That’s the message from a new article in the holy New York Times, the best paper in the most powerful country in the world.
One of the main arguments against the idea there is a wage gap between men and women is that it is clear that the difference in salaries is because men work an average 10 more hours a week than women. It is put down to baby pressure furthering the call for public re-education centers for social engineering of people from before they have the power to understand speech.
Now we have a new and far more powerful argument from the NYT.
It goes like this: Yes, the wage gap is due to men working more hours but the men are faking it and women are better workers so get done in 35 hours what a man can do in 45 hours.
“How Some Men Fake an 80-Hour Workweek, and Why It Matters”
A second finding is that women, particularly those with young children, were much more likely to request greater flexibility through more formal means, such as returning from maternity leave with an explicitly reduced schedule. Men who requested a paternity leave seemed to be punished come review time, and so may have felt more need to take time to spend with their families through those unofficial methods.
The result of this is easy to see: Those specifically requesting a lighter workload, who were disproportionately women, suffered in their performance reviews; those who took a lighter workload more discreetly didn’t suffer. The maxim of “ask forgiveness, not permission” seemed to apply.
But the fact that the consultants who quietly lightened their workload did just as well in their performance reviews as those who were truly working 80 or more hours a week suggests that in normal times, heavy workloads may be more about signaling devotion to a firm than really being more productive. The person working 80 hours isn’t necessarily serving clients any better than the person working 50.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/05/upshot/how-some-men-fake-an-80-hour-workweek-and-why-it-matters.html?rref=upshot&module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=The+Upshot&action=swipe®ion=FixedLeft&pgtype=article&abt=0002&abg=0&_r=0
The NYT’s liberal audience ate it up cooing and agreeing with every point. Agreeing that men don’t ever work harder than women. Women are just better, I mean more productive, than men and can do it in less time and, here it comes:
Feminists want equal pay for 35 hours of work and 45 hours of work because giving more for more time favors men over women.
Just like multitasking became this mythical advantage women had over men, then their ability to have a “feeling” was only present in women and every female dream had to be investigated. Now we will have: “Women are better workers than men”.
I had a hard time understanding this kind of logic until I remember that women act as a herd. If everyone is working 35 hours we all should and all get paid the same as all the other members of the herd.
It is men who strive for more.
It is women who spend it.
One of the things men have not done successfully is get out in front of feminist cultural war cries like this new one.
They are announcing it in the NYT’s. It’s not a news paper article, it is a talking point in the war on men.
I’m getting the message loud and clear. In our feminist future, read Hillary’s time, longer hours will be punished or at least not rewarded.
Nice, if your MGTOW and reading this and don’t understand that it mean’s to work less and enjoy your life, what more evidence to you need?
I’m going white water rafting with my son, thanks feminism.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
chir 4 years, 9 months ago.
