Search Results for 'Trump'

Home Forums Search Search Results for 'Trump'

Viewing 20 results - 2,921 through 2,940 (of 14,585 total)
  • Author
    Search Results

  • Anonymous

    Disgusting and appalling couldn’t be more personified than this when it comes to the Parkland shooting. In case you were wondering if little soy boy Davey Hogg hadn’t received enough attention for himself, he’s coming out with a book about a school shooting. This is lower than low.

    There is a reaaon for all this I believe – enough sympathy before the mid-terms is expected to change the majority in Congress with ex-CIA operatives who will go for Trump and /or gun control in a big way.

    This will be repeated – I see another few such ‘lone wolf’ instances before the actual voting takes place.

    That’s the problem. They’ll keep trying and trying until they get what they want or some major paradigm shift happens on it’s own.

    #787324
    IRuleMe
    IRuleMe
    Participant

    The level of tin hat conspiracy theory s~~~ from MSNBC is laughable. How anyone can take this network seriously is beyond me. “What if Trump barricaded himself up in the white house and refused to testify before a grand jury? What if he fired secret service agents who didn’t try to stop FBI agents?” “We could throw him in jail!!!!!” These idiots believe that Trump is going to magically become a totalitarian and start overruling Congress/Senate. The best comment was coming from the guy with the hair like a hedgehog.

    Ranger One
    Ranger One
    Participant

    http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/jeff-bezos-amazon-washington-post-and-the-cia/

    I’d known about a lot of this, but I hadn’t made all the connections; especially about the bit about Amazon only being profitable AFTER the $600 million CIA contract.

    I’d known Amazon wasn’t profitable until the last few years, and I knew about the CIA contract, but I didn’t think about the connection with profitability.

    Right after getting $600 million CIA contract, Bezos bought the Washington Post for $250 million. Interesting how the Washington Post is always toting the pro-globalist, pro-Leftist, anti-Russian, anti-Trump line.

    I do have to wonder about In-Q-Tel and Amazon, as well as Amazon and stuff like Alexa/Echo. (In-Q-Tel is essentially the military industrial complex’s venture capital branch)

    All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

    There is a reaaon for all this I believe – enough sympathy before the mid-terms is expected to change the majority in Congress with ex-CIA operatives who will go for Trump and /or gun control in a big way.

    Clearly something went very, very wrong with that plan. The DNC funded fascist youth march seems to have destroyed any gun-control support among the population.

    Those opposing President Trump and his supporters have become fanatics. They keep redoubling their efforts while losing sight of their goal.

    Also, they are completely blind to how insane they appear to most of the population.

    This will be repeated – I see another few such ‘lone wolf’ instances before the actual voting takes place.

    The latest false flags, including Parkland have politically blown up in their faces.

    Also, the anti-American media companies parroting the fascist party line are not popular anymore. They have lost control of the narrative.

    Y_
    Y_
    Participant

    Looks like a showdown on President’s Trumps resolve!

    Looks like those Chocolate Mtn. gun range scrappers will be moving a little south to pick up all the brass!

    Got anything bigger? Those pea shooters ain’t gonna cut it .

    Y_
    Y_
    Participant

    Disgusting and appalling couldn’t be more personified than this when it comes to the Parkland shooting. In case you were wondering if little soy boy Davey Hogg hadn’t received enough attention for himself, he’s coming out with a book about a school shooting. This is lower than low.

    There is a reaaon for all this I believe – enough sympathy before the mid-terms is expected to change the majority in Congress with ex-CIA operatives who will go for Trump and /or gun control in a big way.

    This will be repeated – I see another few such ‘lone wolf’ instances before the actual voting takes place.

    Y_
    Y_
    Participant

    Why Americans Need to Reclaim Their First Amendment Rights Part 2 of 2

    [Y : Forward

    Right at the start I must clarify and emphasise that this post is about the people of the United States of America and their Constitutional rights under the First Amendment.

    This post is a continuation of [1] given in the citations list and concludes the topic with the original article that got the author terminated as described in Part 1.

    I strongly encourage reading Part 1 before the current post.

    Again – thanks for reading

    Y]

    The First Amendment

    America’s Jews Are Driving U.S. Wars [2]
    Shouldn’t they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?
    Philip Giraldi
    Information Clearing House
    September 19, 2017

    Philip Giraldi

    Philip Giraldi is a former counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer of the United States Central Intelligence Agency and a columnist and television commentator who is the Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest. This article was originally published in the InformationClearingHouse

      UPDATE: September 25, 2017 –
      On the morning of September 21st Phil Giraldi was fired over the phone by The American Conservative [3], where he had been a regular contributor for fourteen years. He was told that “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars” [2] was unacceptable. The TAC management and board appear to have forgotten that the magazine was launched with an article by founder Pat Buchanan entitled “Whose War?” [4] which largely made the same claims that Giraldi made about the Jewish push for another war, in that case with Iraq. Buchanan was vilified and denounced as an anti-Semite by many of the same people who are now similarly attacking Giraldi.

    Flags

    I spoke recently at a conference on America’s war party where afterwards an elderly gentleman came up to me and asked, “Why doesn’t anyone ever speak honestly about the six-hundred-pound gorilla in the room?

    Nobody has mentioned Israel in this conference and we all know it’s American Jews with all their money and power who are supporting every war in the Middle East for Netanyahu? Shouldn’t we start calling them out and not letting them get away with it?”

    It was a question combined with a comment that I have heard many times before and my answer is always the same: any organization that aspires to be heard on foreign policy knows that to touch the live wire of Israel and American Jews guarantees a quick trip to obscurity.

    Jewish groups and deep pocket individual donors not only control the politicians, they own and run the media and entertainment industries, meaning that no one will hear about or from the offending party ever again.

    They are particularly sensitive on the issue of so-called “dual loyalty,” particularly as the expression itself is a bit of a sham since it is pretty clear that some of them only have real loyalty to Israel.

    Most recently, some pundits, including myself, have been warning of an impending war with Iran. [5] To be sure, the urging to strike Iran comes from many quarters, to include generals in the Administration who always think first in terms of settling problems through force, from a Saudi government obsessed with fear over Iranian hegemony, and, of course, from Israel itself.

    But what makes the war engine run is provided by American Jews who have taken upon themselves the onerous task of starting a war with a country that does not conceivably threaten the United States.

    They have been very successful at faking the Iranian threat, so much so that nearly all Republican and most Democratic congressmen as well as much of the media seem to be convinced that Iran needs to be dealt with firmly, most definitely by using the U.S. military, and the sooner the better.

    And while they are doing it, the issue that nearly all the Iran haters are Jewish has somehow fallen out of sight, as if it does not matter. But it should matter. A recent article in the New Yorker on stopping the impending war with Iran [6] strangely suggests that the current generation “Iran hawks” might be a force of moderation regarding policy options given the lessons learned from Iraq.

    The article cites as hardliners on Iran David Frum, Max Boot, Bill Kristol and Bret Stephens.

    Daniel Larison over at The American Conservative has a good review of the New Yorker piece entitled “Yes, Iran Hawks Want Conflict with Iran,” [7] which identifies the four above cited hawks by name before describing them as “…a Who’s Who of consistently lousy foreign policy thinking.

    If they have been right about any major foreign policy issue in the last twenty years, it would be news to the entire world. Every single one of them hates the nuclear deal with Iran with a passion, and they have argued in favor of military action against Iran at one point or another. There is zero evidence that any of them would oppose attacking Iran.”

    And I would add a few more names, Mark Dubowitz, Michael Ledeen and Reuel Marc Gerecht of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; John Podhoretz of Commentary magazine; Elliot Abrams of the Council on Foreign Relations;

    Meyrav Wurmser of the Middle East Media Research Institute; Kimberly Kagan of the Institute for the Study of War; and Frederick Kagan, Danielle Pletka and David Wurmser of the American Enterprise Institute.

    And you can also throw into the hopper entire organizations like The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Hudson Institute. And yep, they’re all Jewish, plus most of them would self-describe as neo-conservatives.

    And I might add that only one of the named individuals has ever served in any branch of the American military – David Wurmser was once in the Navy reserve. These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne warriors who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do the fighting and dying.

    So it is safe to say that much of the agitation to do something about Iran comes from Israel and from American Jews. Indeed, I would opine that most of the fury from Congress re Iran comes from the same source, with AIPAC showering our Solons on the Potomac with “fact sheets” explaining how Iran is worthy of annihilation because it has pledged to “destroy Israel,” which is both a lie and an impossibility as Tehran does not have the resources to carry out such a task.

    The AIPAC lies are then picked up and replayed by an obliging media, where nearly every “expert” who speaks about the Middle East on television and radio or who is interviewed for newspaper stories is Jewish.

    One might also add that neocons as a group were founded by Jews and are largely Jewish, hence their universal attachment to the state of Israel. They first rose into prominence when they obtained a number of national security positions during the Reagan Administration and their ascendancy was completed when they staffed senior positions in the Pentagon and White House under George W. Bush. Recall for a moment Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Scooter Libby.

    Yes, all Jewish and all conduits for the false information that led to a war that has spread and effectively destroyed much of the Middle East. Except for Israel, of course. Philip Zelikow, also Jewish, in a moment of candor, admitted that the Iraq War, in his opinion, was fought for Israel.

    Add to the folly a Jewish U.S. Ambassador to Israel who identifies with the most right-wing Israeli settler elements, a White House appointed chief negotiator who is Jewish and a Jewish son-in-law who is also involved in formulating Middle East policy. Is anyone providing an alternative viewpoint to eternal and uncritical support for Benjamin Netanyahu and his kleptocratic regime of racist thugs? I think not.

    There are a couple of simple fixes for the dominant involvement of American Jews in foreign policy issues where they have a personal interest due to their ethnicity or family ties.

    First of all, don’t put them into national security positions involving the Middle East, where they will potentially be conflicted. Let them worry instead about North Korea, which does not have a Jewish minority and which was not involved in the holocaust.

    This type of solution was, in fact, somewhat of a policy regarding the U.S. Ambassador position in Israel. No Jew was appointed to avoid any conflict of interest prior to 1995, an understanding that was violated by Bill Clinton (wouldn’t you know it!) who named Martin Indyk to the post. Indyk was not even an American citizen at the time and had to be naturalized quickly prior to being approved by congress.

    Those American Jews who are strongly attached to Israel and somehow find themselves in senior policy making positions involving the Middle East and who actually possess any integrity on the issue should recuse themselves, just as any judge would do if he were presiding over a case in which he had a personal interest.

    Any American should be free to exercise first amendment rights to debate possible options regarding policy, up to and including embracing positions that damage the United States and benefit a foreign nation.

    But if he or she is in a position to actually create those policies, he or she should butt out and leave the policy generation to those who have no personal baggage.

    For those American Jews who lack any shred of integrity, the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.” That would be kind-of-like a warning label on a bottle of rat poison – translating roughly as “ingest even the tiniest little dosage of the nonsense spewed by Bill Kristol at your own peril.”

    As none of the above is likely to happen, the only alternative is for American citizens who are tired of having their country’s national security interests hijacked by a group that is in thrall to a foreign government to become more assertive about what is happening.

    Shine a little light into the darkness and recognize who is being diddled and by whom. Call it like it is. And if someone’s feelings are hurt, too bad. We don’t need a war with Iran because Israel wants one and some rich and powerful American Jews are happy to deliver. Seriously, we don’t need it

    Philip Giraldi
    Information Clearing House

    Citations
    [1] /forums/topic/why-americans-need-to-reclaim-their-first-amendment-rights-part-1-of-2/
    [2] http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47843.htm
    [3] http://www.theamericanconservative.com/about-us/
    [4] http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/whose-war/
    [5] http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/iran-again/
    [6] https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-iraq-war-hawks-can-help-stop-trump-from-going-to-war-with-iran
    [7] http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/yes-iran-hawks-want-conflict-with-iran/


    Anonymous

    Looks like a showdown on President’s Trumps resolve!

    Looks like those Chocolate Mtn. gun range scrappers will be moving a little south to pick up all the brass!

    Solid
    Solid
    Participant

    with tens of millions of illegals

    “But they work” is the lamest excuse that leftists use. Trump wanted they banned for a reason, and this reason was based on FBI statistics of crimes.

    A green card is the most desired property than anyone in south america can have. Those low lives want all the benefits of being an american, without the responsibilities, or even capable of doing a descent job.

    They are just parasites

    Solid
    Solid
    Participant

    This is why Trump put the national guard at the border. If they think they are just going to walk in here they are mistaken.

    I would love to see those f~~~ers getting a shot like animals while trying to do it.

    I’ve nothing against people who EARNED by hard work his way into a better country. But those people are the problem in their country, they are just moving the problem to your country.

    Listen to me, this kind of people only get the minimum wage jobs, and you know what happens ? They start complaining that they want to raise the minimum wage. If the government does, everything increases too, including the government bills, so they just print more money and raise the taxes, all of this together result in inflation.

    If you have 800k saved for your retirement, sooner as those parasites start doing this economic disaster, you can expect in 10 years your money to worth 50% of what it worth now.

    They will ruin everything brothers, if you have children, care for your children’s future, get rid of those f~~~ers even if you have to use chemical weapons in your border, just don’t let those creatures invade your country.

    Romulus
    Romulus
    Participant

    This is why Trump put the national guard at the border. If they think they are just going to walk in here they are mistaken.

    Unfortunately, because of US immigration law, that’s exactly what they will do in most cases.

    Once they reach the border, and are greeted by US agents, the law does not allow our agents to turn back anyone under the age of 18, (if not with a parent, the so-called unaccompanied minors) women that are pregnant, and/or anyone in need of medical care.

    Instead they will go through an in-processing screening and generally released in to the US.

    As the US did not fund additional holding facilities (we can thank Paul Ryan) for the unaccompanied, pregnant, or ill border crossers, they are for the most part given a notice to appear at some future date, and released to a relative or to a sponsoring group.

    Average wait time for the hearing…..years

    This is why Trump was pressuring Mexico to stop the caravan BEFORE they present themselves at the border.

    Regardless of how one feels about such rules/laws, they are the constraints that must be observed by our federal agents, at least until such time as the laws can be changed.

    How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

    MarketWatcher
    MarketWatcher
    Participant

    This is why Trump put the national guard at the border. If they think they are just going to walk in here they are mistaken.


    Anonymous

    MEXICO CITY — The remnants of a migrant caravan of Central Americans that angered President Donald Trump continued their journey north through Mexico toward the U.S. border Wednesday. Organizer Irineo Mujica, speaking from the western Mexico city of Guadalajara, said about 500 migrants had been riding trains north since departing Mexico City last weekend. The caravan that left the Guatemala-Mexico border in late March grew to more than 1,000 migrants who found safety travelling in numbers.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/migrant-caravan-mexico-that-irked-donald-trump-resumes-journey-us-border/

    So much for Mexico’s immigration enforcement. There is no such thing as negotiating with Mexico. They are not trustworthy whatsoever.

    Mujica said they were headed for Tijuana, where about half planned to go to the border to request asylum in the U.S.” –

    Let me rephrase this to what it actually means: Mujica said they were headed for Tijuana, where about half planned to go to the border to request asylum in the U.S., the other half, likely hardcore MS-13 gangbangers will try to sneak across the U.S. border illegally.

    Y_
    Y_
    Participant

    By the way, the top article lies and pretends China is contracting, when China is expanding with its Silk Road and String of Pearls project.

    Apologies. Nowhere does the article categorically state or imply that China is contracting.It implied the opposite as you mentioned.

    At the same time it pretends President Trump’s actions without motive, such as the tens of millions of U.S. citizens whom voted for President Trump for their own future.

    The article points out the inconsistencies in US policy since the Trump Administration took office. The issues are real. How the current US policies relate Trump’s voter base is not the purpose of this article.

    In summary, the top article is a globalist crying in his wine that the U.S. will no longer willing impoverish its population to enrich the globalists.

    The article is neither globalist or isolationist. It states a number of points on current US ‘policy’ and known outcomes.

    #786849

    You can just imagine George Carlin laughing his ass off as the President Trump administration vindicating his statements.

    George would likely go something along the lines of, “You see, it is a club and we are not in it.”

    #786795

    In reply to: Riot Gear

    Bstoff
    bstoff
    Participant

    I think the left is looking for an excuse to have a riot(s) to kick off the summer.
    Isn’t Pittsburgh the same town the Starbucks crap is going on?

    I am going to assume riots are going to be the norm throughout the Trump presidency, and maybe indefinitely.

    Whenever a rioter gets martyred, they are used that to gain public sympathy to further their cause.
    High school and college kids are the perfect cannon fodder for them to use.

    #786769

    In reply to: Riot Gear

    MarketWatcher
    MarketWatcher
    Participant

    I hope President Trump does it. Liberal heads would explode, it will be better than election night!

    RIOT ON!!!!!!!

    #786717

    In reply to: Riot Gear

    GregB0
    GregB0
    Participant

    Pittsburgh police warn officers to bring ‘riot gear’ to work in event Trump fires Mueller

    Idiots, I would always have all my issued gear with me to ensure that I had it when I needed it. To not have it would mean that ANY GROUP could lob a CS/Chemical/Mineral substance on the officer who did not have the proper gear (PPE) and then it’s POW, lights out BatMan.

    ​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

    #786698
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/18/pittsburgh-police-warn-officers-to-bring-riot-gear-to-work-in-event-trump-fires-mueller.html

    Pittsburgh police warn officers to bring ‘riot gear’ to work in event Trump fires Mueller

    Rumors spread by left-leaning groups alleging President Trump will fire special counsel Robert Mueller have begun prompting official action, with Pittsburgh’s police department preparing for an eventuality the commander-in-chief has said will never come.

    Pittsburgh Police Commander Victor Joseph sent out an email to officers Wednesday saying “there is a belief that President Trump will soon move to fire Special Prosecutor Mueller,” which “would result in a large protest within 24 hours of the firing.

    ——–When I first read this thought it had to be the most stupid thing ever,…..then reading the story the leftist groups this is their calling card. Riot in the streets over nothing.

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    When is comes to domestic matters, for the last forty years, until President Trump, debt was considered an asset and U.S. citizens being employed was considered a liability.

    By the way, the top article lies and pretends China is contracting, when China is expanding with its Silk Road and String of Pearls project. At the same time it pretends President Trump’s actions without motive, such as the tens of millions of U.S. citizens whom voted for President Trump for their own future.

    In summary, the top article is a globalist crying in his wine that the U.S. will no longer willing impoverish its population to enrich the globalists.

Viewing 20 results - 2,921 through 2,940 (of 14,585 total)