mean full time benefits or full time work? as i have worked in places without benefits for full time hours for 8 to 12 hour shifts 40 plus hours a week. It is part of the reason i am now a Leftist, without it i doubt i would be as left as i am today.
because he hasn’t had the pleasure of watching 1/3 of his gross go to the government yet.
It depends on the benefit i and others receive and you are talking to someone in a high tax State (which subsidizes other States), if it means i have to pay into the overbloated Military which commits bulls~~~ offensive wars, or the NSA which spies on US Citizens or Trump’s border wall we both should be able to agree as that is complete bulls~~~. But if my tax dollars go to Education, Healthcare, Programs which help People and other beneficial things then i am fine with it.
These days though I’m fairly certain that among my peers there is a strong correlation between having a low income and negative net worth and being a liberal
One thing you fail to mention is Conservatives are liars who’s Policies the typical Liberal turning Conservative would still not support. The actual Conservative Policies are not very popular so they cloak them or lie about them so earned benefit programs become entitlements or they scream about the deficit when a Democrat is in office but drive it up when they are in office and use the deficit as an excuse to reform the programs (aka cutting them).
Most People who turn into Conservatives buy into the idea of it being the Traditional/Religious party who wants to lower taxes but when you look at the facts Conservatives are fond of raising taxes on the middle class/poor while cutting them for the rich (for example the Trump tax cuts as a sunset provision on the tax cut for those making 70 or less a year but not one on the rich).
Now onto the next guy.
we had 80% literacy based on signatures on wills.
The thing is Education is more about just being able to read and even if it was 80 percent who could read that still leaves 20 percent who could not and those 20 percent were in far worse situations due to their lack of Education (just as those without Educations are today). Even if 90 percent of People could read if we abolished Public Education that is not a reason to do it and it is still a f~~~tarded idea.
that is, let THEM pick the PRIVATE school and still charge ME the same taxes as now
No as that would mean Government funds would funnel into Religious Schools which is a violation of the first amendment but even if it was not (Secular Schools) that would still drain away the funding for Public Schools and put Education onto the Free market.
Right now social security is good for about 17 years before insolvency/benefit cuts or tax hikes. If you let everyone opt out, it would go insolvent much sooner.
Which is another retarded idea to do and akin to letting People choose whether or not they pay taxes and the way to fix the insolvency of Social Security would be to end the cap on the collected income for it (it is about 100k right now which is the limit). Take away the cap and there would be less problems with it down the line.
Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.
2019-02-03 at 5:06 AM#887855In reply to: China Uncensored: A Real Dystopian Nightmare
Communism is too demonized over here
Communism is not too demonized anywhere – that’s not possible. There should be a law saying that communists (called “progressives” over here) should be shot and killed on site.
The cultural revolution is happening here in the West. It is deliberate. Obama was ushered in to destroy this country, and he did what he was paid to do. And all the dumb-f~~~ blue-pilled simps voted him in. And now, Trump is too scared and soft to do the nasty job that needs to be done. Trump is gone. Someone recently joked about Trump running again as a Democrat, and I can actually see that.Fortunately we have what is called ‘rule of law’ and a constitution here, where people can work out their differences without being ‘shot and killed for their beliefs’. We don’t need any more communist witch hunts. The House Unamerican Activities Committee, was both un-american and un-constitutional.
The best way to work against communism and socialism (progressivism) is to promote FREEDOM and INDIVIDUALISM and educate people about the abuses and hardships under communist rule.
Progressives, much as I dislike them, are socialists, not communists. I sure as hell disagree with Bernie Sanders, but I don’t want him imprisoned, shot, or killed!
The Republicans and Democrats, are more alike, than they are different. When the Republicans controlled the Congress AND the Presidency, did they reduce government spending and regulation to any significant extent?
The conspiracy theory of cultural marxism, is bulls~~~.
And what is the ‘nasty job that needs to be done’?
2019-02-03 at 12:51 AM#887810In reply to: What really happened to Chris Christie
Holy S~~~. Didn’t know this. I always wondered why Trump threw Christie under the bus. Never made sense. It came out of nowhere. Christie was the first major GOP to back Trump, and really Christie’s backing is what gave Trump legitimacy in the eyes of many.
Trump has thrown all his supporters under the bus. And now, Roger Stone. It’s one after the other. For all the Loyalty Trump demands, is seems he has none to give in return for theirs. Trump really does seem to be spineless.
Very disheartening. I have lost faith in Trump. I don’t believe the wall will get built, and I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump does own stock in Raytheon.
Interesting what this guy says about wanting the Rabbi’s to adjudicate the case. One thing I have noticed is that you never see burkas in US courts. Hmm… do they never get in trouble? There are ladies wearing burkas BEHIND the desks taking our court fees and documents… But I have not ever seen one muslim in a US court. Only white, hispanic, and blacks.
2019-02-02 at 11:21 PM#887798In reply to: China Uncensored: A Real Dystopian Nightmare
Communism is too demonized over here
Communism is not too demonized anywhere – that’s not possible. There should be a law saying that communists (called “progressives” over here) should be shot and killed on site.
The cultural revolution is happening here in the West. It is deliberate. Obama was ushered in to destroy this country, and he did what he was paid to do. And all the dumb-f~~~ blue-pilled simps voted him in. And now, Trump is too scared and soft to do the nasty job that needs to be done. Trump is gone. Someone recently joked about Trump running again as a Democrat, and I can actually see that.
- AuthorSearch Results

925069
924988
922113
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
