Home › Forums › Blue Pill Hell › Yet Another Defense of "Innocent Girls"
This topic contains 13 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by
Dcue95 4 years, 8 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
So last night, I had to deal with YET AGAIN another onslaught of feminazis on Facebook. There was a news article about a 30 year old church music director who had sex with a 13 year old girl. Now, this alone sounds terrible and horrible. He’s a lawbreaker, yes. We have all that aside. Yet, if you read the article more closely, it says they had sex 4 times. Some of us on the comments definitely noticed this, and were trying to say that this girl knew what she was doing, just as much as he did. I mentioned how I thought that punishing the girl should be in order, too.
Needless to say, that didn’t go to well with the emotional women on Facebook.
One was attacking me for “sounding like a rapist myself” and “sounding ill.”
One was telling me and another guy she “hopes we never have kids.” (It was even funnier when the other guy told her he didn’t plan to, as he was gay.)
One was telling me “I know you think women are favored and men are oppressed…’poor men’.” (The sarcasm was just seeping out of that vile woman’s metaphorical teeth.)
I haven’t even had time to read the other comments on that board. Bringing logic to the argument (as I lately have been to things like this) just made it hilarious. What’s even better is I started having more men agreeing with me that this girl should NOT be worshiped and SHOULD face some kind of punishment, because there have been previous articles where a female teacher slept with underage boys and these kinds of women said it was the boys’ fault anyway!
I also mentioned how females receive slaps on the wrist compare to men, to which women of course told me that “all sentences are equal.” I even provided a link that was a list of female teachers that have had relations with their students…wasn’t good enough for the harpies. They continued to try to attack my character, sex life, education, etc. I took into consideration the list of “feminist shaming tactics.” They made fun of me for pointing out their immaturity, but I think the men on the post had a good time reading them get destroyed.
Is arguing with women really THIS easy, and I’ve just been missing out on it? Go read the comments (I provided the link above) and see for yourselves. It’s a hoot!
If you look at the scale of punishment for women vs men who have sexual contact with under-aged individuals you’ll see that the law is not interested punishing those with a vagina. I’ll have to find the article again, but there was a woman who slept with her 14 year old male student a couple dozen times they were able to prove. She was given a two year suspended sentence which means she only received probation. A male teacher who slept with is 16 year old student once received 20 years in prison. The whole system is screwed.
"Life is the future, not the past." Wizard's 7th rule, Terry Goodkind
Exactly. Trying to explain that to women though is impossible. Wasn’t my goal to convince them (as I know it’s impossible to actually try to debate with them and come out on top), just to provide defense to my side and let any actual logical person out there reading the posts have some facts.
As member of this site and the acceptance that the world is how it is and not what we’d like it to be there is a certain responsibility to state the logical arguments. We’re not supposed to engage in a screaming match, but to calmly express the reality of the situation. You never know when someone will be reading the comments section or a forum post and have that “AH-HA” moment that allows them to see clearly for the first time in a long time if not the first time in forever.
"Life is the future, not the past." Wizard's 7th rule, Terry Goodkind
Exactly. Trying to explain that to women though is impossible. Wasn’t my goal to convince them (as I know it’s impossible to actually try to debate with them and come out on top), just to provide defense to my side and let any actual logical person out there reading the posts have some facts.
This is time very well spent. I discovered MGTOW while reading through the comments on a post about the future of fully humanoid female robots. This one guy just kept laying out verifiable facts and clear logic. The women posting were behaving like, well, women but he just stayed above the fray.
There were a couple other guys posting and I saw several go from defending the dames to agreeing with the MGTOW guy. This is probably the best way to help make other guys aware of MGTOW. Would be a great to have a forum/thread dedicated to helping guys do that.
It is for very good reasons the Devil chose to tempt Eve not Adam...
Exactly. Trying to explain that to women though is impossible. Wasn’t my goal to convince them (as I know it’s impossible to actually try to debate with them and come out on top), just to provide defense to my side and let any actual logical person out there reading the posts have some facts.
A man will NEVER win an argument with a woman, ever..
Why?
Because what sprays out of a woman’s mouth, unlike a man’s, doesn’t have to be fact/truth. The bull always has one more drop of dung that can come out, it’s an infinite network of stomachs full of bull crap inside a woman’s head.
Too bad the old dude didn’t bang her in Angola. The age of consent is 12. 12! Oh Africa…
So I went to this church as a kid. One of the male leaders of the church was a councilor. One of the 14/15 year old girls needed counseling because her home life was pretty bad. By counseling, I mean f~~~ing. He was in his fifties, married with 4 children. Over the course of their counseling sessions, evidently, they “fell in love.” She ended up getting pregnant (DOH!) and they had the kid…who turned out to be autistic (DOH!). Time went by and the “councilor” got back together with his wife who was begging for him to return.
The average guy will NOT find himself in this predicament anywhere in civil society except in religious orders. If you have kids in religious communities…don’t let them out of your sight. If you don’t want to “fall in love” with some kid, don’t be a church councilor. If you are a pedophile/rapist…may the mujahedeen cut your dick off with a dull, rusty hacksaw…then your head.
@MegaChris My eyes are deceiving me, because I see my avatar over there. Holy s~~~! lol!
And then I scrolled all the way down to your “not inherently anti-female” comment.
And then!! You flattened her text book shaming tactic — BY THE BOOK!!!!Someone’s been doing his MGTOW homework.
You are going to fly through & graduate MGTOW university with a doctorate!!!…except for one thing.
I had to deal with YET AGAIN another onslaught of feminazis on Facebook.
Don’t ever say that s~~~ out loud again. You never “HAVE” to deal with c~~~s.
It’s purely voluntary, s~~~loads of fun and it’s called “intellectual rape” or “nuking hamsters”.Otherwise, very nicely done. You’re excused. Keep up the great work.
MegaChris. Changing the planet. One c~~~ at a time.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.I’ve had to temporarily “borrow” your avatar while I posted these comments, because
1) The wommenz had no room to “attack the way I looked” (unless they really thought I was Bill Murray/Peter Venkman, which would be HILARIOUS).
2) The face he’s making in the picture seems to be exactly the face I’d make while dealing with these wenches.
3) I figured it would be a “code” for the guys reading this, so they’d know where to find my posts.
I use the term “dealing with them” very loosely and semi-sarcastically, so no worries there! Another man on this page put it in a good way, too. I didn’t want to troll them, I wanted to “beast” them. I wasn’t just there for upsetting the females, I was there to present facts and logic…like a fragging boss.
Glad to see on other articles that men are seeing my comments and agreeing. Maybe I’ll have more male eyes opened to how irrational they are.
Women always think about women.
And sending innocent men under the bus or down with the ship is nothing to them.
I’m about thru arguing with feminists. They all want the attention so they have something to cry about.And get attention.
frankly my dear i don't give a damn
@Megachris%
Way to go, Sir.I think the one of the problems is the hard truth (i.e. teenagers of this generation are maturing faster than the previous ones, also known the Flynn effect). People would rather believe that it’s the man who initiated seduction and is a pedophile. These things rarely happened in the past, but people would rather argue that men now a days are pedophiles, rather than accepting the fact that teenagers now a days are becoming more promiscuous.
The girl in question shares at least 45% of the blame if not 50/50 or more. She sent nudes, had sex more than once, lied to her parents about choir practice and did everything in her power to enable the intercourse. She could have sought help after the first encounter if it was a rape. Or could have stopped going to choir/church altogether (most kids withdraw after assault and show fearful tendencies which is a nice indicator of assault/rape).
Just skimming the article quickly would lead any sane person to conclude that the girl’s at fault.
But of course, modern women aren’t completely sane anyway, so them saying “the girl did NOTHING wrong” is not shocking to me. It’s actually rather disgusting. I pointed out once in a similar situation that in the middle ages, people were married by their teen years, even to older men. The actual definition of “pedophilia” is in regards to prepubescent children that are still just that physically and mentally: little children. Nowadays, if a man finds a girl attractive, and she hits it off with him, and then finds out she lied about her age, HE is still the only one in trouble. I’ll admit I’ve had a fair share of this almost happening to me in the past. I let my physical attraction to the female cloud my judgment. That’s kind of what I’m seeing in this case, too. Not to say he’s completely right in his illegal actions, but people are so quick to scream for his castration, their hope that he gets “raped in jail” and is tortured in Hell for eternity…and the girl should “walk free” to them.
Actually, it can be argued that the law is in place to protect children, but is it? Say a male accidentally has sex with a minor after the minor lies to him, then the man’s seeing 10 years. Reverse the situation and the woman (who knows she’s f*king a minor) barely gets a slap on the wrists. Somehow the law fails to protect minor boys.
If such a severe law is to be enforced, it should be enforced on both ends. #doublestandards
Lord Vats, until MGTOW gets large enough to start putting a dent on feminism and women’s nature, we really can’t do much about the double standard.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
