Women win the first round against "the patriarchy"

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

Well, in a way this is a victory. The c~~~s are basically admitting that they can’t compete with a toy. A setback, perhaps, but it’s kind of like someone punching you in the face because he knows he’s lost the debate.

I have been married for 13 years, and during my life, mostly between 17 and about 25, I had sex with more than 100 women, not sure about the actual number, it might be 110, 120 or even 130, it’s just an approximation and I don’t care.

I CONFIRM: MOST WOMEN CAN BARELY COMPETE WITH A FLESHLIGHT, MANY WOMEN CANNOT EVEN COMPETE WITH A FLESHLIGHT.

IT ISN’T DUE MEN’S ATTITUDES.

IT’S DUE THE FLESHLIGHTS AND MOST WOMEN HAVE A COMPARABLE BEHAVIOR: IN THE OVERWHELMINGLY MAJORITY OF CASES A WOMAN DOESN’T TRY TO HAVE INITIATIVE OR TO BE ENTERTAINING. THERE ARE TWO CATEGORIES OF WOMEN: THOSE WHO GIVE STRONG HINTS, AND THOSE WHO DO NOTHING.
The fleshlight doesn’t give hints, but it’s immediatly available.
The fleshlight beats hands down the women who do nothing.
WOMEN GIVING STRONG HINTS: EVEN WHEN THEY GIVE STRONG HINTS YOU STILL KNOW THAT YOU HAVE TO DO MOST OF THE WORK, AND THEY’RE LIKELY TO NOT PUT OUT IMMEDIATLY, MANY DO NOT EVEN PUT OUT IF YOU MEET THEM FOR A FIRST “OFFICIAL” DATE! THERE ARE EVEN MANY WOMEN WHO DO NOT PUT OUT ON THE SECOND DATE!!!
AND DURING THOSE DATES YOU HAVE TO DO MOST THE WORK.
SOME DATES ARE JUST LIKE A F~~~ING JOB INTERVIEW!

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Since when does a sex worker/prostitute get to tell me what I can do with my money? It is no business of hers. If I want an orgy with 10 sex dolls, who cares?

I think I would prefer a sex doll. Little chance of STD’s.

If the sex worker is concerned with the competition, then it is up to her to provide a better or cheaper product.

Free market sweetie.

These bitches may have won round one, but they will lose. There is a thing called competition

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

These bitches may have won round one, but they will lose. There is a thing called competition

They’re losing even now: VR porn is spreading, combined with heated fleshlight
it’s 1,000 times more practical, more satisfying, more safe, cheaper, than sex workers. It’s even better than a sex doll: you cannot pack a sex doll in a bag, it takes space even within home.

The only reason to oppose feminists trying to criminalize men buying sexual services from women is that if they pass without serious opposition then their next step will be against porn. As long as there are countries like Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and Greece with legal brothels, then EU cannot attack porn.
If it wouldn’t be a preparation for the obiouvs next step against porn, then letting radfems to impose the swedish model against prostitution could be a good lesson for those whores blabbering about “patriarchy”.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[goodkid43Spectator 550]

“It is another strategy of the patriarchy that presents us as objects without rights or soul”

The above is a quote from Eric Lauder’s opening post.

My response:
If you can treat children in the womb without rights or soul then you have given others the right to treat you as objects without rights or soul.

Also, women who Frivorce their husbands treat them as if the men were objects to be discarded at will without rights or soul, then you have given others the right to treat you as objects without rights or soul.

The same disregard to the most innocent of human being justifies rape in that the rapist treats the victim as an object without rights or soul.

Ideas have consequences.

God bless, Michael

[Anonymous 3]

goodkid43 wrote:

Ideas have consequences.

Two concepts unknown to women.

[Anonymous 11]

Nothing threatens the power of The Hive. Even dolls will trigger these histrionic women and their manginas.

They’ve won nothing against my patriarchy. I choose not to fight.

[AttonParticipant]

If sex bots are a real threat to human prostitution then the war is over before it begins.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Atton wrote:

If sex bots are a real threat to human prostitution then the war is over before it begins.

Bingo.

That’s why my only concern is about the educational gender gap and incentives to hire women.
Take away incentives to hire women, restore an about 50:50 split of degrees (even 55% women won’t be a problem, the problem begin over 60% and become really troubling over 66%, now we’re at 63% master degrees taken by women) and let things happen…

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

That has just turned me against ever using the services of a prostitute EVER.

Porn is free.

Women are a hazard and a hassle.

AWALT.

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

MgtowWave wrote:

That has just turned me against ever using the services of a prostitute EVER.

Porn is free.

Women are a hazard and a hassle.

AWALT.

I didn’t like the idea of buying their services, but before reading that I had some empathy for sex workers.

Not anymore.

Those whores dare to allege that they “provide affection” in order to get their way.
Their arguments against sex dolls are THE VERY SAME arguments that anti-prostitution feminists use against prostitutes and the customers!!!

AWALT.

What’s funny is that if Spain would implement the swedish model criminalizing buyers of sexual services, it couldn’t be applied to sex bots brothels, since it’s justified by saying that all the whores are slaves and victims of human trafficking: POLITICIANS COULD EVEN PROMOTE SEX BOTS BROTHELS IN ORDER TO GIVE TO CUSTOMERS AN ALTERNATIVE WHILE CRIMINALIZING BUYING SEXUAL SERVICES FROM HUMANS! 😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Rafe GBParticipant 474]

Lol. On that very page, 4,900 people voted on whether to keep the business open or close it.

95% voted to keep it open.

Sorry… prostitutes don’t have a chance in hell with this steamroller.

Real women are afraid. They should be.

MGTOW: The silent heralds of cataclysmic societal change. AGAIN!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Rafe GB wrote:

Lol. On that very page, 4,900 people voted on whether to keep the business open or close it.

95% voted to keep it open.

Sorry… prostitutes don’t have a chance in hell with this steamroller.

Real women are afraid. They should be.

Today the sex work and the hookers.
Tomorrow the marriage and the wives.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/727308/Sex-robots-with-hot-genitals-will-offer-emotional-attachment-for-the-lovelorn

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[AttonParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Atton wrote:

If sex bots are a real threat to human prostitution then the war is over before it begins.

Bingo.

That’s why my only concern is about the educational gender gap and incentives to hire women.
Take away incentives to hire women, restore an about 50:50 split of degrees (even 55% women won’t be a problem, the problem begin over 60% and become really troubling over 66%, now we’re at 63% master degrees taken by women) and let things happen…

Women don’t pay any net taxes, governments f~~~ing men out of high paid employment that is tantamount to the goverment beheading itself. It’s revenue will be gone along with its worker drones. Women have no interest in taking over the role of men as the goverment atm machine. This would turn women into worker drones paying for men’s alcohol and video games. Kind of like what men are forced to do today but worse, that and the number of voters would invert giving men the majority of power. In theory men would do the unthinkable and that is actually advocate in their interests for the first time in history. That is how a real patriarchy would be made and it would be enforced at gun point.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

Eric Lauder: What’s funny is that if Spain would implement the swedish model criminalizing buyers of sexual services, it couldn’t be applied to sex bots brothels, since it’s justified by saying that all the whores are slaves and victims of human trafficking: POLITICIANS COULD EVEN PROMOTE SEX BOTS BROTHELS IN ORDER TO GIVE TO CUSTOMERS AN ALTERNATIVE WHILE CRIMINALIZING BUYING SEXUAL SERVICES FROM HUMANS! ?

Now that’s a silver-lining!!

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Anonymous 5]

The terrible truth: “Men learn.”

– just you troll f~~~s wait and tunas you have no idea. Your mind will fall apart. Mgtow will bring a flock in like no other. That “flock”? They will find this place/ own there own terms. We don’t sell “snake oil” we sell nothing. Just information. For free. For freedom!!!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Skeptisk wrote:

Eric Lauder: What’s funny is that if Spain would implement the swedish model criminalizing buyers of sexual services, it couldn’t be applied to sex bots brothels, since it’s justified by saying that all the whores are slaves and victims of human trafficking: POLITICIANS COULD EVEN PROMOTE SEX BOTS BROTHELS IN ORDER TO GIVE TO CUSTOMERS AN ALTERNATIVE WHILE CRIMINALIZING BUYING SEXUAL SERVICES FROM HUMANS!

Now that’s a silver-lining!!

It’s going to happen, I’m pretty sure.
Just mix those factors all together:

Swedish model criminalizing buyers of sexual services is becoming more and more common in Europe.

It’s justified by alleged widespread human trafficking and abuses of the prostitutes.
There’s even the “re-educative” radical feminist reason, “men should learn that women’s bodies aren’t commodities”, but such idea have less charm for the general public.

Between 1-in-3 and 1-in-6 men (it depends by the survey and the country) are more or less, REGULARLY customers of sex workers. REGULARLY being the keyword here.

Politics is the art of compromise.

It’s very clear that the political solution is promoting sex dolls brothels while criminalizing sex with real prostitutes.

It’ll end with prostitutes with less and lesser customers, and normalization of sex between men and sex dolls.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

objected saying a doll cannot match the services of a real person and denigrates real sex workers to merely being an object.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, that is what they are selling themselves as, THEY ARE SELLING THEIR BODIES AS OBJECTS!

What a retarded argument, they just do not want their market ruined and will use any kind of s~~~, actually prostitutes are the winners in our society, 70 to 300 bucks for 30-60 minutes of sex. Put up all that money(that are taxfree!), and in a few years they can retire FOREVER if they are smart(oops!). Now that the market is changing, and that the easy game is ending, they are bats~~~ scared by the idea of finding a real job, because they do not want to work for real.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

When you take away the pussy factor, then most women have nothing to offer, and even among those who would have something else to offer there are so many women who have too much entitlement.

If prostitutes in Barcelona would really offer something more than their used vaginas, then sex dolls wouldn’t be an issue for them, there wouldn’t be real competition, and this episode would never have happened. Prostitutes would have simply laughed about the idea.

If wives and aspiring wives in Europe would really offer something better than prostitutes, then the swedish model criminalizing buyers of sexual services would never have been passed, nor even seriously proposed, because the market for prostitutes would be 20 times smaller. Wives and aspiring wives would have simply laughed about the idea of criminalizing few men with problems trying to get some comfort through prostitutes.

Facts are very telling.
Facts are stubborn.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[TwistParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Facts are very telling.
Facts are stubborn.

Yes. In time you can not out run the facts. Very well put, EL.

“You are free to choose, but you are not free to alter the consequences of your decisions.”

― Ezra Taft Benson

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Twist wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Facts are very telling.
Facts are stubborn.

Yes. In time you can not out run the facts. Very well put, EL.

“You are free to choose, but you are not free to alter the consequences of your decisions.”

― Ezra Taft Benson

That’s why I think that men (including many MRA) who keep “warning” women with the usual whiney “if you keep doing so men aren’t going to marry you anymore” are doing it wrong.
Women, from the height of their entitlement (partially biological but extremely reinforced by our society, from feminism to the likes on the social medias), simply laugh about them, also because such “warnings” just show weakness and weakness is never forgiven to men.
It also suggests “men have a problem”.

Wrong.
Let’s make it a “women’s issue”.
Then we’ll see what they do, apart the usual “keep blaming the men”.
Women will probably appeal to powerful men’s authority, but such men (an example being probably Trump), just see men avoiding women as “losers who can’t get laid”, and by so they’ll be very unlikely to be able to find a solution to the new “women’s issue”.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts