Search Results for 'Trump'

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Even the guys here that don’t like Trump, agree that the White Coat shenanigans is poison.

Those white coats are so obviously, unflinchingly obstructive to civil discourse. They’re just there to be provocative roadblocks. Even idiots see this type of politics as juvenile!

The liberals have no idea how bad they are hurting the Democratic party. It’s going to be a landslide victory for Trump in 2020.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Just like what is going on in the states with Trump. The liberals have gone off the deep end and the media is pushing it for all it can get.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[iMickey503Participant]

Keymaster.

BOb Carver.

TFM.

Trump

Fran from Fran Labs.

Edward Snowden (again)

THe Crew from the REAL TOP GEAR.

DDJ

Steve MEade.

ExoContralto

Mazda (Bass videos)

Bid D Wiz

Karen Strong and the chick from the light house project.

Milio!

qAnon

Worf from star trek! And Cisco! and Data!

Sad, So many dead people I wanted to meet. Really wish I had met Gene Wilder. Walt Disney. I wish I got to see Curt Cobain.

Adolf Hitler. REgan, and of course Kennedy . Mr. Rodgers. Kahdafi,

OMG NIKOLA TESLA DUDE! WHOA!! Dude, I would of asked him on how to make KILLER SPEAKERS!! Man, we would of had a great time! We would have the first SPL CAR! All powered by the Warden cliff tower! All CLASS A POWER TO THOSE SUBS! and VACUUM TUBE POWER!!!!

Mr. Honda,

THere are a TON of people!

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

This sort of thing happened to my dad when he was married to her back in the 80s and early 90s. She threw out his childhood collectables and to make room for her stuff. She did the same thing to my stuff also when I was a kid. It wasn’t until after she left that’s when my dad and I began to build a man’s fortress in our home.

Now at an adult age, I have my own comfortable man cave filled with neon signs, street signs, Coors Light décor, Donald Trump standee, a 3D puzzle city, a 4K TV, Star Wars FX lightsabers, a Conan sword, license plates and so on. I built it by myself over the years and I made it so comfortable, I have a hard time leaving.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

If you can meet or be neighbors with any celebrity, who would you like to meet? Below is a list of Hollywood badasses I wish I could meet and have a beer with:

Jackie Chan
Bruce Lee – if only he were still alive today
Jet Li
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Donald Trump
Ed O’Neil – Al Bundy
Marc Rudov – The No Nonsense Man
Chuck Norris
Kurt Russell
Dan Bailey – CrossFit
John Candy – if he were still alive today

What famous celebrity would you like to meet if ever had the chance?

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Trump and company crafted a brilliant speech. Played the democrats like a fiddle, instead of beating on them like a drum. The optics across the viewing public and the leftist media bashing both before and after really showed how petty. Who dose not stand and clap for vets? Who dose not stand and clap for an economy that has more of their constituents employed? 76/77% approval rating of the speech. get some funding for the wall and it will not matter who the dems put up 2020 will belong to the Donald.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Anonymous]

JB Books wrote:

Ain’t buyin’ your crazed anti-semitism. You’re giving decent Americans a bad image with your tin-hat rants. Move to Iraq or some other arab place if you love kissing Muslim ass so much.

Tin hat rants? Counter a single point I have made, just one. Your ad-hominem come backs are a joke. Everything I present is fact based, you have no argument, you just cry and meltdown like a Snowflake. What is even more sad this is that your anti-intellectualism is APPLAUDED by more like minded head in the sand idiots. I guess I see why this site is a near graveyard compared to what it once was…A Christian Zionist Circle jerk…Guess what? Without the Freedom loving Libertarians the Republican party is DEAD!

Pro-Freedom, Pro-Constitution, Pro-Free Speech now equals Anti-Semitism?

Welcome to the fascist United States of Israel.

What does any of this have to do with kissing Muslim ass?

Everything is upside down in the world of a clown… This is about not wanting to kiss Israeli ass…It is about seeking Sovereignty, the very mission statement of this site… The likes of you are no different than Leftists, you want big government and oppressive laws, just as long as they are the ones YOU want.

You fake Patriots are all traitors. Better just go ahead and hand that gun in of yours, the Duke would kick your teeth in for your stance on the continuing destruction of the Constitution in the name of foreign interests. Israel is going to be the only country in the West one day that allows it’s citizens to own weapons, just go hand yours in now to the nearest AIPAC backed congressman in your district.

“Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies”~
Orwell/Paul

If this is what exists on the Right, fake Patriots who bow to a foreign interest and are in favor of Fascist laws in what once was a free U.S.A., tell me, why should I not go Left as they push back slightly more than the Right does against such nonsense?

Trump is one and done, have fun with your ever growing population of Muslim neighbors you like so much. Israel is the only country in the West that is/will be allowed to have walls and retain their cultural identity, as 90%+ of the Jews in your country and countries throughout the West push for open borders/refugee acceptance…

F~~~ing dumbass Christian Zionist Kosherservitives…Keep lubing up and bending over…

[narwhalParticipant]

Ranger One wrote:

When one thinks about it… the Federal government should NOT be so huge and have so much power that it matters much who controls it.

Absolutely true, but we are so far off of what the Federal government should look like, it’s really not a part of the conversation.

Gravel Pit wrote:

narwhal wrote:
For claiming that we’d be at war with N. Korea if wasn’t elected president.

That part was true, no matter how many people hated to hear that, it was the goddamn truth. Hillary dude…

It can’t be true by definition since we do not know exactly what would have happened if Trump wasn’t President. I think it’s safe to say that N Korea would have tested Hilary, as they test every new President, and she would not have handled it as well, but I can’t say we’d be at war with N. Korea. The fact that N Korea didn’t go to war when Obama was President, and has nothing to gain by attacking us, makes me think they are mostly hot air, as they’ve always been.

Ok. Then do it.

[BeerParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

It depends on how you look at it.

If you consider supporting the working class, no matter in what way, then both Sanders and President Trump are in the political center. The globalists consider supporting themselves to be the political center, with supporting the working class to be an extremist viewpoint.

No. It doesn’t depend how you look at it. Bernie Sanders is a far left candidate. He is a self described and proud socialist. Socialism is not the political center.

If you are an extreme left wing communist looking at Bernie Sanders he’s to the right of you, but you are both still pretty far left on the political spectrum.

[narwhalParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

The only person the never-Trumpers have whom could possibly spoil President Trump win in 2020 would be Romney, but it is likely Romney will, or already has realized that doing so would needlessly wreck his political career, when if President Trump wins in 2020, Romney would have a real chance as the presidency in 2024.

I can’t seem him with any chance, not unless he starts trying to erase his disdain for Trump. Assuming Trump wins in 2020, why would Trump supporters turn around and vote for a guy who hated Trump? Certainly not because he’s got an R behind his name. Obviously it’s way too early, but I think Pence is going to be the most likely candidate. I also think Rand Paul will be in the mix, but he seems to have disappeared a bit lately. And of course, there will be new comers.

Switching gears a bit, is the SOTU go to actually mean anything? Was it enough to push democrats into dealing on the wall? Will the democrats/media be able to wipe out any gains Trump made last night…10 days from now?

Ok. Then do it.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

That’s a good point. I actually think Schultz is in play as a ploy by the RINOs to take down Trump. If he can take away some of the Trump voters, like a Ross Perot, then the democrats can win. With a democrat win, Republicans can go back to claiming to represent conservatives while doing the will of corporate donors.

Here is the point. From the republican point of view, Schultz was the CEO of Starbucks, the most SJW companies for several years. While running Starbucks, Schultz even pushed for some SJW policies that backfired.

The only votes Schultz will get will likely be from democrats, that is why the DNC and media went crazy when Schultz stated he would run as an independent.

The rinos have destroyed themselves. They either quit and handed their seats over to democrats, or they started to play ball with President Trump. The only person the never-Trumpers have whom could possibly spoil President Trump win in 2020 would be Romney, but it is likely Romney will, or already has realized that doing so would needlessly wreck his political career, when if President Trump wins in 2020, Romney would have a real chance as the presidency in 2024.

On the flip side, the corporate democrats have so driven much of the rank and file democrats insane, the corporate democrats have lot control with the rank and file democrats pushing for extreme collectivism.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

Beer wrote:

I wouldn’t exactly describe Sanders as middle of the road…he’s about as far left as they come.

It depends on how you look at it.

If you consider supporting the working class, no matter in what way, then both Sanders and President Trump are in the political center. The globalists consider supporting themselves to be the political center, with supporting the working class to be an extremist viewpoint.

[narwhalParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

On the side note, Schultz is trying to go an independent run that triangulates to the political center, but at this point there is no real political center in the sense of moderate beliefs. The divide is to great and even those that fall outside the political parties hold strongly to their personal beliefs. Independents are likely as jaded as everyone else.

That’s a good point. I actually think Schultz is in play as a ploy by the RINOs to take down Trump. If he can take away some of the Trump voters, like a Ross Perot, then the democrats can win. With a democrat win, Republicans can go back to claiming to represent conservatives while doing the will of corporate donors.

Ok. Then do it.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

I think the democrats would be doing much better if they had someone like Bill Clinton (before his women issues were exposed), a middle of the road guy, then going far left. But that isn’t what they are doing, so it doesn’t matter.

They only two men the democrats have whom could come close to pull that off are Biden and Sanders.

Biden has to much baggage from the Obama administration. The first question by President Trump in any debate with Biden is “during your time as VP, why did you not speak out about all the damaging Obama was working class of America?”

Sanders wrecked his political career after it came out he took a bribe from Hillary to stay quiet about Hillary stilling the democrat presidential nomination from her.

On the side note, Schultz is trying to go an independent run that triangulates to the political center, but at this point there is no real political center in the sense of moderate beliefs. The divide is to great and even those that fall outside the political parties hold strongly to their personal beliefs. Independents are likely as jaded as everyone else.

[BeerParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

White is typically thought of to represent purity, but I that can’t be what they were going for.

It was supposed to be a nod to the suffragette movement…

“suffragettes’ colour scheme of purple for loyalty and dignity, white for purity, and green for hope.”

Ironically the white represents purity, but the thing these women most care about is abortion.

narwhal wrote:

I also thought it was telling when Trump gave the stats regrading the accomplishments of women this past year. They decided to stand up for this, clearly the right move, but instead of being well behaved, they decided to act as if it was they themselves who had reached the achievement.

Yup. I noticed this as well. This was one of the few times they stood up, and what did they do? “Raised the roof” and acted like a bunch of kids. The funny part was they had originally stood up when Trump mentioned how women filled 57% or whatever of NEWLY CREATED JOBS. Their jobs aren’t even newly created, they aren’t part of that statistic lol.

They just seemed angry the rest of his speech. Apparently they don’t support or care about anything but “women’s rights.” Considering we have a split congress right now these women made it obvious to me they have no interest at all in even pretending they would attempt to work with the other side. Oh well…at least we’ll get to watch the melt down sometime in the next two years when Trump gets to replace RBG on the supreme court. I’m pretty sure she’s already dead, the left is just playing Weekend at Bernies with her to delay the inevitable.

narwhal wrote:

I found the rebuttal to be pretty much irrelevant.

I watched about 3 minutes of it and heard not a single idea or plan from the democrats, it was just fluff and attacking the other side, so I shut it off.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

I found the rebuttal to be pretty much irrelevant.

Exactly.

narwhal wrote:

Voter suppression seems like a horrible topic to bring up, being that the democrats did have victories in the past election, and Trump praised women for their accomplishments, and there is no upcoming election.

I agree.

And on the matter of President Trump praising women. By doing so, he caused the democrats to actually stand up and cheer his comments. Right beforehand, President Trump verbally commented they would want to stand for what he was about to say.

By doing so, President Trump broke the solidarity in silence the democrats were trying to portray.

narwhal wrote:

And why did they put random people as the backdrop for her speech? What was point? if the point was try and make it look like the democrats represented the ‘everyman’, then it failed horribly…since she didn’t even acknowledge their existence. It actually reminded me that the democrats have a habit of paying people to show up at protests.

The DNC believe that the “everyman” is everyone who is NOT a white man.

narwhal wrote:

His weaknesses are his reactionary tweets that cause unnecessary drama, not all tweets in general, but ones that are clearly not well thought out.

Actually, part of the reason his has so much support is from his willingness to political hit back towards the media whom constantly lie and insult him and his supporters.

narwhal wrote:

For claiming that we’d be at war with N. Korea if wasn’t elected president.

The U.S. might have been in a war with North Korea by now. But, due to President Trump’s carrot and stick approach, the U.S. now has a dialogue with the North Korea government, with tensions easing greatly between North Korea and South Korea.

Given the situation, this is the best outcome from the moment.

narwhal wrote:

Yes, it definitely is. But it’s only a strength as long as the media, and by proxy the democrats, continue to provide a stark contrast for him to fight against. If the media started reporting things straight, and I think this could happen if the politicians echo-ed the truth for a while, then the Trump can no longer rally against the media. He will not be a viewed as a fighter if he has nothing to fight against.

You are correct. But, considering those whom own the media are running the media at a loss to politically attack President Trump and his supporters, I do not see that happening.

narwhal wrote:

Not all of his personality is an asset, and even then, I don’t think his personality is worth much if it doesn’t come with results, results that only he can take credit for.

When is comes to President Trump, you get what you see. He does not pretend to be something he is not, and in that way his personality as a whole is an asset to him.

The American working class respects sincerity, even if that sincerity is a bit rude.

narwhal wrote:

I haven’t heard yet why they wore white.

The democrat women claimed to have dressed in white to honor the “sufferjet movement” and to support abortion. But, people are already making memes comparing the women with the KKK.

The optics last night were horrible for the democrats.

I believe we agree more than we disagree on this matter.

[narwhalParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

On a side note, during President Trump’s speech, the only female democrat politician whom showed any signs of intelligence last night was Congressional member Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. From what the cameras shows, a few times she almost stood up by herself and during these times she looked at her other democrat seniors whom would not let her. She clearly knew President Trump had trapped them and she was trying to figure a way out, but she was stuck being henpecked by the other democrat women to follow the flock.
By the way, it is considered a major western cultural taboo for women to wear white during the winter.

I haven’t heard yet why they wore white. I can’t agree that she looked intelligent, but I suppose it could depend on which channel you were watching. I 100% agree that the President set a lot of traps for the democrats, making them chose between supporting him and common sense, or opposing him and looking rather petty and.or evil. Again, I think the democrats are making a huge mistake in opposing Trump on absolutely everything. They are handing him ammunition. He forced them to answer questions about what they truly believe about America, and what their agenda is by the response to his statements. They had to be on their toes the whole speech, and they looked rather uncomfortable, as they much prefer to have prepared speeches from reporters who won’t ask them tough questions.

I didn’t think the optics on her were very good. While everyone else is wearing suits like they are going to office, she looks like she’s going to the ball.

Ok. Then do it.

[narwhalParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

Where you see weakness, many see strength of President Trump standing up to the fascist corporate media whom attack the American people at every turn.

I see that more as policy and action of the president, and not at all what I was calling a weakness. His weaknesses are his reactionary tweets that cause unnecessary drama, not all tweets in general, but ones that are clearly not well thought out. For claiming that we’d be at war with N. Korea if wasn’t elected president. And his history with women. These are not things that people like about the president, it’s things they put up with because the results are more important to them. The democrats strategy is to attack the baggage AND the results. I think they would be much better off if they sold the idea that they can get the same results without the baggage.

Faust For Science wrote:

That is the divide. President Trump will not kiss the ring of the media and play by their rigged rules and his supporters love him for bucking the corrupt system.

Yes, it definitely is. But it’s only a strength as long as the media, and by proxy the democrats, continue to provide a stark contrast for him to fight against. If the media started reporting things straight, and I think this could happen if the politicians echo-ed the truth for a while, then the Trump can no longer rally against the media. He will not be a viewed as a fighter if he has nothing to fight against.

Faust For Science wrote:

So, as you can see, personality is his greatest asset. His personality is his brand, which he spend forty years building.

Not all of his personality is an asset, and even then, I don’t think his personality is worth much if it doesn’t come with results, results that only he can take credit for. Just imagine if a wall had already been under construction and the democrats were in full support (as they have claimed in the past). It would not be something the President could really claim as a big success or something that separates him from a democratic contender.

Putting it a different way, democrats failed to see why Trump was elected in the first place. Instead of recognize that and trying to reshape their policy to give people what they want, they doubled down on politics as usual. Instead of drifting to middle and taking away the differences, they went a sharp left and gave many people no choice but to support Trump, even if they think he’s an asshole.

Ok. Then do it.

[narwhalParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

Meanwhile, the DNC rebuttal was a trainwreck in so many ways. The DNC woman whom lost an election and refuses to concede the race she ran was given the roll of speaker for the rebuttal. I guess Hillary declined giving the speech, so they picked her. The woman falsely claims that voter suppression was the cause of her defeat, when in truth it was the fact that GA laws prevent voter suppression through ballot stuffing that lead to her defeat.

I found the rebuttal to be pretty much irrelevant. I have no idea why Americans wanted to know her personal story. The issues/concerns she brought up seemed much smaller, not current, and generally unimportant compared to the Presidents speech. Voter suppression seems like a horrible topic to bring up, being that the democrats did have victories in the past election, and Trump praised women for their accomplishments, and there is no upcoming election. The claim that Trump was the cause of the shutdown was very hollow, since Trump already outlined how the shutdown was not about what’s best for Americans, but political vengeance. Her attempt to lie about the state of the economy was shutdown quickly by the media.

And why did they put random people as the backdrop for her speech? What was point? if the point was try and make it look like the democrats represented the ‘everyman’, then it failed horribly…since she didn’t even acknowledge their existence. It actually reminded me that the democrats have a habit of paying people to show up at protests.

Ok. Then do it.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

They correctly determine that Trump has some personal and personality issues as a weakness.

Where you see weakness, many see strength of President Trump standing up to the fascist corporate media whom attack the American people at every turn.

The issue is most elitists and their servants want to micro-manage the emotions of the people and use the rules to control people. The elitists declare any outspoken people to be the enemies of society.

President Trump is from Queens, they are natural fighters. And the American working class love firebrands such as President Trump.

That is the divide. President Trump will not kiss the ring of the media and play by their rigged rules and his supporters love him for bucking the corrupt system.

President Trump is willing get his hands dirty in political fighting, where elitists like to use their minions to do so. The American working class respect President Trump for doing so.

So, as you can see, personality is his greatest asset. His personality is his brand, which he spend forty years building.

narwhal wrote:

If the only significant difference between Trump and a democrat challenger is personality, then Trump losses.

Personality won President Trump in 2016 and personality and success will likely see him through to 2020 victory.